Roleplay. Daddy is a pet name (I've called boys Daddy in the past). As long as it's clearly within the bounds of fantasy and roleplay, then what's the harm?
Printable View
But, this is sex. It's deeply personal and deeply psychological. What is hot and horny for one person is triggering and upsetting for others. Which is why there are so many sex workers like us out there, right? If we all offered the same, or all had the same moral compass, we'd be squabbling over the same damn customers.
xx
As they say on The King of Queens...gonna have to give you a big fat 'NO' on that one!
it's in the terms of service though that you can't roleplay incest on every site I know of (except a few clip sites).
There are a lot of roleplays that I could offer that I feel there is no harm (blackmail, hypno fantasies, forced cum) but most of the sites I work won't allow it. I hate turning down money but don't want to get banned either.
Oh, I really think that depends on the session. I don't think that everyone who is into ageplay is literally into children. But I do think that some are. I was more speaking of whether playing out a fantasy makes you less likely to pursue it - I don't think, however, that two adults roleplaying dd/lg are gonna go out and molest people. On the other hand, going to a more young-looking performer and asking her to pretend to be 13 while you molest her or whatever is a massive warning sign to me.
I get the Daddy name thing. I don't do it. And then there's supposedly Big Daddy= Shawn from SM. Then there's the kid and boy names. Like Lakid or Laboy. It's trendy like Daddy. But in my head I'm just thinking wtf. Peter Pan syndrome I suppose.
I'm sure my comment sounds closed minded from a sex worker. I'm actually all for legalized prostitution- Just not ageplay/incest. And if the Daddy/daughter thing is about domme/sub relationships then why not just come in like that? As a domme.
I wish there wasn't so many guys looking for incest, ageplay and mother fucking because I'd make bank if I was into it. The kind of bank that would have me running next to Trump.
N E way. Thanks for letting me voice my opinion without flaming me.
I just had my first dom exclusive. I dont even offer it but he wanted to try me out i guess. It starts out as "a lil caucasian fag hungry for blk cock", then it devolves into wanting to suck"daddies cock" and me dressing him up and humiliating him. It was kinda hard considering ive never done humiliation or roleplay like that and his cam wasnt on. Obviously i didnt know what i was doing lol. Does this type of scenario play into this?
This topic is dead to me as far as I'm concerned. I read this thread and did a stepdad RP and the very next day was suspended. Sorry but it's too grey area and there's too many models that are patrolling pages and reporting ppl. No, I would do stepdad or anything grey area bc SM will not stand by you no matter what that email says about step. Don't do it.
SM might very well have been monitoring but I never stated an underage age and said stepdad the entire time. Grey area is always going to be no in a sites TOC. I also think there are models who screenshot anything they feel uestionable on other models profiles and report it.
I love you for this hyori. Best post on here.
i think SM needs to do a better job on banning users who habitually come on SM and ask for pee poo age play and ect should be reported or monitored and removed. Sure you can penalize the model and prevent streaming but what about the users who are hunting for these acts? Why let them have accounts when every single thing they want isn't legally allowed? I can't even prevent users from changing their usernames so they can bamboozle me for content but they can stay? Yeah they might have the credit card on file but SM you can't do anything with his card until he starts a show with one of us. So users shouldn't be able to ask for lude shows just as much as much as we can't ride the line and accept them.
All sites have a TOS, due to the billing companies requiring it. No site is going to risk it losing their biller for a few dollars. You must assume everything is being recorded & will end up on a tubesite somewhere.
Thus, you could be breaking local laws in regards to incest or underage play. Not to mention the U.S. gov watches & knows everything we do on computers & phones.
Is taking the risk for the mone on a slow day worth the long term repercussion? ON sm you can be terminated for breaking underage & incest role play, is those few dollars you make worth losing the ability to cam on it for the rest of the time you cam as a career?
If recorded & put on a tubesite, if you were to have children & a custody battle how well do you think that will do you in a court room? Several of my friends have had videos pulled off of tubesites & used against them in a court of law. Fortunately for them regular porn is NOT illegal, but if they had done incest or underage role play, might not have gone so well for them.
As soon as anything underage or incest was typed out in free or paid chat if not reported by SM and many other cam site rules is enough to terminate the contract with you. So what custie is worth losing your job over? So if you made $100 off of it, but lost the job & say you made $20,000 a year on that cam site. Didn't gain $100, but could lose out on $20,000 & more depending on how long you plan to cam as a career.
To be honest, I think a lot of Daddy/daughter play isn't really about incest at all. It's kind of like a kink for an S.S. officer uniforms/persona/roleplay- it's not that the people who fetishise that particular scenario are Nazi sympathisers, but rather that Nazi-ism is a prominent symbol of brutal, inflexible, authoritarian power. Most people into that kind of thing want to be treated like dirt, made to do humiliating/degrading things, perhaps beaten or whipped, all without the 'S.S. Officer' (airquotes) breaking rank or delivering any sort of gratification to the 'detainee'. It's more about symbolism than circumstances.
What does a father represent? Strength, authority, teaching, nurturing, responsibility, love, discipline, and so on. A child supplicates to their father's will. Without the incestuous connotations, that's quite similar to the dominant persona lots of people enjoy exerting in the bedroom. It doesn't have to be/isn't always about incest, but about the roles people play during sex. The atmosphere and edging on taboos can be a huge part of people's sexual excitement. Personally, I choose to judge not.
I do not do it at all and it makes me made when I am in a middle of private the guys try to enforce age play/incest roleplay. Just because I am sex worker does not mean I do not have boundaries.
So, in terms or what it's ALLOWED by Adultwork's TOS, is it allowed to roleplay as underage where the age is stated (i.e, 16), incest daddy/daughter (and you actually referring to the customer as "daddy"), and other stuff like , for example, roleplaying that you're engaging in bestiality, or are all these super big NO-NOs and you'll get your sorry ass suspended?
Not talking about what everybody thinks is wrong or right but what actually is in the TOS of Adultwork. I've read them but I want to be sure 100%.
Cheers! x =)
There's no "gray area" really with the daddy/daughter or mommy/daddy fetish at all. Age is irrelevant, as is the actual "relationship" between the role-players. The legit fetishists want the "feeling" associated with being comforted or doing something dirty/humiliating. They may say an age only as relevant to the mindset or maturity level they wish to regress. They would be morally opposed like anyone else if actual children were involved. There's nothing wrong with this. Being child-like is the fetish.
Legit pedophiles, on the other hand, will demand you need to be a certain age or a particular person in relationship to them to fulfill their fantasy. They want you to actually be or describe yourself as a child (with details) among other disturbing scenarios. These people would have no issues involving actual children in their scenarios, real or fantasy. Children are the fetish.
The issue is that its very nuanced to someone not experienced, and even less nuanced for law enforcement or credit card companies to make that difference, so most websites will make it entirely against the TOS for any such roleplay of either type. Even if websites allowed A but not B, you'll still get both models and customers that will do B and claim A if they're caught.
You should check the rules of the site you are on to see if incest is allowed. I would never wanna pretend to be underage and I ban guys that pull this shit mid show. If it's streamate then incest play is a definite "no". Age play is a no on all sites because why talk about minors on a sex site?
Just as a sidenote to this thread, most convicted paedos have been found to role play their age 'fantasies' out online in one form or another prior to doing the deed!