Log in

View Full Version : Kim K robbed @ gunpoint



Pages : 1 [2]

baer45
10-06-2016, 11:58 AM
Kim Kardashian isn't that likeable in my eyes. Kim Kardashian woud not give a rats ass about what happens in my life. And vice versa. It's okay to ask a few questions and get a few different answers if we want to gossip a little. I won't get personal or heated. And that's my attitude.

I remember everytime I had a conversation with my dad about whatif I win a lottery. His advice was always: say nothing, tell no one. Load all your guns and get the hell out of the town asap.
I don't deserve anything horrible if I have the lottery money but it's my fault to act stupid if that happens.

Genoveve
10-06-2016, 12:06 PM
I'm thinking of people who just spend for the sake of it... I mean purely to show that they can blow thousands on shit they admit they don't want or need. I've seen that and it is stupid and empty and wasteful and vapid to me, especially if it fails to make that person happier.

Even if someone is buying stuff just for the sake of buying it, why does that make so many people so angry? If someone is actually feeling empty inside and blowing money to try and fill the void(which this is a thread about Kim K and unless her psychologist is here I don't think anyone can verify that this is her thought process), why does that make people feel angry and judgmental and not feel sympathetic or something instead? Like I said it's this attitude of anger and scorn towards rich people buying things that are within their price range that is what puzzles me. I have a piece of quartz in my crystal collection that cost me around $700, that probably seems like a huge waste to some people because they wish they could afford to blow hundreds on a rock but can't. I've also shown said crystal off on social media so I guess I must be a wasteful show-off too but fuck it; I love crystals, I loved that one, I could afford it, so I bought it. Why is that wrong and wasteful? I'm sure the people that make a living mining crystals don't think my purchase was wasteful, I'm sure the people who make a living carving and polishing crystals don't think my purchase was wasteful, I'm sure the people who make a living selling crystals don't think my purchase was wasteful. Why is it different with rich people and diamonds?


I just think people will always resent anyone who becomes known through anything to do with sex, because society is hypocritical like that.

I agree and I find it baffling when I hear strippers attack Kim K for profiting solely off of being a sex symbol.

Kim K to me is like a modern day Marilyn Monroe, and nobody probably is going to like that comparison since Marilyn is such a beloved figure these days, but in her time she wasn't. Marilyn was a huge star but was mostly famous for being a controversial sex symbol, she was always being attacked by the media and the public for being dumb and for being unable to act and one of her biggest struggles was that she could never get anyone to take her seriously because of this. Also while her sexiness is considered very innocent and glamorous these days, back then it wasn't and she was seen as vulgar.

Genoveve
10-06-2016, 12:14 PM
I completely agree with Charlemagne on this(at 6:06):


https://youtu.be/75r--m81myU?t=6m6s

whirlerz
10-06-2016, 12:36 PM
Anyway, this talks about the possible suspects, I thought they were joking when they said Pink Panther

https://mic.com/articles/156031/who-are-the-pink-panthers-what-to-know-about-the-kim-kardashian-west-robbery-suspects?utm_source=policymicTBLR&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=social#.2aVxe558b

whirlerz
10-06-2016, 08:14 PM
Keeping Up is on hold http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/06/entertainment/keeping-up-with-the-kardashians-robbery/index.html

arielbriel
10-07-2016, 01:49 AM
Originally Posted by fbsmgirl View Post
"This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. And it's fucking offensive.

I'm not even a fucking stripper and i admire the fuck out of women who are able to dance on stage wearing six inch heels in front of complete strangers.
That's like saying Beyonce makes money doing nothing. That woman is being paid to PERFORM just like these women are being paid to PERFORM. It takes a lot of emotional and physical strength to make a living doing this year after year. How dare you? Why is it only considered work when Beyonce does it? Sex work is REAL work. Period.



My mother always said you can tell a lot about a person by what inspires them.

If Kim K or Donald Trump inspires you to be a better version of yourself, I urge you to travel the world and if you can't, read better books.

There are LOTs of shitty, wealthy folks, my dear.



Nope, not jealousy. This is the american way of thinking - that everyone wants to be rich and famous. It's extremely narrow-minded.
I'm sure that there are people that are jealous of celebrities but those people have deeper issues within themselves. Being jealous of Beyonce and Kim Kardashian for me is like being jealous of someone on a different planet. There are levels to this shit - and I respect that.

The fact of the matter is Kim Kardashian is annoying. Her family is annoying and her husband is annoying. With or without money, they're just annoying individuals. The reason why people are accusing her of pulling a publicity stunt is because she's done similar things in that past. I bet you money if this were Miley Cyrus or Justin Beiber, while they are both annoying, there would be more compassionate response. The notion that the negative response is due to "jealousy" just says that you are looking at things through a superficial lens.


Bingo.

There are children being blown up in Syria as we speak. They have no money and no home to go back to. And we're talking about Kim Kardashian losing a 10 million dollar ring.

Hurricane Matthews is killing people by the hundreds as we speak but no let's talk about Kim Kardashian losing her 10 million dollar ring.

Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump are the best candidates America can come up with but stop the madness Kim Kardashian lost her 10 million dollar ring.

It must be nice to live in a bubble."


Well, I have been working as a stripper for 6 years so I think I know what its like to perform on stage lol, and I know how people view my/our work. That's my whole point..normal people don't think what we do requires talent nor should we be earning 6 figures a year but guess what, we do and I'm happy we do. KimK is no different except she turned her sex tape scandal into a multimillion dollar business for not only herself, but her entire family! She is a GENIUS!! I also don't think the Kardashians are annoying and yes I do find them inspiring, sue me. The ring was 4 million, however they took other jewelry bringing the amount to 10mil. I know there are other things going on in the world, but this is interesting right now as well!

Vyanka
10-07-2016, 11:52 AM
A lot of ppl just wonder what is it about the reality show that makes it so entertaining to watch. What is the inflated hype about? I've caught a couple of the episodes and I find her really boring. What is it about her personality that some ppl like?

It's just constant selfies and a ton of over the top whining.

Genoveve
10-07-2016, 01:34 PM
A lot of ppl just wonder what is it about the reality show that makes it so entertaining to watch. What is the inflated hype about? I've caught a couple of the episodes and I find her really boring. What is it about her personality that some ppl like?

It's just constant selfies and a ton of over the top whining.

That seems to be something a lot of people get riled up about, that they find the show boring and can't understand the popularity. Which I understand but again I don't get why that infuriates people. Like there's a lot of shit that people love that I find boring as hell and don't get, but I don't get irate about it. I just accept that different people like different things.

And in regards to people being upset at how popular the show is because it's so vapid, people get really worked up about that and blame the Kardashians for the downfall of society but the thing is---they are only so popular because of our society. Society being the way is what made them so big. People often blame the media for what it does to society, but I feel like society shapes the media way more than the media shapes society. I feel like the media gives people what they want. Just my theory anyway.

JessaJade
10-07-2016, 02:12 PM
And in regards to people being upset at how popular the show is because it's so vapid, people get really worked up about that and blame the Kardashians for the downfall of society but the thing is---they are only so popular because of our society. Society being the way is what made them so big. People often blame the media for what it does to society, but I feel like society shapes the media way more than the media shapes society. I feel like the media gives people what they want. Just my theory anyway.

That's a really interesting point. I'm now trying to figure out whether I think it's chicken or egg.

Genoveve
10-07-2016, 03:11 PM
I have a theory about why the show may be so popular, aside from the fact that it is vapid entertainment and humans have a long history of enjoying vapid entertainment. I normally do not like the 'fake reality tv' genre(I think it's pretty obvious that tons of the scenes and story lines in KUWTK are completely contrived just like with all those kinds of shows) but I watch KUWTK, the main reason I watch it is to look at Kim. I have loved her look and her style ever since she first came on the scene and so I watch the show to see more of it and I think that is probably why most people watch, for the glamorous aspect. On the show they usually have their hair and makeup done even for just filming around the house and I know it sounds weird but I think people like that, because it's not realistic. It reminds me of the golden age of Hollywood where no matter what kind of role an actress was playing, even if their character was supposed to be poor, they looked extremely glamorous and were wearing designer clothes with full hair and makeup. It was larger-than-life and unrealistic and the Kardashians channel that to me.

baer45
10-07-2016, 04:52 PM
I don't often watch reality television shows...except cake boss.

SnuffleUffleGrass
10-09-2016, 09:12 AM
I personally feel Kim met a personal goal & staged the robbery as an easy way to retire from public life. I see her in 30 years being a female version of Donald Sterling...
Still scamming for money & living in La La Land.

We had a rabbit like you
10-09-2016, 09:24 AM
I feel that way about football..I think it's stupid and I have no idea why overgrown buffoons in tight pants grappling w each other is such a huge deal in this culture and why they make so much money, but whatevs! Doesn't make me angry (except when they get away w rape, murder and child abuse). Kim k has never hurt anyone that I know of. I'm not a huge fan but I don't think she deserved to be held at gunpoint or have her belongings taken from her. Nobody deserves to be a victim of robbery, rape, murder, or abuse. Idc if you walk down the street nekkid w hundred dollar bills sticking out from under your tits.

Genoveve
10-09-2016, 12:18 PM
I personally feel Kim met a personal goal & staged the robbery

This theory being so widely adopted kind of cracks me up, Kim went from being as dumb as a pile of sticks to now being a successful, highly intelligent criminal mastermind.

whirlerz
10-10-2016, 08:24 AM
Not only that, but major fraud..she would be in huge trouble. I'm sure the insurance co is going to thoroughly investigate

SnuffleUffleGrass
10-10-2016, 08:31 AM
This theory being so widely adopted kind of cracks me up, Kim went from being as dumb as a pile of sticks to now being a successful, highly intelligent criminal mastermind.

She just has to have smart lawyers....her papa was one.

Also Kanye might have cooked up the scheme. He is nuts.

baer45
10-10-2016, 08:55 AM
She just has to have smart lawyers....her papa was one.

Also Kanye might have cooked up the scheme. He is nuts.

I don't personally think Kardashian clans cooked up this robbery. It's too much at stack here. But I do believe she might have exaggerated the fact or perhaps reported more missing items, or still trying to find a way to profit from this loss.

Genoveve
10-10-2016, 09:52 AM
Not only that, but major fraud..she would be in huge trouble. I'm sure the insurance co is going to thoroughly investigate

Exactly, $10+ mil insurance fraud is no joke let alone filing false police reports, especially when as my friend pointed out an inside job is going to be the first thing an investigation looks for.

I remember back when Kim divorced Kris Humphries everyone was screaming about how she only did it for publicity and I didn't think that made sense and I never even used to watch the show or anything back then. Now that I do and I've seen all those episodes I really really don't think it was a publicity stunt. When she first started dating Kanye everyone was like 'It's just for publicity, they'll be done soon,' and I never thought they were a fake couple. Then when they got engaged everyone said that they would never make it to the altar because the engagement was just for publicity, then once they got married everyone said their marriage would be done before a year because they were just doing it for publicity, meanwhile 2+ years and another baby later and they're still together. Now Kim was the victim of a violent crime and people are saying that she staged the whole thing for publicity. People just love negative, sensational tabloids, I guess it's more entertaining to them especially since celebrities are mainly here for entertainment purposes anyway.

Genoveve
10-18-2016, 01:56 PM
Update from the concierge: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3834121/I-said-don-t-touch-Don-t-harm-opened-door-Kim-thought-sister-started-screaming-pulled-bed-Concierge-8-5m-Kim-heist-says-let-robbers-acted-INTERPRETER.html

Genoveve
01-09-2017, 04:11 PM
I saw an article earlier saying that 17 suspects were arrested and now I just saw this one saying that her chauffeur at the time is one of them:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4103718/Was-inside-job-Police-confirm-chauffeur-27-drove-Kardashian-family-Paris-17-people-arrested-connection-robbery.html

Which isn't surprising because I just saw the other day Naomi Campbell on Wendy Williams talking about how a similar thing happened to her a few years ago in Paris and she said that the chauffeur had to be in on it:

http://people.com/tv/naomi-campbell-paris-nightmare/

She added that she and Kardashian West are not the only ones who have been robbed in the past. “It’s happened to a few other people — but it’s not for me to say, that are well-known also.”

DeathAndTaxes
01-09-2017, 04:22 PM
That daily mail headline is in no way inflammatory, not one bit.

Genoveve
01-09-2017, 04:25 PM
^^I don't think it was?

DeathAndTaxes
01-09-2017, 04:57 PM
^^I don't think it was?

The accusation came first, then the "supporting" evidence which is really new developments. That headline screams clickbait.

Genoveve
01-09-2017, 05:12 PM
^^I'm pretty sure all headlines are clickbait, the whole point of a headline is to be bold and startling and attention-grabbing. But that one^^ in particular I felt was actually pretty tame, especially for the Daily Mail. I mean the headline says:

Was it an inside job? Police confirm chauffeur, 27, who drove the Kardashian family around Paris is among the 17 people arrested in connection with the robbery

And then as you go on to read you find that 17 people were arrested including the chauffeur who worked for the firm the Kardashians were using, so it's accurate. I mean if it had said KIM'S NIGHTMARE CONTINUES AS DOZENS OF SUSPECTS ARE HAULED INTO CUSTODY IN PARIS, THE CITY OF CRIME I could see it being ridiculous. Or something like this: http://weeklyworldnews.com/aliens/42896/earth-to-collide-with-nibiru-on-decembe-21-2012/

Genoveve
01-09-2017, 05:21 PM
They edited it since I posted it although I still don't think the update is particularly outrageous. The original title I copied and pasted in that post^^^.

whirlerz
01-09-2017, 07:40 PM
The vid from earlier w/Charlemagne is no longer^