Log in

View Full Version : What do you prefer - circumcised or uncircumcised?



Pages : 1 2 [3] 4

ASSLover
05-27-2011, 09:34 AM
I'm cut, the ladies love it.

Kellydancer
05-27-2011, 11:50 AM
I've known a lot of filthy unhygenic men so no I don't trust many would keep it clean, especially a little boy.

The son of my ex best friend was originally uncircumsized but decided to have it cut off. The reason is when he was born his mother was on welfare and welfare doesn't pay for the procedure. As he got older he decided to get it cut because his boyfriend thought it looked weird. He doesn't regret it.

Naida
12-26-2012, 02:19 AM
Necro posting, but I thought I would weigh in with my two cents- I prefer natural/intact.
When I was younger, I just thought "a penis is a penis is a penis." Since I babysat and had seen both while caring for little boys (and, FYI, diapering hygiene is no different between the two, just "wipe what you see." I learned this from my mother because my brothers are intact and she made it clear to me that pulling the foreskin back would HURT THEM.), seeing both when I became sexually active wasn't surprising. Before I understood what sexual pleasure was, I THOUGHT circumcised was better. As I've learned what it really is, I quickly realized that circ'd guys weren't giving me pleasure, the added sensation was actually irritation. I've also experienced more frequent pain with circ'd guys because they pound the pussy (it's only been recently that I figured it they do this to make up for the lost sensation.) I've only had pain twice with intact partners, and both times were because they were LARGE and I wasn't fully aroused.
Personally, I think of (most) circumcision as mutilation. An adult can consent to something like tongue splitting, implants, etc, including circumcision. A child cannot. For that reason alone, I say let the penis be and let the guy decide for himself as an adult. Also, the perceived "benefits" of it are nearly fictitious in nature, while no one seems to mention the negative effects.

"Pros":
Better hygiene- The foreskin is attached to the glans like a nail is to a finger. It should never be retracted by anyone but the boy it's attached to as he explores his own body. It usually cannot fully retract until the boy is in puberty. I'd say that the time between birth until approximately age 12 is plenty of time to teach proper hygiene. And that hygiene is very simple; during your daily shower, take thirty seconds to retract and rinse well with plain water.
Decreased UTIs- The average rate of UTIs for intact boys is 4% and the rate for circumcised boys is 2%. I don't think a 2% difference is big enough to warrant amputation without consent of the amputee. Easier ways to prevent UTIs? Proper diet and water intake, proper diapering, limiting bubble baths. In the incident of a UTI that's not caused by an underlying health issue, there's a short round of antibiotics or simply drinking/eating cranberry juice/craisins.
Decreased STDs- I can't recall the exact percentages on this but, excluding HIV, the difference is marginal. A much better strategy? Teach your kid "Don't be silly, wrap your willy!"
Decreased HIV- This, I give some credence to. A quick refresher: we all know that HIV is transmitted through sexual contact and coming into contact with HIV+ fluids. A more in depth explanation imparts the knowledge that even getting HIV+ blood on healthy, unbroken skin will NOT transmit HIV to the person being exposed. However, most mucus membranes can absorb HIV. Mucus membranes are the eyes, inner nostrils, mouth (the mouth, however, seems to be a low transmission MM, usually requiring a sore or cut), anus, vagina, and uncircumcised penile glans. The circumcised penile glans keratinizes, which means the glans becomes skin like other parts of the body, leaving only the urethra as mucus membrane. For this reason, straight, uncircumcised men experience the lowest HIV transmission rates, as far as I'm aware. However, HIV can be avoided by condom use, just like other STDs and, unless the child has become sexually active, should not be an immediate concern of the parent.
Penile cancer prevention- This one honestly makes me lol. Yes, in a world where cancer is affecting everyone in some way, a parent might be concerned with preventing cancer for his/her child. Yes, circumcision almost completely eliminates penile cancer risk. However, by the same token, would you really amputate your pubescent daughter's healthy breasts in order to prevent breast cancer, which is more common than penile cancer?

Cons:
Botched procedure- This is a very high risk, especially because it's being predominantly performed on newborns. Until the puberty, when the foreskin can retract freely, you really don't know for sure what part of the skin is actually foreskin and what's regular penile skin until you forcibly peel the foreskin off (which I'll elaborate on further in my next point.) It's not uncommon for boys to be cut "tight", where the doctor removes too much skin. There is also the risk of causing serious damage to the penis that would require additional surgery and/or entire amputation.
Forcible retraction- In an uncircumcised boy, simply pulling the foreskin back SLIGHTLY can cause immense pain and problems ranging from infection to phimosis. For a circumcised boy? During the circumcision, the entire foreskin is peeled off of the incredibly sensitive glans, and need I remind you that it's fused like a fingernail at that time? Imagine forcefully ripping a healthy fingernail completely off your finger. Not too nice, huh? This forceful removal can even scar or tear off chunks of the glans. Many men have had this ripping occur on their glans but may not be aware because it might leave only a small dimple once he gets to the age where he's really examining his unit.
Lack of anesthesia- A baby cannot be given general or IV anesthesia unless they are having major surgery, which circumcision is not considered to be. Local anesthesia? Some doctors do it now, but a large percentage do NOT, in keeping with the teaching of Dr Kellog. Yes, the man that brought you corn flakes has been regarded as the utmost intelligence on circumcision since the early 1900s until just a few years ago. He thought that performing circumcision would prevent the "self abuse" of masturbation, and performing the procedure without anesthesia would enhance this effect. He also thought it would be a good idea to burn off clitori with acid, but that one didn't catch on.
Psychological trauma- This may or may not be considered a valid point, but it is worth mentioning. A baby, usually just a few days/weeks old, laid into a plastic tray. To elaborate in this tray, it has a depression shaped like a body. This depression is raised in the groin area to thrust the infant's pelvis forward. You can imagine how bad that would hurt an adult's back, but we're talking about an infant who has spent the majority of his existence curled into the fetal position. Ouch. At the knees and elbows, they are strapped down as tight as the nurse/doctor can get them without causing them obvious pain, but that's kinda hard to judge when this infant is already crying because it's been taken from its parent and thrust into this awkward backbend. The protective outer layer of his penis is then forcibly peeled from the most sensitive part of his body, then cut/burned/frozen off, again usually without anesthesia. If this was done to an adult, there would undoubtedly be years tied up in a court room and several prison sentences, but for a baby everyone thinks of it as a "snip and done" sort of thing. In a world that's becoming increasingly aware that even which direction an infant faces in their stroller can affect them emotionally for years, you think that wouldn't cause some underlying mental trauma? Many men, even if not obviously emotionally traumatized by the event itself, are in fact traumatized by the fact that a permanent change was made to their body without their consent.
Resulting infection- After a baby has been circumcised, the level of hygiene he requires during diapering skyrockets. You have to immediately remove his soiled diaper (which you should do even after he's healed, but we're talking about a major difference between "mommy needs just two more minutes to finish her super important conversation with her life insurance agent" and a trip to the ER), not only clean up the excrement but be EXTREMELY careful of a wound that requires being cleaned extremely well on the child's penis in the process, then continuing to fiddle with said infant penis while you apply some form of salve to it. Maybe it's just me, but all this penis fiddling would make me highly uncomfortable; I just got lucky and never had to change a baby who was healing from circumcision myself, though I have been witness to it.
Potential sexual dysfunction- Now, there's argument over this, but let's think about it logically. A child has about half of his total penile skin removed. Not just any part of the penile skin, but what is considered to be one of the most sensitive portions of his penis, second only to the glans itself. The foreskin contains approximately 20,000 nerve endings! It also contains a semi-rigid band which holds it in place over the glans, the most sensitive portion of the penis, in order to protect it and keep it moist like all mucus membranes are. Without this protective covering, the glans has to find another way of protecting itself, and that protection comes in the form of keratinizing. Ladies, if you will, touch your arm and then touch you clitoris, which is supposed to be as equivalently sensitive as the penile glans. HUGE difference in the level of sensation, because the clitoris is a nerve rich mucus membrane just like the penile glans, while the skin of your arm is KERATINIZED. This keratinization (theoretically, though common sense dictates definitely) dramatically decreases perceived sensation. This can lead to a host of sexual dysfunctions, ranging from premature ejaculation to delayed ejaculation (and, in some men, NO ejaculation from normal intercourse) to impotence. Because you can't tell for sure with an infantile penis, some times one side gets snipped shorter and causes an unnatural and painful curve to the penis in adulthood that requires surgical correction (or, for the "restoration" crowd, lots of stretching to induce mitosis to grow additional skin).

And then there's the argument of how it can negatively impact their female partners. For that, I'll just link a somewhat repetitive but insightful website so you can read about it. www.top10wayscircumcisedsexharmswomen.com

Sorry for the rant, but this is something I've done a LOT of reading about. Obviously, if I have a son, he will not be circumcised by my choice. If he decides to have it done as an adult, then he can. I least I'm leaving him the ability to choose.

Sophia_Starina
12-27-2012, 03:34 PM
I am equal opportunity when it comes to dicks. I don't mind either scenario.

Sophia_Starina
12-27-2012, 03:41 PM
I have a question regarding this issue...

Why do some of you qualify uncircumcised guys as "gross"? In either case, the man in question had no say in the matter... circumcision (or lack thereof) is decided during a boys infancy. Uncircumcised dicks are set up exactly as nature intended. There is nothing incredibly untoward about a bit of extra skin.

LaurenAus
12-27-2012, 03:47 PM
omg i love uncircumcised peens. They glide..hard to explain but the silky movements are made for the vageen. I need to scout for some Europeans..

The Six
12-27-2012, 03:47 PM
Necro posting, but I thought I would weigh in with my two cents- I prefer natural/intact.

This was a good post, and very informative. Hopefully it influences some people's decisions as to whether or not to have it done to their baby.

Sophia_Starina
12-27-2012, 03:54 PM
This was a good post, and very informative. Hopefully it influences some people's decisions as to whether or not to have it done to their baby.

I couldn't imagine approving such a procedure for a tiny baby. If anyone watches the videos of how circumcisions are performed they would be horrified. I do not have kids... but if the baby was mine, I couldn't fathom the thought of cutting them up unnecessarily.

zivlet
12-27-2012, 04:03 PM
I am a hypocrite here . I view circumcision as mutilation and unnecessary unless for medical reasons-I think it's barbaric that any Mother and Father would want to chop the end of their son's cock off.
BUT!I have been with both-and I do like the way the circumcised penis looks, more than the uncircumcised.

Almost Jaded
12-28-2012, 10:55 AM
I never thought about it. I'm cut, and I had my son cut, because that's just what was done. Several years after having my kid, I talked at length with a friend who is uncut, several women, and a couple of doctors. In light of what I now know, I'm firstly kind of bitter that I was cut before I had any say in the matter, and secondly, feel bad for doing the same to my kid. I'm sure he'll be fine - I was - but I wish I'd had the choice, and I feel bad for taking it from him. Especially when I learned about the 3,500 nerve endings you're removing..!

Kellydancer
12-28-2012, 12:47 PM
I have a question regarding this issue...

Why do some of you qualify uncircumcised guys as "gross"? In either case, the man in question had no say in the matter... circumcision (or lack thereof) is decided during a boys infancy. Uncircumcised dicks are set up exactly as nature intended. There is nothing incredibly untoward about a bit of extra skin.

I don't think it's gross really, just that it tends to be more dirty in terms of cleaning. However, I've mostly been with circumcised men because that is far more common in my area, my age and everything else.

cutyummy
03-13-2013, 07:45 PM
thanks i'm circumcised :-)

cutyummy
03-13-2013, 07:53 PM
LOL I accidentally voted for uncircumcised but I meant to vote for circumcised, thank you ativan. I've only come across one uncircumcised penis in the past and it was fine, but I think it's easier for guys to keep it clean when they are. thanks :)

cutyummy
03-13-2013, 08:13 PM
why is circumcised a dealbreaker ?

cutyummy
03-13-2013, 08:14 PM
well said Kourtney

Jessica1001
03-13-2013, 10:57 PM
Thanks for posting that, Naida.

I, personally, think that the overuse of male circumcision in the US has had a role to play in the culture of 'faster, harder, nastier' that men seem to gravitate to. There is absolutely no question: the removal of the foreskin results in the severing of thousands of nerves that would otherwise contribute to sexual pleasure.

I have been with both (multiple instances of each for the statisticians reading) and MUCH prefer uncut. They are more sensitive, reactive lovers.

Basically: Would you rather have your daughters give 7 minute blowjobs, or 37 minute ones? ;-)

simone87
03-13-2013, 11:15 PM
i usually prefer circumcised because that's just what im used to seeing, honestly. i've been with an uncut man and it didn't feel any different. as long as they keep it clean it would not be a deal breaker..
i circumcised my son because at the time i thought he would be ridiculed and teased later and i was doing him a favor. he went into shock, not that i knew it at the time. there is no way to completely anesthetize babies for circumcision and they go through HORRIFIC pain! some choke, go into seizures, etc. its awful!!! i would NEVER do that to another baby, and i am glad to see there has been a HUGE increase in people deciding not to cut their babies. if he wanted it done later in life and be knocked out for it, i'd pay for the procedure.

they say in 30-50 years, nobody will be circumcised, and considering what horrific pain the infant goes through, that's just fine with me. i think its disgusting mutilation when done to a tiny infant, i feel so goddamn guilty for doing that to my baby boy :( :(

Jay12
03-13-2013, 11:18 PM
why is circumcised a dealbreaker ?


Once I went with uncircumcised, I don't wanna go back to circumcised. The best sex I had have has been with uncircucised men (my ex hub and my current hub). I like to suck the foreskin; it's kinda tasty.

cutyummy
03-14-2013, 12:07 AM
well thanks you've made a lot of circumcised guys feel really insecure now

GlamourRouge
03-14-2013, 12:14 AM
I couldn't imagine approving such a procedure for a tiny baby. If anyone watches the videos of how circumcisions are performed they would be horrified. I do not have kids... but if the baby was mine, I couldn't fathom the thought of cutting them up unnecessarily.

Religious reasons maybe? Jewish?


I like circumcised. Its less of a hassle to deal with. But at the end of the day, it doesn't really matter.

Djoser
03-14-2013, 08:11 AM
well thanks you've made a lot of circumcised guys feel really insecure now

Not me, I could give a flying fuck whether women I've never met, and never will meet, prefer it or not.

I prefer not to fuck women who have no visible pussy lips or little tiny ones you can barely see (but I had one girl like this for 2 years and loved her to death for most of that time). Do you think they care if I say that here? Hell no they don't care, because there's a zillion other guys out there that like that look.

Don't take what women on this forum say as any kind of judgement on your personal appearance or character. It's a forum for strippers, not a place for you to get feedback on your appearance or the condition of your penis.


As far as whether I'd keep the foreskin if I could? Nope, probably not. I think they are ugly. And what with the average time of fucking being around 6 minutes (including a whole lot of premature ejaculators), it seems like the loss of a few nerve endings might not be so bad for a lot of women who want to get fucked for an hour or two.

cutyummy
03-14-2013, 08:16 AM
Thanks George I feel better now

The Six
03-14-2013, 11:51 AM
Funny how all these legitimate reasons to not do it are being posted and people still flippantly dismiss it. Now, if you were cut it's not something you should lament and obsess about, because it's done. But it's clear that this is something a man should be able to decide for himself if he wants to do it. Not something done universally to all baby boys.

Djoser
03-14-2013, 12:58 PM
Thanks George I feel better now

Who the hell is George?

Djoser
03-14-2013, 01:01 PM
Funny how all these legitimate reasons to not do it are being posted and people still flippantly dismiss it. Now, if you were cut it's not something you should lament and obsess about, because it's done. But it's clear that this is something a man should be able to decide for himself if he wants to do it. Not something done universally to all baby boys.

"...newbom circumcision virtually eliminates penile carcinoma."

http://www.circs.org/index.php/Library/Schoen

Nothing flippant about that at all. I think my boys can do without penis cancer, thanks...

Djoser
03-14-2013, 01:01 PM
Funny how all these legitimate reasons to not do it are being posted and people still flippantly dismiss it. Now, if you were cut it's not something you should lament and obsess about, because it's done. But it's clear that this is something a man should be able to decide for himself if he wants to do it. Not something done universally to all baby boys.

"...newbom circumcision virtually eliminates penile carcinoma."

http://www.circs.org/index.php/Library/Schoen

Nothing flippant about that at all. I think my boys can do without penis cancer, thanks...

lemiwinks31
03-14-2013, 01:02 PM
I'm cut, had my boy cut. The doc gave us literature/pros & cons....He cried for about 20 seconds....then it was as if it never happened....

Bottom line is that it is such a minor procedure that the risks are so minor and about the same or less than your chances of having painful retraction while not cut.(and the VERY minor increased chance of STDs)

Either way, its such a minor thing that it falls into the realm of preference.

Am I traumatized by the loss of my foreskin or the right to choose?

lol...no

lemiwinks31
03-14-2013, 01:04 PM
"...newbom circumcision virtually eliminates penile carcinoma."

http://www.circs.org/index.php/Library/Schoen

Nothing flippant about that at all. I think my boys can do without penis cancer, thanks...


Thats right, George

The Six
03-14-2013, 01:13 PM
"...newbom circumcision virtually eliminates penile carcinoma."

http://www.circs.org/index.php/Library/Schoen

Nothing flippant about that at all. I think my boys can do without penis cancer, thanks...

You said you didn't care because you think it's ugly. Sounds flippant to me.

And from a quick result on wikipedia:

"Several authors have proposed circumcision as a possible strategy for penile cancer prevention;[12][13][14] however, the American Cancer Society points to the rarity of the disease and notes that neither the American Academy of Pediatrics nor the Canadian Academy of Pediatrics recommend routine neonatal circumcision"



Am I traumatized by the loss of my foreskin or the right to choose?

lol...no

Hard to miss something you never knew you had. And unlike if you were born, say, without a right arm, you would grow up without even realizing that something was once there.

cutyummy
03-14-2013, 01:18 PM
Oooops I thought your name was George Clinton sorry lol

Djoser
03-14-2013, 01:38 PM
Haha OK cool. Funny, I've never been particularly envious of rich, famous celebrities. But George Clinton? I might consider trading places with him.


You said you didn't care because you think it's ugly. Sounds flippant to me.

And from a quick result on wikipedia:

"Several authors have proposed circumcision as a possible strategy for penile cancer prevention;[12][13][14] however, the American Cancer Society points to the rarity of the disease and notes that neither the American Academy of Pediatrics nor the Canadian Academy of Pediatrics recommend routine neonatal circumcision"



Hard to miss something you never knew you had. And unlike if you were born, say, without a right arm, you would grow up without even realizing that something was once there.

OK:

1) Having an ugly dick is not a matter of flippancy to me. I'm very glad mine looks just the way it does, rather than with a piece of loose skin hanging off it. Though of course what one person considers ugly might be different than another. Those men possessing intact foreskins are free to consider their dicks to be beautiful, of course. And all the female fans. Not a problem for me.

2) You can dismiss the likelihood of penile cancer in my boys all you want. I'll take the surefire preventative measure, thanks.

3) The lack of a strong right arm is of considerably greater significance than the lack of a useless piece of skin hanging from the end of my dick.

cutyummy
03-14-2013, 01:43 PM
lol no probs have a good day

The Six
03-14-2013, 01:54 PM
I'm not "dismissing" the likelihood of penile cancer. The American Cancer Society itself says that cancer in particular is very rare, even in uncut men. And two other organizations don't think enough of it to recommend it.

If you want to insist that the foreskin is useless despite all the literature posted in this thread, you clearly have no interest in any other side of this issue than your own, anyway.

My arm comment was obviously a separate comparison.

simone87
03-14-2013, 03:28 PM
I'm cut, had my boy cut. The doc gave us literature/pros & cons....He cried for about 20 seconds....then it was as if it never happened....

Bottom line is that it is such a minor procedure that the risks are so minor and about the same or less than your chances of having painful retraction while not cut.(and the VERY minor increased chance of STDs)

Either way, its such a minor thing that it falls into the realm of preference.

Am I traumatized by the loss of my foreskin or the right to choose?

lol...no

i had my boy cut too, because i did not properly do my research and it was something that was "just done". but a baby's foreskin is different i believe. they cannot be fully anesthetized. it causes them awful pain, and mine didn't cry either because he had gone into shock. i am all for circumcision because there are health benefits, but why do it to a baby? why not do it when they CAN be put to sleep and get pain meds afterwards? "a baby can't remember" is not necessarily true in a sense.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/myths-about-circumcision-you-likely-believe

the above article made me shudder. after reading that, and other literature on the subject, i am now firmly against it when done to a baby. its cruel

summerbre
03-14-2013, 05:14 PM
I have nothing to weigh in on the health benefits of circumcision.

I will say, an uncircumcised dick feels 10x better than a circumcised one, based upon my scientific study of the matter. }:D Knowing how good it feels makes the aesthetics more appealing to me.

And none of the uncircumcised men I've been with had "hygiene issues"... C'mon, a vagina is still more difficult to take care of than an uncircumcised penis and most of us ladies manage just fine. ;)

Djoser
03-14-2013, 06:29 PM
I'm not "dismissing" the likelihood of penile cancer. The American Cancer Society itself says that cancer in particular is very rare, even in uncut men. And two other organizations don't think enough of it to recommend it.

If you want to insist that the foreskin is useless despite all the literature posted in this thread, you clearly have no interest in any other side of this issue than your own, anyway.

My arm comment was obviously a separate comparison.

No, it's not really a matter of earthshaking importance to me. I'm cut and I'm damned glad I am. I don't care who might not like it. I won't be showing them my dick if I meet them by some chance anyway, so it doesn't matter in the slightest.

I'm not planning on having a kid anytime soon so I am not racked with guilt concerned the horrendous trauma I will be causing him when I do. If I do have a kid anytime soon and it's a boy, I will likely research it more seriously before telling the doctors to cut off the flap of skin.

This is a forum for strippers, the Lounge area. None of this shit really matters in the clubs, that's for sure. We are just having fun here.

zivlet
03-14-2013, 06:47 PM
. C'mon, a vagina is still more difficult to take care of than an uncircumcised penis and most of us ladies manage just fine. ;)
I've said similar things beforehand too lol. If it's a cleanliness issue we should all cut our labia off, make it easier to clean the inside bits...

The Six
03-14-2013, 09:07 PM
If I do have a kid anytime soon and it's a boy, I will likely research it more seriously before telling the doctors to cut off the flap of skin.

I hope you would.

lemiwinks31
03-15-2013, 11:43 AM
i had my boy cut too, because i did not properly do my research and it was something that was "just done".


Dont worry, if you had done the reasearch, you may have come the the same conclusion. Plenty of reasearch to support both sides, its just the research that you choose to expose yourself to.

Again....its such a minor procedure and the risks are SO minimal...and the increased risk of UTI, penile cancer & other STDs for those who dont get cut are also minimal..

That is why the American Academy of Pediatrics take a neutral stance on it....they dont recommend it, and they dont discourage it.

For anyone wishing to inform themselves, look the AAP research....If you are only looking for "research" that supports your side of the argument...well.....then you dont really want to inform yourself.

I read it again.....I would do the same thing again...
Someone else can read that and come to the conclusion that they wouldnt have it done.....

The AAP says we are both right.

simone87
03-15-2013, 02:31 PM
i definitely think circumcision has many health benefits and i do support it, so we agree. i just DONT support it being done to a baby where half their penis is cut off and they can't be anesthetized. no reason why they can't have it done later with the proper pain meds and anesthesia. i don't even have a penis and it makes me wanna puke thinkn bout how much it would hurt !!

lemiwinks31
03-15-2013, 03:12 PM
i definitely think circumcision has many health benefits and i do support it, so we agree. i just DONT support it being done to a baby where half their penis is cut off and they can't be anesthetized. no reason why they can't have it done later with the proper pain meds and anesthesia. i don't even have a penis and it makes me wanna puke thinkn bout how much it would hurt !!


They use local analgesia on infants.......Based on the heart rate, blood pressure, crying duration and other infant pain indicators, It is roughly the same to them as getting a shot.

And the reason they do it when they are infants is that chance of complications(which are almost always minor) increase 400% if you wait.

Pain; minor....chance and severity of complications(when they are infants); EXTREMELY minor.....Reduction in chance contracting of UTI, HIV, penile cancer...also minor.

so again.....whatever you want to do is the right decision.

zivlet
03-16-2013, 02:50 AM
I really can't see it hurting only the same as a shot, to be honest. A fine needle piercing the skin is not on the same level as chopping a part of the body off, especially one with such a high proportion of nerve endings in it.
Having said that, don't be harsh on yourself Simone-there are benefits to circumcision and you didn't put your son through pain on purpose!You've no need to feel that way :)

tempest666
03-16-2013, 05:54 AM
When they're uncut you can pull skin over the head right? When they're uncut there's a mushroom hat? (don't ask why I'm asking lol)

Djoser
03-16-2013, 08:29 AM
Right. And as far as I have been informed, there's not going to be the slightest difference in sensation for the woman, when getting fucked by an uncircumcised dick anyway--since the skin is pulled back completely from the head when aroused and fucking. So it looks and feels the same--and there aren't many nerve endings that deep in the vagina.

I much prefer lesbian or solo porn, but when watching regular hardcore and the guy is uncut and the membrane is partly pulled back while he is still getting fully aroused, it looks fucking gross to me. I'm sure it looks normal to the uncut guy since that's all he's used to though. ;D

On a similar topic, I used to wonder why the fuck they cut the tails off some dogs, and crop the ears of others. No medical rationalization there at all.

summerbre
03-16-2013, 03:52 PM
Right. And as far as I have been informed, there's not going to be the slightest difference in sensation for the woman, when getting fucked by an uncircumcised dick anyway--since the skin is pulled back completely from the head when aroused and fucking. So it looks and feels the same--and there aren't many nerve endings that deep in the vagina.

^Not true! While some uncut men have the foreskin completely "taught" when they are aroused, many do not. The foreskin is usually still slightly loose, which creates less friction -- which is ideal for marathon sex because it helps the woman (well, me at least) stay wetter longer. The benefit isn't felt deep in the vagina, it's felt at the opening. The only times I've been able to reach an orgasm without clitoral stimulation was with 2 different uncut men, and it happened somewhat regularly when we had sex. Don't think that's a coincidence! :) I haven't talked about this with many other girls though. I know one of my best friend's hubbies in uncircumcised, he was her first "uncut" man, and she agrees that she prefers it.

Not to say if you're cut the sex is bad! It's still good... Mm... Sex... Now if you'll excuse me I think I need to get laid tonight. LOL

lemiwinks31
03-18-2013, 10:52 AM
I really can't see it hurting only the same as a shot, to be honest. A fine needle piercing the skin is not on the same level as chopping a part of the body off, especially one with such a high proportion of nerve endings in it.
Having said that, don't be harsh on yourself Simone-there are benefits to circumcision and you didn't put your son through pain on purpose!You've no need to feel that way :)


Its because they use analgesia...which is a local pain killer.....so it reduces the amount of pain they experience.

simone87
03-18-2013, 10:57 AM
Its because they use analgesia...which is a local pain killer.....so it reduces the amount of pain they experience.

did you read the link? it doesn't do shit, really. a local little analgesic isn't going to do anything when half your penis full of nerve ending are being pried off! lol my problem with it is NOT the circumcision, im all for that..its the pain that they have to go through as babies. there's really no way of knowing ( especially since the infants foreskin is different than a grown man's) but im just GUESSING they go through hell.

ATLChick
03-18-2013, 10:57 AM
Circumcised. Uncircumcised penises look kind of gross and I hear guys with uncircumcised penises are more likely to get infections and diseases.

BlackSheEp3
03-19-2013, 04:25 PM
I prefer circumcised which I am. Its more aesthetically pleasing (subjective), weight reduction (no excess skin) and its more hygienic and easier to clean.

simone87
03-19-2013, 05:07 PM
^so do you ever remember being uncircumcised? you never know, you may have liked it much better ;)