"Chicks dig scars" right?
AKA, Merry F-ing Christmas to me. I hope, as a friend said to me jokingly "chicks dig scars" 'cause I have me a shiny new one on my chest. Had an inflamed red patch on my chest, which on biopsy, was basal cell carcinoma; e.g., skin cancer.
Yes, had been meaning to get it looked at, but it looked like classic actinic keratosis (a type of skin damage due to radiation/sun exposure) which can over time, convert to cancer, but recently started looking more inflamed... Usually converts to a more malignant type then your basic basal cell, which is especially non malignant.
As scary as the C word is, shouldn't be much drama, and I had it removed under just a local at doctors office (my friend the plastic surgeon) and get looked over once a year by a Derm. It is a good sized scar however as it was a pretty big patch.
I do have a few other spots of actinic keratosis, which will get taken care of with Imiquimod (Aldara) cream.
I spent a lot of time on boats, the ocean, working out doors, etc as a kid, sans any sun screen (hey, it was the 70s and 80s, we didn't know any better...) but I have avoided lying in the sun and always use sun screen.
Interesting to note, there is a big debate currently on the causes of skin cancers, and some very mainstream scientists simply not agreeing with the simple sunlight exposure = skin cancer.
“This is the same sun-phobic message we’ve been getting from dermatologists for more than 40 years,” said Michael Holick, a professor of medicine, physiology and biophysics at Boston University School of Medicine.
Holick, who’s written several books and conducted hundreds of peer-reviewed studies on sun exposure and vitamin D, is at the forefront of a growing number of health and medical professionals who are questioning conventional wisdom when it comes to the dark side of the sun.
Holick argues that what others call “damage” to skin from light tanning is more like sore muscles after a good workout.
“Mother Nature designed us for sun exposure,” Holick said. “You shouldn’t go out and bake, by any means, but you can get a mild tan without significantly increasing your chances of getting cancer.”
Holick notes that studies suggest those who work indoors have higher rates of skin cancer than those who work outside in the sun all day. Meanwhile, skin cancer rates are climbing faster than a Fourth of July thermometer, even as more Americans are slathering on more and more sunscreen.
All this, however, comes as levels of vitamin D have been plummeting.
‘D’ for deficient
A recent study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine found that more than three in four Americans are in short supply of vitamin D.
“We found a marked increase in vitamin D deficiency over the past two decades,” said lead researcher Adit Ginde, an assistant professor of surgery at the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine.
Low levels of vitamin D can lead to weak bones, heart disease, diabetes, infections, and a variety of cancers and other ugly stuff. In short: The body needs it. And where do you get it? A few foods and supplements are a good start, but it’s the sun that really cranks it out.
“Since sunlight is the body’s major source of vitamin D, increases in sunscreen, sun avoidance and overall decreased outdoor activity, while successful in reducing skin cancers, has probably reduced vitamin D levels in the population,” Ginde said.
Balanced approach
“This is a real controversy right now,” said Michael Murphy, a former Army dermatologist who now runs his own skin cancer clinic in the Indianapolis area.
Cont:
http://www.armytimes.com/offduty/hea...ngers_070209w/
Funny, I had just started doing some research on this topic, and had no idea how personal that research would be...There's a simple blood test to see if one had enough active vitamin D in their system, which I will request next time I for blood work me thinks....
So, lesson here is, if you have any red spots, etc you are not sure what it is (acne, etc) get it checked out. There are many things that are not cancer (e.g., various keratosis, moles, etc), that left there long enough, can become malignant, so it's worth getting them removed before they can convert. I, being busy, etc, etc, let it sit there too long...
Merry X Mass and all that crap....
Re: "Chicks dig scars" right?
Re: "Chicks dig scars" right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KS_Stevia
Get well soon Will!
As it's already removed, I guess that's "well" as I'm gonna get. The site of removal is pretty sore today, but that's to be expected. Thatx for your support. ;)
Re: "Chicks dig scars" right?
If u have to get skin cancer a BCC - basal cell carcinoma is the best one to get - or in other words the least dangerous one.
You will have to closely monitor your skin from now on tho.
Living in Australia we have 1 in 3 people getting skin cancers here.
Sorry to hear this Will. Im sure u will be all better now.
Re: "Chicks dig scars" right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jaizaine
If u have to get skin cancer a BCC - basal cell carcinoma is the best one to get - or in other words the least dangerous one.
You will have to closely monitor your skin from now on tho.
Living in Australia we have 1 in 3 people getting skin cancers here.
Sorry to hear this Will. Im sure u will be all better now.
Thanx. Yes, it's a PITA, but not terribly dangerous per se. It's also my own fault for not getting the spots checked years before, when they were not BCC, but I know them to be something that could convert to it. Let that be a lesson you all! :O
Re: "Chicks dig scars" right?
To answer your question, I personally love scars. I think they are incredibly sexy. Big scars, little scars, straight, jagged, burn scars, bite marks, all of em!
Re: "Chicks dig scars" right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caprica6
To answer your question, I personally love scars. I think they are incredibly sexy. Big scars, little scars, straight, jagged, burn scars, bite marks, all of em!
I feel better now, thanx! ;D