Log in

View Full Version : porn versus prostitution



Pages : 1 [2]

sander8son
05-01-2004, 11:08 PM
i dont see what basis law can be made as to who one is entitled to spend money on, depending on who uses drugs. I happen to know someone who works for a professional football team thats a major cokehead/alcoholic, etc. etc. since, his salary is paid by the team, and therefor from revenue from ticket sales, does that mean it should be illegal to purchase tickets to see this team play? afterall its immoral to support his drug problem.

if someone choses to do drugs, thats their choice. how can you say that someone who does drugs doesn't have the right to make a living, but someone who doesn't can? by not allowing them to make money however they chose, you're going to force them to turn to crime in order to get their drug money. its not going to stop them from using drugs(as it hasn't so far) nor is it going to help them in anyway. some people just aren't cut out for life, so be it.

personally, im all for legalized prostitution, and if the first step was regulated prostitution fine. however, im against regulation, but would settle for it.

seraya
05-02-2004, 09:50 AM
<<<The actors are not enjoying themselves...they are doing it solely for the enjoyment of others...they don&#039;t even do it for the money. Prostitution, however, is done solely for the money.>>>

I&#039;m sorry, but am I reading this right??? Porn actresses do it because they love to make people happy? Are you delusional? That&#039;s like saying strippers only give lap dances cause it turns them on.

<<<In porn you are getting paid to make a movie so the sex is acting. In prostitution you are paid to have sex.>>>

Guess what - if the penis goes into the vagina (ass/mouth/ear) for money, it ain&#039;t acting, it&#039;s sex for money. The ONLY difference is whether or not the camera is there. -- "Hey, I&#039;ll give you a thousand dollars to fuck this guy" - you&#039;re saying whether or not I film makes a moral difference?

<<<Prostitution is not an industry for entertainment other than for the man who is paying for sex >>>

So, the difference is if you fuck for one person&#039;s pleasure you&#039;re a whore, if you fuck for a thousand people&#039;s pleasure, you&#039;re an artist. OK. Clear on that now. Thanks.

lol don;t get me wrong, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with porno, I just think prostitution should be legal too. Consenting adults, etc etc


Well what can i say......

You took the words right outta my mind!

Seraya.

darkness
05-02-2004, 10:20 AM
Darkness, I actually find it hard to believe that most pro&#039;s achieve orgasm. I could be wrong.

Isn&#039;t orgasm in women two-thirds mental?

P.S. (Edit)~ And I REALLY doubt that the Orgasms a porn star is shouting out... is a real orgasm.

darkness
05-02-2004, 10:21 AM
i am so shitty at making a quote,but any hoot what i wanted to say about that is why do some porn stars contract aids while doing there "job" if anything real wasn&#039;t coming out?or why do they wear condoms?

Lexi
05-02-2004, 10:49 AM
Darkness, it IS sex going on. Forget the crap that its an act. It is real sex, and that is why the contracted HIV.
They didnt wear condoms because sales of porn when down when the people wore them.

czarina
05-02-2004, 04:34 PM
I say...Thank God for porn!

Madcap
05-02-2004, 07:37 PM
i am so shitty at making a quote,but any hoot what i wanted to say about that is why do some porn stars contract aids while doing there "job" if anything real wasn&#039;t coming out?or why do they wear condoms?


This would be because a guy can fuck a hole in the ground and still get off. As far as I know, most of the male porn actors are homosexual, anyway (the fluffers are usually male). For a guy it&#039;s biological. The package will get delivered regardless.

LoveSexMoney
05-03-2004, 09:19 AM
They didnt wear condoms because sales of porn when down when the people wore them.


with all this lovely technology why don&#039;t they just digitally retouch the film and make the condom "disappear" ? or...is that too expensive? Hell, they could even make fake money shots!

Lexi
05-03-2004, 11:42 AM
Sapphire, excellent point! LOL Thats a great idea actually. Crazy shit though, right?

darkness
05-03-2004, 12:04 PM
saying most male porn stars are homosexual is like saying most strippers are lesbians.STEROTYPYE

Madcap
05-03-2004, 12:10 PM
Most among the big timers, at least. At any rate, it&#039;s as far as I have heard anyway. I could be wrong.

DancerWealth
05-04-2004, 11:29 PM
They didnt wear condoms because sales of porn when down when the people wore them.


with all this lovely technology why don&#039;t they just digitally retouch the film and make the condom "disappear" ? or...is that too expensive? Hell, they could even make fake money shots!


Yes, it&#039;s possible. Is it practical, not really. When you consider that a total budget for a porn movie is less than a few thousand dollars to shoot, adding to that cost by doing digital touch-ups would increase the budget many fold. NTSC Video (the format used in the U.S.) is shot at 30 frames per second (actually it&#039;s 29.97 frames per second) so to remaster that video, you&#039;d have to have an artist digitally correct each frame one at a time. This is not only very time consuming (just ask George Lucas about how long it took to remaster the original Star Wars movies), expensive, but also realize that the majority of people working in video production are guys, and finding someone interested in working to retouch video footage of a guy&#039;s penis will be a real challenge. :)