See my previous post for the basis on which I disagree. But after hitting "Post" and reading your post, Yekhefah, I would agree with you that it's reprehensible to so modify a work of art, and then selling or presenting it as the original artist's work.
I don't see the problem if someone takes responsibility for the re-mix/mash-up/edits themselves and makes it clear that it's been changed from the original artist's vision or intention.
I don't think I made that clear in my original post, but the idea was lurking in the back of my mind while I wrote it.




Reply With Quote



Bookmarks