Is this acceptable nowadays or disturbing, in your opinion?
Some of these girls don't even look 18 which really creeps me out, but I guess a lot of guys are into it?
Is this acceptable nowadays or disturbing, in your opinion?
Some of these girls don't even look 18 which really creeps me out, but I guess a lot of guys are into it?
This one is disturbing http://www.jailbaitgallery.com/index.php?id=13
^![]()
this one too.. clearly she's underage.





my first girlfriend also looked really super young and wasn't.
Ya just never know. However i think the guys who fuck these girls and fantasize about younger girls are just sick bastards and thats what this site seems to cater to. Honestly it makes me nervous about bringing another beautiful woman into this world.





This is just as bad as influencing donkey punches and dirty sanchez.
If you are 18 or older and posing for this site i mean....
well i don't have room to talk about it, i do young girl fantasy for money.
But wierd to look at
Disgusting. I fucking hate older men who get off on these CHILDREN. Fucking disturbing
I know there is a guy who shoots sites like this..not sure if he does this site...but since the girls are clothed and there are no sexual positions it isnt technically child porn. They try to take him down. but they cant ever get him....and the girls are often very underage. I've heard of girls as young as 9 posing for him.
I forget his name though.....a girl I worked with in LA told me about him..she used to pose for him
I seen this on i think CNN or MSNBC, well one of those. No harm being done they said. Probably the same guy. BUT, some of these girls are 11 yrs. OLD! and pulling up a tight shirt on the side a bit, nothing to see but a little stomache, but it's sick to be able to have a site like this and they wont shut him down.
We all know his reasons for the site. He makes big $$$$, and pedo's get off actually looking at underage! Now that is sick.





This fucking disturbs me. then again, it's not like we didn't know about it.
However...I have to think... there have been times, especially when I weigh less and I haven't bothered to dress particularly feminine or do extensive makeup, etc., that I end up looking VERY young, and I have to wonder...
there are two sides to this coin. some women can't help the fact that unless they really try, they still look 17. what they CAN help is fucking POSING for this pedophiliac-encouraging site.
EWWWW there really IS an underage girl on this site, on the right
That's disgusting.
I'm sure they got all these photos from MySpace or Facebook.
I get sick to my stomach each time I click on a new picture...I mean even if they're not underage, the concept certainly is disturbing...and if they are underage, where are these girls' childhoods? It's sad to see young girls be so sexualized, I mean all over, not just on those types of websites...I think we had a thread about that a while back?
Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children, not just those who are below the arbitrary legal age. The idea that kids should be completely sexless until they're 18 is extremely new. Throughout most of human history, a 14-year-old girl was considered to be in her sexual prime, and many men still like to look whether they would act on it or not.
I'm not endorsing predatory sex or pornography, mind you. I'm just saying that the guys who look at these pictures are NOT pedophiles and it's not particularly disturbing to think of a man finding a teenage girl attractive. Most of them do.
Eh, K and I check them out all the time, especially the ones who are dressing to be checked out. It doesn't hurt them to look, LOL. I think most people are aroused by taboo fantasies and still know the difference between harmless fantasy and harmful reality.
Well, throughout most of human history, people haven't lived past what we consider middle age, so we've adjusted our norms. At 14, OUR girls are just starting high school, but in the past they would probably be close to being married and pregnant by then.
Of course it's not unnatural to find them attractive in passing, but a site called Jailbait is wrong. It's specifically jerk off material of underage girls, whether it's overtly pornographic or not.
I agree. I'm just saying they're not pedophiles. That's a pretty strong word to throw around so casually.
I agree too, but there's not much of a physical difference between an 18 year old, a 16 year old, and for that matter a 21 year old. 21 year olds are still fresh and young - and for that matter, so am I at 24. Why specifically lust after the 16 year old? I think lusting after girls who are specifically as close to being illegal as possible (like porns that say "filmed on her 18th birthday!") is a weird and inappropriate fetish. It's like legal pedophilia when they approach it that way, to try to seek girls as soon as they're legal then likely find them unattractive when they come into womanhood. Remember Lolita? How Humbert found her attractive as a teen and was repulsed by her as an adult? That makes me shudder.
I agree with you, if you look at most models, they start in their mid teens. If they don't have a career by 20, they won't have one at all. They're very aesthically (though not sexually) attractive.
I saw a few pictures of girls that were disturbingly young. Others were more than likely 18.
A lot of people get off on taboo. When you make it seem dirty and wrong, that's hot. It's like fucking your best friend's wife - the sex isn't necessarily the hot part, it's the fact that you're not supposed to be doing it. By raising such a hue and cry about how dirty and wrong it is to lust after teens, we fetishize it.Originally Posted by ViolaStrings
Bookmarks