View Full Version : Pink Side = Prude Side
mr_punk
06-15-2005, 03:36 AM
So democracy's dead, is it? My utter speculation is that Pryce didn't need much prompting. Ya know, I've had posts deleted, but I've never gotten an administrator's directive that I subsequently ignored, nor have I created a second account to complain after I was reprimanded. No, my only ruse is some ginormous stripper style shit which one day may lead to a sitewide whipping.so, who's talking about democracy. look, if pryce wants to ban him for those actions...fine. i didn't follow the drama upstairs. my only point is that despite what some people thought of his posts. **thorn was always civil**. however, despite his civility. it's seems some people really became unsettled by his posts here and i wouldn't be surprised if that type of reaction occured upstairs long before he pulled any of those stunts.
*note*: based on his posts on SCJ before his sitewide ignore.
Well, here's where we have a fundamental disagreement. I refer you to my previous post. You guys just haven't been supertrolled enough over hyere to influence your perspective.well, if you ladies are fainting and swooning at the sight of a first-time poster who asks, "hey strippers! how much are the blowjobs?". perhaps, you have a point. in any case, i don't think overmoderation is a major issue here on SCJ. i don't know about SW. besides, moderation is mostly a function of experience. hopefully, it gets better as time passes and they are not so quick to pull out the admin toolbox. no, what i dislike is this idea of group consensus or conformity to maintain harmony and the notion that if such a plateau isn't reached. it's seen as being "unproductive". i don't think that's necessarily the case.
Lord knows Jenny and I have tried but we're just not enough of an insurgency.well, if it's any help. i've been constantly PMing Pryce about banning you two from SCJ from day one. i'm think i'm starting to wear him down. the day of reckoning for you two uberbiatches will come soon.
SportsWriter2
06-15-2005, 04:01 AM
i've been constantly PMing Pryce about banning you two from SCJ from day one. i'm think i'm starting to wear him down. the day of reckoning for you two uberbiatches will come soon.
LOL, Mr P, Jenny is your reason for living, and you need Ev when you run out of Jenny quotes to play with. :D
I think the Pinks need another virgin gangbanger to replace Rose Delight. :)
evan_essence
06-15-2005, 04:59 AM
Ev, I don't believe you and Jenny were here for the Mike/Harvard/Sixfigures era of SCJ.No, but that doesn't surprise me now that you bring it up. I should have said "recently." And I prolly shouldn't have been quite so flippant about that, amidst a serious convo because I'm not seriously suggesting I want it to happen.
There's a mighty lot of artificial harmony in public on the pink site, and alot of DISharmony in private. Seems to me alot of ill will is breeding under the surface.Okay, where can we go from here? I realize the guys might gag at this "prudish" thought, but is there a way to resolve this issue diplomatically with a carrot rather than a stick? Might be hard if the disgruntled won't express their views publicly. Meanwhile, I suspect certain others aren't necessarily dissatisfied at the moment because, like me, they just aren't aware of the club.. urm.. forum drama. They may miss it when it transpires and aren't plugged into the shop talk after the fact.
For totally selfish reasons, I sincerely request that you not leave. When I first found SW, I remember reading one of your posts discussing business deficiencies in the way clubs are operated, written in such clear concise terms, I thought, totally awesome, smart business women post here! The same could be said of Kat's business savvy and a few others. Knowing other dancers exist who think in sane terms sometimes gets me through the tough days. I know ya gotta do what ya gotta do, but 'twood royally suck if you left, Bridgette.
-Ev
evan_essence
06-15-2005, 05:11 AM
no, what i dislike is this idea of group consensus or conformity to maintain harmony and the notion that if such a plateau isn't reached. it's seen as being "unproductive". i don't think that's necessarily the case.Got ya. This is the crux of our disagreement. Having said that, I won't go into a round and round 'cause both sides of it seem to have been clearly expressed.
the day of reckoning for you two uberbiatches will come soon.Ohmygod, you make that sound so sexy I might actually get faint and become vulnerable to performing extras.
-Ev
SportsWriter2
06-15-2005, 08:11 AM
For totally selfish reasons, I sincerely request that you not leave. When I first found SW, I remember reading one of your posts discussing business deficiencies in the way clubs are operated, written in such clear concise terms, I thought, totally awesome, smart business women post here! The same could be said of Kat's business savvy and a few others. Knowing other dancers exist who think in sane terms sometimes gets me through the tough days. I know ya gotta do what ya gotta do, but 'twood royally suck if you left, Bridgette.
I'll second that, and I don't often agree with her. :)
Casual Observer
06-15-2005, 09:09 AM
Nevermind that she was the first SW girl I ever met, Bridgette is an institution here; SW wouldn't be the same and would be worse in her absence.
Jenny
06-15-2005, 03:38 PM
my only point is that despite what some people thought of his posts. **thorn was always civil**. however, despite his civility. it's seems some people really became unsettled by his posts here
Okay. Small point here. I did not find Thorn to be civil. Now, our definitions of civil could greatly differ. Okay, our definitions of civil CERTAINLY greatly differ, but I found Thorn to be sexist, rude, dismissive and (although this is somewhat unrelated), frankly, stupid. However, most importantly, Thorn was... not funny. We can tolerate a certain amount of misogyny, discourtesy and even stupidity, but for crying out loud, can the man not even amuse us while he is being... well, you know. Misogynist, discourteous and stupid. If one cannot even coax a chortle out of me with all the "feminist" jokes available - well, there's not much hope for you, and sitewide banning is the least of your problems. In fact, now that I think of it, Thorn is probably stuck in a small, closeted and humourless room, alone and screaming "Why? Why? Oh, gods, why did I alienate ALL of stripperweb, including its subsite, SCJ? Why is mr_punk and his unending ass-talk and immature, embarrassing avatar welcomed and loved, whilst I am shunned? Why?"
By the way, in case any of you need it later on, here:
(Off topic!!! Off topic!!! I want a whole pile of mods leaping all over me, like ballerinas or rugby players. You can decide which you want to be).
Ahem.
"How many feminists does it take to screw in a lightbulb"
...
"That's not funny."
well, if you ladies are fainting and swooning at the sight of a first-time poster who asks, "hey strippers! how much are the blowjobs?". perhaps, you have a point.
Okay, now I have never, ever actually fainted from a guy asking me for a blowjob. Except that once, and I don't think that really counts. But let's really examine our hypothetical poster. He has gone looking for stripper convo, and finds us. Fair enough. But really, the site SAYS that it isn't porno, escorts, etc., and really even for those with limited comprehension, the design, with the pink, the lack of T&A etc., would show anyone with even a smidge of web savvy that this was kind of rude questioning for this particular site. Now since our poster KNOWS it is rude (note, he is addressing the strippers, so he seems to know that it is a site FOR strippers, not really about strippers), he (I assume it is a he, what with the blowjob and all) is intending to be rude. So, really. How much do we really owe this hypothetical blowjob seeker? Why is banning/ignoring such an unfair option to someone who really only wants to be discourteous (because if he REALLY wanted to find out about blowjobs, there are many more appropriate places that are easier to find than here)?
well, if it's any help. i've been constantly PMing Pryce about banning you two from SCJ from day one. i'm think i'm starting to wear him down. the day of reckoning for you two uberbiatches will come soon.But.. but... but - then you would be lonely. You know. Alone in a room. "Why, why" and all of that.
FBR: i'm not sure what these gimps are really talking about. The purpose of the thread by the creator was simply to call the pink siders a bunch of prudes, not to make a statement about moderation or whatever for the most part
Bridgette: quite a few people have told me similar stories about "you go" in private but "whatever" in public.
Obviously the reason is simple: The pink siders have been replaced by porn by their boyfriends and they are taking it out on each other.
Jenny
06-15-2005, 03:57 PM
^^^
Yeah, but really. Think about it. How would it look to you if there was a pink thread entitled: "Why do those bluies have to even EXIST on the internet (although we don't have to see or hear them) bragging about spreading the clap and oral herpes through whole towns of exotic dancers?"
It would seem kind of bad spirited? Bitter? And pointless? And maybe like they were trying to bolster their own "interesting level" by just levying out nasty insults?
I wouldn't give a fuck, i say they should do it.
They've already had threads like that, often posted in by erotictonic and amylynnnj
"pathetic losers" and other such monikers, etc.
You should start one like it right now to get it going
SportsWriter2
06-15-2005, 06:27 PM
Obviously the reason is simple: The pink siders have been replaced by porn by their boyfriends and they are taking it out on each other.
That is so on point. I hear that complaint at least once a week from young dancers. I'd estimate that maybe 34 really hot video teens in CA are getting off 10 million guys in the 18-29 market. :O
Bridgette
06-15-2005, 09:07 PM
LMAO. See, most of the last several posts would've been deleted or at least severely edited if this thread were on the pink side. Then of course half or 2/3 would've been split off and sent to site issues, because god forbid, a conversation can't evolve to discuss more than one extremely narrow topic at once ::)
Institution? CO, you sure know how to make a girl blush :P
Ummm, and thanks to you others as well. Not looking for anyone to beg me to stay, but it's nice to know I might be missed....
evan_essence
06-16-2005, 06:48 AM
That is so on point. I hear that complaint at least once a week from young dancers. I'd estimate that maybe 34 really hot video teens in CA are getting off 10 million guys in the 18-29 market. :OWhoa! I'm thinking, 10 million stranded women for me to target. Not a bad trade off.
-Ev
evan_essence
06-16-2005, 07:22 AM
LMAO. See, most of the last several posts would've been deleted or at least severely edited if this thread were on the pink side. True, but I usually adjust my posting to the context of the forum. If I look around and see most everyone driving 70 mph here, I'm going to do so, too, just to avoid being run over. If I'm over there and see most everyone driving 45, I'm asking for trouble if I stay at 70. Nevertheless, I don't disagree that 45 is a bit too restrictive, but I'd vote maybe for 55 to 60 and strict seat belt enforcement over there with 70 staying the standard over here. Now if I could just get the hang of parallel parking.
-Ev
xdamage
06-16-2005, 07:45 AM
I wouldn't give a fuck, i say they should do it.
Hehe! I felt the same sentiment - go for it and enjoy ;)
Then again I'd miss it if the girls did post such a thread on the pink site. I rarely read the pink site. Most of it is so boring and predictable - Yawn. If they started a thread like that on the blue site well, then bombs away. Not because I even care all that much but at least we can have some fun and a discussion that doesn't devolve into everyone having to agree with each other.
p.s. A lot of us guys already know we can be assholes sometimes. Not really news to us. Would slide off my back. But then, its not people like shot here or myself that feel a need for censorship or heavy handed moderation.
More seriously, to some degree as moderators you just have to say fuck it, you can't make everyone happy all the time. You can't be constantly second guessing yourself. Choose what to cut based on your own judgement. One way or another things will work out just fine in the end. If you're over cutting it won't be long before you know it.
mr_punk
06-16-2005, 11:07 AM
But let's really examine our hypothetical poster. He has gone looking for stripper convo, and finds us. Fair enough. But really, the site SAYS that it isn't porno, escorts, etc., and really even for those with limited comprehension, the design, with the pink, the lack of T&A etc., would show anyone with even a smidge of web savvy that this was kind of rude questioning for this particular site.what kind of mesugha assumption is that? if SW is going to attract a certain amount of asskissing fuckoes looking for stripper interaction despite the lack of T&A, etc. why wouldn't SW also attract the antithesis of an butt-licking toady who's looking for stripper interaction as well?
So, really. How much do we really owe this hypothetical blowjob seeker? Why is banning/ignoring such an unfair option to someone who really only wants to be discourteous (because if he REALLY wanted to find out about blowjobs, there are many more appropriate places that are easier to find than here)?oh, you don't owe him a thing. i didn't mean to imply otherwise. so, feel free to ignore or answer his question with caustic sarcasm which you seem to relish. strangely enough, after this kind of treatment. they usually disappear shortly afterwards never to be seen again. of course, like a freshly killed cockroach. eventually, a new one takes his place, but after you've seen the first one or two. you shouldn't faint and swoon at the sight of a new cockroach. finally, banning is also a viable option. although, it seems like a lot of work (not for you, of course) compared to the other two options....but hey, that's what moderators are for. they exist and live to answer and respond to your whiny PMs.
But.. but... but - then you would be lonely. You know. Alone in a room. "Why, why" and all of that..oh, don't worry about me. i guess you've never heard of sporty bashing. sure, he's not canadian or a newfie, but he'll do in a pinch.
doc-catfish
06-16-2005, 11:27 AM
FBR: i'm not sure what these gimps are really talking about. The purpose of the thread by the creator was simply to call the pink siders a bunch of prudes, not to make a statement about moderation or whatever for the most part
Whatever your intentions in starting this thread, it now seems to be about three related, but somewhat different topics:
1. Overmoderation both here and on SW.
2. The usual pink versus blue chicanery.
3. The purpose you mentioned above. Whatever that is.
I just didn't want to mention it until this point for fear that the thread might get split (see#1).
:-\
Jay Zeno
06-16-2005, 12:29 PM
Hell, we wouldn't know where to split the thread, even if we wanted to, and we don't. I'm enjoying it.
I agree with JZ...its interesting.
I just threw out my comments thinking that you might want someone higher in the food chain to hear your concerns (assuming they were truly concerns and not just bitching for the fun of it). If venting is all you are striving for thats fine with me. Ive done plenty of that myself over the years.
FBR
Bridgette
06-16-2005, 06:35 PM
I'm not just venting. I'm tired of the 45mph speed limit and friggin speed bumps every 1/4mile over there. Tired of having to hunt down split threads, or posts that have been deleted. Tired of trying to respond to a post, only to have half the thread/post cut out before I could hit the damn reply button so whatever I was going to say is pointless. Tired of feeling like I can't say anything too friggin normal or conversational. Ferfuckssake! I thought this place was supposed to be fun! I mean it is a damn stripper board, not a librarian board!
One point to bring up. I realize this isn't such a big deal to administrators, but the stripperfest we had last year would NOT have happened at all if we'd been under such strict moderation then as we are now. The thread that got it all started would've been squashed before the excitement built, and the party would've never happened IMO. I think it sucks ass that sort of comraderie(sp?) has to suffer here.
Ev, I would agree on your proposed raised speed limits to 55 or 60. I say 60. I think we can handle it. I never knew a stripper who drove like a grandma anyway! ;D
Jay Zeno
06-16-2005, 10:07 PM
OK, now I had to step in and moderate in this moderation-protest thread. I feel so dirty. Let's try to keep it over the fourth grade neener-neener level.
Jenny
06-17-2005, 06:09 AM
what kind of mesugha assumption is that? if SW is going to attract a certain amount of asskissing fuckoes looking for stripper interaction despite the lack of T&A, etc. why wouldn't SW also attract the antithesis of an butt-licking toady who's looking for stripper interaction as well?
I didn't say a word about who stripperweb might attract. I'm pretty sure I've noticed the kind of riff raff that conglomerates around here. I said that this hypothetical poster knew his (her?) question was rude, and posted with the intention of "offending" us. And that therefore the cry of "censorship! censorship!" (however inappropriate in this context), and accusations that we are cutting off interesting, meaningful conversation are bullshit. I mean as facinating as I'm sure you find the unending parade of "I wanna git me some strippa's to suck my cock" most of us find that about as interesting as you find "so what should my new name be?"
And just a point - interesting, meaningful and even dissenting conversation doesn't HAVE to take place in the format of:
"This is the problem with strippers. They're ______ (e.g. sluts, whores, liars, manipulators, etc.)"
"No, strippers aren't like that you ugly, ugly man who is so covetous of our stripper bodies"
"See? Typical of slutty, slutty strippers, bringing up their bodies all the time."
"Yeah? Well we have nice bodies and should be able to bring them up whenever we want!"
Etc.
Etc.
That is the dissent that is deleted. The interesting, meaningful dissent is not deleted - it is usually just not responded to. Or maybe some real, super-interesting dissent WAS deleted before I got to see it.
oh, you don't owe him a thing. i didn't mean to imply otherwise.
Oh. Well. Good. Carry on then.
so, feel free to ignore or answer his question with caustic sarcasm which you seem to relish. but after you've seen the first one or two. you shouldn't faint and swoon at the sight of a new cockroach.
Well we don't faint and swoon. We swoop in with name calling and caustic sarcasm and then he is deleted when he tries to respond. I think that is a great way of handling things. Go Moderators!
but hey, that's what moderators are for. they exist and live to answer and respond to your whiny PMs.
Hey! My PM's (if I sent any) would be pithy and clever.
Bridgette
06-17-2005, 06:34 AM
But Jaaaaaaaayyy! He started it!:weeping::neener:
Bridgette, I have a confession.
Bridgette
06-17-2005, 06:49 AM
Um, ok....
SportsWriter2
06-17-2005, 06:50 AM
oh, don't worry about me. i guess you've never heard of sporty bashing. sure, he's not canadian or a newfie, but he'll do in a pinch.
Face it, Mr P, you need Jenny more than any white guy I know. Have you ever gone a week without quoting her? :P
Not Canadian, but definitely Canadien enough to love Montreal. Pretty girls and maize sucre at 50-80% off US rates. :)
White guys must be converted into Stereos!
Jay Zeno
06-17-2005, 08:51 AM
But Jaaaaaaaayyy! He started it!:weeping::neener:
*chuckle*
(parental voice) Yes, he did! And I'm finishing it!
stant
06-17-2005, 09:21 AM
Are you a manhating bitch? Join your sisters!
http://www.manhaters.com/forum-for-women/
This site is a Howard Stern wet dream.
Silverback
06-17-2005, 02:07 PM
Well, I think that
http://www.cdphotography.com/4posting/ava1.gif
sol_de_pr2
06-17-2005, 06:04 PM
But Jaaaaaaaayyy! He started it!:weeping::neener:Yeah, and you fell for it :neener:
Let it go. At least in public.
- JZ
sol_de_pr2
06-18-2005, 06:00 AM
Ok, Jay.
evan_essence
06-18-2005, 10:48 AM
Dammit. Why do I always miss the good stuff before it gets wiped off? I'm going to have to install some 'bot program that scans and copies all new messages as soon as they're posted. (Wouldn't that be an extra drain on an already strained server!)
-Ev
sol_de_pr2
06-18-2005, 03:48 PM
Yeah, moderation, moderation...
mr_punk
06-20-2005, 01:25 AM
I did not find Thorn to be civil. Now, our definitions of civil could greatly differ. Okay, our definitions of civil CERTAINLY greatly differ, but I found Thorn to be sexist, rude, dismissive and (although this is somewhat unrelated), frankly, stupid.
"rude"? that's strange. like i said, i didn't follow the drama upstairs. however, he didn't come across as the "strippers are all a bunch of lying whores" type down here.
I didn't say a word about who stripperweb might attract.no, you didn't....i did.
I'm pretty sure I've noticed the kind of riff raff that conglomerates around here. I said that this hypothetical poster knew his (her?) question was rude, and posted with the intention of "offending" us.offending "us"? certainly, you're not including yourself in that group. usually, you react to those posts by mouthing off as many one-liners like you're the next Henny Youngman.
And that therefore the cry of "censorship! censorship!" (however inappropriate in this context), and accusations that we are cutting off interesting, meaningful conversation are bullshit. I mean as facinating as I'm sure you find the unending parade of "I wanna git me some strippa's to suck my cock" most of us find that about as interesting as you find "so what should my new name be?"i'll only cry censorship. if i post a really caustic reply and the thread is deleted. it's like destroying a work of my art. seriously, i'm not offended in the least by the deletion or the post nor would i find it particularly interesting (unless, i see an opportunity for a sneering, acrid reply. now, that's always worth a moment of my time), meaningful or worth spending a lot of time worrying about the offensive quotient of the post. then again, acting like an uberdrama queen isn't my style.
Well we don't faint and swoon. We swoop in with name calling and caustic sarcasm and then he is deleted when he tries to respond. I think that is a great way of handling things. Go Moderators!oh, i see. you're offended, but not so offended that you can't restrain yourself from responding in kind. well, if want people to actually believe that you're offended. i hope you realize that kind of response combined with a histrionic and hammy acting performance, commonly taught in the canada's William Shatner school of acting, completely undermines the verisimilitude of your performance.
Face it, Mr P, you need Jenny more than any white guy I know. Have you ever gone a week without quoting her?given that you always provide a cornucopia of quotable material, sporty. i actually have to restrain myself from quoting you too often. in fact, if i did quote you more often. it would be sort of like clubbing baby seals or some other small helpless animal. it wouldn't quite be sporty bashing anymore. i suppose, i would have to start calling it something like sporty decapitation or sporty evisceration or sporty dismemberment or sporty exsanguination or sporty....well, you get the idea.
Jenny
06-20-2005, 06:33 AM
"rude"? that's strange. like i said, i didn't follow the drama upstairs. however, he didn't come across as the "strippers are all a bunch of lying whores" type down here.
Actually, I think he named me personally as a lying whore. He phrased it like "I really wonder about your ethics" so he either thought that he was being very subtle, or that I wasn't bright enough to understand the meaning of "wonder" and "ethics" or possibly both.
no, you didn't....i did.
Okay. What I meant by that was that you were contending a point I didn't make. Of COURSE a site named "stripperweb" is going to attract some riff raff.
Speaking of riff raff. For a guy who treats strippers like "life sized action figures" you spend an awful lot of time here, engaging with strippers in a non-anal probing kind of way. I'm not accusing you of anything. I'm just saying.
offending "us"? certainly, you're not including yourself in that group. usually, you react to those posts by mouthing off as many one-liners like you're the next Henny Youngman.
Hee hee. Yeah. I'm one of those people that thrive on confrontation of conflict. Which is likely why you and I have struck up such a close, chummy e-relationship.
then again, acting like an uberdrama queen isn't my style.
Okay. I think you just keep forgetting where you are man. Look around. What do you see for mile upon virtual mile? Strippers! Worse yet, many a university educated stripper who has some feminist leanings. Uberdrama is our way of life! I think maybe you need to be a little more accepting of different cultures.
oh, i see. you're offended, but not so offended that you can't restrain yourself from responding in kind. Well, no. D'uh! You've met me, right? (like in the digital sense?) Hi, I'm Jenny. I thrive upon confrontation. Anonymously on the internet at any rate.
oh, don't worry about me. i guess you've never heard of sporty bashing. sure, he's not canadian or a newfie, but he'll do in a pinch.
Okay, you are the one who is nearly constantly sending me marginally inappropriate instant messages, aren't you?
Okay, which one of you keeps sending me marginally inappropriate instant messages?
SportsWriter2
06-20-2005, 06:42 AM
given that you always provide a cornucopia of quotable material, sporty. i actually have to restrain myself from quoting you too often.
Well, you either talk them wet or bring your own lube. :)
Speaking of riff raff. For a guy who treats strippers like "life sized action figures" you spend an awful lot of time here, engaging with strippers in a non-anal probing kind of way.
Yeah, but it's like when a dancer complains that her BF was "up my butt" all day, meaning he wouldn't leave her alone. ::)
Still, I think that Mr P and you are the most interesting combo since Tracy and Hepburn.
evan_essence
06-20-2005, 10:42 AM
if SW is going to attract a certain amount of asskissing fuckoes looking for stripper interaction despite the lack of T&A, etc. why wouldn't SW also attract the antithesis of an butt-licking toady who's looking for stripper interaction as well?Yes, but the many antitheses of butt-licking toadies are off topic. Just remember: butt-licking toadies - on topic; antitheses - off topic.
Btw, can we ban the phrases "fucko" and "pathetic loser" from our consciousness? I'm trying to think of any other incidence of name calling here that wouldn't be denounced as an ad hominem attack. (Besides, pathetic loser is redundant.)
-Ev
SportsWriter2
06-20-2005, 04:16 PM
(Besides, pathetic loser is redundant.)
I beg to differ, Ev. Loser is like when a basketball team loses 94-93. Pathetic loser is like when they lose 94-39. :O
Jay Zeno
06-21-2005, 04:33 AM
Btw, can we ban the phrases "fucko" and "pathetic loser" from our consciousness? I'm trying to think of any other incidence of name calling here that wouldn't be denounced as an ad hominem attack.We can, but I don't know that we want to. Any number of blueballers (oops! is that ad hominem?) here have adopted those terms with some glee on given occasions.
Bridgette
06-22-2005, 07:45 AM
I just think that one part of that stated purpose is getting pushed aside.
and just hang out!"
And no, I don't think most girls want it so bland. I really don't.
http://www.no-fat-chicks.de/no-fat-chicks-de.jpg
doc-catfish
06-22-2005, 07:03 PM
Given the anonymity of posting here we all tend to become brave - whether we'd use terms like "fucko" or "PL" so freely to a persons face is another matter.
I would never use these terms in an actual strip club, because such terms are relegated to internet chatter about strip clubs and not really a part of the club environment itself. Using them or the majority of such terms from a SC website glossary is utterly pointless. Even something like "your mileage may vary" which has been used in other contexts will get you some blank stares from a dancer or fellow customer.
Silverback
06-22-2005, 07:40 PM
I just think that one part of that stated purpose is getting pushed aside.
And no, I don't think most girls want it so bland. I really don't.
Accept it, Bridgette. We have to keep it bland so it doesn't upset the delicate female constitution.::)
SportsWriter2
06-22-2005, 08:49 PM
I would never use these terms in an actual strip club, because such terms are relegated to internet chatter about strip clubs and not really a part of the club environment itself. Using them or the majority of such terms from a SC website glossary is utterly pointless. Even something like "your mileage may vary" which has been used in other contexts will get you some blank stares from a dancer or fellow customer.
On the other hand, I hear dancers using the following terms in clubs:
regular, pervert, loser, asshole, pig, slut, cokehead, drunk, whore, retard, bitch, Mexican (any Latino), fucker, hustler, cow, skank and freak
These terms are often used in derogratory ways and sound meaner than anything we write here. :-\
KC Joe
06-22-2005, 10:27 PM
I think the pink side should be for the ladies only. If they want interaction from the boys, let them come over to the blue side. From my limited reading of the pink side, its mostly a mutual admiration society. Not too many ruffled feathers, unless you get into the political poo. The real fun is here. Political correctness has taken a holiday. If I had a choice, I’d spend my time and money on the ladies who venture into the basement rather than the ones who think we’re beneath them.
Katrine
06-23-2005, 12:12 AM
When I get onto SW, this is the first place I come. If I get the "too many users" error, I refresh until I'm back in. If I get that error on the pink side, I close the window and masterbate, or eat, or take a leak, or something else.....
Bridgette
06-23-2005, 02:12 AM
From my limited reading of the pink side, its mostly a mutual admiration society.
Because it's been moderated down to that. Seriously. It wasn't nearly so damn huggy-fuzzy last year.
But. LOL at your wording.
evan_essence
06-23-2005, 06:24 AM
These terms are often used in derogratory ways and sound meaner than anything we write here. :-\Meanness wasn't really the component I was thinking of. I expect that and sometimes take glee in it, at least in moderation. No, I was thinking PL and fucko are akin to Orwellian newspeak in that the terms automatically brand certain types of thinking or acting as negative without analysis. Even a poster who has had a positive experience often times starts out his post with a self-deprecating disclaimer, i.e., "I guess this makes me a total PL but I had a blast," as if he has to apologize for his decisions because portraying it too positively would be crimethought.
-Ev
Phil-W
06-23-2005, 02:48 PM
I think the pink side should be for the ladies only. If they want interaction from the boys, let them come over to the blue side. From my limited reading of the pink side, its mostly a mutual admiration society. Not too many ruffled feathers, unless you get into the political poo. The real fun is here. Political correctness has taken a holiday. If I had a choice, I’d spend my time and money on the ladies who venture into the basement rather than the ones who think we’re beneath them.
I don't have a problem with the "blandness" of the pink side. It's after all entirely within my own control as to whether I post or not. If it ain't to your taste, don't post - it's a free world.
I'd have to say from my OTC friendships with a number of dancers, bland is probably where it's at as far as they're concerned on the pink side. Dancing is a business to them, and their posts will reflect their business like attitude. Their living comes from persuading customers to buy private dance's and the content of what they post reflects that. Unemotional as the content might be, it's what interests most of the "pink posters".
Phil.