This is inspired by the "Men Can Be So Hyprocritical" thread. http://www.stripperweb.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=101354
So, I have had this conversation with quite a few guys, and a lot of them hold their girlfriends/wives to one standard, but the woman who was their most excellent lover to another. If a woman is especially sexually open, really (or should I say suspiciously?) good in bed, then she's good for a good time, but not for a wedding ring. The wife doesn't suck dick/balls, do any tricks in bed. No, she's just a good little wife that raises your kids while you screw Jezebel behind her back. Quite a few guys I know have conveyed this to me in one conversation or another.
To be fair, a lot of these guys were in their mid to late 20s (some early 30s sprinkled in). Older men that I have asked say otherwise. They are not intimidated by a woman that is good in bed. As a matter of fact, the older divorced guy I dated said he was totally wrong to marry a "wholesome" woman. He was miserable and depressed because his wife was a "good girl" who would ONLY do missionary.He said if he ever married again, he would definitely marry a woman who could stimulate him sexually and intellectually.
So guys, I need your input on this, as I'm terribly curious. Also, if you don't mind (this is totally optional, as I don't wanna deter anyone from answering), give your age range.



He said if he ever married again, he would definitely marry a woman who could stimulate him sexually and intellectually.

Reply With Quote


Bookmarks