View Full Version : Question for customers ?
Gia2608
06-22-2009, 05:13 AM
Mainly older men are replying about liking natural better. so it depends on whether you want to attract guys 35 and under or old guys 45-65 yr olds. Younger guys don't mind or even like implants from seeing so many in porn. up to you babe, do what makes you happy.
That's because the older a man gets the more he wants to nail teenagers.
Golden_Rule
06-22-2009, 03:28 PM
That's because the older a man gets the more he wants to nail teenagers.
Its not teenagers. Its women of child reproductive years.
People like to think that having "evolved" we escape millions of years of the proceeding evolutionary stages. We still posses the reptilian brain stem and the early mammalian brain that sits a top of it. Just because we added more highly developed frontal lobes to the mix doesn't mean we've escaped instinctual behavior.
We are thinking animals, but animals none the less.
Acknowledging that gives those frontal lobes a better chance to use reason to cope with all the evolutionary baggage we bring along for the ride we call life. :)
Gia2608
06-22-2009, 03:34 PM
Nope, old pervey men wanna touch jailbait girls in their pants. Maybe you're not old enough so it hasn't happened to you yet, but it will.
hockeybobby
06-22-2009, 05:00 PM
http://whatthe.blogetery.com/files/2008/04/jailbait.jpg
Cyril
06-22-2009, 07:23 PM
http://whatthe.blogetery.com/files/2008/04/jailbait.jpg
That is funny. :)
dlabtot
06-22-2009, 08:07 PM
didn't read thread but no, don't like 'em, occasionally they look ok, but they never feel right
dlabtot
06-22-2009, 08:09 PM
Ok, but I still don't understand why this effects who you get dances from. You shouldn't be touching the girls anyway, so who cares how a dancers breasts feel?
well, gee, it kinda ruins it if you are thinking: "I would hate to touch those"
don'tcha think?
Earl_the_Pearl
06-22-2009, 09:21 PM
Mainly older men are replying about liking natural better. so it depends on whether you want to attract guys 35 and under or old guys 45-65 yr olds. Younger guys don't mind or even like implants from seeing so many in porn. up to you babe, do what makes you happy.
Point of order; we may prefer one over the other but like beer we will take what we find in out mouth. :bigmouth:
Earl_the_Pearl
06-22-2009, 09:26 PM
I really think guys just don't like BAD implants.
Yes that's it; well said. Now how does one insure one won't get a bad boob job?
Earl_the_Pearl
06-22-2009, 09:29 PM
Acknowledging that gives those frontal lobes a better chance to use reason to cope with all the evolutionary baggage we bring along for the ride we call life.
My frontal lobes sleep much of the time. No problem in a club frontal lobes get in the way of a good time.
Earl_the_Pearl
06-22-2009, 09:35 PM
Nope, old pervey men wanna touch jailbait girls in their pants. Maybe you're not old enough so it hasn't happened to you yet, but it will.
Actually the older I get the eraser it is to find women that look young to me. It is to the point that a women in her thirties is looking young. I see a MILF and think what a young chick.
Earl_the_Pearl
06-22-2009, 09:39 PM
http://whatthe.blogetery.com/files/2008/04/jailbait.jpg
Yes it's like the girls at the Jersey Shore; they are as timeless as the sea. Forever young.
FYI in New Jersey jail bate is 15 or younger. The women in that picture are not jail bate in any state in the union.
lopaw
06-22-2009, 09:41 PM
I've had a hundred dancers ask me if they should get implants, and I've told every one of them NO (my personal preference). Most told me that my opinion was in the majority of those surveyed.
Every one of them got the BA anyways.
Why do they bother asking when they have already made up their minds???
:confused:
Earl_the_Pearl
06-22-2009, 09:44 PM
Why do they bother asking when they have already made up their minds???
They think boobs are the answer and are just looking for validation.
Gia2608
06-23-2009, 01:02 PM
[quote=
Why do they bother asking when they have already made up their minds???
:confused:[/quote]
You are talking about FEMALE dancers I presume (and not TS), that's a pretty rhetorical question.
Earl_the_Pearl
06-23-2009, 01:48 PM
You are talking about FEMALE dancers I presume (and not TS), that's a pretty rhetorical question.
What did I miss; how did Transsexualism get involved?
Gia2608
06-23-2009, 02:06 PM
I'll clarify:Q: Why do they bother asking if they have already made up their minds?
A. Because they are women!
I guess I screwed up the html on that one;
verfolgung
06-23-2009, 02:24 PM
Its not teenagers. Its women of child reproductive years.
People like to think that having "evolved" we escape millions of years of the proceeding evolutionary stages. We still posses the reptilian brain stem and the early mammalian brain that sits a top of it. Just because we added more highly developed frontal lobes to the mix doesn't mean we've escaped instinctual behavior.
We are thinking animals, but animals none the less.
Acknowledging that gives those frontal lobes a better chance to use reason to cope with all the evolutionary baggage we bring along for the ride we call life. :)
Sounds like a convient way to rationalize pedofile tendencies. :P
Did you accept this rationale when you were called on to enforce statutory rape laws?
Earl_the_Pearl
06-23-2009, 02:40 PM
Sounds like a convient way to rationalize pedofile tendencies.
Pedophile refers to one that is sexually attracted to a child that is a medical fact.
If it does not refer to a child it is a moral judgment not a medical fact. 16 is the age of consent in most states but not in some; that is moral judgment not medical fact.
princessjas
06-24-2009, 06:59 AM
Pedophile refers to one that is sexually attracted to a child that is a medical fact.
If it does not refer to a child it is a moral judgment not a medical fact. 16 is the age of consent in most states but not in some; that is moral judgment not medical fact.
This is one thing that always terrifies me. Men who have to defend their urges to sleep with insanely young teenagers. Splitting hairs and pointing out legalities and definitions just seems like a smokescreen used to blur some very horrifying character flaws, either in you or others of your gender.
Hopper
06-24-2009, 07:23 AM
"Insanely young" teenagers? The youngest they can be is thirteen. But I don't think many adult men are attracted to girls that young.
Don't see what terrifies and horrifies you - it's not "hair-splitting" to distinguish between a child and a sixteen-year-old. The "legality" is based on a biological fact: the sixteen-year-old is physically matured, the child isn't. You've heard of puberty? So what are these character flaws you mentionned?
Earl_the_Pearl
06-24-2009, 07:35 AM
Splitting hairs and pointing out legalities and definitions just seems like a smokescreen used to blur some very horrifying character flaws, either in you or others of your gender.
I don't like shock buzz words especially when used incorrectly. It corrupts the King's English.
Pedophilia is defined as: Over a period of at least six months, recurrent intense sexual urges and sexually arousing fantasies involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 or younger).
FYI the clubs I frequent have dancers that will NEVER be remotely thought of as jail bate.
princessjas
06-24-2009, 08:45 AM
"Insanely young" teenagers? The youngest they can be is thirteen. But I don't think many adult men are attracted to girls that young.
Don't see what terrifies and horrifies you - it's not "hair-splitting" to distinguish between a child and a sixteen-year-old. The "legality" is based on a biological fact: the sixteen-year-old is physically matured, the child isn't. You've heard of puberty? So what are these character flaws you mentionned?
So, because an 11-12 year old boy is able to ejaculate does this mean it is ok for a grown woman to have sex with him? :rotfl: After all he is sexually mature also.
Beyond that I'm not arguing is WHY sleeping with a 16 year old is wrong. If you have to have it explained, well your too stupid for me to waste my time.
I don't like shock buzz words especially when used incorrectly. It corrupts the King's English. FYI the clubs I frequent have dancers that will NEVER be remotely thought of as jail bate.
I didn't bring it up or use any shock term. Just said it is alarming that men, most men, even those that aren't interested in young girls, feel the need to defend those that are. ;)
Anyway, I'm checking out of this line of discussion. It upsets me and we never get anywhere. The majority of women, who have actually BEEN 16 year old girls, seem to think they are kids. The men who want to nail them, seem to think they are adults. Shocking! ::)
vmurphy252
06-24-2009, 08:58 AM
Anyway, the King's English is French.
Earl_the_Pearl
06-24-2009, 09:28 AM
I didn't bring it up or use any shock term.
True but you did defend the incorrect use of it though when you stated;
...pointing out... definitions just seems like a smokescreen used to blur some very horrifying character flaws, ... in you ...
princessjas
06-24-2009, 11:03 AM
True but you did defend the incorrect use of it though when you stated;
I defended it because picking apart someones grammar and/or verbage is a pet peeve of mine. If the post is nearly indecipherable, then go ahead and bitch. Most of the time though, I find it is a thinly veiled attempt to avoid the real subject matter. :P
Earl_the_Pearl
06-24-2009, 01:49 PM
I defended it because picking apart someones grammar and/or verbage is a pet peeve of mine.
It is a pejorative term. If someone used prostitute in referring to what a dancer does you would not defend it.
princessjas
06-24-2009, 03:13 PM
It is a preparative term. If someone used prostitute in referring to what a dancer does you would not defend it.
What a clean dancer does and what a prostitute do are VASTLY different things. If we were referring to an extreme extras girl or someone who routinely grinds her custies to completion, then yep I'd feel the same about picking apart the verbage. The description wouldn't be entirely accurate, but that would be splitting-hairs.
You are correct though, on this forum, I wouldn't defend it (although I would do a mental eye-roll). ;)
dreamer1980
06-24-2009, 05:03 PM
So, because an 11-12 year old boy is able to ejaculate does this mean it is ok for a grown woman to have sex with him? :rotfl: After all he is sexually mature also.::)
morally speaking, that would not be ok. same with a 13 year old fertile girl having sex with a grown man. it would be very immoral. in my mind (and in society's) it is definitely not ok.
however, i will say this. humans have outpaced natural evolution. many moons ago we only lived 30-35 years max. in order to reproduce and have healthy offspring, nature made humans fertile around the age of 12-13. now medicine has progressed so much and so fast that we are living longer, but evolution has yet to catch up. so in natures eye, being of fertile age is what matters. which unfortunately is still young. theres no reason anymore for humans to be sexually mature at 12-13 years old. i believe that if human lifespan plateaus for a good amount of time, evolution will catch up and humans will start maturing sexually at an older age.
Cyril
06-24-2009, 06:55 PM
Yes it's like the girls at the Jersey Shore; they are as timeless as the sea. Forever young.
FYI in New Jersey jail bate is 15 or younger. The women in that picture are not jail bate in any state in the union.
Thank God for the tender mercy! Because, the one in the blue is definitely my type.
Hopper
06-25-2009, 12:32 AM
So, because an 11-12 year old boy is able to ejaculate does this mean it is ok for a grown woman to have sex with him? :rotfl: After all he is sexually mature also.
Beyond that I'm not arguing is WHY sleeping with a 16 year old is wrong. If you have to have it explained, well your too stupid for me to waste my time.
...
...The majority of women, who have actually BEEN 16 year old girls, seem to think they are kids. The men who want to nail them, seem to think they are adults. Shocking! ::)
An 11-12-y-o boy is not physically or sexually mature just because he can ejaculate. The mental maturity of 16-y-o girls varies between individuals. I'm not defending older men who go around nailing any 16-y-o they can.
JayATee
06-25-2009, 12:53 AM
LoL so much for the thread about breast implants...
bstillmatic
06-25-2009, 02:46 AM
If their big, fake and feel real (soft) thats an unbeatable combo.
johnnytwoshoes
06-25-2009, 02:00 PM
No. No. No. Only one type of woman needs breast implants. These are the ones whose breasts sag or otherwise are not well shaped. If the breast is small but shapely don't do a damn thing.
Earl_the_Pearl
06-25-2009, 02:12 PM
If the breast is small but shapely don't do a damn thing.
Especially if perky with puffy areolas.
Britney_B
06-25-2009, 10:35 PM
I'm so lost !
JayATee
06-25-2009, 11:33 PM
Yeah it got beyond off topic.
hockeybobby
06-26-2009, 02:28 PM
Speaking of tits....
Elvia
06-26-2009, 02:40 PM
An 11-12-y-o boy is not physically or sexually mature just because he can ejaculate. The mental maturity of 16-y-o girls varies between individuals. I'm not defending older men who go around nailing any 16-y-o they can.
How exactly do you define sexual maturity then?
Hopper
06-26-2009, 09:02 PM
^I don't know. But 11 yo boys definitely aren't. 16 yo's might be. They are at opposite ends of adolescence.
Averyxo
06-26-2009, 09:53 PM
I hear how guys like my little boobs a lot, but then later, I see them getting dances from the girl with the biggest fake boobs in the club...lol :P
Cyril
06-26-2009, 09:55 PM
I hear how guys like my little boobs a lot, but then later, I see them getting dances from the girl with the biggest fake boobs in the club...lol :P
I will always go for natural boobs.
the truth
06-26-2009, 11:42 PM
I hear how guys like my little boobs a lot, but then later, I see them getting dances from the girl with the biggest fake boobs in the club...lol :P
The big boobed girl could have had a nice job done, and/or she may be willing to do things you are not.
If you are in a no extras club the only thing I can suggest is for you to post some pics. No, that is not just an excuse to get a boob shot.
Ok, so maybe it is. }:D
Hopper
06-27-2009, 01:10 AM
^Maybe if you tip her.
Golden_Rule
06-27-2009, 01:39 AM
Nope, old pervey men wanna touch jailbait girls in their pants. Maybe you're not old enough so it hasn't happened to you yet, but it will.
No. I'm going to be 52 and, romantically, am generally interested only in women close to my own age. When talking in terms of a consort, partner, life companion I would prefer someone who has a similar range of life experiences, a historical perspective only someone of the same age range could share, a greater chance to have things in common.
That is all frontal lobe stuff.
The only reason I'd desire younger women* is the instinctual want to spread my seed and increase the chance it will continue on after I am gone [though that children aren't a result of these liaisons is the effect of those frontal lobes kicking in and having their say in the process]. This is purely instinctual behavior, yet to ignore its presence and effect is folly born in ignorance, and doesn't help address the issue. I address it by giving into it in safe ways that don't cause me, or hopefully the people who I use [and it is using, but that is OK as it is using by mutually informed consent and the women in question are using me as well to get what they want] any problem and hopefully there is mutual gain. That also doesn't mean we can't respect each other and perhaps become friends in the process. Even mentoring isn't out of the question. In fact, if handled right, it can be a lovely part of the outcome with the right person. Learning stuff isn't nearly as fun if you cant pass it on to someone else.
The truth of the matter is that the fact that younger women will allow me to have sex with them, for whatever the reason, has nothing to do with anything other than it means I am still viable as a re-creator of life and means I'm not quite dead yet.
It may sound Freudian [well, that's because it is] but the reason most older men want to fuck young women has to do with fear of death, and very little else, because most [I said MOST] aren't very interesting to older men on intellectual and experience levels. That is simply a function of the difference in time spent living on this planet, not a knock at young people in general. Its the same reason most 15 year olds don't want to hang out with 8 year olds, etc. It is, the younger people here will find, a mind set they will share themselves when they reach a given age.
So now line up and shoot me for telling the truth. :)
*I said younger women [Websters: Woman n: an ADULT female], not children, for the boobs [to keep this on topic :) ] in the audience who don't know the difference and looking to start crap because someone is talking intellectual stuff and subtracting from their BLT time [talk about irony ::) ].
[Sorry... hot button. I use to arrest people like that and being lumped in with them for expressing a purely intellectual concept totally unrelated to anything having to do with such ugly things as what that poster suggested truly crisps my cookies.]
Golden_Rule
06-27-2009, 01:57 AM
My frontal lobes sleep much of the time. No problem in a club frontal lobes get in the way of a good time.
I've never learned how to turn mine off.
We're going to have to get together at some point and you can explain to me how that works over a beer or two.
Golden_Rule
06-27-2009, 02:15 AM
Sounds like a convient way to rationalize pedofile tendencies. :P
Did you accept this rationale when you were called on to enforce statutory rape laws?
You are approaching the point where you're going to owe me an apology for attributing thoughts to my posts that simply aren't there.
I specifically said "women of child reproductive age". Women, look it up. Let me help you. Websters: Woman: n: an ADULT female. The only person referencing an interest in children is YOU. And further more what does the fully acknowledged, readily accepted - so much so that it is a point of study in any 100 level college psychology course [fundamental instinctual drives: breath, thirst, hunger, shelter, survival, procreation] - have to do with statutory rape?
We aren't talking agree/disagree here. We are talking an apparent fundamental misunderstanding of the concept I expressed. Are you trying to profess your ignorance that an idea as simple as the one I put forth is over your head, because when you ascribe notions to my posts that simply aren't there that is what it looks like?
Elvia
06-27-2009, 07:54 PM
^I don't know. But 11 yo boys definitely aren't. 16 yo's might be. They are at opposite ends of adolescence.
"adolescence" being the key word there. Why would you want to have a sexual relationship with any adolescent, as opposed to an actual adult?
Gia2608
06-27-2009, 08:07 PM
*I said younger women [Websters: Woman n: an ADULT female], not children, for the boobs [to keep this on topic :) ] in the audience who don't know the difference and looking to start crap because someone is talking intellectual stuff and subtracting from their BLT time [talk about irony ::) ].
Possibly I can get on board with this, since you are not trying to say that the age of consent is 14, or 16 (which refers to minors having sex with minors and not adults having sex with minors- in some states an 18 yr old can be arrested for bedding a 16 yr. old). On the other hand, you may change your mind in 9 years. Is it frontal lobe, which has to do with consciousness/ dreaming/ critical thinking/ intellectual being? Maybe, maybe not. I am not a psychiatrist. Maybe you wouldn't feel so compelled to sow your seed if women in pop culture were portrayed at 35-40 instead of 15-26. Who knows, I don't really have the desire to argue that.
My previous post about old guys wanting to "bang" teenagers was way off topic and half kidding, and mostly drew on the fact that in my experience the younger and younger looking gals in the club don't make money off 21 yr. olds, they make their money off the 55+'ers.
But I thought this thread was about tits, no?
Hopper
06-27-2009, 08:11 PM
^I mean 16 yo might be considered post-adolescent. Wikipedia says girls have reached full physical maturity by age 16. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolescence (Last paragraph under heading "Puberty".)
Again, I don't approve of older men who lay all the 16 yo girls they can. In our culture, girls that age are usually not fully mature socially or psychologically. But that is to do with our culture and their upbringing. However, many 16-yo girls have boyfriends in their 20s. When I was at high school a girl that age I knew had a 26-yo boyfriend.
Generally I like girls 18 and over, since generally they have the level of maturity I prefer.