Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: More Media Bias!!

  1. #1
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    378
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default ....

    God save us from imbeciles without any sense of humor.

    — Silvio Berlusconi
    Last edited by Pan Dah; 11-12-2008 at 12:02 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Location
    California~Texas
    Posts
    93
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    Speaking of films/movies....Isn't there supposed to be a movie released before the election about George Bush called "W" or something like that?


    Boy....that will send some people clearly over the edge. Oy vey..

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Location
    California~Texas
    Posts
    93
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    An Oliver Stone Film...


    Here is the trailer...due to be released at the end of October.



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyDvUwRalXY

  4. #4
    God/dess VegasPrincess's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Location
    MKE
    Posts
    4,660
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 182 Times in 40 Posts

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Pan Dah View Post
    This afternoon, the day of the Vice-Presidential debate, what did HBO choose to show on its family channel? Balto, the last animated film made by über-liberal Steven Spielberg for Disney, a company frequently denounced for its lack of support for traditional family values.

    The showing today of this film, a paean to a half-dog, half-wolf for saving Alaskan children, can be nothing but a transparent attempt by the left-wing radicals in charge of HBO to demonize Sarah Palin for her courageous stand against wolves while simultaneously sending a subliminal message on the heroic merits of those of mixed heritage.

    All right-thinking Americans should contact the FCC to protest this blatant misuse of the public airwaves!
    Dude, you seriously have two much time on your hands if you see some political undercurrents in a movie shown on the Disney channel....That is all.
    Sexy Jasmine after getting fucked over at work:

    God loves strippers and when guys do things like that its an automatic ticket to HELL!


    Quote Originally Posted by anomar View Post
    Perhaps you stopped spending money on her. Strippers need money to operate. They are like coin operated juke-boxes of love.

  5. #5
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    if you want hardcore media bias, try this tidbit ...



    (snip)"In the kitchens of the Associated Press, it's almost as if the wire service asked its chief cook -- er, pollster -- GfK Roper Public Affairs and Media, to do the following:

    Whip up a tasty, representative poll after the Republican Convention.
    Three weeks later, make the same dish, but this time adjust the mix of ingredients by radically oversampling Democrats and undersampling Republicans, thereby creating a false illusion of momentum in the campaign of Barack Obama, and of decline in John McCain's.
    Hope people don't notice the changes in the recipe.
    Of course we don't know if the differences between AP-CfK's Sept. 5-10 and Sept. 27-30 results were created deliberately, but the results sure look suspicious (both polls are available at PDF links found at AP-GfK's home page).

    The more recent poll shows Obama with a 7-point lead among likely voters, both with and without leaners; the earlier poll showed McCain with a 5-point lead with leaners, and 4 points without.

    Almost all of this 12-point swing (11 points with leaners) is more than likely almost completely due to major differences between the two polls' samples:

    "Somehow," the sample make-up changed from 33-31 Democrat to 40-29 Democrat from the earlier to the latter poll -- a shift of nine points.

    "Somehow," the Strong-Dem vs. Strong-GOP difference went from nothing to eight points.

    "Somehow," the Strong-GOP vs. Moderate-GOP mix went from +3 to -3, a swing of six points."(snip)

    (snip)"Either AP isn't supervising its GfK cooks properly, or it's directing them to poison discussions of presidential race, while hoping that no one notices the rancid product it is clearly producing.

    AP waitress -- er, reporter -- Liz Sidoti brought out the new poll's results for our consumption yesterday with this exultant intro:

    Barack Obama has surged to a seven-point lead over John McCain one month before the presidential election, lifted by voters who think the Democrat is better suited to lead the nation through its sudden financial crisis, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll that underscores the mounting concerns of some McCain backers.

    Likely voters now back Obama 48-41 percent over McCain, a dramatic shift from an AP-GfK survey that gave the Republican a slight edge nearly three weeks ago, before Wall Street collapsed and sent ripples across worldwide markets.


    As you can see above, her celebration is founded on fabrication; thus, her "explanations" are deep-fried in deception.

    Just because AP, GfK, and Sidoti are serving us this rotten recipe doesn't mean that readers have to swallow it. So don't. "(snip)

  6. #6
    TheSexKitten
    Guest

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    It's a joke....

    Don't worry, I got it.

  7. #7
    Featured Member Miss_Luscious's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Raleigh
    Posts
    988
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 36 Times in 23 Posts

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    I got the joke too. It's not too far fetched to think that someone would be upset at something like that though.
    "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says is never accurate because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand." - Bertrand Russell

    "It's just a matter of people having low self esteem and being way too easily offended." -Random Guy on a Internet Forum

    Quote Originally Posted by Katrine View Post
    Ya'll bitches need to calm down. Cerously.
    In other words: Boo-motherfucking-hoo

  8. #8
    Featured Member francescadubois's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,595
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    Thank you, Pan Dah. Some of us are not so tight assed as to not understand a joke. I LOL'd.
    "I came in like a lamb, but I intend to leave like a lion."

    -Sade
    Quote Originally Posted by Mastridonicus View Post
    The only thing a person hates more than being a sex object, is NOT being a sex object.
    Quote Originally Posted by TigersMilk View Post
    If you should your way through life you'll be should-ing all over yourself later.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSexKitten View Post
    Finger pointing is awesome!! No really, it gets things done.

  9. #9
    God/dess Paris's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    6,345
    Thanks
    168
    Thanked 801 Times in 419 Posts

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    I thought this was a joke too, then I saw the first couple of responses and that made me think maybe not?

    I'm pretty sure the viewing audience of Balto won't be voting in November's election anyway, LOL


    Promote yourself and earn more money! This is a business that is owned by strippers for strippers. Let's make that money!


  10. #10
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    certainly the late October release of Oliver Stone's new movie 'W' is no joke !

  11. #11
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    and yet another example which is more relevant to today's news ..,



    (snip)"WASHINGTON — Unqualified home buyers were not the only ones who benefitted from Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank’s efforts to deregulate Fannie Mae throughout the 1990s.

    So did Frank’s partner, a Fannie Mae executive at the forefront of the agency’s push to relax lending restrictions.

    Now that Fannie Mae is at the epicenter of a financial meltdown that threatens the U.S. economy, some are raising new questions about Frank's relationship with Herb Moses, who was Fannie’s assistant director for product initiatives. Moses worked at the government-sponsored enterprise from 1991 to 1998, while Frank was on the House Banking Committee, which had jurisdiction over Fannie.

    Both Frank and Moses assured the Wall Street Journal in 1992 that they took pains to avoid any conflicts of interest. Critics, however, remain skeptical.

    "It’s absolutely a conflict," said Dan Gainor, vice president of the Business & Media Institute. "He was voting on Fannie Mae at a time when he was involved with a Fannie Mae executive. How is that not germane?

    "If this had been his ex-wife and he was Republican, I would bet every penny I have - or at least what’s not in the stock market - that this would be considered germane," added Gainor, a T. Boone Pickens Fellow. "But everybody wants to avoid it because he’s gay. It’s the quintessential double standard."

    top GOP House aide agreed.

    "C’mon, he writes housing and banking laws and his boyfriend is a top exec at a firm that stands to gain from those laws?" the aide told FOX News. "No media ever takes note? Imagine what would happen if Frank’s political affiliation was R instead of D? Imagine what the media would say if [GOP former] Chairman [Mike] Oxley’s wife or [GOP presidential nominee John] McCain’s wife was a top exec at Fannie for a decade while they wrote the nation’s housing and banking laws."

    Frank’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment."(snip)

    from

  12. #12
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    About the OP ... HBO and those other over-the-air and cable networks plan most of their programming at least a month ahead, and certainly movies where they have to deal with licensing issues, traffic, advertisers, etc. More likely timing is an issue with local stations making public interest programming in a rush to be relevant.

    Let's not be so quick to judge. At least let's think a little first please.
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

  13. #13
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    It was Toddler Wellington if you must know.
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

  14. #14
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    Believe it or not, the NY Times finally reported a story on Obama / Bill Ayres. However, in the opinion of many, it was highly biased in Obama's favor ...

    (snip)"We’ve been waiting for the mainstream media to apply one-tenth of the investigative power that they’ve put into Wasilla probing Sarah Palin into Chicago to check on Barack Obama. The New York Times offers about that — a tenth of an effort — into exploring Obama’s connections to William Ayers. Despite the fact that Obama worked for Ayers at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge for several years and with Ayers on the Woods Fund for a few more, the Paper of Record insists that the two men have no real ties at all.

    The first clue as to their spin? The headline — “Obama and ’60s Bomber: A Look Into Crossed Paths”. Crossed paths? Are they just two ships that passed in the night?

    At a tumultuous meeting of anti-Vietnam War militants at the Chicago Coliseum in 1969, Bill Ayers helped found the radical Weathermen, launching a campaign of bombings that would target the Pentagon and United States Capitol.

    Twenty-six years later, at a lunchtime meeting about school reform in a Chicago skyscraper, Barack Obama met Mr. Ayers, by then an education professor. Their paths have crossed sporadically since then, at a coffee Mr. Ayers hosted for Mr. Obama’s first run for office, on the schools project and a charitable board, and in casual encounters as Hyde Park neighbors.


    How can Scott Shane write with a straight face that “[t]heir paths have crossed sporadically since then”? Obama worked as CEO of the project that Ayers helped found, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, for several years. Ayers served on the board at the same time. In an overlapping period, both men served for a few years on the Woods Fund, which notably granted $75,000 to Yasser Arafat’s associate, Rashid Khalidi, during that time.

    Their paths didn’t cross “sporadically”. They worked on two projects together, political projects, for almost a decade in Chicago. That’s hardly “sporadic”; that’s a well-established working relationship, and certainly much more substantial than Obama’s description of Ayers as just another familiar face in the neighborhood.
    Shane mentions the understated nature of Obama’s description:

    More recently, conservative critics who accuse Mr. Obama of a stealth radical agenda have asserted that he has misleadingly minimized his relationship with Mr. Ayers, whom the candidate has dismissed as “a guy who lives in my neighborhood” and “somebody who worked on education issues in Chicago that I know.”

    A review of records of the schools project and interviews with a dozen people who know both men, suggest that Mr. Obama, 47, has played down his contacts with Mr. Ayers, 63. But the two men do not appear to have been close.


    How close does Obama have to be to make this connection a valid point? The two men worked together on political projects in Chicago. The issue has nothing to do with the quality of their friendship, if one exists (and there seems to be some evidence of one), but with the kind of work the two men did together. Ayers still agitates for the overthrow of the capitalist system, and his educational project was designed to create little charter schools for churning out radicals.
    Why didn’t Shane bother to do some of the work Stanley Kurtz had to fight Richard Daley and the Chicago Machine to do? I guess Shane was more interested in putting out stories about “sporadic” contact that discourages further looks into Barack Obama’s political work, his associates in that work, and the direction it took.

    Would John McCain get the same kind of pass? Shane at least at the intellectual honesty to include this:

    Steve Chapman, a columnist for The Chicago Tribune, defended Mr. Obama’s relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., his longtime pastor, whose black liberation theology and “God damn America” sermon became notorious last spring. But he denounced Mr. Obama for associating with Mr. Ayers, whom he said the University of Illinois should never have hired.

    “I don’t think there’s a statute of limitations on terrorist bombings,” Mr. Chapman said in an interview, speaking not of the law but of political and moral implications.
    “If you’re in public life, you ought to say, ‘I don’t want to be associated with this guy,’ ” Mr. Chapman said. “If John McCain had a long association with a guy who’d bombed abortion clinics, I don’t think people would say, ‘That’s ancient history.’ ”


    If John McCain had spent ten years on charitable boards with someone less egregious than abortion bombers — say, with Randall Terry of Operation Rescue — the New York Times would have Page One, in-depth reporting, complete with teams of reporters combing through the minutes of the board meetings. Hell, the New York Times infamously smeared McCain with allegations of a sexual affair based on nothing but gossip from two disgruntled ex-staffers last February, and spent days rolling that out, using four reporters on the story. For the Obama/Ayers connection, they have Scott Shane telling us that there’s nothing to see here.

    Great reporting. Thanks for nothing."(snip)

    from

  15. #15
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: More Media Bias!!

    Ayres is not in hiding. Society has already dealt with him long ago and he is apparently a productive concerned citizen now. If we are seeking retribution for old lifestyles, then we should do the same for others, including those whose lifestyle involved buying illicit drugs, supporting the murderous drug cartels. People need to get a little scope on things beyond their own lives and neighborhoods.
    Last edited by threlayer; 10-08-2008 at 01:07 PM.
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

Similar Threads

  1. The anti muscle bias in science and medicine
    By Will in forum Body Business
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 07:49 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-30-2008, 08:57 PM
  3. Liberal Bias: Ebony & Irony
    By Budai in forum Member Boards
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-29-2008, 03:39 PM
  4. I hate the Media!
    By lilac666 in forum Stripping (was Stripping General)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-05-2004, 03:33 PM
  5. Media with Strippers as subject
    By sadbuttrue in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-15-2003, 10:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •