mr_punk
11-27-2004, 12:53 PM
have you ever heard of the phrase? i didn't [who can keep up with this crap] until a couple of weeks ago when i stumbled upon a website that reviews other porn websites. some of these review sites have the porn sites broken down by genre and reality porn is one of them. the genre seems to be wildly popular on the internet. which isn't unusual because the porn industry (like the mainstream film industry) has a history of taking an idea that works and beating it into the ground.
however, it seems to me that reality porn is both a bit of a misnomer and a clever marketing strategy. IMHO, reality porn is nothing more than gonzo porn in much smaller digestible chunks. in any case, make no mistake. the action is staged and the actors..er.....complete amatures are paid. it's about as real as the WWF and they do a pretty good job suspending your disbelief. in any case, i don't think too many guys would be sucessful driving around the streets of miami luring "amature" women to have sex in the back of a van with other men. which is the premise of the reality porn site, "Bangbus".
IMO, one of the more interesting reality sites out there has to be "midnight prowl" and "meatholes". the latter isn't a reality site per se, but both series have similar themes. trust me, there isn't that much of a difference. anyway, it turns out that the content of both sites is being created by a man named Khan Tusion. five or six years ago, he directed a couple of movies for anabolic video called "rough sex 1 & 2 ". it caused quite a stir on the rame newsgroup and in the porn industry. if you're looking for a copy; don't bother because the line was discontinued and removed from the shelves.
so, what kind of viewer might be interested in "midnight prowl" or "meatholes"? well, if you like your porn with at least a lame half-assed attempt at characterization or plot. if you like somewhat decent production values, mtv style editing, and women who pretend (albeit badly) to enjoy the sex or something that you can watch with the SO (ukrainian women excepted :) ) that won't make her hair turn white. you won't like either site.
however, if you like your porn, relatively speaking, a bit more edgy (ie: violent, depraved or more hardcore). if you don't want to know why the couple is fucking in the first place. if you could care less about the woman's enjoyment (or more accurately her acting skills) of the act. if you enjoy scenes depicting women being humiliated (verbally and physically) to tears. if you like watching her being throat fucked until her eyes water or she pukes or is nearly suffocated by a scrotal sack. if you like watching being anally pounded doggie style while some industry parolee steps on her head or while said parolee forces her to lick out his asshole or go ATM while jokingly stating to the camera, "hey biatch! what did i eat for lunch today? a chalupa or a flame-broiled whopper? :) " or if you're just the type of person that slows down at the scene of a car accident despite feeling uncomfortable by the act. you might like might both sites. then again, if you're so jaded by porn that you watch snuff movies in your lesiure time. you probably won't like the both sites, either. ;)
however, it seems to me that reality porn is both a bit of a misnomer and a clever marketing strategy. IMHO, reality porn is nothing more than gonzo porn in much smaller digestible chunks. in any case, make no mistake. the action is staged and the actors..er.....complete amatures are paid. it's about as real as the WWF and they do a pretty good job suspending your disbelief. in any case, i don't think too many guys would be sucessful driving around the streets of miami luring "amature" women to have sex in the back of a van with other men. which is the premise of the reality porn site, "Bangbus".
IMO, one of the more interesting reality sites out there has to be "midnight prowl" and "meatholes". the latter isn't a reality site per se, but both series have similar themes. trust me, there isn't that much of a difference. anyway, it turns out that the content of both sites is being created by a man named Khan Tusion. five or six years ago, he directed a couple of movies for anabolic video called "rough sex 1 & 2 ". it caused quite a stir on the rame newsgroup and in the porn industry. if you're looking for a copy; don't bother because the line was discontinued and removed from the shelves.
so, what kind of viewer might be interested in "midnight prowl" or "meatholes"? well, if you like your porn with at least a lame half-assed attempt at characterization or plot. if you like somewhat decent production values, mtv style editing, and women who pretend (albeit badly) to enjoy the sex or something that you can watch with the SO (ukrainian women excepted :) ) that won't make her hair turn white. you won't like either site.
however, if you like your porn, relatively speaking, a bit more edgy (ie: violent, depraved or more hardcore). if you don't want to know why the couple is fucking in the first place. if you could care less about the woman's enjoyment (or more accurately her acting skills) of the act. if you enjoy scenes depicting women being humiliated (verbally and physically) to tears. if you like watching her being throat fucked until her eyes water or she pukes or is nearly suffocated by a scrotal sack. if you like watching being anally pounded doggie style while some industry parolee steps on her head or while said parolee forces her to lick out his asshole or go ATM while jokingly stating to the camera, "hey biatch! what did i eat for lunch today? a chalupa or a flame-broiled whopper? :) " or if you're just the type of person that slows down at the scene of a car accident despite feeling uncomfortable by the act. you might like might both sites. then again, if you're so jaded by porn that you watch snuff movies in your lesiure time. you probably won't like the both sites, either. ;)