Bear with me for a moment... This is kind of an odd thing I've been tossing around.
Now I don't do hardcore "extras" simply because I don't feel comfortable with it, but this is something I've been thinking about lately.
A prostitute--as long as she's not a street-walker--is less likely to be arrested for prostitution than a clean stripper. The simple reason is exposure. Most experienced prostitutes (again, NOT the street-walkers) tend to be more selective of their clients. They get clients as referrals and not just off the street. They tend to screen their clients to make sure that they AREN'T cops. Now this doesn't work all the time, of course, but it seems to me that I'd be less likely to be arrested as an independent prostitute than as a stripper.
And that irks me to no end. Why the fuck should I be risking arrest just by going in to work and giving a lapdance? I've never been caught in a raid (knock on wood), but I think this is just ridiculous. I think that the more restrictive a state's laws, the greater the chance that everyone will just ignore it. I mean, if you're going to be a "prostitute" for getting within 6 feet of the customer, what difference does it make if you're grinding on his lap? If you'd be arrested for grinding (but every other girl in your club is grinding), then what difference does it make if you give him a hj through his pants?
I know it makes a difference to us PERSONALLY, but from a legal standpoint there's no real difference. And that irritates the heck out of me. Lawmakers try to make it illegal to give a lapdance, and then they wonder why the strippers went from giving clean lapdances to sucking cock in VIP--DUH! Because there's no LEGAL difference between the two!
Am I making any sense or just rambling?





Reply With Quote





Bookmarks