Log in

View Full Version : Stormy Daniels arrested at a SC in Ohio



Pages : 1 [2]

slowpoke
07-20-2018, 04:19 PM
^^ Abducted by penguins?

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/clubpenguin/images/8/83/Cop_Cap_from_a_Player_Card.PNG/revision/latest?cb=20121221140708

SnuffleUffleGrass
07-22-2018, 05:59 AM
^^ Abducted by penguins?

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/clubpenguin/images/8/83/Cop_Cap_from_a_Player_Card.PNG/revision/latest?cb=20121221140708

I'm used to squaring off with officers in blue or tan uniforms. In my disorderly mind an Ohio cop looks like the Ice Cream man. Law Enforcement is a dirty job, why wear white?

eagle2
07-26-2018, 04:31 PM
Ohio Police Pre-Planned Stormy Daniels Arrest, According to Leaked Emails

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ohio-police-pre-planned-stormy-daniels-arrest-according-to-leaked-emails

Sam38g
07-26-2018, 05:16 PM
Also, could the arrest be a publicity stunt to resurrect some of the fading attention?

I admire her pr moves as part of her business acumen but basically outing a client is a no bueno. She's not worth the 130k to "have an affair with,"-I mean, just look at her! Trump payed her to keep her mouth shut. It's typical hooker etiquette to know this. And being the astute businesses man that he is, I could see how he might have taken the money out of the wrong fund. The best business men/women have others pick up their tab-highly unethical, yes, but happens in business all the time.

Anyways, even as strippers, I think it would be distasteful for us to brag about all the famous ppl we've ever met and danced for. This woman is haggard and nearing her retirement age, with this drama about "afairs" meant to drum up business, but ultimately, it will backfire cuz karma.

Lastly, I wish we werent taking sides as to who's in the right. The two are equally gross human beings, it's almost as though they belong together.

Outing a client? How do you explain him taking pics with her several times a different events in public & inviting her to red carpet events to help her get more publicity & build her brand? He even promised her a spot on Celebrity Apprentice....
Trump having affairs with different women no matter which marriage has never been a secret. He has gone on Stern bragging about his sex life too many times for this to be true.

Him on the phone inviting Allana Evens to join them doesn't seem discrete at all either. At that same golfing event he also hit on Jessica Drake, lecture us all again about how he was being discrete................. So that is a total of 3 porn stars he made a pass at in one weekend.

Stormy didn't out the story his lawyer COHEN did, Cohen made that contact null & void. So why are you blaming her?

Him using campaign funds is illegal. Doesn't matter who else does it, doesn't make it legal either.

As for her nearing retirement age...... Let us go over some facts here. Stormy is one of the few porn stars in the industry who is a contract girl. Contract as a porn star & Director.. Porn companies don't give out contracts to porn stars who don't sell. She is a top star because she gets to hand pick who her co-stars will be. Very few girls in the porn industry ever get to reach that status.
Stormy is a porn star, director & feature dancer who is in high demand. I bet she is getting paid more money than any other feature dancer out there currently. Old & haggard... or a legend with many long term fans?
Did you forget that Milf/mature is one of the top selling niches in porn?

She got majorly paid to host Xbiz webcam event in Miami. She has hosted several times at AVN. She has won numerous AVN awards.

Apparently, you don't know much about the porn industry or feature dancing.

Is she profiting off of this scandal? Yes & why the fuck not........ Is Trump profiting off of being Potus & constantly promoting his resorts, hats & everything else? Despite it being against the 25th amendment emoluments clause...... yes, but some of ya'll have zero issue with that on here. Which doesn't make sense at all. Can we say DOUBLE STANDARD!!!

Sam38g
07-26-2018, 05:19 PM
Ohio Police Pre-Planned Stormy Daniels Arrest, According to Leaked Emails

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ohio-police-pre-planned-stormy-daniels-arrest-according-to-leaked-emails

Yes, it was a total set up. The police abusing their powers to go after Trump's enemies is what dictators do.

Now that the truth has came out will Rick apologize?

rickdugan
07-27-2018, 12:50 PM
Our hero in the news again: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6000125/Stormy-Danielss-husband-says-not-seen-two-months.html


EXCLUSIVE: Stormy Daniels is a no-show at court as estranged husband claims neither he nor his daughter have seen her for more than TWO months and he has 'no idea' where she is.


Glendon Crain arrived at a court hearing in Kaufman, Texas on Friday morning to confirm a temporary restraining order against estranged wife Stormy Daniels.

Crain's attorney revealed they have been unable to serve Stormy with divorce papers because they have 'no idea' where she is.

The former porn star, 41, claimed he hasn't seen Stormy in 10 weeks and said she has only spent seven days at home in the last five months.

Judge Casey Blair agreed to extend the restraining order until they are able to serve her.

Crain has had sole custody of their daughter Caiden, seven, saying he was concerned over Stormy's wish to take her on her Make America Horny Again tour.

The divorce petition was filed in Kaufman on July 19 and lists the reason for the split as adultery on Daniels's part.



Before I am accused of wallowing in her further misdeeds and child abandonment, let me make it clear that nothing could be further from the truth. As a father of a daughter that age, most of what I feel is sadness for the girl and anger towards the mother who has abandoned her.

Well, now Stormy can't go near her daughter even if she wants to, which clearly she doesn't if she's been MIA for 10 week and only home for seven days for a 5 month period. I wonder where Stormy has been staying all of these months. Her strip club appearances have not been constant, so there is no reason that she shouldn't have been able to return home to care for her child. I guess she's enjoying her popularity and a newfound lifestyle now more than she enjoyed being a mother.

I hope this is all worth it, including everything that her daughter must be reading and hearing in school, on TV, online, etc. But I suspect that it won't be in the end.

miss.a.p1600
07-28-2018, 07:18 AM
Before you accuse a person of “child abandonment” you should know the laws and typically a guardian cannot bring legal action against a parent for abandonment before 4 month mark.

Secondly wtf they mean they don’t know where she is??? - the broad posted her tour schedule publicly!

No no I don’t think anyone should take kids on tour with them (with the exception of kids who may be homeschooled and parents can keep them their lives as normal as possible) but this seems like a jilted man who doesn’t like taking care of his own kid while the mom has to work. Women stay getting persecuted for having to choose between career and motherhood.

I bet money this dude probably doesn’t make that much.

Now if stormy isnt isn’t sending a portion of her earnings to the kid then yeah she done fucked up. This could be why dude is running his mouth to the media and the courts. Otherwise it’s just a case of her becoming public enemy number one and a lot of low ego men coming for her.

you got ain’t shit parents that’s been gone for several months / years on end and you literally cannot find those mfs. child abandonment is (jurisdictions will vary) when a parent has NO contact and has not provided support for at least 4 months. She does not yet fall into this category as it has only been 2 months according to him and she has spoken with her daughter. Not sure how much she is paying him for child support though.

Does she sound like mother of the year - no. But has she abandoned her child - no. not according to the typical abandonment laws

Maybe slowpoke can provide more insight into the statues but I think they are reaching a bit because her ex husband is going to try to use anything to make her look bad to the public.

SnuffleUffleGrass
07-28-2018, 07:26 AM
I have rick blocked but I will say this-


Stormy Daniels HAS been getting death threats against herself and her family (yes MAGA-ots are willing to threaten to harm babies and women, they're classy like that)

So her travel habits might have more to do with security concerns versus being "absent or neglectful."

side note- not every child is harmed by the mere idea of Mommy having had sex. Hell my friend's mom fucked every guy in the rock band Journey and he STILL gets high fives for that fact over four decades later.

miss.a.p1600
07-28-2018, 07:37 AM
If she didn’t have a kid with him, I’d say She should have never married that trick.

Just read the article that said he shoved her to the ground and shit before marrying him - a dude put his hands on you does not deserve to marry you

And my initial thoughts were correct, stormy is the breadwinner and dude is probably salty he’s been delegated to the role of househusband plus she is not trying to be tied down to him so he’s looking for anything to get revenge on her - the best way? Sue and slander her while she’s litigating against the president

Although stormy should have gotten some sort of parenting agreement with this dude before going on a tour, Sounds like she knew he was going to problem and just went with moving forward with her career.

miss.a.p1600
07-28-2018, 07:46 AM
Our hero in the news again....

Please speak for yourself

rickdugan
07-28-2018, 10:35 AM
Well, she actually stopped posting tour locations on twitter before the lawsuit was filed, so I can see her husband's contention that he couldn't locate her.

But, since she was indeed posting tour locations and letting various random strangers rub up on her, I'm not so convinced that death threats had anything to do with her disappearing from home for all of one week out of five months. Also, if there were threats against her family, what kind of mother could leave behind her baby girl? I don't really have to answer that question for anyone on here who is a parent.

As far as these other rationalizations, I'll just leave them to percolate in light of what has come to light re: Stormy's behavior and let others think through how much sense they make. I'm also not interested in hitting Lexis-Nexis to research the legal definition of child abandonment, lol. ;)

But two perhaps not so obvious points should be made:

1. She answered "No" to a written question posed when she was arrested asking if she was married. So clearly in her mind, he (and perhaps the daughter too since she left her behind) was already out of the picture; and

2. She knew that the court case was coming for days and she had no scheduled strip club appearances around that time, yet she did not go back home to fight the restraining order that prevents her from having contact with her child. TX is no more than a 5 hour flight from just about anywhere in the country, yet she just didn't care enough to bother.

Well, Stormy Time is just about over now in any event. The press doesn't seem to have any interest in her anymore now that all of this has been revealed. Even her attorney is moving away from her now, recently getting what will likely be one of his last attention-whore moments talking about three other anonymous clients who likely don't really exist. Whether her strip club gigs dry up also remains to be seen, but I'm guessing that they will as her stock is plummeting fast now.

slowpoke
07-28-2018, 11:02 AM
If she was not served she would have no reason to appear.

slowpoke
07-28-2018, 11:06 AM
FAMILY CODE


Sec. 161.001. INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP.
(a) In this section, "born addicted to alcohol or a controlled substance" means a child:
(1) who is born to a mother who during the pregnancy used a controlled substance, as defined by Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code, other than a controlled substance legally obtained by prescription, or alcohol; and
(2) who, after birth as a result of the mother's use of the controlled substance or alcohol:
(A) experiences observable withdrawal from the alcohol or controlled substance;
(B) exhibits observable or harmful effects in the child's physical appearance or functioning; or
(C) exhibits the demonstrable presence of alcohol or a controlled substance in the child's bodily fluids.
(b) The court may order termination of the parent-child relationship if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence:
(1) that the parent has:
(A) voluntarily left the child alone or in the possession of another not the parent and expressed an intent not to return;
(B) voluntarily left the child alone or in the possession of another not the parent without expressing an intent to return, without providing for the adequate support of the child, and remained away for a period of at least three months;
(C) voluntarily left the child alone or in the possession of another without providing adequate support of the child and remained away for a period of at least six months;
(D) knowingly placed or knowingly allowed the child to remain in conditions or surroundings which endanger the physical or emotional well-being of the child;
(E) engaged in conduct or knowingly placed the child with persons who engaged in conduct which endangers the physical or emotional well-being of the child;
(F) failed to support the child in accordance with the parent's ability during a period of one year ending within six months of the date of the filing of the petition;
(G) abandoned the child without identifying the child or furnishing means of identification, and the child's identity cannot be ascertained by the exercise of reasonable diligence;
(H) voluntarily, and with knowledge of the pregnancy, abandoned the mother of the child beginning at a time during her pregnancy with the child and continuing through the birth, failed to provide adequate support or medical care for the mother during the period of abandonment before the birth of the child, and remained apart from the child or failed to support the child since the birth;
(I) contumaciously refused to submit to a reasonable and lawful order of a court under Subchapter D, Chapter 261;
(J) been the major cause of:
(i) the failure of the child to be enrolled in school as required by the Education Code; or
(ii) the child's absence from the child's home without the consent of the parents or guardian for a substantial length of time or without the intent to return;
(K) executed before or after the suit is filed an unrevoked or irrevocable affidavit of relinquishment of parental rights as provided by this chapter;
(L) been convicted or has been placed on community supervision, including deferred adjudication community supervision, for being criminally responsible for the death or serious injury of a child under the following sections of the Penal Code, or under a law of another jurisdiction that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under one of the following Penal Code sections, or adjudicated under Title 3 for conduct that caused the death or serious injury of a child and that would constitute a violation of one of the following Penal Code sections:
(i) Section 19.02 (murder);
(ii) Section 19.03 (capital murder);
(iii) Section 19.04 (manslaughter);
(iv) Section 21.11 (indecency with a child);
(v) Section 22.01 (assault);
(vi) Section 22.011 (sexual assault);
(vii) Section 22.02 (aggravated assault);
(viii) Section 22.021 (aggravated sexual assault);
(ix) Section 22.04 (injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual);
(x) Section 22.041 (abandoning or endangering child);
(xi) Section 25.02 (prohibited sexual conduct);
(xii) Section 43.25 (sexual performance by a child);
(xiii) Section 43.26 (possession or promotion of child pornography);
(xiv) Section 21.02 (continuous sexual abuse of young child or children);
(xv) Section 20A.02(a)(7) or (8) (trafficking of persons); and
(xvi) Section 43.05(a)(2) (compelling prostitution);
(M) had his or her parent-child relationship terminated with respect to another child based on a finding that the parent's conduct was in violation of Paragraph (D) or (E) or substantially equivalent provisions of the law of another state;
(N) constructively abandoned the child who has been in the permanent or temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services for not less than six months, and:
(i) the department has made reasonable efforts to return the child to the parent;
(ii) the parent has not regularly visited or maintained significant contact with the child; and
(iii) the parent has demonstrated an inability to provide the child with a safe environment;
(O) failed to comply with the provisions of a court order that specifically established the actions necessary for the parent to obtain the return of the child who has been in the permanent or temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services for not less than nine months as a result of the child's removal from the parent under Chapter 262 for the abuse or neglect of the child;
(P) used a controlled substance, as defined by Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code, in a manner that endangered the health or safety of the child, and:
(i) failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse treatment program; or
(ii) after completion of a court-ordered substance abuse treatment program, continued to abuse a controlled substance;
(Q) knowingly engaged in criminal conduct that has resulted in the parent's:
(i) conviction of an offense; and
(ii) confinement or imprisonment and inability to care for the child for not less than two years from the date of filing the petition;
(R) been the cause of the child being born addicted to alcohol or a controlled substance, other than a controlled substance legally obtained by prescription;
(S) voluntarily delivered the child to a designated emergency infant care provider under Section 262.302 without expressing an intent to return for the child;
(T) been convicted of:
(i) the murder of the other parent of the child under Section 19.02 or 19.03, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, the law of a foreign country, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 19.02 or 19.03, Penal Code;
(ii) criminal attempt under Section 15.01, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, the law of a foreign country, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 15.01, Penal Code, to commit the offense described by Subparagraph (i);
(iii) criminal solicitation under Section 15.03, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, the law of a foreign country, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 15.03, Penal Code, of the offense described by Subparagraph (i); or
(iv) the sexual assault of the other parent of the child under Section 22.011 or 22.021, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 22.011 or 22.021, Penal Code; or
(U) been placed on community supervision, including deferred adjudication community supervision, or another functionally equivalent form of community supervision or probation, for being criminally responsible for the sexual assault of the other parent of the child under Section 22.011 or 22.021, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 22.011 or 22.021, Penal Code; and
(2) that termination is in the best interest of the child.
(c) A court may not make a finding under Subsection (b) and order termination of the parent-child relationship based on evidence that the parent:
(1) homeschooled the child;
(2) is economically disadvantaged;
(3) has been charged with a nonviolent misdemeanor offense other than:
(A) an offense under Title 5, Penal Code;
(B) an offense under Title 6, Penal Code; or
(C) an offense that involves family violence, as defined by Section 71.004 of this code;
(4) provided or administered low-THC cannabis to a child for whom the low-THC cannabis was prescribed under Chapter 169, Occupations Code; or
(5) declined immunization for the child for reasons of conscience, including a religious belief.
(d) A court may not order termination under Subsection (b)(1)(O) based on the failure by the parent to comply with a specific provision of a court order if a parent proves by a preponderance of evidence that:
(1) the parent was unable to comply with specific provisions of the court order; and
(2) the parent made a good faith effort to comply with the order and the failure to comply with the order is not attributable to any fault of the parent.
(e) This section does not prohibit the Department of Family and Protective Services from offering evidence described by Subsection (c) as part of an action to terminate the parent-child relationship under this subchapter.

rickdugan
07-28-2018, 11:09 AM
If she was not served she would have no reason to appear.

Except that the restraining order against her remains in place until she shows up to contest it. That's a pretty important point given that she is now prohibited from having contact with her 7 year old daughter.

slowpoke
07-28-2018, 11:50 AM
A TRO will expire of its own terms. She is on tour, so it doesnt matter and she can make her husband keep going back to get it extended. If it is a typical TRO she will be prohibited from doing anything.

whirlerz
07-28-2018, 12:04 PM
Yes, it was a total set up. The police abusing their powers to go after Trump's enemies is what dictators do.

Now that the truth has came out will Rick apologize?

HA!^. Why, he'snever wrong::) *Heavy Sarcasm*

rickdugan
07-28-2018, 12:18 PM
A TRO will expire of its own terms. She is on tour, so it doesnt matter and she can make her husband keep going back to get it extended. If it is a typical TRO whe will be prohiited from doing about anything.

Except that it was extended because she did not show and apparently has been extended until she can be served. And where is she "touring" now anyway? She hasn't been in a club in over a week, at least if her twitter posts are any indication. Even when she was active, her club stops were not constant. Now she's just MIA.

miss.a.p1600
07-28-2018, 12:22 PM
Well, she actually stopped posting tour locations on twitter before the lawsuit was filed, so I can see her husband's contention that he couldn't locate her.

But, since she was indeed posting tour locations and letting various random strangers rub up on her, I'm not so convinced that death threats had anything to do with her disappearing from home for all of one week out of five months. Also, if there were threats against her family, what kind of mother could leave behind her baby girl? I don't really have to answer that question for anyone on here who is a parent.

As far as these other rationalizations, I'll just leave them to percolate in light of what has come to light re: Stormy's behavior and let others think through how much sense they make. I'm also not interested in hitting Lexis-Nexis to research the legal definition of child abandonment, lol. ;)

But two perhaps not so obvious points should be made:

1. She answered "No" to a written question posed when she was arrested asking if she was married. So clearly in her mind, he (and perhaps the daughter too since she left her behind) was already out of the picture; and

2. She knew that the court case was coming for days and she had no scheduled strip club appearances around that time, yet she did not go back home to fight the restraining order that prevents her from having contact with her child. TX is no more than a 5 hour flight from just about anywhere in the country, yet she just didn't care enough to bother.

Well, Stormy Time is just about over now in any event. The press doesn't seem to have any interest in her anymore now that all of this has been revealed. Even her attorney is moving away from her now, recently getting what will likely be one of his last attention-whore moments talking about three other anonymous clients who likely don't really exist. Whether her strip club gigs dry up also remains to be seen, but I'm guessing that they will as her stock is plummeting fast now.

Your posts about "rubbing up on strange people" comes off as very hypocritical considering your actions in/out the clubs.

The article said 2 months in the title

A good mother leaves their child with family where they will be safer. No one is threatening to kill to dad so it make sense to have the kid more with the dad especially while she travels for work.

The dude is making minimum wage. So economically, it would make financial sense for her to tour and make money to provide for the kid while he stays home and takes care of the kid. Real men understand this. Weak men resent the women for having to take care of their own kid while the woman provides.

Well you need to "hit" some sort of research, before you throw around reckless accusations based on your emotional biases against women, so you can have a more rational educated response like slowpoke ;)

rickdugan
07-28-2018, 12:34 PM
I certainly wouldn't be letting random people rub on me if I was actually concerned about death threats. That was the point of the comment and I thought that it would be obvious.

She's not away from home because she has been too tied with back to back club appearances to return home - her schedule is public and it is not exactly jammed. She has two week gaps between some appearances and she hasn't even shown up to all of them. She is not home because she doesn't want to be home, period. Not showing up to contest a restraining order, which keeps you from even calling her daughter, simply pounds that point home.

whirlerz
07-28-2018, 12:48 PM
Oh, for Cry Fucking Eye::)

slowpoke
07-28-2018, 01:09 PM
Whirleeeeee! Snakes said tell you hello, and to come visit. Its warm and sunny, you can work on your tan.

Back on the topic:

If you advocate using the kid as bait to trick her into an appearance, that does sometimes work.

RULE 680. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

No temporary restraining order shall be granted without notice to the adverse party unless it clearly appears from specific facts shown by affidavit or by the verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the applicant before notice can be served and a hearing had thereon. Every temporary restraining order granted without notice shall be endorsed with the date and hour of issuance; shall be filed forthwith in the clerk's office and entered of record; shall define the injury and state why it is irreparable and why the order was granted without notice; and shall expire by its terms within such time after signing, not to exceed fourteen days, as the court fixes, unless within the time so fixed the order, for good cause shown, is extended for a like period or unless the party against whom the order is directed consents that it may be extended for a longer period. The reasons for the extension shall be entered of record. No more than one extension may be granted unless subsequent extensions are unopposed. In case a temporary restraining order is granted without notice, the application for a temporary injunction shall be set down for hearing at the earliest possible date and takes precedence of all matters except older matters of the same character; and when the application comes on for hearing the party who obtained the temporary restraining order shall proceed with the application for a temporary injunction and, if he does not do so, the court shall dissolve the temporary restraining order. On two days' notice to the party who obtained the temporary restraining order without notice or on such shorter notice to that party as the court may prescribe, the adverse party may appear and move its dissolution or modification and in that event the court shall proceed to hear and determine such motion as expeditiously as the ends of justice require.

Every restraining order shall include an order setting a certain date for hearing on the temporary or
permanent injunction sought.

Sam38g
07-30-2018, 02:37 PM
Except that it was extended because she did not show and apparently has been extended until she can be served. And where is she "touring" now anyway? She hasn't been in a club in over a week, at least if her twitter posts are any indication. Even when she was active, her club stops were not constant. Now she's just MIA.

So you hating on Stormy for the Trump scandal didn't go over well and NOW you bring her personal relationships and trash it.

I thought trashing people on this site & their personal lives was not allowed. Why is Rick allowed to break the TOS?

Sam38g
07-30-2018, 02:41 PM
Our hero in the news again: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6000125/Stormy-Danielss-husband-says-not-seen-two-months.html


EXCLUSIVE: Stormy Daniels is a no-show at court as estranged husband claims neither he nor his daughter have seen her for more than TWO months and he has 'no idea' where she is.


Glendon Crain arrived at a court hearing in Kaufman, Texas on Friday morning to confirm a temporary restraining order against estranged wife Stormy Daniels.

Crain's attorney revealed they have been unable to serve Stormy with divorce papers because they have 'no idea' where she is.

The former porn star, 41, claimed he hasn't seen Stormy in 10 weeks and said she has only spent seven days at home in the last five months.

Judge Casey Blair agreed to extend the restraining order until they are able to serve her.

Crain has had sole custody of their daughter Caiden, seven, saying he was concerned over Stormy's wish to take her on her Make America Horny Again tour.

The divorce petition was filed in Kaufman on July 19 and lists the reason for the split as adultery on Daniels's part.



Before I am accused of wallowing in her further misdeeds and child abandonment, let me make it clear that nothing could be further from the truth. As a father of a daughter that age, most of what I feel is sadness for the girl and anger towards the mother who has abandoned her.

Well, now Stormy can't go near her daughter even if she wants to, which clearly she doesn't if she's been MIA for 10 week and only home for seven days for a 5 month period. I wonder where Stormy has been staying all of these months. Her strip club appearances have not been constant, so there is no reason that she shouldn't have been able to return home to care for her child. I guess she's enjoying her popularity and a newfound lifestyle now more than she enjoyed being a mother.

I hope this is all worth it, including everything that her daughter must be reading and hearing in school, on TV, online, etc. But I suspect that it won't be in the end.

You are dragging her through the mud. You are bringing her personal/private life onto this board.

You are making assumptions and trashing a fellow performer.

Sam38g
07-30-2018, 02:45 PM
I certainly wouldn't be letting random people rub on me if I was actually concerned about death threats. That was the point of the comment and I thought that it would be obvious.

She's not away from home because she has been too tied with back to back club appearances to return home - her schedule is public and it is not exactly jammed. She has two week gaps between some appearances and she hasn't even shown up to all of them. She is not home because she doesn't want to be home, period. Not showing up to contest a restraining order, which keeps you from even calling her daughter, simply pounds that point home.

Good think you are not a female stripper................ Like many of us are or have been having to deal with stalkers, ex's and crazy customers.

You act like you have never stepped foot in a strip club. Judgy much? Do you hate all of us here? Your contempt for Stormy seems to be derived from a long history of resentment & double standards towards women in the sex industry.

Her husband is a male porn star. He knew that she was a porn star, director & feature dancer before marrying her.

Rick I used to like you know you are coming off as a misogynist, makes me wonder where you always one?

Sam38g
07-30-2018, 02:50 PM
Wow......Rick.. So you are trashing her as a bad MOM> is the husband working? Who is paying the bills? She is a working Mom.

I am sure between tour dates she has to write, produce, direct and star in several videos per you. Contracts don't care what is going on in your personal life.
Wow, you are turning out to be a Stormy Daniels stalker the way you are keeping up with all her tour dates, what she does in her time off, her divorce and such.

How do you know how often she calls her daughter? Dude, that is just scary.

Djoser
07-30-2018, 02:59 PM
"...brought this all on herself when she decided that her $130k payday wasn't enough and started all of this attention seeking behavior. Now she gets to live with the consequences."

Right, because we all know Trump would never seek attention, or try and leech more than a laughable 130K from anyone.


OK see now you even drew me into it lol. My apologies to all for violating the rules against politics in SW. I'm going to close the thread temporarily while I clean it up.