View Full Version : Girls, How old are these girls!! Jeeze!
blondhottie
01-29-2006, 02:19 AM
See, I would've guessed that they were 18 or 19, but I'm terrible at guessing ages.
I don't see what the big deal is-they're not taking any clothing off, they're just dancing around. That's kind of what I danced like when I first started stripping-I had no clue how to dance! LOL
exotisch23
01-29-2006, 06:04 AM
omg wow...nice parents they must have.. when I was that age I had barely even kissed a boy, girls are getting skankier early! :O
amylynnej
01-29-2006, 07:19 PM
whats funny is I have those same silver shorts LOL
TheLastBug
01-29-2006, 08:55 PM
Okay--a lot of people have missed this post: They ARE underage, and if theyre freshmen in high school they're about fourteen. So--yeah, if you know that AND want to hit it...you really need to reevaluate. And they LOOK 14-15
THEY DON'T LOOK TWENTY unless you're seeing some severely socially impaired twenty year old girls.
Post a link. The more I look, the more I think the *are* 18-19. I think there might be some sour grapes here that they are young and fresh. That's just my IMHO.
lizlizliz
01-29-2006, 09:35 PM
what's up with the one girl in the granny panties?
exotic0690
01-29-2006, 10:02 PM
16-18
Bridgette
01-29-2006, 10:07 PM
Post a link. The more I look, the more I think the *are* 18-19. I think there might be some sour grapes here that they are young and fresh. That's just my IMHO.
::) Sour grapes because they're "young and fresh"? Is that the best you can do??? We think they might be acting a tad inappropriate for their ages, so we're bitter because we're older? LMAO, please.
Personally, I think I'm MUCH sexier and I'm twice their ages - or more. I can damn sure dance better :P
And you only think they're 18 because you WANT to think that. Keep trying and you might convince yourself.
Yekhefah
01-29-2006, 10:11 PM
Has anyone seen the poster just inside the entrance to the Hustler Club in San Francisco? I find it just slightly disturbing. It features two girls who have the bodies of 18-year-olds, but in the face they don't look a day over nine. My bf and I examined that poster thoroughly and there's just no WAY those girls are over 18! Is it a Photoshop job or what?
Krazyjane
01-29-2006, 10:20 PM
Post a link. The more I look, the more I think the *are* 18-19. I think there might be some sour grapes here that they are young and fresh. That's just my IMHO.
Sour grapes? HA! Imagine if these girls were your daughters.
TheLastBug
01-30-2006, 11:15 AM
She's 19... and looks younger. So...?
susie
01-30-2006, 12:23 PM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8344345230801231934
She's 19... and looks younger. So...?
No. She doesn't. She dresses younger and wears her hair and make up "fresher", but their are changes in the skin that attest to her true age. Actually, she looks 22-25 from the skin. Sun damage is a bitch.
lunchbox
01-30-2006, 12:29 PM
off the top of my head:
www.arielrebel.com
www.josiejunior.com
MulattoKitten
01-30-2006, 02:20 PM
Just because they look that young doesn't mean they are.
Just as someone that looks older, doesn't mean they are.
Either way, it's not kiddie porn based on the fact they have clothes on (Although I cannot imagine how much brain power these three have among themselves if they are underage.)
MulattoKitten
01-30-2006, 02:21 PM
off the top of my head:
Are they 18 or older? Holy crap. See, how do we know the girls on the video are?
smartcookie
01-30-2006, 03:27 PM
Not a day over 16 is my guess for the Google vid.
Men want to fuck teenagers - it's a fact. Even if they'd never actually go through with it out of fear of being prosecuted for statutory rape (sic?), a man who says he'd never "hit" the girls in that video is lying through his teeth.
Phedre
01-30-2006, 03:38 PM
I don't think it's really that bad, except that it got videotaped. I know I did worse at 14 and 15 but I was smart enough not to video it. Well there are some polaroids but I have them. I grew up around boys so the fact that these girls (and they def. are GIRLS, easily given away by their still square bodies) danced in front of a video in bikini-like clothes really doesn't surprise me. Although if I was one of their moms I sure would have a talk with them about video taping these types of behaviors.
amylynnej
01-30-2006, 05:13 PM
Ironically those of us that are criticizing this all take our clothes off for a living and play sexy to men for money. So we're kind of hypocrites dont ya think!
Wwanderer
01-30-2006, 06:27 PM
I am pretty sure this sort of playing at adult sexuality with their rapidly maturing bodies in private has been common among adolescent girls, and boys too for that matter, forever. But as others have pointed out, the ready availability of reasonably high quality video cameras and the possibility distributing material widely via the net puts a whole new complexion on the matter. I'll be that most of these young girls wouldn't even think "showing off" like that in person in front of boys their own age, to say nothing of much older ("gross!!") adult men. However, it probably felt very private to them when were actually doing it.
I don't know how google video works, what sort of screening/censorship they impose, but whatever it is, I'll bet it gets to be a difficult job to hold the envelope in a place that will keep them out of legal problems (in all jurisdictions).
-Ww
GuyPOV
01-30-2006, 06:37 PM
I don't think it's really that bad, except that it got videotaped.
Right on there!!! These girls are just acting out videos they have seen on TV. The problem is they are not mature enough to understand that there family, friends, teachers, future employers and school administrators have access to the internet. There is a lot of explaining to do. I feel sorry for them.
songofthesword
01-30-2006, 07:04 PM
Not a day over 16 is my guess for the Google vid.
Men want to fuck teenagers - it's a fact. Even if they'd never actually go through with it out of fear of being prosecuted for statutory rape (sic?), a man who says he'd never "hit" the girls in that video is lying through his teeth.
damn... you got us :-\
GuyPOV
01-30-2006, 07:08 PM
Not a day over 16 is my guess for the Google vid.
Men want to fuck teenagers - it's a fact. Even if they'd never actually go through with it out of fear of being prosecuted for statutory rape (sic?), a man who says he'd never "hit" the girls in that video is lying through his teeth.
That is a bunch of crap. You need to get your situation together, if you think that is true.
Bridgette
01-30-2006, 09:08 PM
She's 19... and looks younger. So...?
No, just from the vid I would've guessed her as 20-something. This just proves guys suck at guessing ages (as well as weight), and you guess more to what you'd RATHER believe than what is really there.