Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 79

Thread: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

  1. #51
    Banned
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    Location
    With the luggage NJ
    Posts
    2,995
    Thanks
    80
    Thanked 115 Times in 98 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle2 View Post
    Then Ford decided instead to concentrate on gas-guzzling trucks and SUV's for bigger short-term profits. That turned out to be a brilliant decision if your goal was to lose billions of dollars. Honda continued to concentrate on small and mid-size fuel efficient vehicles and continued to remain profitable.
    "Helped by a lightened debt load, Ford Motor Co. posted a surprise second-quarter profit of $2.8 billion Thursday, following the worst loss in company history a year earlier. Shares gained 60 cents and closed Thursday at $6.98 per share."

  2. #52
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Ya know, why don't we all just throw in the towel and move to China were at least $2.00/hour jobs are or soon willbe waiting for us, giving us time to learn that lanuage. Let's just sell everything and live on cheap, but unspeakably gross foods while we wait out that job.

    I, for one, am just about fed up with hearing in this forum that we and the rest of the world is going to have to live at the Chinese "lowest common denominator standards" merely because they exploit cheap sweatshop labor, that that is inevitable, and that no one can do a damned thing about it but wait for it to happen. Globalized economy, baloney. It will be that way ONLY if we lay back, spread our butts, and let them rape us every which way!! Them, being the exploiters with all that lobbying expendture to make sure they get rich by stealing everything all of use have worked for all our lives. NO ONE can work smart enough or hard enough by him/herself to "earn" multi-millions of dollars/year without exploiting (with, I might add, politicians' help) hundreds and thousands of others ---- US !!
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

  3. #53
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    I, for one, am just about fed up with hearing in this forum that we and the rest of the world is going to have to live at the Chinese "lowest common denominator standards" merely because they exploit cheap sweatshop labor, that that is inevitable, and that no one can do a damned thing about it but wait for it to happen. Globalized economy, baloney
    Well there are two available historical alternatives ... with the first being Smoot Hawley. The USA could simply impose import quotas and tariffs of such magnitude that the recent stream of foreign imports would simply stop. In turn, without lower cost imported products remaining available, the costs of food / gasoline / virtually everything would increase by 30% ... in proportion to the mandated higher labor / energy / regulatory compliance / benefit costs of doing business in the USA. This would also immediately translate into a 30% decline in disposable incomes and thus a 30% reduction in the US standard of living.

    At the same time, former exporting countries would probably impose retaliatory tariffs and quotas on US products being imported into their countries. This would make a severe 'dent' in the earnings of every US multinational corporation, from Microsoft to IBM to Caterpillar to Boeing to ADM ... and probably cause the loss of large numbers of high skill level US jobs. However, by the same token, the door would be open for the 'resurrection' of US industries that long ago gave up the ship due to unmatchable foreign competition. This would probably include textiles, TV's, etc. which would create a huge number of new minimum wage jobs. Of course, all of these 'resurrected' products would probably be double the cost of the banned foreign imports in order to cover the minimum wage labor costs !

    On the 'bright' side, the imposition of tariffs and quotas would definitely spur a big burst of domestic oil drilling and refining ... because Americans will never go back to the de-facto 'gas rationing' of the 1970's when foreign suppliers stopped shipping imported oil to America ( leaving domestic supplies well below levels of domestic demand).

    The second historical alternative is to start World War 3. As a result, China's factories could be destroyed in the same way that European and Asian factories were destroyed during WW2 - leaving the US as the only remaining global source for certain products. This US dominance of workable manufacturing capacity was responsible for 20 years worth of US economic dominance from 1945 to about 1965 ... at which point the first low cost imports (i.e. Volkswagen, Honda, Sony, Panasonic et al) started to erode the pricing power and market share of US competitors.
    Last edited by Melonie; 07-27-2009 at 02:28 PM.

  4. #54
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    I'm guessing that a little more imagination might produce results that are a little less catastrophic. Maybe something along the lines of trying import quotas to environmental performance, worker benefits, import/export level parity etc. Or something, hopefully, better than that. This is like begging Iran not to use nukes on us because it would not be 'polite' for us to bomb the Hell out of them.
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

  5. #55
    God/dess
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,964
    Thanks
    6,155
    Thanked 10,183 Times in 4,602 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by Melonie View Post
    Well there are two available historical alternatives ... with the first being Smoot Hawley. The USA could simply impose import quotas and tariffs of such magnitude that the recent stream of foreign imports would simply stop. In turn, without lower cost imported products remaining available, the costs of food / gasoline / virtually everything would increase by 30% ... in proportion to the mandated higher labor / energy / regulatory compliance / benefit costs of doing business in the USA. This would also immediately translate into a 30% decline in disposable incomes and thus a 30% reduction in the US standard of living.

    At the same time, former exporting countries would probably impose retaliatory tariffs and quotas on US products being imported into their countries. This would make a severe 'dent' in the earnings of every US multinational corporation, from Microsoft to IBM to Caterpillar to Boeing to ADM ... and probably cause the loss of large numbers of high skill level US jobs. However, by the same token, the door would be open for the 'resurrection' of US industries that long ago gave up the ship due to unmatchable foreign competition. This would probably include textiles, TV's, etc. which would create a huge number of new minimum wage jobs. Of course, all of these 'resurrected' products would probably be double the cost of the banned foreign imports in order to cover the minimum wage labor costs !

    On the 'bright' side, the imposition of tariffs and quotas would definitely spur a big burst of domestic oil drilling and refining ... because Americans will never go back to the de-facto 'gas rationing' of the 1970's when foreign suppliers stopped shipping imported oil to America ( leaving domestic supplies well below levels of domestic demand).

    The second historical alternative is to start World War 3. As a result, China's factories could be destroyed in the same way that European and Asian factories were destroyed during WW2 - leaving the US as the only remaining global source for certain products. This US dominance of workable manufacturing capacity was responsible for 20 years worth of US economic dominance from 1945 to about 1965 ... at which point the first low cost imports (i.e. Volkswagen, Honda, Sony, Panasonic et al) started to erode the pricing power and market share of US competitors.
    Again you're making things up with no basis. There are plenty of industries where the US is a world leader or very competitive. Your own statement contradicts itself when you refer to products being exported by US multinational corporations, "from Microsoft to IBM to Caterpillar to Boeing to ADM".

    Your statements are based 100 percent on ideology and zero percent on facts. You seem to think that everything in business revolves around how low wages are and how much industries are allowed to pollute. You completely ignore such factors as the quality of products, the skills and experience required to produce products, the amount of labor vs. capital vs. raw materials needed to produce products, the cost of transporting products, the fact that current wage rates do not last forever. China is not always going to be a low wage country just like Japan and Singapore were not.

    While the US will probably never again be as dominant of an industrial power as we were in the 1950's, we will continue to be a major economic power for years to come.

  6. #56
    God/dess
    Joined
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Your imagination
    Posts
    2,875
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 174 Times in 119 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    in the long term, mel is more right than the rest of y'all. when all countries are competing (our current global scenario), first worlders will either end up making 2 bucks an hour with 2nd and 3rd worlders, or 15% of all people everywhere will make high union-worker pay while governments try to persuade them to spend 85% of that high union pay on the remaining 85% jobless, globally.

    we can't all actually make 20 bucks an hour. either a few of us do or everyone makes 2-3 bucks an hour eventually. you can't actually persuade consumers that paying extra for literally no reason at all is worth it in the long term.

  7. #57
    God/dess Deogol's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,493
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by threlayer View Post
    NO ONE can work smart enough or hard enough by him/herself to "earn" multi-millions of dollars/year without exploiting (with, I might add, politicians' help) hundreds and thousands of others ---- US !!
    So you believe it is a zero sum situation. For some to succeed, others must fail?

  8. #58
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by Deogol View Post
    So you believe it is a zero sum situation. For some to succeed, others must fail?
    Not so. Theoretically it is possible that many will gain unless the game is 'stacked.'

    By the way, the game is always stacked.
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

  9. #59
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by miabella View Post
    in the long term, mel is more right than the rest of y'all. when all countries are competing (our current global scenario), first worlders will either end up making 2 bucks an hour with 2nd and 3rd worlders, or 15% of all people everywhere will make high union-worker pay while governments try to persuade them to spend 85% of that high union pay on the remaining 85% jobless, globally.
    Smarter congresses / excutives can come up with plans that provide worker incentives and at the same time provide productive jobs. There is much to do. Giving away so much to so many just hurts the rest of us. So give away less and find a smart way for businesses to provide jobs.

    Quote Originally Posted by miabella View Post
    we can't all actually make 20 bucks an hour. either a few of us do or everyone makes 2-3 bucks an hour eventually. you can't actually persuade consumers that paying extra for literally no reason at all is worth it in the long term.
    Much like we can't all win in the stock market. If everyone took profits at once, from whom would they take them? Still after all the taxes, inflation, welfare, etc. We have a better life than we did before taxes and welfare. Just that ther may not be as many billionaires as before.
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

  10. #60
    God/dess
    Joined
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Your imagination
    Posts
    2,875
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 174 Times in 119 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by threlayer View Post
    Smarter congresses / excutives can come up with plans that provide worker incentives and at the same time provide productive jobs. There is much to do. Giving away so much to so many just hurts the rest of us. So give away less and find a smart way for businesses to provide jobs.


    Much like we can't all win in the stock market. If everyone took profits at once, from whom would they take them? Still after all the taxes, inflation, welfare, etc. We have a better life than we did before taxes and welfare. Just that ther may not be as many billionaires as before.
    politicians are power-mad. most of them are of average intelligence. some smart people seek power at any price, but it is not a norm the more intelligent you are. so no, magical technocrats are not the answer.

    we cannot all actually live in a fairy paradise where everyone makes 20$/hr, has the living standard of an american in the midwest making 50k per year now, and there is full employment and full health care and retirement at 20$/hr for all. humans don't work that way, otherwise it would already have occurred.

    people really do not understand what it means that the entire planet is competing for resources and income access that used to be limited to people in a few countries.

    by your logic, stripclub owners should all be gentlemen who pay the dancers 200$/shift, and VIP should be fully clothed, conversation only for 2000/hr and every night there should be 10 customers per dancer to pay it. I mean, since so many women increasingly want to be strippers, why can't club owners and customers just make sure they make piles and piles of money, regardless of what these extra dancers look like or how they hustle or even how darned many there are?

    there is no REASON to make this happen when dancers will pay a fee to work in the building. correspondingly, there is no REASON to give the entire world a coke and a hundred dollar bill since some people can and will work for less per hour and save money and acquire wealth anyway.

    if humans didn't comply with being exploited because sometimes you can make it really work out for yourself, we'd already be living in a paradise of peace and plenty for all.

  11. #61
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    people really do not understand what it means that the entire planet is competing for resources and income access that used to be limited to people in a few countries.
    This is precisely the point at the root of the minimum wage argument specifically, and the profitability of American businesses in general. To really understand this point, you have to look at how 'value' is actually created. You can A. extract 'value' from the ground, via mining or oil drilling or farming. Or you can B. create additional 'value' by combining raw materials into a useful manufactured product / tangible asset. But providing a service does not create additional 'value' unless that service directly contributes to an increase in A. or B. In the absence of A. or B. providing services merely shuffles money from one person / business to another without any additional 'value' being created.

    For a variety of reasons, America's economy has gradually divested itself of A. and B. As a result, America's economy is now very heavily dependent on providing services ... and most of those services do not actually create additional 'value'. But this has created a problem in that consumption is always taking place, thus additional 'value' needs to be created somewhere in order to balance out consumption. Because America has divested itself of A. and B., for many years the American economy has been running a 'value' deficit. In simplest terms, America was able to continue running a 'value' deficit by liquidating tangible assets, and by borrowing from others who were actually creating more 'value' than they were consuming i.e. the Chinese, the Japanese etc. Arguably one of the worst 'value' deficit creations occurs in areas such as forcing businesses to pay a minimum wage which is now 3-4 times the global average for unskilled labor. Large 'value' deficit creations also result from most 'service' workers ( whose 'services' are not related to A. or B.), with the most serious of these being gov't employees.

    Well the point has come where the Chinese etc. are becoming increasingly reluctant to loan America any more of their 'value' surplus, where lots of tangible US assets have already been liquidated, and where increasing the 'value' deficit to ever deeper depths can no longer continue. Thus continuing to allow a 'value' deficit to exist in the form of a high minimum wage ( and in all other forms as well) will require that actual 'value' being created by some American businesses and individuals must be 'confiscated' and 'transferred' to other American businesses and individuals, because it can no longer be borrowed from foreign lenders.

    This will soon become apparent to middle class Americans as state / local tax increases and price increases required to fund the 'value' deficit situations hit their discretionary budgets hard i.e. a forced reduction in their consumption / standard of living ! When this 'sinks in', it will probably result in a major 'rethinking' of continued 'confiscation' from those who actually create 'value' in excess of their consumption, and the continued 'transfer' to those that do not !

    ~
    Last edited by Melonie; 07-30-2009 at 03:56 AM.

  12. #62
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    ^^ Two comments. First, where in A or B does healthcare fall? I'm saying that there is another category, C, which is demanded by humans, but that does not contribute to A or B except by the fact that humans exist to do A and B. Humans demand, and work for, more than food, shelter, and implements. Thus C has value also.

    Second, though A and B are dwindling, the US still does a significant amount of A and B, moreso than almost all of the other countries of the world. you are being far too pessimistic about the present. The future----you have some good points unless something changes

    Further...
    The reality worldwide is that those who have the most money are well able to control who else has any money. If poor people didn't further enrich the rich, they would be "regulated" out of existence. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely." "Those who have the gold make the rules."
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

  13. #63
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    ^^^ from the standpoint of cold, hard, global economic analysis, health care does NOT create additional 'value'. Yes in the USA and EU, employees working for companies that actually create 'value' that are receiving good health care are supposedly more productive than those who do not. But from a global standpoint, as long as there are unemployed job applicants, there will always be a healthy worker available to replace a seriously sick worker.

    Thus in simplest terms (some portion of) the costs of (mandatory) health care are 'confiscated' from companies and individuals that actually create 'value'. Here I'm thinking mandatory medicare taxes, mandatory workers' comp premiums, union mandated health insurance coverage, some portion of income taxes used to pay for medicaid etc. In turn this money is 'transferred' to health care providers who do not produce one iota of additional 'value' as measured in terms of tangible assets. Thus while health care may be of great personal value, it creates no tangible 'value'.

    As to your other claim that significant amounts of A. and B. based 'value' creators are still located in the USA, you certainly haven't seen recent reports. According to the US Dep't of Commerce, the 'service sector's' share of the US economy has now risen to 80 percent, and the 'service sector' now employs 85% of non-farm US workers !!! See . The USA has been running a steadily deepening 'deficit' in the creation of 'value' for many years now as the result of disincentivizing A. and B. and filling the gap with 'service sector' companies / jobs. It just hasn't been adequately acknowledged because, until recently, it was possible ( and arguably very easy ) for the USA to 'borrow' ever larger amounts from foreign lenders in order to continue to bridge the 'value' creation gap.

    When those foreign lenders seriously start to balk at making additional 'loans' ( actually US treasury bond purchases / state muni bond purchases ), the resulting necessity of America / US States being forced to balance total created 'value' versus total consumption won't be postponable any longer. As is arguably already the case in California, the 'value' creation gap must then be closed either by increased 'confiscations' or by reduced consumption or both !

    ~
    Last edited by Melonie; 07-30-2009 at 01:04 PM.

  14. #64
    God/dess Deogol's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,493
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    ^^^ That's pushing it even by my standards LOL

    It has been shown health care increases productivity.

  15. #65
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    ^^^ not in China it doesn't, since unskilled Chinese workers basically do not have meaningful health care !

    (snip)"the [ Chinese - sic ] government provides the equivalent of $2.50 a year to help cover a basic insurance plan for peasants, who must match this with an annual $1.25 of their own. Because of their modest funding, these plans cover only inpatient care (with a very high deductible) and leave peasants without adequate primary care services and drugs."(snip) from

    However I voluntarily included the increased productivity aspect for US and EU workers. So yes if good health care causes these workers to be 20% more productive, but if only 2 out of 10 US workers are still employed in a sector that actually creates added 'value' ( versus being a gov't employee / 'service sector' employee ) then I concede that the health care industry is a 4% 'value' creator !

    ~
    Last edited by Melonie; 07-30-2009 at 01:40 PM.

  16. #66
    God/dess threlayer's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    5,921
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 419 Times in 290 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    I suppose by cold, hard work unit 'economics' that may be true. But if we are merely abstract work units, why do we even value anything. I'm thinking there must be some purpose that this absatract 'value' is used for other than for itself. For example what are these values for?

    My point is that humans, living (or dying) in your scenario, existing as work units must have some reason to do so. In effect we start with A and then do B in order to arrive at C, which must be the ultimate situation which evaluates the work value. If there were no C, then there would be no way to evaluate A and B. Not even in George Orwell's vision.
    I loved going to strip clubs; I actually made some friends there. Now things are different for the clubs and for me. As a result I am not as happy.

    Customers are not entitled to grope, disrespect, or rob strippers. This is their job, not their hobby, and they all need income. Clubs are not just some erotic show for guys to view while drinking.

    NOTE: anything I post here, outside of a direct quote, is my opinion only, which I am entitled to. Take it for what you estimate it is worth.

  17. #67
    Banned
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    Location
    With the luggage NJ
    Posts
    2,995
    Thanks
    80
    Thanked 115 Times in 98 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by Melonie View Post
    union mandated health insurance coverage,
    Unions don't mandate anything they negotiate; remember business writes off health coverage as a business expense.

  18. #68
    Banned
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    Location
    With the luggage NJ
    Posts
    2,995
    Thanks
    80
    Thanked 115 Times in 98 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by Deogol View Post
    ^^^ That's pushing it even by my standards LOL

    It has been shown health care increases productivity.
    Not if people are used as they were in concentration camps where the sick are discarded and replaced by healthy ones.
    Quote Originally Posted by Melonie View Post
    But from a global standpoint, as long as there are unemployed job applicants, there will always be a healthy worker available to replace a seriously sick worker.
    Last edited by Earl_the_Pearl; 07-30-2009 at 02:37 PM. Reason: Can't spell.

  19. #69
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    ^^^ to respond to your first point, A. and B. are free market assigned a global 'value' by the global buyers of the raw materials and manufactured products they produce. It is impossible to charge a localized price for the same raw materials and manufactured products that is higher than the global 'value' without making up the 'value' deficit from one source or another. Paying unskilled US workers a $7.50 per hour minimum wage versus a free market assigned global unskilled worker 'value' of $2 an hour widens the 'value' deficit, and as a result that deficit must be subsidized by one means or another by other workers and businesses that actually create more 'value' than they consume.

    To respond to your second point, when C. means death in a country like China, existing as a work unit means the difference between living and dying. However, the USA and EU have removed this sort of 'incentive' via the availability of social welfare benefits. Thus your valuation theory when applied to the US begins by comparing the minimum wage standard of living to the social welfare standard of living. In contrast your valuation theory when applied to China must compare the $2 available wage standard of living to NOT living ! Virtues or evils of generous social welfare benefit availability aside, you're attempting an 'apples and oranges' comparison based on very different localized conditions. But the free market / rest of the world makes no such distinction, comparing products made by $7.50 per hour labor to equivalent products made with $2 an hour labor.

  20. #70
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Unions don't mandate anything they negotiate;
    not in China they don't ! And I highly doubt that any US union would tolerate the outright cancellation of employer provided health care benefits.

    remember business writes off health coverage as a business expense
    doesn't matter a bit if that business is on the verge of losing money ... since there won't be any income taxes to apply the deduction against. And even if the tax deduction achieves real dollar savings, the net cost of the employer's health insurance coverage of employees is still an out of pocket expenditure which Chinese competitors don't have to bear.

  21. #71
    Banned
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    Location
    With the luggage NJ
    Posts
    2,995
    Thanks
    80
    Thanked 115 Times in 98 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by Melonie View Post
    not in China they don't ! And I highly doubt that any US union would tolerate the outright cancellation of employer provided health care benefits.
    The UAW tolerated just that and most companies are phasing out retiree health care. Health care that was purchased by accepting lower wages for many years.

  22. #72
    God/dess
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,964
    Thanks
    6,155
    Thanked 10,183 Times in 4,602 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Quote Originally Posted by Melonie View Post
    This is precisely the point at the root of the minimum wage argument specifically, and the profitability of American businesses in general. To really understand this point, you have to look at how 'value' is actually created. You can A. extract 'value' from the ground, via mining or oil drilling or farming. Or you can B. create additional 'value' by combining raw materials into a useful manufactured product / tangible asset. But providing a service does not create additional 'value' unless that service directly contributes to an increase in A. or B. In the absence of A. or B. providing services merely shuffles money from one person / business to another without any additional 'value' being created.
    Yes it does. Anything you can charge money for has value whether it's a product or service. Where did you get the idea that providing services doesn't create value? According to your logic, Disney World is worthless.

    Quote Originally Posted by Melonie View Post
    For a variety of reasons, America's economy has gradually divested itself of A. and B. As a result, America's economy is now very heavily dependent on providing services ... and most of those services do not actually create additional 'value'. But this has created a problem in that consumption is always taking place, thus additional 'value' needs to be created somewhere in order to balance out consumption. Because America has divested itself of A. and B., for many years the American economy has been running a 'value' deficit. In simplest terms, America was able to continue running a 'value' deficit by liquidating tangible assets, and by borrowing from others who were actually creating more 'value' than they were consuming i.e. the Chinese, the Japanese etc. Arguably one of the worst 'value' deficit creations occurs in areas such as forcing businesses to pay a minimum wage which is now 3-4 times the global average for unskilled labor. Large 'value' deficit creations also result from most 'service' workers ( whose 'services' are not related to A. or B.), with the most serious of these being gov't employees.
    Again you're making things up with no basis. You don't seem to have a basic understanding of the laws of supply and demand. The supply of unskilled labor in China is much, much higher than the supply of unskilled labor in the US, hence the cost of labor is much, much lower lower in China than the US. The US economy is strong enough enough to pay Americans a much higher wage than workers in China.

    Quote Originally Posted by Melonie View Post
    Well the point has come where the Chinese etc. are becoming increasingly reluctant to loan America any more of their 'value' surplus, where lots of tangible US assets have already been liquidated, and where increasing the 'value' deficit to ever deeper depths can no longer continue. Thus continuing to allow a 'value' deficit to exist in the form of a high minimum wage ( and in all other forms as well) will require that actual 'value' being created by some American businesses and individuals must be 'confiscated' and 'transferred' to other American businesses and individuals, because it can no longer be borrowed from foreign lenders.
    The minimum wage has nothing to do with deficits. The deficit comes from the irresponsible fiscal policies of the previous administration.

  23. #73
    God/dess Gia2608's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Miami/ Ft. Lauderdale
    Posts
    3,337
    Thanks
    4,235
    Thanked 3,664 Times in 1,451 Posts
    My Mood
    Cheerful

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Don't know if one has any effect on the other but have noticed a few jobs paying an almost decent wage lately (in the $16 range per hour). That's still dick but getting better. Maybe employers realized you get what you pay for!
    XoXo Gia
    Danielle Fishell (the Dish): "If the Super-Star thing doesn't work out, Gia makes a great stripper name"

  24. #74
    God/dess
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,964
    Thanks
    6,155
    Thanked 10,183 Times in 4,602 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    That's true. Costco pays it's employees much higher salaries than Walmart, yet their labor costs are lower. As a result of the higher salaries, workers are more motivated and more productive. They are also less likely to leave, so Costco spends less money training new employees than Walmart.

    http://weiwentg.blogspot.com/2007/09...-wal-mart.html

    Melonie doesn't seem to be able to understand this. She seems to thinks workers are raw materials, like coal or grain and there is no difference between the quality and quantity one worker does vs. another, even another a worker in another country 12,000 miles away.
    Last edited by eagle2; 07-31-2009 at 10:22 PM.

  25. #75
    God/dess
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,964
    Thanks
    6,155
    Thanked 10,183 Times in 4,602 Posts

    Default Re: July 24th new min wage laws take effect

    Melonie,

    What is your explanation as to how Costco can pay its employees over 60% more than Walmart does, and still remain profitable?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Under $3 a min!!!
    By Camgirltee in forum Camming Connection
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 11-19-2011, 08:45 PM
  2. Min Payout
    By BuffyFlame in forum Other Work
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-26-2011, 05:11 AM
  3. LOST - April 24th
    By xdamage in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-22-2008, 06:33 PM
  4. new laws taking effect - keep this one in mind !
    By Melonie in forum Dollar Den
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-03-2007, 04:49 PM
  5. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-02-2005, 02:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •