Log in

View Full Version : If Blue had a "Men Only" section...



Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6

mr_punk
11-10-2007, 03:43 PM
The main problem with guys on pink is that they are full of shit so often. When guys think chicks are looking/listening, they start promoting that Prince Charming shit when behind closed doors, the say the same crass shit I do. I don't know why they bother, the women don't fall for it. Then they go beyond the prince charming stuff and then try to troll me as if that's going to help.LOL. <shrug> well, they can't help themselves. furthermore, it's what most strippers want to hear to a degree. although, i do find it ironic the same behavior got them biatch slapped down to CC.

lestat1
11-10-2007, 03:44 PM
Katrine,
I should have phrased that in the past tense. That was true until very recently at the dirty club, still true at the nicer club. Yes, you read that right. Go figure.

The ATF at the dirty club was the only reason I still bothered to go there, the other dancers have become unfriendly, demanding, and aren't putting in much effort. Meanwhile, in the 5-8 years or so I've been going to the club, I went and finished up school, got a job, and now bring in double the money when I go. Seemed odd that money would go up and fun would go down like that.

Slowly over many visits, the ATF's once fantastic, sensual, hot, sweet, cuddle-afterwards dances have gotten more and more mechanical. Getting off is a guarantee, but that's about all I can expect now. Grind, squirt, ugh, see you next time. No thanks. There must be a new asshole manager, or some shift in the customers, or something. I don't know, it's confusing. So, hopeless at the dirty club? Move on? Hopeless to rekindle the former wonders of her earlier VIPs?


Jenny,
Well after that cheeto description, what did you expect X to do but crank one out? LOL Sorry X, couldn't resist that one.


Anyway, I think I've answered my own question about tonight. I keep praising the nicer club and trashing the other one. Plus I have a 2-4-1 dance token left over from last time there. It looks like the nice club it is! :)

mr_punk
11-10-2007, 03:44 PM
It's not the mileage, so much as the mileage combined with the hefty tipping practices in my area that make "value" a concern for me and leave me with questions.sure, you should be concerned. i've read your posts about that clip joint..er..sc. frankly, i wouldn't step foot in the place even if another SCJer was footing the bill.

Here's where I think input from dancers who work at these sorts of clubs and/or with this sort of tipping practice could offer me some insight, and make the dirty club less of a gamble.you really think so? you think these girls will come even remotely close to admitting having experience with intentionally grinding a customer until he pops? well, except for Kat, but she doesn't count because she's out of her mind. in any event, good luck with that.

What I'm looking for out of sex is not something available for pay, I don't think. I want tenderness, affection, and cuddle time (something the ATF got pretty good at faking for a while).LOL..it isn't? for the right amount of money. any sex worker can create a badly contrived, hastily constructed, reasonable facsimile, lestat.

I have a feeling those girls are fleecing you because you are kind and don't stand up for yourself. Just sayin....you're not the only one thinking along those same liines. especially, with respect to his ATF. it's unacceptable behavior for $200-300.

lestat1
11-10-2007, 04:00 PM
you really think so? you think these girls will come even remotely close to admitting having experience with intentionally grinding a customer until he pops? well, except for Kat, but she doesn't count because she's out of her mind. in any event, good luck with that.

Well not 'these' dancers as defined as the majority of the SW population; they work in clubs very different from my own. I was lamenting the lack of input from sources that match my experiences.

mr_punk
11-10-2007, 04:13 PM
Well not 'these' dancers as defined as the majority of the SW population; they work in clubs very different from my own. I was lamenting the lack of input from sources that match my experiences.LOL..oy vey, don't tell me you you buy that girl scout act? dennis green summed it up best,"they are who we thought they were". the lack of input isn't due to the kind of clubs they work.

Katrine
11-10-2007, 04:38 PM
I went to the Bahamas last year. I'll leave the U.S., but Central America? Uhhh no thanks.

That saddens me 'stat. I wish everyone was just like me, and is interested in the types of things I like. Then I would have no problems or issues with the world.;) :P

What's wrong with C. America? Its beautiful there! Are you afraid of Sandanistas or something?

Also, I'm sensing a bit of "one-itis" here. You can re-create that same experience with a different girl. It just may take some time to find the right one. Same idea as dating, and probably costs you about the same.

Lapaholic
11-10-2007, 04:58 PM
C'mon Kat - the terrists start in C. America before they cross the border into the US. lol ... Seriously ... If I was young and horny ( as opposed to being old and horny - 2 different things BTW ) Id def. haul it to Costa Rica or Brazil. If only the internet had been around when I was young, single and horny.

lestat1
11-10-2007, 05:14 PM
I'm afraid of other countries' justice systems. As much as we complain about OJ, or being overly-litigious in the U.S, we have one fantastic legal system! It can vary a lot from country to country. I'm afraid of places like Mexico, where it's literally guilty until proven innocent (or until you bribe your way out the corruption is so bad). Or places where minor vandalism gets you corporal punishment, or speaking out negatively against the royal family is a 10-year jail sentence (I forget where I just read this one). I mean, I know the U.S. is one of few nations that will execute minors, and I think the only "western" nation that still has capital punishment at all, but damn, there are so many actions I take for granted that could get me in a lot of trouble fast in another country.

There are so many places in the U.S. I haven't been yet, I don't need to travel outside of it. I would, however, love to see some history though...ancient Roman sites all over Europe, medievil castles in England, etc. I'm sure Central America is beautiful, but...I suspect you might fit a bit better on a lovely tropical beach than I. ;)

Jay Zeno
11-10-2007, 05:27 PM
Leave it to Jenny to use the word "ejaculate" to take all of the fun and pervyiness out of it and make it sound so sterile and sucky.Leave it to me, too, because I've been accused of the same thing. Such criticism is the price one pays for merely being accurate.

Katrine
11-10-2007, 05:28 PM
If you don't do anything to get in trouble, nothing is going to happen to you. Believe me, I've done MANY illegal things in 3rd world countries, and there weren't any cops around every corner to catch me. If you stick to the resorts and tourist areas, you would be fine. But, its your life...

Lapaholic
11-10-2007, 05:28 PM
Try Providence then - I think they have a safe legal system there. I mean they are awfully close to Portugal but it should be OK ... When u r inside 4 walls in Providence, sex for money is OK - Im sure Yoda can turn u on to a hot Brazilian there ... sound like he has a virtual stable ....!!

safado
11-10-2007, 05:45 PM
Believe me, I've done MANY illegal things in 3rd world countries, and there weren't any cops around every corner to catch me.

Any good stories you would like to share?

lestat1
11-10-2007, 05:47 PM
If you don't do anything to get in trouble, nothing is going to happen to you. Believe me, I've done MANY illegal things in 3rd world countries, and there weren't any cops around every corner to catch me. If you stick to the resorts and tourist areas, you would be fine. But, its your life...

But I don't know what "trouble" is in other countries, and sometimes it's shocking (to me) how restrictive another country can be (and vice versa, what's restrictive here is sometimes no big deal in another country). I'm not going to get arrested in the U.S. for saying: "Bush is a pole-smoking nut-nuzzler," but in other countries saying: "I'm less than thrilled with the current political situation here" can get your ass thrown in jail.

Here's a good one: a friend of mine who just left the Air Force (and is far more adventurous than I am) visited some of the former Yugoslav states last year while in the area, and commented that it was fine there, "you just have to stay on the main roads to avoid the land mines, then it's no problem." :-\ If land mine-avoidance is an issue, no matter how small, like if it even shows up on the list of discussion points, that is a deal-breaker for me on "places I will visit." He did say gorgeous beaches there, but...land mines! :O

lestat1
11-10-2007, 05:49 PM
Try Providence then - I think they have a safe legal system there. I mean they are awfully close to Portugal but it should be OK ... When u r inside 4 walls in Providence, sex for money is OK - Im sure Yoda can turn u on to a hot Brazilian there ... sound like he has a virtual stable ....!!

Well now you're just mocking my non-ethno-centric view of the world. :P

Jenny
11-10-2007, 06:01 PM
lestat - dude. You sound bizarrely paranoid. I mean, I don't know where you get the idea that US has the best legal system in the world - I mean two words: Guantanamo Bay. But even if you choose not to visit countries with a reverse onus of the burden of proof, there are a lot of countries in the world. I mean, it sounds sort of equivalent to saying "I never want to leave my house in case the police frame me for a crime. I know it might not - nay probably won't - happen. But I know it has happened in the past, and what is to stop it from happening to me?"

You need to get yourself a passport and conquer your fear.

Bob_Loblaw
11-10-2007, 06:36 PM
'stat, baby steps my man, baby steps. What's the worst that can happen? Capital punishment? Come to Canada, we don't have that. For that matter, if you killed someone in the states and came to Canada, you wouldn't be extradited back to the US unless they guaranteed capital punishment would not be sought. Eh?

lestat1
11-10-2007, 06:43 PM
I have a passport already. I've been to Canada a few times (that still counts as a foreign country, right? :) ) and the Bahamas twice. There are probably 40-60 countries I'd feel fine going to, but admittedly, 40-60 is still pretty low out of the 182 (or so) countries on the planet.

And c'mon "best" != "perfect." It's got its flaws, and I can think of many countries that are a close second, but I'm comfortable with calling the U.S. justice system best for now. I'm undecided on how I feel about Guantanamo Bay; I really don't know enough yet.

I don't think I'm paranoid, rather, I think there is a strong ethno-centrism in America where people think the world is just like the U.S. and assume that everything they know here still holds true once you cross the border elsewhere.

Out of curiosity, has anyone here been to say, 30 or 40 countries and feels like they're not very wordly yet and need to travel to more? I mean, is there some reason I would really need to expand my list?

lestat1
11-10-2007, 06:45 PM
Bob, I had a blast one New Year's up in Montreal! So no complaints here, but how do you keep the subway so damn clean? It's amazing!

Jenny
11-10-2007, 06:51 PM
Dude - I mean, dude. An attempt to set up a detention centre with no responsibility to either American or international law is one hell of an imperfection. Although, I'm interested. You reserve judgment on Gitmo because you don't know enough yet - how exactly do you compare the America criminal justice system to Canada, or the UK or Israel or South Africa or Australia and determine that it is "the best"? Like which criteria are involved that render it best?

I don't think recognizing cultural difference makes you paranoid; I do think, however, that taking the attitude that all that is outside the US is hostile or at best potentially hostile is a little paranoid though.

Bob_Loblaw
11-10-2007, 07:07 PM
Bob, I had a blast one New Year's up in Montreal! So no complaints here, but how do you keep the subway so damn clean? It's amazing!

LOL, Quebec is foreign to me as far as I'm concerned.


I don't think recognizing cultural difference makes you paranoid; I do think, however, that taking the attitude that all that is outside the US is hostile or at best potentially hostile is a little paranoid though.

Not to incite American bashing or anything but this is largely due to the American propaganda (i.e., news) that is broadcast IMO. You notice a huge difference in the way news is delivered in Canada or other places in the Western world for that matter.

lestat1
11-10-2007, 07:37 PM
I don't think recognizing cultural difference makes you paranoid; I do think, however, that taking the attitude that all that is outside the US is hostile or at best potentially hostile is a little paranoid though.

...and I said anything even remotely close to that where? I said I wouldn't go to Central America, but that there were around 40-60 I would go to. I admitted that that is low compared to the total number of countries out there.

There must be a lot of Central America fans on here.

Anyway, Canada is out as #1, for me, based on their more limited free speech compared to here, but overall is definitely up there. The UK is definitely a close #2, the U.S. modeled much of its civil law (property, torts, etc) after the UK system, which has a good 400 years behind it. South Africa, are you joking? Israel raises some civil liberty red flags for me on the basis of forced military service during peacetime (although I understand the need). For some reason I vaguely recall Australia being about in the same boat as Canada, with a slightly more diminsihed version of free speech in comparison.

You can eliminate, what, maybe a third or more of the legal systems out there on the basis of gender inequality alone? Throw in child labor, systems ruled by corruption to the point of not even functioning, and it's not long before we're looking at a greatly-diminished list.

But the point is made, no, I of course do not have an intricate and detailed knowledge of all justice systems on the planet. If you do, or you know of one you think might be better than the U.S. system, I'm all ears. I'm the "that guy" that will write a letter complaining to a company, so if there is a better system out there, hell yeah I'll write my congressmen about it.

Bob, go right ahead and bash our media. They simply suck.

xdamage
11-10-2007, 07:45 PM
X - sorry, man. I didn't realize that you were using lestat's posts as erotic masturbatory material, so I thought that any non-pejorative terminology would do. If I'm really ruining the eros of this thread for you - feel free to skip my posts. I won't even be offended.

It's all good. Just be aware, you are personally responsible for my not spending several thousands on strippers on my next trip to Vegas (in about one month). Hard as it is to believe, I'd rather wack one off to my girlfriends erotic goodnight stories, but still, at one time in life I actually enjoyed visiting SCs.

Thanks to you, I will save thousands. The fantasy, art of the seduction if you will, has been all but completely reduced to thoughts of money, and ejaculation. Where is the romance? The passion? The fantasy? All gone gone gone... TRs? Just reminders of money wasted. Why bother. Men... next time you feel like visting a club, just crank one out first. For the cost of a paper tissue, your sanity will be restored, and it will save you hundreds.

Thanks Jenny, you've done more then any other stripper to completely reduce the fantasy and enjoyment factor to facts and intellect. You're going to save me thousands ;)

Jenny
11-10-2007, 08:00 PM
I'm kind of interested in how you think the U.S. has demonstrated a higher commitment to free speech than Canada, Australia or Britain. I'm also interested in why you would privilege freedom of speech over the rule of law. I mean, offhand that seems like a bad decision to me, but I would like to hear your reasons.

x - you're very welcome. I cannot say that you have a similar influence on my life or lifestyle, but whatever. I also cannot say that I joined this message board to maintain an aura of romance and seduction for guys like you without getting paid. So I will say the same thing I say to every other bitter tool that comes on either board and whines about how stripperweb has ruined the fantasy - that you should spend your money on whatever you want, and if hearing the word "ejaculate" really ruins it for you, you probably didn't have such a good grip in the first place on what strippers are meant to do.

xdamage
11-10-2007, 08:10 PM
x - you're very welcome.

Thank you, and I'm sure the many women who won't be getting paid this X-Mas will thank you too.

Also you've done so much to help the feminist movement, it's really amazing. Before you, I kind of thought feminism was all about equality between the sexes, mutual admiration and all that. I now know that it is all all about ball-busting hatred of the other half of the species. Thanks J!!! My money will go to a more worthy cause this year.

Jenny
11-10-2007, 08:18 PM
Thank you, and I'm sure the many women who won't be getting paid this X-Mas will thank you too.
Well. I don't think that any women have an innate right to your money. And like I said - if hearing the word "ejaculate" ruins your stripclub experience... clearly your enjoyment was tenuous at best. So if you find something that you enjoy more - like for example, food - provided the word "viand" or "cattle" doesn't ruin meat for you.


Also you've done so much to help the feminist movement, it's really amazing. Before you, I kind of thought feminism was all about equality between the sexes, mutual admiration and all that. I now know that it is all all about ball-busting hatred of the other half of the species. Thanks J!!! My money will go to a more worthy cause this year.
Yes x. I'm very sure you were a proud and generous donor to many feminist causes before me. Quick - name three feminist writers you've actually read. Guffaw. Scoff. In any case - my gosh, but I've had a profound effect on your life. Really - I don't take you all that seriously, and you haven't changed my opinion of men or customers at all. So I can't say that I have anything to thank you for. But like I said - you're very welcome. Maybe this means that you can start enjoying your life rather than stalking my posts through stripclubjunkie? Because really - I think it's a little weird and obsessive.

lestat1
11-10-2007, 08:49 PM
I'm kind of interested in how you think the U.S. has demonstrated a higher commitment to free speech than Canada, Australia or Britain. I'm also interested in why you would privilege freedom of speech over the rule of law. I mean, offhand that seems like a bad decision to me, but I would like to hear your reasons.

Tell me if this has changed, but I recall Canada outlawing satellite television receivers due to the content it brought in? This was before DirecTV, back in the days of the big lawn ornament dishes, so things may have changed. For a specific example, while Howard Stern got fined here and in trouble, he was flat out banned in Canadian radio. Again, tell me if that's changed, that was the last I heard on him up there. I thought I read similar about Australia regarding satellite dishes. Any Aussies care to comment? I never cited Britain for free speech issues; I claimed them a close second. The part of their legal system that troubles me is that the loser in a civil court case pays both side's legal fees. While that approach reduces excess litigious behavior, it gives the wealthy greater legal power.

In the U.S. free speech is right in the Constitution, so it IS the rule of law. In that sense I don't understand the question.

Saying 'stat you need to get out more, or 'stat you should travel more, or stat just relax and lighten up, or if y'all told me of all your positive experiences traveling abroad would all have been constructive and helpful. Labeling me paranoid is not so constructive and borderline insulting. So I got riled up. Then I left and got four awesome dances (I know, back already;
short but good trip with TR to follow) and now I'm too happy to care. Plus, I have Baconator.

Carry on with the ejaculate talk. :P

Jenny
11-10-2007, 09:10 PM
I've never heard of satellite TV being outlawed - I know I see lots of satellites. Well, the CRTC licences broadcasts - pretty much the same as the FCC does. They may make different decisions on individual cases, but I don't think that they are systematically different. The Canadian charter was written in 1982; before that freedom of speech was protected through the common law (as it is in Great Britain now). Howard Stern was regulated by the CRTC; the FCC makes all sorts of decisions about who can be heard on radio and when. There is also, in the U.S. and Canada, a difference between "expression" created domestically and "expression" that is imported. You may disagree with that difference - and you would have a point. But it doesn't change the fact that when things are imported they are subject to a different kind of scrutiny in both countries.

The "Rule of Law" refers to the law being applied equally to all citizens as well as the state, not just like the various bodies of law. And neither the U.S. nor Canada has a stellar record for that right now. In Canada right now we have a government with fairly shruggy attitude towards the constitution, and what seems to be a deliberate time wasting strategy - that is pass laws that have a poor chance of being upheld by the judiciary because of blatant unconstitutionality, and depend on the time it will take to challenge the law. The U.S. idea of the rule of law is a blot on the free and developed world. I think the rule of law is the absolute bottom - the basic doctrine on which all law is founded. I think the issues of cost distribution and analysis of individual decisions, while revealing and certainly important, are far, far, far... secondary

I'm sorry calling you paranoid hurt your feelings. See? I can be conciliatory. I will read your trip report if you promise to use the word "ejaculate" or "ejaculation" at least once.

Lapaholic
11-10-2007, 09:27 PM
I swear if Jenny says "ejaculate" one more time - ill just bust a nut ... lol

Crap there is a law from 1919 that seriously infringes the freedom of press in the US - I must go google ...

But 'stat last I heard Providence, RI is in the US

Lapaholic
11-10-2007, 09:37 PM
Here it is the Sedition Act - repealed in '21... I think i read about it in context of the Patriot act ... U know leStat, these posts are prolly being reviewed right now by FBI agents... it happens here in the good ol' USA...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition_Act_of_1918

lestat1
11-10-2007, 09:45 PM
I will read your trip report if you promise to use the word "ejaculate" or "ejaculation" at least once.

LOL! You got it.

I'm curious about the distinction between imported versus domestic content. Is the thinking that it's a bit easier to monitor domestic content, so they need to be more vigilent with what's imported?

lestat1
11-10-2007, 09:49 PM
Here it is the Sedition Act - repealed in '21... I think i read about it in context of the Patriot act ... U know leStat, these posts are prolly being reviewed right now by FBI agents... it happens here in the good ol' USA...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition_Act_of_1918

Good stuff! I'm torn on that one too, but if they could draw a clear enough link between dissent and wartime casualties, then I'm sold on it. We have a solid foundation of limiting free speech to protect people from physical harm, so it would fit in with that. It would be damned hard to draw that clear link though, I see why they repealed it.

BTW, I freaking love Wendy's Baconator! Just had to add that.

Sh0t
11-10-2007, 09:53 PM
The Constitution was the PATRIOT ACT of its day.

Jenny
11-10-2007, 10:02 PM
No - it's just a matter of that from an administrative standpoint customs officials (for example) are given more latitude to inspect and hold things at the border. So, producing pornography in Canada (or the U.S.) only has to meet domestic laws, whereas when it is brought in, it endures a more rigorous inspection process and is subject to whatever customs and importation regulations; decency, if I remember correctly, is one of the exception to the international anti-protectionist laws (I think). For radio and TV - again, the regulatory bodies are given a lot of deference, and stuff that is not yet in the country is not given the same protection as stuff that is.

Why they do it? I have no idea. Moral hygiene? Exerting what control they can to make up for all the control they can't? Although from what I understand the FCC is pretty freaking powerful, and subject to way, way fewer appeals and more deference than the Canadian equivalent. Very likely it has to do with the sheer volume of content produced in the U.S? I don't really know - that would be a hypothosis.

xdamage
11-11-2007, 12:35 AM
Well. I don't think that any women have an innate right to your money.

...

Yes x. I'm very sure you were a proud and generous donor to many feminist causes before me.

...

LMAO... I can't believe you took that seriously and wrote that much in reply... I guess my subtle humor was lost on you.


Hey, as a total aside as long as you were telling us about feminism, what do you think of this for a siggy for one of the guys?

"Drink Me, Matriarchal Whine"

See, whine, wine... the whole thing rhymes with your siggy.

Okay not very good.


Still, I'm sure if say most of us had little female hate messages in our siggy I know as an open feminist you'd be in favor of it.

Bob_Loblaw
11-11-2007, 02:48 AM
Tell me if this has changed, but I recall Canada outlawing satellite television receivers due to the content it brought in? This was before DirecTV, back in the days of the big lawn ornament dishes, so things may have changed.

Yes and no. Satellite TV was not banned per se. You were permitted to own satellite TV receivers and programming provided it was through Canadian sources regulated by the CRTC. What people were doing was getting Amercian P.O.Boxes and getting service through the US.

doc-catfish
11-11-2007, 03:44 AM
The part of their legal system that troubles me is that the loser in a civil court case pays both side's legal fees. While that approach reduces excess litigious behavior, it gives the wealthy greater legal power.
Believe it or not, the not so wealthy actually fare better under a "loser pays" system...when they have a legitimate case. Most European nations have had them in place for some time and a majority of the people in those countries are supportive of the idea.

http://www.reason.com/news/show/29696.html

Jenny
11-11-2007, 08:08 AM
LMAO... I can't believe you took that seriously and wrote that much in reply... I guess my subtle humor was lost on you.
It totally was. I don't find you very funny. So there - you got me. Now I'm sure you can start enjoying your life, and stop following me around stripclubjunkie like an annoying younger sibling? Seriously - this is not normal behaviour.



Hey, as a total aside as long as you were telling us about feminism, what do you think of this for a siggy for one of the guys?
As long as I was telling you about what? Where in here was I telling you about feminism? Dude - you are obsessed with feminists. Do I have to say again that it is not normal? Because it is not normal.


"Drink Me, Matriarchal Whine"

See, whine, wine... the whole thing rhymes with your siggy.

Okay not very good.


Still, I'm sure if say most of us had little female hate messages in our siggy I know as an open feminist you'd be in favor of it.
Dude - I have signatures turned off. I would never see it. But judging from some signatures I've seen in the past, I suspect it would have to be pretty out there before anyone cared. In any case, didn't we go over my signature before? Only the humourless and the stupid take it seriously (you can decide which you are). It's a quote from one of you guys (you know - one of the ones that doesn't see the truth about me no matter how clear you make it - one of those). We thought it was funny.

Sitri
11-11-2007, 10:02 AM
No - it's just a matter of that from an administrative standpoint customs officials (for example) are given more latitude to inspect and hold things at the border. So, producing pornography in Canada (or the U.S.) only has to meet domestic laws, whereas when it is brought in, it endures a more rigorous inspection process and is subject to whatever customs and importation regulations; decency, if I remember correctly, is one of the exception to the international anti-protectionist laws (I think). For radio and TV - again, the regulatory bodies are given a lot of deference, and stuff that is not yet in the country is not given the same protection as stuff that is.

Why they do it? I have no idea. Moral hygiene? Exerting what control they can to make up for all the control they can't? Although from what I understand the FCC is pretty freaking powerful, and subject to way, way fewer appeals and more deference than the Canadian equivalent. Very likely it has to do with the sheer volume of content produced in the U.S? I don't really know - that would be a hypothosis.

I have a theory that Jenny is really Tigerlilly on Testerone.
The only other person that could transition a topic from ejaculate to Guantanamo Bay would be her...
I thought Political Poo was closed :O

Jenny
11-11-2007, 10:18 AM
Whoa, whoa, whoa - that transition was so not my fault. I was perfectly happy discussing lestat ejaculating all over his local dancers. He's the one who brought up the whole "americans have the best legal system in the world" thing. I request that you re-direct that accusatory pointing finger, sir!

Bob_Loblaw
11-11-2007, 10:58 AM
Dammit, I was hoping for a catfight!!

Meow? ;)

Well that was mildly hot... I guess.


Whoa, whoa, whoa - that transition was so not my fault. I was perfectly happy discussing lestat ejaculating all over his local dancers. He's the one who brought up the whole "americans have the best legal system in the world" thing. I request that you re-direct that accusatory pointing finger, sir!

I too had to raise my eyebrow :eyebrow: over the US justice system being the best statement but egocentrism is a large part of thar Amar'can stereotype.

But to be fair, lestat has inferred he does not ejaculate all over the dancers. He just has them sit in his wet spot. http://www.stripperweb.com/forum/images/smilies/smellie_splash.gif

lestat1
11-11-2007, 12:54 PM
Yeah, talk of my local dancers led to talk of another thread and Central American ladies, which led to me not wanting to go there, which led to why. Thread derail all me. And it's ejaculating in my pants, not on them...although I suppose with Peter North it would be a different story. I'm not sure 5 layers could soak that up. :)

lestat1
11-11-2007, 12:57 PM
Well that was mildly hot... I guess.



I too had to raise my eyebrow :eyebrow: over the US justice system being the best statement but egocentrism is a large part of thar Amar'can stereotype.

But to be fair, lestat has inferred he does not ejaculate all over the dancers. He just has them sit in his wet spot. :smellie_s

And that's only at the dirty club with the ATF, where dances are sans-pants.

Jenny
11-11-2007, 01:07 PM
You know - whatever. I was happy discussing dancer absorbing lestat's come through their skin through whatever mechanism was at hand - bath, wet pants or spray bottle.

xdamage
11-11-2007, 02:28 PM
It totally was. I don't find you very funny.

The respect (or lack of) is mutual. Still, it is the blue side... just saying, you spend a lot of time over here, apparently needing to interject a note of ball-busting into every topic... let it go Jenny. While it is kind of amusing, you stalk this site to a degree that is almost unfathomable.

Jenny
11-11-2007, 03:00 PM
Dude - it's hardly my fault your balls are so fragile. There are plenty of guys who interact with me who are... intact and don't feel the need to scurry around after me in every topic whining about feminists when I'm trying to talk about some guy's ejaculation habits.

And while I enjoy participating on this site - hey, I like it here - I don't participate in every topic. It just seems that way to you because you are only interested in the topics I participate in - like I said. Really, really weird. And I can't say I find it amusing. I find it a little creepy, actually. So - are we done here, yet? I mean you are free to just... not wander around this website looking for my posts in order to attack my character. I mean - there must come a point when you are saturated with this, and just finished, right? Would that be now? I'll even let you finish.... okay - go.

lestat1
11-11-2007, 03:44 PM
Y'know what's really funny in the same post? These two phrases:

"some guy's ejaculation habits"

"I'll even let you finish.... okay - go."

Hehe :D

yoda57us
11-11-2007, 03:46 PM
Wow, it's been a real whirlwind keeping up with this.....a few observations....

Providence is in fact in the US and you can ejaculate all over many of the dancers in some of the clubs. Personally, I decided a few years ago that ejaculating with a stranger is much more fun in a nice cozy in call location so I don't go to visit the fine ladies of Providence nearly as much as I used to. When I do I look for the ones who can actually carry on a conversation....but stat, I can still give ya' names if ya' want em'!

I can't for the life of me understand how reading what dancers have to say on a website could cause a guy to not still enjoy going to strip clubs....I just will never understand that. What? Did you guys think that she really liked you?

Lastly, if this was the proposed male only section of SCJ this thread would have died around post #10

Jenny
11-11-2007, 03:58 PM
Y'know what's really funny in the same post? These two phrases:

"some guy's ejaculation habits"

"I'll even let you finish.... okay - go."

Hehe :D
Lestat - please, I beg you, do not make these connections in my posts. I don't like the idea of guys ejaculating near my postings. Even in real life, I prefer if they go into another room. I find it oppressive.

Sh0t
11-11-2007, 04:32 PM
I would love for a girl to make me cum simply from giving me a lap dance.

It takes me almost an hour to cum from head, and I sometimes fake orgasms when using condoms and simply roll off dejected sometimes from naked coitus.

What is setting these guys off in strip clubs?

xdamage
11-11-2007, 05:05 PM
LOL, I've been honest. I just think most of them don't have what it takes to do much more then polite, or even outright suck up. OTOH mr. p. doesn't suck up, but some guys do. Not that I always agree with Mr P, but he is like your twin.. only the opposite sex.

The beauty of it though is it pretty much ends when pretty runs out. Until then you get to believe anything you want because guys are wired to agree. Just some of us are well past it, and just don't care. So if you are nasty, we just say it, no need to be nice. Also no need to bow down and be spineless. Some of us guys LOVE being guys, even yep, ejaculating... GO MALENESS!!!!

Anyway, if we had a guys only room yes, the topic would be over at post #10, but since the rest of it is about Jenny, really, who cares?