Luke34
07-24-2008, 05:34 AM
It was that paying that much money to sex workers isn't usually simply for conversation.
Now, if you want to state that when men give sex workers large amounts of money more times than not what is taking place is simply conversation then you do that, but we both know it would be stretching the lines of the believable. .
Think the difference Golden Rule is that most people in Australia who have been around the clubs would not really term a dancer a sex worker and probably because prostitution is legalised here.
You buy a fantasy and you buy entertainment. Whilst extras, OTC and the like happen, it is like any other industry, some people will bend the rules with certain clients.
The VAST majority of the time when men give women in the sex industry large sums of money they, at the very least, expect or anticipate sex. They may not get it but that is what they are looking for. .
When was the last time you wined and dined any woman, in excess of the norm (the standard business transaction) sent her flowers, jewellery or whatever and did not at the very least expect or anticipate sex.
I'll even go out on a limb here and say that the when goodly amounts of money changes hands more often than not there is some form of sex that takes place. Making the "dry hustle" the exception and not the norm in when large amounts of money are changing hands.
If you throw large amounts of money anywhere some women will party with you and others will not. I guess IMO it is less likely that a dancer who has had numerous men at some stage or the other give her large sums of money in pursuit be as swayed as someone who has not had that happen before. I can assure you that there are plenty of non dancers who will help spend your money if they think they can, with no intention of sleeping with you.
Many guys pay for the fantasy and they and the dancer are happy with it. As yoda said " to each their own".
In summary, it really depends on the person, their value system and not the profession they are in.
Now, if you want to state that when men give sex workers large amounts of money more times than not what is taking place is simply conversation then you do that, but we both know it would be stretching the lines of the believable. .
Think the difference Golden Rule is that most people in Australia who have been around the clubs would not really term a dancer a sex worker and probably because prostitution is legalised here.
You buy a fantasy and you buy entertainment. Whilst extras, OTC and the like happen, it is like any other industry, some people will bend the rules with certain clients.
The VAST majority of the time when men give women in the sex industry large sums of money they, at the very least, expect or anticipate sex. They may not get it but that is what they are looking for. .
When was the last time you wined and dined any woman, in excess of the norm (the standard business transaction) sent her flowers, jewellery or whatever and did not at the very least expect or anticipate sex.
I'll even go out on a limb here and say that the when goodly amounts of money changes hands more often than not there is some form of sex that takes place. Making the "dry hustle" the exception and not the norm in when large amounts of money are changing hands.
If you throw large amounts of money anywhere some women will party with you and others will not. I guess IMO it is less likely that a dancer who has had numerous men at some stage or the other give her large sums of money in pursuit be as swayed as someone who has not had that happen before. I can assure you that there are plenty of non dancers who will help spend your money if they think they can, with no intention of sleeping with you.
Many guys pay for the fantasy and they and the dancer are happy with it. As yoda said " to each their own".
In summary, it really depends on the person, their value system and not the profession they are in.