All Good Things
09-22-2005, 05:16 PM
Guys' expectations are understandably higher for such absurdly high amounts of money.
So the girl will have to hint at (if not outright promise) more to get the guy to spend $900 than she would for $600 than she would for $400 than she would for $60.
Rath, I appreciate that you are describing your own experience in the clubs, but extending this dynamic to the entire industry is just plain crazy. For starters, this implied cash-for-sex continuum is complete nonsense. It's predicated on the notion that every guy in the club is interested in extras. It also implies that rising prices are offered solely in exchange for increasing sexual activity. Both of these are simply untrue on their face for many clubs, dancers and customers. Even a cursory review of the surveys on this topic on the blue side shows this consistently.
When I spend $1,500 - $2,000 ("absurdly high amounts of money" by your calculus) on a series of CRs and bar tabs over an evening at PEC or Scores West in NYC or the Rhino in Vegas, or any other high-end club, my interest is in finding the smartest dancers in the club and enjoying their company and dances in that specific environment. Are extras on the menu? Well, sure, they are always out there with some dancers. But like many blueballers, I'm not a paying customer for that service. Just on strictly selfish terms, I don't find it particularly sexually stimulating to pay a dancer to give me a HJ, BJ or FS. I'm the kind of guy who expects a woman to want to fuck me before it becomes interesting. ;) And that leads to an entirely different OTC dynamic in certain very special cases (no, money does not change hands OTC, either.)
All this is just a personal preference, admittedly, but I think it's a view that's widespread enough to merit mention here. In short: Customers are in the clubs for very different reasons.
So the girl will have to hint at (if not outright promise) more to get the guy to spend $900 than she would for $600 than she would for $400 than she would for $60.
Rath, I appreciate that you are describing your own experience in the clubs, but extending this dynamic to the entire industry is just plain crazy. For starters, this implied cash-for-sex continuum is complete nonsense. It's predicated on the notion that every guy in the club is interested in extras. It also implies that rising prices are offered solely in exchange for increasing sexual activity. Both of these are simply untrue on their face for many clubs, dancers and customers. Even a cursory review of the surveys on this topic on the blue side shows this consistently.
When I spend $1,500 - $2,000 ("absurdly high amounts of money" by your calculus) on a series of CRs and bar tabs over an evening at PEC or Scores West in NYC or the Rhino in Vegas, or any other high-end club, my interest is in finding the smartest dancers in the club and enjoying their company and dances in that specific environment. Are extras on the menu? Well, sure, they are always out there with some dancers. But like many blueballers, I'm not a paying customer for that service. Just on strictly selfish terms, I don't find it particularly sexually stimulating to pay a dancer to give me a HJ, BJ or FS. I'm the kind of guy who expects a woman to want to fuck me before it becomes interesting. ;) And that leads to an entirely different OTC dynamic in certain very special cases (no, money does not change hands OTC, either.)
All this is just a personal preference, admittedly, but I think it's a view that's widespread enough to merit mention here. In short: Customers are in the clubs for very different reasons.