Interactive devices making for bad cam girls?
Since they came out with those interactive toys that "react to tips" I've seen a trend with many gals and I'm wondering what some others think. Case in point a favorite of mine, who I regularly tipped and bought a few vids from switched to using one. She went from full nude shows with toys to sitting there fully clothed, not even able to see if the toy is there, and shaking like she is having a seizure. I've noticed more going to this method and the "cam shakes" seem to be the next big fake orgasm thing. When you compare it to the gals still getting naked, but using toys or couples and the interactive toys their reactions are much more like they were using the toys, not having the hand of god giving them the finger one token at a time, often making more noise and distraction than the girl
So for us guys... what do you think? and for the girls do you think this has changed things for the better or worse?
Re: Interactive devices making for bad cam girls?
I'm not a fan. I think most of the reactions are at bare minimum over acted if not outright faked. The cynical part of me suspects that many girls don't even have a working vibrator and are just giving us a fake reaction whenever they hear the tip bell. If a cam girl stopped doing nude shows in favour of doing fully clothed "interactive vibrator" shows I would probably stop going to her room. Then again if there are enough suckers who want to pay for that then so be it, like all these things the market will dictate what happens.
Re: Interactive devices making for bad cam girls?
It's a fad like everything else and b/c of those very thoughts you seem to have op, will pave the way back to new/old school finger flicks. Keeping the saying... 'to each his own', alive and well.
Re: Interactive devices making for bad cam girls?
Haven't seen a show like that that looked like real orgasms were involved. I do like the idea of using controllable fuck machines while in private too. Not to mention the chick with the dildo that cums to tips. That is actually really awesome.
Re: Interactive devices making for bad cam girls?
Recently started watching cam girls and the interactive devices are the only reason I'm still doing it. Who cares if it's fake as long as it's sexy. I don't see it being different than a stripper/cam girl pretending to like you since you're tipping. Is that just as disingenuous?
The stripping, TnA, conversations I can get at a physical strip club with the added benefit of it being in person. The interaction of making her orgasm cannot (non-extras)
Re: Interactive devices making for bad cam girls?
The interactive devices have changed things for the worse. Too artificial and fake.
I avoid rooms/girls that are using them.
Re: Interactive devices making for bad cam girls?
Here is the thing about the Lush. I really cannot fake with that thing. Do you have a gspot? Do you have this high vibrating device buzzing at it? When you get a string of tips, omg does that thing really feel good. And yeah, it gives me weird noises and people think I'm faking. But they can fuck off, THEY DONT KNOW. During goldshows countdowns I like to use it BECAUSE it makes me wet. I'm sure you guys rather look at a soaking wet cunt then a dry one? Also sometimes yes I can cum during tips. I've done it before.
So when you dudes say faking it... say that to the 4 pairs of panties I have to go through anytime I use it.
Re: Interactive devices making for bad cam girls?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
audritwo
I'm sure you guys rather look at a soaking wet cunt then a dry one?
Sorry, that just strikes me as being hilarious. Not in a bad way for you! You certainly made your point...
I hardly ever watch the camgirls, but in general I don't like the heavy reliance some of the models seem to make of the devices, when I have surfed MFC in the last couple years. Had a girl I used to visit a few years ago, she still looks great, but it seems this is all she does the 2-3 times I checked her out in the intervening time. (how long have they had these, 2 years?)
Whereas before she had a variety of ways she used to tease and draw out the customers. The girl never got fully nude or did toy shows, unless maybe in private (I never tried that)--she didn't have to. She was great at the periodic dancing and 'near nude' teasing before. For all I know she still does it, but it didn't look that way.
Seems like Audritwo has mastered the use of it, though. I could see how it might be a good idea.
But I am not a regular cam guy by any means, so my opinion isn't as relevant.