Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Clive Maund finally 'spills the beans' re US in Middle East

  1. #1
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Clive Maund finally 'spills the beans' re US in Middle East

    (snip)"Back in the late 20th century there were predictions that the 21st century would be characterized by “resource wars” where fighting breaks out between countries and aligned groups of countries, as they scramble to secure increasingly scarce commodities for themselves, principally oil and water. Barely had we entered the new century when a major resource war began, with the big surprise being that it was not some banana republic suddenly deciding to invade and loot its neighbor’s territory, but instead the most powerful country on earth muscling its way around an entire region on the other side of the planet in order to position itself to plunder its oil resources en masse for itself.

    We have all heard about “Peak Oil”, which is oil production peaking and then tailing off gradually, due to finite supplies dwindling and remaining reserves being increasingly difficult and costly to both find and extract. The timing of the peak depends on who you listen to but is supposed to occur anytime between a couple of years ago and about 2020 - 2030, but in any event we are historically speaking close to it, and now, with the world population continuing to expand and booming demand from up-and-coming economies with massive populations like China and India, steadily increasing demand for oil is colliding with relatively fixed or even declining supply. The result of this can only be rising prices, which will continue to rise until demand moderates sufficiently to bring about a rebalancing of supply and demand. The big problem with oil is that it is so central to everything and still so incredibly cheap in relation to the energy it supplies and its sheer usefulness, that prices will have to rise to much higher levels before demand is choked off sufficiently to bring about an enduring state of balance between supply and demand - only in the case of severe global recession resulting in a big reduction in economic activity would this upward price pressure abate, and that, of course, is exactly what a continued steep rise in the oil price may bring about.

    The United States, more than any other country, is an economy dependant on an abundant supply of cheap oil. The per capita use of oil in the US vastly outstrips that of most countries in the world, the two principal reasons for this being that the infrastructure of the country has been developed on the assumption that cheap oil will continue indefinitely, and the other reason is that taxes on gasoline are held are much lower levels than in many other nations for political reasons. Back around the middle of the last century the big oil companies in the US, with the collusion of government, set out to intentionally destroy the public transport system in the US, in order to force the population to use automobiles more and thus burn more gas netting more profits for oil companies, and they were largely successful in achieving this objective. For the same reason they also encouraged massive urban sprawl and the development of suburbia, so that millions of people have to drive huge distances to get to work - a reason why gas taxes have to be held at much lower levels than in other countries such as Great Britain, where they are exorbitantly high. Clearly, if affordable gasoline disappears, then the countless vast tracts of suburbia in the US will become middle class ghettoes. Once you grasp the implications of this you will immediately comprehend why the United States is particularly aggressive about access to oil supplies and will stop at nothing to secure them. The United States is structured geared to the profligate consumption of oil and would collapse without it.

    The oil and gas reserves of the planet, which took millions of years to form, have been and are being plundered and burned up recklessly in the space of a mere one to two hundred years. Like greedy children cramming a sudden bonanza of chocolates and sweets into their faces until they have nothing left, individuals - and corporations and governments - have selfishly and thoughtlessly squandered this precious resource without any regard for the needs of future generations. You only have to look around you at the vast volumes of largely unnecessary traffic - businessmen flying halfway across the world to sign a paper, holidaymakers taking a four hour flight to lay on a sunbed in a gated compound and read for a week, commuters who drive for an hour or two to get to the office and whose work will be viewed by future historians as being of considerably less value than the energy they consumed in getting to their workplace. The scale of unnecessary consumption and sheer waste is mind-boggling, and, of course, it cannot and will not continue indefinitely. Once the energy that took millions of years to form and only two hundred years or so to burn up is gone, it’s gone. The day of reckoning will be upon us and human beings who have bred like flies on the back of this bonanza will face starvation by the hundreds of millions or billions if substantive measures are not taken in time to make good the energy shortfall by means of other fuels. This will be hard luck for the victims but great news for the planet which is groaning under the strain of unimaginable hordes of human beings projected to reach about 11 billion by the year 2050. Alternative energy sources such as wind and water power, which take a lot of energy initially to create and install, may not be available in sufficient quantity or in time to fill the massive void - it is thought to be only Uranium that has a realistic chance of meeting the enormous energy needs. We are now starting to feel the first winds of this energy - food maelstrom with sharply rising global food prices, caused in part by rising oil prices, already putting a huge strain on the world’s poor, many of whom are on the verge of starvation, if not actually starving. "(snip)

    (snip)"According to their logic the US elites have good reason to feel pleased with themselves following the successful takeover of Iraq, even if the general public in the United States is unable at this stage to grasp what a “glorious achievement” it is. Iraq is known to have over 100 billion barrels of oil reserves. In addition to this the country is still relatively unexplored and there are an estimated 200 to 300 billion barrels more waiting to be discovered. Given that this is largely light crude, the most valuable type of oil, it doesn’t take much effort of the imagination to figure that US forces have seized control of one of the world’s greatest treasures, whose value dwarfs the cost of the invasion. The invasion of Iraq would therefore be a strong contender for an entry in the Guinness World Records as the greatest act of piracy in the history of the world. It makes the exploits of Blackbeard and Captain Jack Sparrow look decidedly tame. With this being election year in the US, various politicians try to curry favor with the voters by talking about “bringing the troops home”. So let’s be clear about this - the troops are not coming home until the infrastructure has been built to fully exploit Iraq oil resources, and to this end to partition off the local population who might otherwise interfere with production. In fact, a background level of violence is actually desirable at this time, in order to provide the excuse to keep the troops there. We should also not overlook the reality that the US elections are pure spin anyway, a charade. The United States is not a democracy and has not been for a long time. Its political system is a duopoly of power, with the same plutocratic forces controlling both the Democrat and Republican parties, the election being a 4-yearly circus to fool the masses into thinking that they live in a democracy. In one sense democracy is an absurd concept anyway - how can you allow ignorant, uneducated people the same vote as intelligent, discriminating people? The answer is that that you can - and then you program them to do what you want them to anyway via their favorite entertainment and media inputs. If you spend an hour of your time going down to the polling station to vote, you have just wasted an hour of your life, except that it can be amusing to watch the other fools wasting their time lining up - thinking that they are going to make a difference.

    Complete control of the Mid-East, which the United States and the major oil companies are now close to having achieved, of course confers massive power over the rest of world, in particular over rising economic powers such as China and India and the immense leverage that this will in time afford can be used to steer these countries in whatever direction is desired. The US is believed to be involved in a strategic race against time to corner the bulk of the world’s remaining oil reserves, the control of which can then be used to dissuade countries like China from resorting to the wholesale dumping of dollars or US Treasuries, along the lines of “Try it and we’ll cut off your oil supply”, which one would expect to be couched in more diplomatic language. Because of its gargantuan levels of debt the US is acutely vulnerable now, but with time it plans to tip the scales back in its favor partly by sales of its recently acquired plunder. Anyone who has watched those David Attenborough nature programs about seal colonies on beaches will know that the US is like the “beach master”, the huge bull elephant seal, taking possession of all of the females on the beach and jealously guarding them, while China and Russia are the other strong contenders, who don’t quite have the strength or size to try to assert dominance and as a result can only make gains when the beach master suffers some drastic reversal of fortune. The irony is that China now has the power to stop the US in its tracks, by dumping its vast dollar and Treasury holdings, which would send the US economy straight over a cliff, but it is unlikely it will do this because it can’t stomach the consequences to itself or its people of doing so.

    There are those who believe that the multinational oil companies and US interests will not be left in peace in Iraq to reap the fruits of their exploits. What these people don’t understand is that in order to make it possible to develop Iraq’s oil infrastructure and actually ship out the oil in quantity an apartheid system will be created across the country, which is scheduled to be partitioned and balkanized. The indigenous people will largely be confined to their towns and cities and specific rural areas and ruled over by the US installed puppet government - they won’t be allowed anywhere near the oil installations, which will be run mainly by imported technicians and service personnel. The country will essentially be run as an oilfield, with the original inhabitants being marginalized and viewed as incidental. The infrastructure for this system of control is currently under construction and as it approaches completion the vulnerability of US and coalition military personnel and consequent casualties will decrease significantly. "(snip)

  2. #2
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: Clive Maund finally 'spills the beans' re US in Middle East

    continued ...

    (snip)"This is a long article, and it is therefore important to conclude by focusing on the most important points.

    1. The resource wars of the 21st century are now well underway, with the US and Britain leading the charge in the Mid-East, behind the façade of the War on Terror. The goal is complete control of the Mid-East oilfields, which will be achieved by a combination of the already existing client states such as Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states, and the forcible acquisition of remaining oil rich countries. Logic dictates that the next country to be appropriated will be Iran, and although they would like to take in addition the oil rich countries around the Caspian Sea, an attempt to do so would result in a direct confrontation with Russia, so instead they will bide their time and likely attempt to subvert these countries politically.

    2. Peak Oil is upon us, or very close at hand. The combination of rising population and strong increase in demand for oil from developing countries such as China and India, coupled with inelasticity in demand for oil, at least on the downside, is likely to force a continuing uptrend in the price of oil, although this may be mitigated once Iraq is brought on stream in a big way.

    3. As the oil price is an underlying component of the price of food, the price of food is likely to continue to rise, a situation that will be exacerbated by the recently fashionable and rather bizarre practice of turning food into fuel. This can be expected to lead to widespread unrest and possible anarchy in many poorer countries.

    4. The seizure of Iraq is widely perceived to be have been a blunder. From the strategic standpoint of the US elites it was no such thing. The oil reserves contained within Iraq are gigantic, and thus its acquisition was a major economic and security leap forward for the United States. In addition its central position within the region and the earlier acquisition of Afghanistan make the eventual appropriation of oil-rich Iran an almost foregone conclusion. In comparison with the US strategic planners, those in the European Union are hopelessly naďve and ineffectual - they can’t even organize the trash collection in Naples.

    5. The United States is desperately sick economically, with an economy lamed by gargantuan debt, outsourcing and rampant speculation, and yet somehow it manages to spend more on its military machine than every other country in the world combined. This is only possible because the dollar has been, up until now, the world currency, and because the US is living on the rest of the world’s savings. The supreme irony is that the rest of the world is financing the US takeover of the Mid-East, and in a few years countries which have had, and have right now, the power to stop the US in its tracks by dumping dollars and Treasuries, but can’t face the dire consequences of doing so, will have to kow-tow to the US for oil. Once that time arrives they won’t dare dump US paper and face the retribution of having their oil supply cut off and their economies shut down. At present the US is only militarily the greatest power on earth, but in a few years it looks set to assume comprehensive hegemony of the planet, as the massive oil revenues from the spoils of the Mid-East campaigns flow in and correct the careening deficits. China will then comply with US demands or the oil tap will be swiveled in the off direction. Russia, currently blessed by an abundant supply of oil and other natural resources, should do well, but will be surrounded and eventually forced into compliance as its resources dwindle and it becomes increasingly isolated. Britain, as the 1st officer of the US in its wars of acquisition, will enjoy a privileged place at the table in an increasingly resource starved world. Israel will look on with quiet satisfaction at all of this.

    6. Now we crystallize the most important point of this article, which is what the whole thing has been leading up to. As we have already noted, the United States is widely perceived as an economic basket case on account of its astronomic debts and weakened domestic economy, but it is in the process of seizing control of the world’s most important remaining oil reserves and bringing them on line. Once it has achieved this it will not just be the greatest military power on earth but will assume center stage as the greatest economic power on earth as well and be completely unassailable. By that time no other country will dare to, or perhaps even want to, dump dollars or US Treasuries. As we have observed on in the recent past, the US stockmarket has refused to make new lows (apart from a fleeting intraday new low) for a couple of months now, despite all the doom and gloom flying around, and the volume internals of the market are bullish. So it would appear that Smart Money is beginning to get a handle on what’s cooking as set out here. If our evaluation of the situation is correct, and China continues to play ball by not dumping US dollars or Treasuries, despite the Tibet provocation in the western media, then the US stockmarket is poised for a powerful bull market advance, as the injection of massive amounts of newly created liquidity works its magic and eases the global financial crisis. This advance would initially take the market back to its highs, but should later continue on to new highs. The huge global increases in money supply are of course highly inflationary and should continue to fuel a robust bull market in commodities, including gold and silver, even if they get put on the back burner and continue to correct for a while as the focus shifts to the broad stockmarket. Right now the US stock markets are poised to break out above the crucial 1400 resistance level on the S&P500 index, an event that could easily trigger a 400 - 500 point up day on the Dow Jones Industrials.



    Clive Maund, Diploma Technical Analysis
    [email protected]


    Copiapo, Chile, 26 April 2008"(snip)

  3. #3
    Featured Member BrodieLux's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    938
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts

    Default Re: Clive Maund finally 'spills the beans' re US in Middle East

    I completely agree with this analysis. You know who else said this? The guy who wrote "The Threatening Storm: The Case For Invading Iraq" many years ago. Kenneth Pollack.

    A less evil move for the US would be to use all that effort and channel it into eliminating dependency on petroleum.
    Quote Originally Posted by CuriousSeeker View Post
    ^Pssssttttt, your stripper is showing.

  4. #4
    Featured Member
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,030
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 117 Times in 78 Posts

    Default Re: Clive Maund finally 'spills the beans' re US in Middle East

    Yeah, some prominent writers also predicted civil war if gas got to $3 a gallon... This isn't quite conspiracy theory crap, but it's close.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Joined
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Boston/Montreal
    Posts
    194
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 57 Times in 20 Posts

    Default Re: Clive Maund finally 'spills the beans' re US in Middle East

    I wish I bought into this peak oil theory or the theory that we went into Iraq to secure oil.

    both fail the reality check..one how can there be peak oil when we continue to find new oil deposits

    two how could have we secured a supply of inexpensive oil supply by going into Iraq when oil has incresed more than 3 fold since?
    don't hate the player hate the game......

  6. #6
    God/dess Deogol's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,493
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts

    Default Re: Clive Maund finally 'spills the beans' re US in Middle East

    Peak oil isn't about not finding oil deposits. Peak oil means a declining amount of oil available for pumping.

    There can be new oil deposits, but they are smaller and/or dirtier and/or more expensive to pump.

  7. #7
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: Clive Maund finally 'spills the beans' re US in Middle East

    The 'tin foil hat' crowd is of the opinion that, from a strategic standpoint for the USA, the matter of rising world market oil price is a totally separate matter from the ability of the USA to import sufficient world market oil to meet its needs.

    Along those lines, it's becoming increasingly apparent that Mexico's Catarell oil field output is declining sharply ... the US has counted on imported Mexican oil as a 'captive source' of imported oil for decades, but that source is now drying up. The US also counts on Canadian oil exports as another 'captive source', and that source is no longer increasing (and is projected to decline beyond 2010 or so). These two 'captive sources' cannot meet America's needs for imported oil by themselves, forcing the USA to purchase oil from 'non-captive' sources i.e. OPEC countries and other countries. As Mexican and Canadian oil output declines, the USA will be forced to become more and more reliant on OPEC and other countries to stem the shortfall.

    As has been well publicized, the US currently imports a lot of oil from countries such as Venezuela and Nigeria where the future availability of oil for export to the USA is in question ... primarily for political reasons ( see ). If these political problems worsen, it is entirely possible that these sources of oil imports could be lost to the USA regardless of price.

    Obviously the USA imports a very large amount of oil from Saudi Arabia ... second only to Canada on the imports list ( see ). However, future exports of Saudi oil are contingent on the continued ability to sail oil tankers halfway around the world without them being torpedoed, are contingent on Saudi Oil wells operating without terrorist bombings etc. In the absence of a large US military presence in the middle east, there is a very real risk that the shia led middle eastern terrorists could increasingly disrupt the flow of sunni oil from Saudi Arabia.

    Going back to the exporters list, Iraq is #6 on the list. Despite what you might see in mainstream news media, Iraqi oil exports to the USA have increased about 50% over the past year and will continue to increase in future years - most likely bringing Iraq up to #4 on the list by next year after Canada, Saudi Arabia and Mexico. But again the flow of Iraqi oil faces the very same risks as Saudi oil i.e. shia backed terrorists blowing up pipelines / pump stations / oil tankers etc.

    As Deogol touches on, attempting to bring additional Canadian or Mexican oil into production ( cost issues aside) could only amount to a 'drop in the proverbial bucket' of Americas total need for imported oil. Same is true of any possible future attempt to bring additional domestic US oil production online (i.e. ANWR, offshore drilling, Texas stripper wells etc.). Thus if America is going to continue to meet present need for imported oil, the continued flow of Saudi and Iraqi oil are absolutely essential. As Clive Maund points out, the only trustworthy way of guaranteeing the continued flow of Saudi and Iraqi oil is via the continuation of a large US military presence in the middle east.

    Right now 2/3rds of US oil consumption is supplied by imports (vs domestic production). Of those imports, about half come from 'non-captive' sources i.e. countries other than Canada and Mexico. This means that 1/3rd of US oil supplies are potentially subject to being cut off via terrorist / political action. Stop and think for a minute what would happen if every American individual, and every American business and industry, were forced onto a rationing system that allowed them only 2/3rds as much gasoline / heating oil / electricity as they currently consume. Suddenly, every suburban commuter would be looking at working 4 days per week instead of 5. Suddenly, every restaurant would be looking at only being able to sell 2/3rds as many meals. Suddenly, every industry would be looking at only being able to sell 2/3rds as many products. In reality the cutbacks would not be uniformly distributed of course, with certain individuals and businesses / industries being given higher priority by the gov't and certain other individuals and businesses / industries being cut severely.

    The 'tin foil hat' crowd will tell you that THIS is the scenario America faces if a strong military presence in the middle east is not maintained !!! Rationing of oil based products will result in a severe economic depression as many 'non-essential' energy consuming businesses / industries are closed down. Rationing of oil based products will result in the outright death of Suburbia, as suburban commuters cannot bridge the energy gap of shipping products to suburban stores + heating their suburban homes on 1/3rd less fuel + commuting to work on 1/3rd less gasoline. This will snowball into widespread suburban unemployment, widespread defaults on suburban home and auto loans, widespread failures of suburban / regional banks ... and on and on.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 06:18 PM
  2. Clive Maund with a 'gloomy' analysis / prediction ...
    By Melonie in forum Member Boards
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-07-2008, 02:11 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-12-2008, 04:50 AM
  4. Empire ruling the middle east
    By Deogol in forum Member Boards
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-11-2006, 05:52 PM
  5. Message from the Middle-East
    By 242_fair in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-17-2006, 11:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •