http://img109.exs.cx/img109/267/sincity4ja5zl7bt.gif
Is hot! :-*
Printable View
what is fake stripper?a movie?
kinda looks like coyote ugly....
LOL Mermaid.. That's Jessica Alba. She's in the movie "Sin City" Where she plays a stripper. From what I hear she doesn't take her clothes off, so technically she doesn't qualify as a stripper.. LOL
The clip is hot, although Jessica has never really done anything for me. Not sure why, just something about her.
Now if we could only get Vy to dress up like that with a fruit hat on it would just rock my frickin world. LOL
She said in her interview she was so nervous because her butt cheeks hung out.....wtf?
Sorry, it's the worst so far i have seen. Should have been on Life Time For Women TV, it fits there IMO.
Pamela
I think she was actually supposed to be a hooker. The only thing I really liked about that movie were the kick ass hookers because the rest of it sort of lost me so I might as well just enjoy looking at pretty women.
No, Nancy isn't supposed to be a hooker. She's all over the source material as the one "untouchable" girls out of them all (Though Miho comes close, ya only touch her if you're fond of circumcision).Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunny
I hear that's the interesting thing about the movies. Unless it's a documentary, it's all fake. Julia Roberts doesn't really have to hook for Richard Gere and Jennifer Beals doesn't have to dance like a spinning top. The movie cops don't use real bullets when they shoot at the bad guys either. }:D
-Ev
In Texas Chainsaw Massacre that Jennifer Beals chick sure had a great bounce to her rack though, can't deny that.Quote:
Originally Posted by evan_essence
}:D
She did an interview on MSN. The reason she didn't strip was because she didn't want to feel that her father couldn't watch it. She made a comment saying that he might disown her or something! lol
She also said that she didn't feel comfortable baring the top or the bottom part of her body. Basically, I respect that. A lot of girls who hate bearing themselves will brace themselves and do it to get up on the career ladder without even disussing it with directors etc, but she is still there and didn't need to bear an ounce or flesh. Respect to that!!
Well, making a movie about strippers and then NOT stripping is kind of like making a movie about firemen and NOT showing them fighting fire! WTF?Quote:
Originally Posted by Malibu
She knew she was gonna be making a movie about the work, she should've been prepared to make the character as life-like as possible. I haven't seen the movie, though. Is the fact that she's a stripper *the* central plot line in the movie, or just a side line? /:O
The clip looks very nice.How's the movie,btw,is it worth watching?
LMAO @ Hate & Pam. :D
Rusdancer, yes it's worth watching. Great movie, imo. I loved it.
I <3 the hookers the most too. Rosario *hot*!
LOL, I agree. I do respect what she said about her dad. But if she was gonna do the role of a stripper she should've done the role of a stripper. I thought she was a gogo dancer. I still love her anyway & like seeing her in that film though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueyez
It takes a lot more than an attractive, shapely woman moving around a pole in next to nothing on to make a stripper. There has to be some overt eroticism and seduction. And a desire to make money by not giving into the customer's fantasy about what may be promised.
i hate her!
Blueyez, and others, who haven't seen the movie. The fact that Jessica Alba is a stripper has very little to do with her part of the movie. It just happens to be her occupation. The part of the trilogy with her and Bruce Willis deals with Bruce saving her life when she was 11, their reunion 8 years later, and him having to save her life again.
While she is shown on stage dancing in a bar, that scene has minor significance. It's just a way of reuniting the two characters after eight years.
Although this movie has central characters who are strippers, the movie is certainly not about stripping. I don't want to give a lot away, but this movie is unlike any I have ever seen and I highly recommend it. Robert Rodriguez, Frank Miller, and Quentin Tarantino have made a movie that I think will be recognized as a masterpiece as time goes on.
I thought it was funny that she didn't strip, but didn't care to see her naked anyway...so win-win for me.
I think Eliza Dushku would've been a better choice anyway...
WORST MOVIE EVER!!!!! I saw it and it had the worst acting i have ever witnessed by Josh Hartnett. Also, Brittany Murphy absolutely cannot do any accents at all, she switches between a new york accent, a boston accent and some weird non specific drawl. Trust me don't waste your money!Quote:
Originally Posted by rusdancer
It's a great movie. Stayed fairly true to the graphic novels. Of course, I'm a Frank Miller addict, so ymmv.....
Now you're just being silly. That's Jessica Biel, not Jennifer Beals. :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Madcap
-Ev
Whatever her name is, great rack... :D
We must remember not all of us get naked..we do have clubs where you only see a girl in a bikini, so technically she still is portraying what she is supposed to.
Thank you! Agreed! F. Miller gave her the option of removing more clothing or just doing what she did. I think she was great. The whole movie was so incredible in it's comic book style, I absolutely loved it! Would see it in theaters again. Also, the hookers and strippers are just details in the whole sordid story. No need to pick apart an "insignificant" stripping performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky
i don't think blonde hair suits her..she looks sick