View Full Version : Hooters or Nah?
Omegaphallic
03-20-2016, 11:39 AM
Yeah seriously stop. You are being super annoying. I feel like you are shoving anti-feminism down my throat just as much as the feminists do on other parts of the web. You have brought up gender bullcrap in a hooters thread. I get it, you really like watching Milo and Sargon. I do too, it's just time and place baby.
I don't watch milo, mostly I listen to the honeybadgers, the Amazing Athethist (except when he's ranting about religion), Girlwriteswhat, Sugar-Tits (love the aussie accent), Laura Babcock (not an MRA, but seems to like men, and has great big tits, almost as nice as Amazing Athethist’s :p), Shoeonhead, some chicks that do ASMR, Thunderfoot, mostly, the occasional rant by Ed the Sock.
Omegaphallic
03-20-2016, 11:48 AM
I also like the The Young Turks and Real Time clips.
Genoveve
03-20-2016, 11:53 AM
I think he has Gender Issues Debate Tourette's, it's like he can't help himself. It just keeps coming out of his mouth no matter what is actually even being discussed, he even said he would stop but it keeps flying out.
audritwo
03-20-2016, 12:43 PM
Okay I figured you were on the youtube anti-feminist bandwagon. Ya'll turn into a bunch of self-righteous cunts.
Oh btdubs. Shoe, Amazing Atheist, and Thunderfoot aren't MRA's too.
Also want to add that politics are not allowed to be discussed on this forum. Identity/gender politics falls under that. So you are wrong, you can't debate this shit here. Go to a fucking subreddit and circle jerk about that there.
miss.a.p1600
03-20-2016, 01:11 PM
You say the same thing about penises, why do penises always have to sexual? I say free the penis!
No penises don't always have to be sexual. But only if they are limp and not hard. Or they're not acting sexual with the male penis.
And the Hooters girls are not acting sexual on their job and their vaginas are covered by at least 3 layers of fabric.
luvnrockets
03-20-2016, 03:43 PM
There won't be any freeing of any penis, nor should there be unless we completely restructure our entire society's views on sexuality. People have been covering up their genitalia for a very very long time.
Also, we have laws against such things in food establishments. I don't really care to eat my dinner on a chair that had some stranger's smegma or vaginal fluids on it. I go to an indoor/outdoor sex retreat every year, and the dress code is "wear as much or as little as you want, but you MUST cover your genitals in the dining room, because it's the law."
EDIT: I've reached Featured Member status with this post (I think)! *happy dance*
Omegaphallic
03-20-2016, 06:32 PM
No penises don't always have to be sexual. But only if they are limp and not hard. Or they're not acting sexual with the male penis.
And the Hooters girls are not acting sexual on their job and their vaginas are covered by at least 3 layers of fabric.
You'd be surpised at how unsexual a hard penis can be. Its a myth that an erection is always a sign of being turned on. I used to get boners for no reason at all, I wasn't turned on, I wasn't thinking sexual thoughts, and often at the most humiliating times too. Hated, but I developed this techique to getting rid of unwanted boners, I just picture my boner trapped between two roller pins and I would roll them towards my body, pushing the blood back in till my penis was flat (this was all in my imagination) and it would make me flaccid. Its one of the first times I realized how powerful visualization can be.
Btw the Free the Penis was might to be joke, a tongue in cheek mockery of the free the nipple
movement, which while I support on a free speech level, I find the philosphy of desexualizing the nipple to be obsurd and insulting to men. I no one can decide for other people what turns them on, and showing me you nipples isn't going to change that I love big tits. And small tits. Medium tits too. But big tits best of all.
DonaDiabla
03-20-2016, 07:01 PM
Seriously, dude, I mean you were talking about your man boobs and now you are talking about your boner. What is wrong with you? Are you trying to get banned, get off or you just want to just disgusted us with your attitude. Because that part is working :) I think that the human body is beautiful but the way you are talking about it is just gross. This is not tumblr or reddit.You know what is absurd...talking about your body parts on here for no reason. You have no purpose to derailed the OP's thread with your nonsense and foul body comments. No other guy on this forum is doing that but you. Even the trolls would not bring up their man boobs and women wanting to play with it. Then you have the nerve to talk about erections are signs of not being turned on. I am sure that anyone who had Biology in the 11th grade knows this.
You'd be surpised at how unsexual a hard penis can be. Its a myth that an erection is always a sign of being turned on. I used to get boners for no reason at all, I wasn't turned on, I wasn't thinking sexual thoughts, and often at the most humiliating times too. Hated, but I developed this techique to getting rid of unwanted boners, I just picture my boner trapped between two roller pins and I would roll them towards my body, pushing the blood back in till my penis was flat (this was all in my imagination) and it would make me flaccid. Its one of the first times I realized how powerful visualization can be.
Btw the Free the Penis was might to be joke, a tongue in cheek mockery of the free the nipple
movement, which while I support on a free speech level, I find the philosphy of desexualizing the nipple to be obsurd and insulting to men. I no one can decide for other people what turns them on, and showing me you nipples isn't going to change that I love big tits. And small tits. Medium tits too. But big tits best of all.
Djoser
03-21-2016, 02:24 AM
Well we do wake up with raging hardons for no apparent reason sometimes. However...
Really, Omegaphallic you MUST back off this shit, going on & on about man boobs and imagining your penis in rollers, etc. This isn't your playground, it's a stripper support website.
If I keep seeing these reports about you, I will have no choice but to ban your ass. Maybe this seems harsh but I am trying really hard to be nice. But over and over again the reports. My patience is limited
22lligm
03-27-2016, 05:01 AM
Interesting however does a woman's cleavage and body form have to always be sexual though?
The women in hooters are not doing anything sexual. They are however working (serving food and drinks) while dressed in form fitting clothes/short shorts/cleavage baring tops.
Women dress similar tightly fitted skimpy clothes at many womens althletic events (short tight volleyball shorts, barely there cheerleader skirts, tight buttcheek baring ballet/gymnast leotard, track runners wearing nothing but short shorts and sports bras, etc) and even women in bikinis at beaches and pools.
I could see why people wouldn't want to take their kids but then I just can't see how it would ruin a kids innocence especially if they've seen women in bikinis, leotards, sports bras, etc.
I mean cleavage and the woman's body by itself aren't always sexual but those tiny tight outfits and the whole Hooters marketing definitely makes it sexual in my opinion. I mean it's called HOOTERS! Lol might as well take your kids to a restaurant called TITS where you can be served wings by girls in teeny little outfits. I think it's inappropriate but not out of this world inappropriate.
I think it's different than any athletic event. They aren't all about the women looking sexy and advertising themselves with sexy calendars. So yeah in my opinion thats what makes Hooters sexual even though the waitresses are just serving food. I don't think it's outrageous people take their kids there but I would choose something like a Chuck e Cheese over Hooters if I had kids lol.
miss.a.p1600
03-27-2016, 08:02 AM
Lol! TITs here we come!
I know the word hooters may have an innuendo or a pg 13 connotation but that's the meaning the adults attach to it to mean breasts or cleavage. Ask any kid what hooters mean and elementary kids or even tweens would have no clue. And isn't there a real type of bird called hooter? If they asked I'd just tell them hooters is a type of bird but also a slang term for breasts and not to use the word at school.
The word Tits is more explicit to me. Most people I know don't even call breast hooters they say tits or breast or boobs etc. I use clinical terms with the kids so all these nicknames and pet names don't register yet. But at the same time the nickname/pet name does kind of take the explicitness out of the word.
I took the kid there at about age 5 and trust the kid not once asked what hooters meant. I don't think the kid even remembers the trip there.
And I do think their clothes are skimpy but I don't think they're doing anything remotely sexual. Civilian women dress uber skimpy in places like LA and Miami in summer. And kids can see women dressed even skimpier if they've ever been to community pools/beaches.
Yes they have calendars that could be seen as sexy but so do the firefighters (which I'm sure their shirts are off) and the police officers and football players (their shirts are off). Cheerleaders also have calendars, with their stomachs showing and those skimpy ass skirts and posing in splits and whatnot. How are these examples not sexual but hooters is?
I'm just saying if you look carefully in other places (pools/beaches/sporting events/Victoria's secret/magazine and tv ads) you and the kids will see more skin, more sexuality, more women dressed scantily clad. You may not want to take your kids to hooters but I guarantee they will see women in form fitting clothes elsewhere.
22lligm
03-27-2016, 05:47 PM
Lol yeah TITS isn't really the same I just thought it was funny. And I don't really think its just that skin is showing but I still just think the whole marketing thing and the name of the place referring to boobs makes it all slightly inappropriate and not kid friendly. Not that taking your kids there destroys their innocence and childhood lol. Even tho kids don't get it I still think its not the best place for them. It reminds me of like a kid watching a show and hearing a dirty joke and not getting what it means. It's not the end of the world since they don't get it but its still not super appropriate for them to hear. Just my opinion :)
ScarletKitten
03-27-2016, 08:59 PM
I understand both sides. There are way worse things a child can be exposed to. So, in the grand scheme of things, it really isn't THAT big of a deal to take them to Hooters. Miss.a.p., I don't think you're wrong or weird to go there with your kid. However, if we're talking about a perverted parent with perverted intentions, yeah....that's a different story. Like, the dude I mentioned earlier in the thread would flirt with all the waitresses and say inappropriate things to them in front of his kid. So....that's a horse of a different colour, so to speak.
SweetJulia
03-28-2016, 07:43 PM
Hell to the no.
msjoiparker
03-29-2016, 03:55 PM
I've eaten there before...with my family. Lol. I don't see it as that big of a deal. My father said that Hooters used to be topless in a case like that the answer would be an obvious no
Genoveve
03-29-2016, 05:15 PM
I wouldn't bring kids there just because it's a place that's deliberately and obviously set up for men to perve on chicks so I think it would be a weird choice for kid dining. It's not about the skimpy clothes of the waitresses, I mean I would take my kids to the beach where there would be way more exposed skin so I feel like who cares. Reminds me; once when I was younger, maybe around 12, I was eating with my mom in a restaurant in New Orleans and there were some guys that I guess were partying with some chicks there, at one point one of the chicks totally pulled her tits completely out of her shirt and flashed everyone at the table and therefor the restaurant, in front of me. I don't know if the chick had seen me but the guys were horrified because a minor was present and saw and my mom just turned and looked at them and said in regards to me "It's nothing she hasn't seen before." And we just kept eating lol.