Log in

View Full Version : Biggest BOOBS: Size 102ZZZ



Pages : 1 [2]

Melonie
08-13-2012, 08:23 AM
^^^ oops, sorry ! But either way it still means that Norma Stitz needs two seats on an airliner where Beshine only needs one LOL !

Mr Hyde
08-13-2012, 06:52 PM
I actually am ok with implants, but here's something I'd like to know....

what are the largest natural breasts on a women with a BMI under 25.

Vyanka
08-13-2012, 07:55 PM
I have a cousin who is on the thin side. No ass but huge natural perky breasts. She was blessed with a great chest. Idk Wtf she got a boob reduction. Those things grew back. Not as big as before but close. Lucky biotch. Lol. She got it from her mom, who is large chested but they won't deflate or sag. It's rare for thin women to have large naturals that stay perky on top of that.

jackie_p
01-09-2013, 11:52 PM
Well, there are limits, lol. I knew a girl who was 5'1" and had the body of a 95 pounder - but weighed almost 145. Natural "I" cups. That poor thing had HORRIBLE back and neck problems.

I'm almost that big, and it can suck at times. But the positives more than compensate for the aches and pains.

whirlerz
03-05-2013, 12:32 AM
Bringing this gem back..:)

Incantatious
03-06-2013, 09:47 AM
http://www.damnlol.com/i/d5b60679c2c13226440583f7fe34bfa7.jpg

Eh.. Wow?

For someone who has been very quick off the mark to jump to the defense of hugely surgically altered boobs, this is so low, and kind of hypocritical when you consider that the bank that BBWs with huge boobs make with their similarly "alternative" body type (to the stereotypical "men fancy this singular, one-dimensional standard of attractiveness" angle), is nothing to sniff at...

You can't declare massive surgically altered boobs "safe" from crit by merit of how much they make, and then post a catty pic like this, saying such-and-such body type "doesn't count". Naturally big-tittied BBWs are very well-documented to make great money, just the same as women who have been surgically altered to have massive boobs.

Sophia_Starina
03-06-2013, 10:24 AM
I actually am ok with implants, but here's something I'd like to know....

what are the largest natural breasts on a women with a BMI under 25.

I'm not sure what BMI < 25 means visually so I'll assume you mean skinny... relatively slender women can have a condition called Gigantomastia which causes them to have very large breasts. Take Soleil Moon Frye for example...

Note: The images linked aren't showing up... just click on the square and they'll open.
32971

32972

And then there is Ellie Jaycock: http://www.findingoutabout.com/ellie-jaycock-17-says-34k-breasts-are-ruining-her-life-but-faces-a-four-year-wait-to-have-them-reduced/

simone87
03-07-2013, 02:21 PM
what about the smallest chested girls?? is that a fetish niche? hehe

Sophia_Starina
03-07-2013, 02:53 PM
what about the smallest chested girls?? is that a fetish niche? hehe

Yeah totally.

simone87
03-07-2013, 05:28 PM
so if you can pull off one extreme its usually more lucrative than looking run-of-the-mill hot?? now im conflicted about a boob job lol

whirlerz
03-07-2013, 05:54 PM
I gets compliments on my smallies all the time, so..:)

tempest666
03-08-2013, 12:37 AM
Mine make me money ::)

breezzzy
03-08-2013, 02:33 AM
ahhh....no thanks

kortneykay
03-11-2013, 06:10 PM
They do too count if you're fat. Big tits run in my family, I can lose as much weight as I want and I'll still be big chested. My mother had HHH and got a reduction and those fuckers came right back. Also, it's already genetically promised that once I have children they will get larger as well.

HaydenBlue
03-11-2013, 06:24 PM
So they gotta be *fake tits* in order to be *real tits* ? Hmmm. ::)::)::)

Nina_
03-14-2013, 09:20 AM
What's with taking the focus off the fact that, that woman has huge natural boobs and putting the focus on the "idea" that if you're overweight, your boobs "don't count" regardless of their natural size? Norma Stitz makes money, as does the woman with the enormous fake balloons. (And I understand that the Beshine woman makes tons of money. When your boobs are freakishly huge you're going to attract people's attention and money. But to be clear, in that first picture posted of her, her boobs look disgusting. They do not look attractive, and I'm sure the "average" man would agree - just like the "average" man would say that while Norma Stitz has huge knockers, she is overweight and not very attractive.) I've seen many great looking boob jobs, even when girls went to the extreme to make them huge. There is a way of having huge boobs that can be commonly found as attractive and there are ways of making yourself look like a freakshow. Beshine is the latter. I don't care who disagrees, those Beshine boobs look awful, and I thought it was a photoshopped pic when I first saw it until I saw more responses. But hey, it's working for her financially to an outstanding degree, so more power to her. The 'fat tits' issue bothers me as well... Norma Stitz has the biggest [natural] boobs in the world; if she lost 50 pounds, she'd STILL have huge boobs; if she weighed 110 pounds, she'd STILL have huge boobs. She's overweight, not extremely obese, so you don't get that huge of boobs just from being "fat."

Sophia_Starina
03-14-2013, 10:05 AM
She's overweight, not extremely obese, so you don't get that huge of boobs just from being "fat."



True.

Norma has gigantomastia (also known as macromastia or hypertrophy of the breasts).

Very skinny people can have this condition: for example---- http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fdJ9DKQU1UU/TQFczvfkWxI/AAAAAAAAGr0/PfgeNK0hrYc/s1600/tyrt.jpg


Weight plays a role.... but there is a huge bank of photos available that spans the spectrum of body-types demonstrating that this condition affects folks of all shapes/sizes. http://www.macromastia-gigantomastia.com/

Melonie
03-16-2013, 05:59 AM
You can't declare massive surgically altered boobs "safe" from crit by merit of how much they make, and then post a catty pic like this, saying such-and-such body type "doesn't count". Naturally big-tittied BBWs are very well-documented to make great money


^^^ for the record, I was not the first person in this thread to post a 'Big Boobs Don't Count if you're Fat' poster link. However, I did ( and still do ) agree with the underlying sentiment.

resurrecting my original comments ...

At any rate, your question about back problems etc. gives rise to a major 'gripe' shared by the vast majority of girls in the huge boobs business. That 'gripe' of course is that casual observers tend to lump together huge boob girls like the OP girl, who make little or no attempt to control their diets, to stay in shape, etc. ... with huge boob girls who make a major personal effort in those regards on top of paying for / going through lots of cosmetic surgeries. Where income potential is concerned, I can absolutely tell you that the huge boob fetish guys definitely prefer girls who make the effort to stay in shape at the same time that they are expanding their bustlines.


Yes, granted, that there is a niche customer base for BBW. There is also a niche customer base for morbidly obese women regardless of their bust size. There's even a niche customer base for tiny asian women with 'glued on' huge fake foam rubber boobs.

However, the 'sentiment' expressed by the poster pics is in fact the same sentiment that I have heard 1,000 times from big spending huge boob fetish customers. What they want to see, and what they are willing to spend outrageous amounts of money to see, are girls with attractive faces, trim bodies, good muscle tone, etc., who also happen to be sporting outrageously huge boobs. The girls who cater to those huge boob fetish customers, myself included, make major efforts to present an attractive image and maintain trim toned bodies. Thus, speaking for the huge boob fetish girls, people essentially making the statement that attractive faces, trim bodies, and muscle tone don't matter ... and that all that really matters is how big the boobs are despite 'butterface's or 200 extra pounds of fat ... comes across as an insult to the serious efforts we all make at working out, dieting, going 'under the knife' etc.


Here's my second most successful 'acquaintance' working the huge boob fetish niche these days ... courtesy of

and an obvious 'contributor' to her industry success ...

http://www.penelopeblackdiamond.com/pbd-pic-update/boobsstory/expander.jpg



however ...


But to be clear, in that first picture posted of her, her boobs look disgusting. They do not look attractive, and I'm sure the "average" man would agree - just like the "average" man would say that while Norma Stitz has huge knockers, she is overweight and not very attractive

to restate an earlier point posted in this thread, who cares what the 'average' man thinks. 'Average' guys do not go to strip clubs. 'Average' guys do not spend money on paid webcams.

tempest666
03-16-2013, 10:35 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE9yjmEWTNo

Here's a mixed bag.. it has fake, naturals, skinny fat you name it. But I think one of them is mislabeled.

Nina_
03-16-2013, 08:22 PM
However, the 'sentiment' expressed by the poster pics is in fact the same sentiment that I have heard 1,000 times from big spending huge boob fetish customers. What they want to see, and what they are willing to spend outrageous amounts of money to see, are girls with attractive faces, trim bodies, good muscle tone, etc., who also happen to be sporting outrageously huge boobs. The girls who cater to those huge boob fetish customers, myself included, make major efforts to present an attractive image and maintain trim toned bodies. Thus, speaking for the huge boob fetish girls, people essentially making the statement that attractive faces, trim bodies, and muscle tone don't matter ... and that all that really matters is how big the boobs are despite 'butterface's or 200 extra pounds of fat ... comes across as an insult to the serious efforts we all make at working out, dieting, going 'under the knife' etc.


Melonie, to be fair, if you're going to bring up the fact that girls who cater specifically to the clientele that likes toned, slim women with huge fake tits you should also acknowledge and appreciate the fact that there are also tons of paying customers whose "fetishes" are the contrary; they won't want women who've been surgically altered. Their fetish is those women who do have heavier bodies, big boobs, etc. They prefer "natural" women, even though those women who represent that particular fetish are overweight. They may find THESE women beautiful, not the ones who've went to measures such as "going under the knife" to cater to customers who do not share the same fetish as them. And Melonie, I completely understand that you've gone through great measures of hard work to maintain your appearance that caters to those men with that particular fetish, I respect that, and I'm glad that it has paid off for you. I just don't think that some of the things said about girls like Norma Stitz and other bigger body types is fair at all. The surgeries, exercise, and other effort needed to maintain the huge boob/toned body fantasy shouldn't depreciate the heavier set women who are making money without using those measures.

I'm also going to address that I think some things said in this thread have been taken out of proportion. When girls have mentioned that the "average man" wouldn't find Beshine's breasts attractive (which I personally think is a truism), they weren't neglecting the fact that she makes a shit ton of money. I was one of those girls who said the average man wouldn't find her boobs attractive. Here is what I said about the matter: " They do not look attractive, and I'm sure the "average" man would agree - just like the "average" man would say that while Norma Stitz has huge knockers, she is overweight and not very attractive." This quite obviously is not to say that these two women with such opposing body types do not make money, because it is evident that they do. In the same post, I even went on to say, "But hey, it's working for her [Beshine] financially to an outstanding degree, so more power to her."

Melonie
03-17-2013, 09:34 AM
I guess that we'll have to agree on a personal level, but continue to disagree on a professional level. After all, on a professional level, the position you are taking is a position that every strip club should be hiring dancers who are out of shape and overweight on the premise that an extremely small number of strip club customers will spend money on out of shape, overweight dancers. This does not and will not happen because the clubowners realize that market demand for girls having these attributes is tiny compared to market demand for girls who are toned, who stay in shape, who have attractive faces etc. The position you are taking attempts to create a professional 'instead of' to replace a professional 'in addition to'. Or put another way, the trim toned girls with attractive faces who then choose to have their breasts enlarged to huge proportions not only have to meet the basic criteria for being hired in a strip club, but also must meet the advanced criteria of a high breast size to body mass ratio. In contrast, the out of shape, overweight girls with huge breasts don't meet either criteria.

At a professional level there is no such thing as 'fair' ... there is supply and there is demand. This is why out of shape, overweight girls with huge boobs never had a career as a feature performer or much success in mainstream adult video / magazines ... because the clubowners / editors / producers had no choice but to acknowledge that such girls' failure to meet the basic criteria of being toned, in shape, and having an attractive face would potentially offend far more of their customer base than it would appeal to. In truth it has only been via the internet's 'new' ability to selectively target very small niche customers, without also risking offending larger numbers of customers, that has allowed out of shape, overweight girls with huge boobs to hook up with their very small number of niche customers.

Nina_
03-17-2013, 09:52 AM
It seems that my words have been taken out of context. When I say "to be fair" I am clearly NOT talking about strip clubs, I am talking about the outright making fun of women like Norma Stitz and others who have huge boobs and big bodies to go along with it; the "big boobs don't count if you're fat" thing is funny, yes, but to use it as leverage against bigger women who ARE making money, whose big boobs DO count, is unfair. Don't pretend that I am neglecting to understand that this industry doesn't care about fairness. That was not my train of thought and you know that. I understand supply and demand (I'm a business major btw) and that supply and demand argument was not a part of my post nor does it have much relevance because there IS a demand for women who are bigger - that is why many of them make good money camming! If you'd read my post more carefully you'd realize I actually said nothing about strip clubs, I was referring to the money they make camming (which could've been inferred by the fact that Norma and Beshine both cam). I particularly think it's OK that upscale clubs don't hire a lot of bigger women because there is such a low demand for them in strip clubs. I actually had a word with my agent, who agreed with me that my club had hired too many bigger/out of shape women. My customers were complaining about the quality of dancers going down because of these women that they hired. The out of shape [clean] dancers don't make much money. But is seems a lot of them can to much better camming because they see a market for that there. I really don't know how this turned into a "big women at strip clubs" issue because Norma does cam work, and it was my understanding that Beshine did as well... so why include opinions that are not relevant?

Melonie
03-17-2013, 10:02 AM
^^^ because this website and this particular forum is for strippers as well as camgirls. And I never disavowed the fact that Norma Stitz was able to make money camming despite her earlier, mostly unsuccessful efforts with featuring and with mainstream adult magazines / videos. I specificially pointed out how the internet's ability to allow a particular girl to hook up with a tiny paying customer base of webcam customers - despite the fact that she may offend a much larger segment of the overall webcam customer base - has indeed opened the door for this to be possible. Since you are a business major, you will understand that the tiny paying customer base who is not offended by, and who is willing to spend money on a Norma Stitz is a much smaller group than the customer base who is not offended by, and who is willing to spend money on a Beshine.

Again, this view comes at a professional level, and should not imply any personal negatives toward the Norma Stitz's of the world ( as was mistakenly inferred by previous posters ).

Nina_
03-17-2013, 10:32 AM
Ok, I don't think it is very accurate to say bigger women have a "tiny" customer base. Lol. And you ARE implying that while Norma Stitz offends a lot of people, Beshine generally offends no one, or a "tiny" amount of people, right? Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I gathered from this statement of yours. "you will understand that the tiny paying customer base who is not offended by, and who is willing to spend money on a Norma Stitz is a much smaller group than the customer base who is not offended by, and who is willing to spend money on a Beshine." Since she is overweight (and apparently offensive by her naturalness) and making money off her huge boobs, the "fat tits don't count" joke is not applicable to her. She is a fetish performer, just like all the other big bodied/big breasted women out there. Just because you do not appreciate it doesn't mean paying customers don't. That's axiomatic. I understand you may have a personal desire to defend Beshine, since she caters to the same fetish as you do/did, but I have neither fake boobs nor an overweight body and I am giving an objective viewpoint on this issue.

Melonie
03-17-2013, 10:51 AM
^^^ well, to say this as innocuously as possible, your assumptions about relative customer base size are simply wrong.

is arguably the internet's #1 huge boobs website Scoreland ( tied to #1 huge boobs magazine Score ). Beshine appears on Scoreland's home page ( as well as in Score magazine ), while Norma doesn't appear on the main website or in the main magazine at all. Norma can be found under a specialty fetish sub-website ( and specialty sub-magazine ) Voluptuous ... which is targeted to appeal to a small subsegment of huge boob fetish customers who don't mind the fact that the girls are overweight and out of shape. The reason that this sub-website ( and specialty sub-magazine ) exists in the first place is to allow Score to offer overweight, out of shape girls with huge breasts to the small subset of customers they appeal to, without offending / compromising sales of the main website ( main magazine ) to the much larger customer base who prefers the models to be toned and in shape !

While I don't have access to actual numbers, it would be extremely interesting to see how the total number of free viewers and paying customers compares for webcam categories <huge boobs> versus <BBW> on various webcam host sites. Having that info would eliminate the 'editor's choice' factor that is undoubtedly present at Score / Scoreland. But the fact that Score / Scoreland created a sub-website and sub-magazine to separate the main body of trim and toned models with huge boobs from the small number of overweight models is undoubtedly based on market / sales research, customer complaints etc. In fact I was told as much by Score's editor when I last did a photo / video shoot for them !!!

And yet again, none of this is being put out there with any sort of personal sentiment. However, there are SW readers who may be considering investing time and money toward pursuing the huge boob market niche or the BBW market niche. Those girls need to know that the two markets are definitely NOT of equal size, nor are they of equal earnings potential ... and attempting to equate the two provides dis-information to said SW readers.

But, this is not to say that a particular BBW model can't earn very good money.

Nina_
03-17-2013, 11:06 AM
What I said was not a mere assumption. What I said was factual. Did I say that the customer base for overweight women is the same in numbers as the base for skinny women (regardless of boob size, fakeness, etc)? That was actually a rhetorical question, but to further attempt NOT to have my words taken out of proportion, the answer is no, I never said anything of the sort. In fact, if you'd like to continue to imply that I said such things, then please point out and quote where I uttered or even implied those words. I'd really appreciate if my posts were to cease being taken out of context. To be quite honest, I'm not going to click the link you provided because it's not going to interest me, nor is it going to disproved anything that I've said. Any "assumption" I have made was based on a reasonable observation of facts, and that is simply undeniable. Now, I'm not a regurgitation machine so I don't want to keep repeating myself so hopefully this will be the last time I have to say this and hopefully when I do say it, it won't be again taken out of context for the purpose of keeping this disagreement going: to say that big boobs don't count if you're overweight, yet if you're skinny and have gigantic fake boobs they do count, is factually incorrect. This is because there are big women with big boobs who are documented to make good money (thus, their boobs do "count.") They make money. This is an unarguable truth. I never compared the numbers of how much overweight women make compared to in-shape women of any boob size, ethnicity, or what have you. I stated a fact. That's all there is to it. There are a plethora of sites in which big women can and do cam and yes, they make money doing it. If you're just going to randomize your argument by bringing up things I've never debated, we might as well call it a day because repeating myself is getting quite boring.

Melonie
03-17-2013, 11:12 AM
^^^ so your 'reasonable observation of facts' is simply undeniable ( based on your wealth of personal experience in the industry ? ), while the actual multi-million dollar business decisions made by the #1 huge boobs website and magazine publisher which contradict your 'reasonable observation of facts' ( based on ~20 years worth of actual market / sales data ) can be discounted ... I get it now !

Nina_
03-17-2013, 11:19 AM
Actually no, I still don't think you get what I'm saying, because what makes you think I have experience in the industry? I've never cammed and I've been dancing for less than two years... unless your statement was sarcasm based on more words of mine you've taken out of context; I've never claimed to have superior amounts of experience in the industry, but it really doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that bigger women do make money camming. (Also, I said there is a plethora of sites where bigger cam girls make money. This means, to keep it simple, that there is a plentiful amount, which means that there are an abundance of other websites where bigger cam girls make money).

FasaCorp
03-17-2013, 11:29 AM
What Nina is saying is (if I understand correctly): since there is a market for big women who have big boobs, just as there is a market for toned women who also have big boobs, then they both "count". If they didn't, then there would not even be a sub-niche (or whatever its called) for big boobed, big women.

Nina_
03-17-2013, 11:39 AM
What Nina is saying is (if I understand correctly): since there is a market for big women who have big boobs, just as there is a market for toned women who also have big boobs, then they both "count". If they didn't, then there would not even be a sub-niche (or whatever its called) for big boobed, big women.

Yes, that pretty much summarizes it. I'm glad you understand :)

Incantatious
03-17-2013, 12:45 PM
A thousand times this ~


What Nina is saying is (if I understand correctly): since there is a market for big women who have big boobs, just as there is a market for toned women who also have big boobs, then they both "count". If they didn't, then there would not even be a sub-niche (or whatever its called) for big boobed, big women.

I reiterate my sentiment that the posting of that image was catty in light of the discussion that has since taken place as it has further degenerated into basically this: "On average, my body type earns more than that body type. Therefore my body type counts. That body type doesn't generate the cash my body type does - therefore it doesn't count". SMH. To say it doesn't is not only ignorant to the earnings those women do generate, but it's also rather body-shaming.

At this rate you may as well just say "My body type is top for profits in this industry. Your body type doesn't make as much as mine? Pah! - Doesn't count".

simone87
03-17-2013, 03:40 PM
that's what i love about the industry ( camming espcially..in a lot of strip clubs you gotta look like an average boring barbie lol) , there's a lid for every pot!! every body type counts, the weirder the better sometimes!

Nina_
03-17-2013, 03:44 PM
Yeah I've noticed that about camming as well. I know big girls who cam and make decent money (much better than they'd make at the club). There's a lot of variety online!

kortneykay
03-17-2013, 03:58 PM
Sings...Okay it must be your TITS 'cause it ain't your face.

Okay, in all seriousness I happen to be a BBW who does great on cam, I've also been asked to model for magazines but I declined including The SCORE Group. I was 22 and working in FL at the time. I also see PLENTY of BBW or (smaller) BBW on SCORE. Also, Samantha 38G has also been a previous SCORE model and she considers herself to be a BBW with amazing success. Yeah, I might not be featured or even be able to work a non bbw stripclub but it doesn't mean I can't make astronomical amounts of money like a thin women with big tits.

Not that you care Melonie, because I think you're extremely smart with a lot of info but I find it insulting that in this thread you seem to parade yourself around like you're above someone (BBW) with natural tits.

kortneykay
03-17-2013, 05:56 PM
The phrase "they don't count if you're fat" is a comeback I see most often used because a lot of girls with very large breasts who are overweight... like to brag about or imply that their large breasts are superior to someone very thin's DD's because they're bigger... despite the fact that at a healthy weight, that woman herself might only be a DD.

No one's saying your giant boobs that resulted from being overweight don't count as big, money making boobs... they're just saying that they're the result of being overweight vs being that size naturally.

Unless it's a fact, what's the point? There are those who are naturally busty at a size 2 or a size 22. Genetics is genetics unless you alter them otherwise no thin girls with naturally large breasts would exist lol. If they got fat, their busts may or may not grow it depends on where you gain.

Nina_
03-17-2013, 06:56 PM
Desuvsdeath, I understand what you're saying. But when comparing a woman whom you have never met (Norma) who has the largest natural boobs in the world to a more slim woman with surgically gigantic natural boobs whom you have also never met (Beshine) and criticizing/degrading the one with the natural tits for no reason other than that she is overweight, it sets a different tone. Especially since overweight people are sometimes already genetically predispositioned to having huge boobs regardless of whether they're fat/skinny, just like KortneyKay AND the original subject of this post, Norma, have illustrated.

Incantatious
03-17-2013, 07:31 PM
For example. My cousin was an a cup... Gained a ton of weight and now brags that her breasts are a cup size bigger than her size zero sisters and talks about her "natural big boobs". It's my opinion that "they don't count if you're fat" is an excellent note to track on there and i would use it.
There's a difference between being naturally busty and ONLY having large breasts because you're overweight.

Whilst it is deplorable that she would shame her sister for having smaller breasts, what's to say her own tits didn't actually just grow...?

That happens between sisters pretty often. Some women are still developing even in their early - mid twenties! Also other factors can play into breast size, later in life, such as going on the pill or dietary factors (not "dietary" as in: simply eating a shit-ton), but nutritional and hormonal...

I would also argue that shaming someone's body, as a good come-back for someone shaming your body, is not a good come-back. - It's cheap, nasty and easy.

Gorgeous natural tits are gorgeous natural tits. Just like a bitch who belittles her sister for having smaller tits, it's a bitch who belittles her sister...



If they got fat, their busts may or may not grow it depends on where you gain.

Ha! - YES!

You can entirely still be overweight with small breasts. There are many overweight women with small boobs!

And let me tell you, speaking as a slender, C-cupped female whose primary sexual fetish is huuuuuuuge naturals, if my boobs could naturally get as big as yours via weight gain I'd be freaking eating relentlessly right now! LMAO! XD

I'm thinking that weight gain is not a massive factor in how big or small a woman's boobs can get in terms of actual cup (band aside here) size here.
A few cup sizes? Maybe? But the blessing of full-on huge great, voluptuous knock-outs (like yours, or the girl in the "Big Boobs Don't Count If You're Fat" picture) by just adding weight? I don't think so somehow...

I feel it necessary to add, that I have endless love for the girl in the "don't count" picture, being as we are on the subject.

I mean.. take that shitty text aside, and just look at them...

Look. At. Them.

http://s7.postimage.org/uib3peqwb/omgyum.jpg

...I don't know about anyone else, but that is a seriously glorious rack. I mean fuuuu-... what about those doesn't count? O_O

There are women who pay huge, huge sums of money with the aim of getting boobs like hers, when just no amount of money can buy those. There are also men who pay huge, huge sums of money, to look at boobs just like those. *Specifically*. And I know for sure that for all the guys with cash who share my fetish for huge naturals, those boobs are absolutely irreplaceable. Fake boobs of the same size cannot, and will not compare. Those babies count. Fake boobies count. Small boobies count.. Can't we all just accept that, please? Lol. I rest my case. <3

Melonie
03-20-2013, 12:34 PM
I find it insulting that in this thread you seem to parade yourself around like you're above someone (BBW) with natural tits.

Well, my first comment in the resurrected thread was to express my own feelings of comparative insult ( which are shared by many of the tight body huge implant girls in the industry, btw ) that our efforts at working out, staying in shape, investing tens of thousands of dollars in plastic surgeries etc. essentially count for nothing ... and that we could have somehow achieved equal industry success and equal customer appeal if we simply stopped working out and ate twinkies until we gained 150 pounds !!!

No personal insults were ever intended. However, not a single comment was made in support of my feeling insulted.

tempest666
03-20-2013, 02:43 PM
I still like your boobs Melonie :)

swunninglinguist
03-21-2013, 11:41 AM
^ I'm sorry but that pic melonie posted is not attractive. It looks like a deformity. That can not be good for your health, they look like they're going to explode for christ sakes.....now here comes melonie to say how the bigger the better, makes more money, blah, blah. The average man is NOT into that!

THIS! Doc who did that to her should have his license yanked. But Melonie is still the shit.

Melonie
03-21-2013, 12:38 PM
The doc that did that to her is also allowing her to retire a multi-millionaire before age 40. Granted that there is a 'heavy burden to bear' in the meantime ...


http://shopbeshine.com/media/images/smartseller-info/Beshine-Huge-Tits-And-Lips.jpg

charlotte.
03-21-2013, 12:50 PM
Well, my first comment in the resurrected thread was to express my own feelings of comparative insult ( which are shared by many of the tight body huge implant girls in the industry, btw ) that our efforts at working out, staying in shape, investing tens of thousands of dollars in plastic surgeries etc. essentially count for nothing ... and that we could have somehow achieved equal industry success and equal customer appeal if we simply stopped working out and ate twinkies until we gained 150 pounds !!!

No personal insults were ever intended. However, not a single comment was made in support of my feeling insulted.

aww im sorry your feelings were hurt, im definitely on the side of people who admire others who put a lot of work into their bodies. I put a lot of time and money into my looks and as a result, I tend to admire those who obviously do as well, even if they aren't "my type" per se.

Sophia_Starina
03-22-2013, 02:03 PM
Variety is the spice of life.... and beauty is in the eye of the beholder. :)

kortneykay
03-22-2013, 02:40 PM
Well, my first comment in the resurrected thread was to express my own feelings of comparative insult ( which are shared by many of the tight body huge implant girls in the industry, btw ) that our efforts at working out, staying in shape, investing tens of thousands of dollars in plastic surgeries etc. essentially count for nothing ... and that we could have somehow achieved equal industry success and equal customer appeal if we simply stopped working out and ate twinkies until we gained 150 pounds !!!

No personal insults were ever intended. However, not a single comment was made in support of my feeling insulted.

I never got the impression that you felt insulted. If you were, I apologize. I just saw your offensive post towards larger women. However, I see plenty of other posters agreeing with you as well joining in on the fun. Trust me, your tens of thousands of dollars in plastic surgeries haven't gone unnoticed as your success shows that. I may also add that there are larger women who have achieved equal industry success and they probably would've had more success if it weren't for beauty brainwashing. It really boils down to preference but back then, there weren't many choices, you bought what was available. Because strip joints didn't allow BBW, there was no chance in hell.

What I'm understanding is that you admit that if it weren't for your surgeries and "keeping a tight body" that you wouldn't have been as successful. My question is, how would you have known? If the tables were turned and being larger in this country was the norm, if you would've gladly stuffed those twinkies in your faces just like all of us fat asses do everyday. Probably. Cultures all over the world prove that peer and societal pressures really make the rules up when it comes to what's "attractive". I also don't buy the success (unfair advantage) bull because the standard of beauty for a long time has been controlled and contorted. If there never was a beauty standard, how many men would actually choose a thin women with big boobs? Taking into the fact that males are more drawn to full hips and large busts(child bearing hips and fuller figures meant health), I highly doubt they would've chosen a thin woman.

I understand that my last statement meant that the majority (brainwashed as they are) of men prefer "tight bodied" women with huge tits but just because it's preferred doesn't mean it's a fact. I think skinny women with huge fake boobs look ridiculous just like you guys think that fat girls with fat tits don't count. To me, a fat girl with fat tits looks more realistic than a skinny girl with fat tits (unless they have the same condition as Norma, or were genetically lucky) because she is proportioned for her body type, big usually means big everywhere. But that's okay because in your career, you took that image (the wow factor/disproportions) and you banked on it. Alas, it doesn't really matter what I think though because after all, I'm not the customer and I didn't put food on your table. I just find it comical that my tits don't count because I'm large but fake tits on a skinny girl does. For what reason? Ohhh because society is brainwashed into believing that thin women are the cream of the crop. I say let's turn back the clock, give ALL larger women a fair advantage, the same opportunities as a thin woman in this industry and see who they choose.

Nina_
03-22-2013, 03:06 PM
Well, my first comment in the resurrected thread was to express my own feelings of comparative insult ( which are shared by many of the tight body huge implant girls in the industry, btw ) that our efforts at working out, staying in shape, investing tens of thousands of dollars in plastic surgeries etc. essentially count for nothing ... and that we could have somehow achieved equal industry success and equal customer appeal if we simply stopped working out and ate twinkies until we gained 150 pounds !!!

No personal insults were ever intended. However, not a single comment was made in support of my feeling insulted.

Melonie, I addressed that not only am I glad that the efforts you made to maintain your appearance for that fetish has paid off, but that I also respect you for it... I wasn't insulting the tight body/giant boob appearance (although I don't think Beshine's look good and in some of her pics it looks like she's gone overboard with the lip and possibly eyebrow injections... but that is neither here nor there). I just thought the fat tits don't count thing was discredited BBW who still make great money. It was nothing against the fetish you cater to at all, I am quite aware of the money that can be in that particular fetish.

tempest666
03-23-2013, 09:29 AM
Btw Melonie I totally creeped on your Myspace pics OMFG!!!!! I am so jealous of your boobs!!!!