Well first it's b/c these sites are run by asshole men & no I don't hate men, but I do detest men who don't respect the women who make them MILLIONS.
They don't want us to ban guys. They want to force us to have to deal with assholes.
On Red Light I spoke to one of the CS guys there & he literally told me that I should put up with FREELOADERS & try to convince them to pay. LOL
The same thing on IM Live. They clearly have no clue what girls go thru & that 99% of all freeloaders will NEVER become a paying customer (at least that's my experience.) In this entire time I've been working only 2-3 guys have ever become paying customers when they either had a free or guest account.
On IMLive they rank us based on how attentive you are & I assume the guys can push a button that says if they found you attentive.
I'm ALWAYS attentive unless I can tell or know the guy is a freeloader (or he's an asshole which is rare for me.) Since 99.9% of them are FREELOADERS on IM Live, I'm constantly banning. So why have that rating for girls knowing full well either the girl is going to be stressed or the site is forcing us to put up with assholes who want freebies.
Also, the rate in which a guy expects me to response (under 1-2 seconds - read that I said SECONDS, not minutes) is ridiculous. There are times I can be typing out my response & they are gone. I have way more of a problem on SM than on IM Live, but this topic pertains to attentiveness.
So my point after my rant LOL is that they never built in the ban into the site. Either they are idiots & didn't think of it which I find hard to believe that every site except for MFC didn't think about this feature, or they just want to force us to live in hell.
Just like they lie to the guys & tell them we work for free (that's all of their marketing PLOY). Why do you think they come into the room & expect freebies?
Only one site that I know of encourages them to pay the model. Every other site advertises they can talk to us for free or see free shows or something.

