I see lots of discussion on SW concerning "appropriate" boundaries and/or behavior between buyers and sellers in the stripping industry. And justifiably so. Let's face it, upon entering a SC, conventional societal norms a waived at the door and we're left to redefine what behaviors are "appropriate." Different states, different clubs, different dancers, different patrons, all have varied "norms" of acceptable contact.
Strippers are to adult entertainment what actors are to theater. Patrons pay to see each performer play their part (there's no free lunch). Once a stripper presses her breast against a man's face, dragging her nipple across his cheek, she establishes the fact that breast/cheek contact is "appropriate" as part of the lap dance transaction.
So the question is: if breast/cheek contact is "appropriate" what difference does it make who initiates the contact? When engaging in a LD (not "giving" as that implies it was "free") the dancer presses her breasts into him that's "appropriate" though if he were to plow his face into her cleavage it would be "inappropriate." Same breast against same cheek, but with very different results.
The patron is paying for the breast/cheek contact. It would appear the dancer is comfortable selling that contact as long as she's initiating it. If her objective (hustle) is to separate him from as many dollars as possible, and breast/cheek contact has been established as an "appropriate" exchange, and he's willing to pay, why does she refuse the transaction when he initiates the contact?
Seems sort of funny that woman dressed in a G-String who moments earlier was dragging her nipple across a man's cheek, would some how be outraged were the same man to indulge himself by nuzzling his face into her chest.
Love to hear a dancer's perspective on the psychology of navigating the porous boundaries bodily contact while performing in SC.



Reply With Quote





Bookmarks