Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 93

Thread: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

  1. #1
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Have you ever noticed that? The best looking people are often the worst lovers. It's my theory that due to being so damn good looking (and I only have the guy -> girl interaction experience to base this on..) everyone they have slept with is just so appreciative to sleep with them, they never developed the need to be particularly good in bed.

    Other guys I have mentioned that too usually say "well now that you mention it...yes"

    Obviously, this is not true in all cases, but my own experiences, and casual conversations, often seem to confirm it.

    The 10s I have been with (and of course it's based on my looks rating scale which is specific to me...) were amazingly boring. I learned the 'hard way' looks does not = satisfying sexual experiences and I can be much more turned on by other variables.

    Why do I ponder such things? I have no f-ing idea, but it's something I have noted for a long time. Does the female experience jibe with that, or am I totally off there?
    A cunning linguist...

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Will For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Featured Member Jezzebelle's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wales, U.K
    Posts
    1,313
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 100 Times in 60 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Iv experience the opposite with guys, the 10s Iv had were awesome.
    A civilian spends money to look good
    A stripper looks good to make money
    A civilian may be after your wage
    A stripper laughs at your wage

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jezzebelle For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jezzebelle View Post
    Iv experience the opposite with guys, the 10s Iv had were awesome.
    Interesting. Perhaps it's more of a male experience...There goes another one of my theories down the drain.
    A cunning linguist...

  6. #4
    God/dess
    Joined
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,066
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 1,844 Times in 779 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    .....no.

  7. #5
    God/dess carmen_b's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2007
    Location
    the mountains ....
    Posts
    14,202
    Thanks
    15,165
    Thanked 21,346 Times in 9,308 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Try keeping your dating in the 2-4 range and that may help!

  8. #6
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by carmen_b View Post
    Try keeping your dating in the 2-4 range and that may help!
    Now that was just mean!

    I actually like someone who is cute/attractive most of the time, and hot when they decide to be hot. The times I have dated drop dead beautiful women, the type that are so good looking that even in sweat pants, baseball cap, and no makeup, people stare, cars honk horns, dogs bark, etc, is tiring. I honestly feel bad for such women. Obviously being dead gorgeous has its benefits, but I have also seen first hand what a PITA it is. I really don't envy it.

    I have dated I guess 3 women who would fit that category - and am friends with a bunch more due to the industry I am in - and the amount of crap they put up with was just amazing. I'm sure some here know what I am talking about. Obviously, being butt ugly aint no fun either....

    So to actually respond to your question, dating 10s is great for the ego, but I actually prefer a 6-7 (in my eyes of course...) who borders on a 9-10 when they dress up, to a true 10 all the time.

    Hope that makes sens....
    Last edited by Will; 12-17-2009 at 11:43 AM.
    A cunning linguist...

  9. #7
    God/dess Paris's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    6,345
    Thanks
    168
    Thanked 801 Times in 419 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Only if they are inexperienced. Experienced men who are 10's are awesome in bed. Maybe you need to find a woman that has a few more notches on her bedpost? Being good at sex, just like anything else in life, is all about practice, practice, practice.


    Promote yourself and earn more money! This is a business that is owned by strippers for strippers. Let's make that money!


  10. #8
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Paris View Post
    Only if they are inexperienced. Experienced men who are 10's are awesome in bed. Maybe you need to find a woman that has a few more notches on her bedpost? Being good at sex, just like anything else in life, is all about practice, practice, practice.
    I like where you are going with that.
    A cunning linguist...

  11. #9
    Veteran Member Autumn Lily's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    589
    Thanks
    277
    Thanked 230 Times in 94 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    I'm one of those odd girls that when I'm just going to the store or whatever or chilling, I'm about a 5-6. But when I put on business casual clothes or put the effort into dolling myself up, I'm easily a 9 or 10 according to most guys.

    And I've gotten complimented that I'm the best in bed they've ever had.

  12. #10
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Autumn Lily View Post
    I'm one of those odd girls that when I'm just going to the store or whatever or chilling, I'm about a 5-6. But when I put on business casual clothes or put the effort into dolling myself up, I'm easily a 9 or 10 according to most guys.

    And I've gotten complimented that I'm the best in bed they've ever had.
    So based on my comments, what do we conclude from that? I'm not making the conclusion from the above.

    That might be because I mixed beer and vodka/cran drinks 'till late, and cant think today, so forgive me if I am being dense to your comments.
    A cunning linguist...

  13. #11
    Featured Member Laurisa's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Doesn't Matter
    Posts
    1,969
    Thanks
    649
    Thanked 1,823 Times in 587 Posts
    My Mood
    Confused

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Paris View Post
    Only if they are inexperienced. Experienced men who are 10's are awesome in bed. Maybe you need to find a woman that has a few more notches on her bedpost? Being good at sex, just like anything else in life, is all about practice, practice, practice.
    I've had sex with people who were experienced, and they sucked anyway.
    If you are willing to do for one year what other's won't, you can spend a lifetime doing what other's cant.


  14. #12
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Laurisa View Post
    I've had sex with people who were experienced, and they sucked anyway.
    Conversely, have had sex with gals with little experience who were great. Some people are just naturals to it no doubt.
    A cunning linguist...

  15. #13
    Veteran Member Lola_sinn's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    467
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked 176 Times in 73 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Will View Post
    The times I have dated drop dead beautiful women, the type that are so good looking that even in sweat pants, baseball cap, and no makeup, people stare, cars honk horns, dogs bark, etc, is tiring. I honestly feel bad for such women. Obviously being dead gorgeous has its benefits, but I have also seen first hand what a PITA it is. I really don't envy it.
    OMG this is so true. I think I am one of these. I don't really consider myself that attractive at all unless I'm putting in effort, but I can't go to the fucking corner store in winter coat without someone trying to holler at me. It sucks and during the summer especially it is one of the biggest sources of aggravation in my life. I'm just glad someone else has noticed this phenomenon because it drives me freakin nuts!

  16. #14
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lola_sinn View Post
    OMG this is so true. I think I am one of these. I don't really consider myself that attractive at all unless I'm putting in effort, but I can't go to the fucking corner store in winter coat without someone trying to holler at me. It sucks and during the summer especially it is one of the biggest sources of aggravation in my life. I'm just glad someone else has noticed this phenomenon because it drives me freakin nuts!
    From your avatar, you're also very unique looking, and that no doubt draws attention too. Obviously, few are gonna boo hoo for the beautiful girl, but I do understand where you are coming from!

    I dated this gal Laura years ago. We literally couldn't go anywhere without my almost getting into fights (and I am NOT a tough guy or fight starter type...), every job she had her bosses (male and female!) wold hit on her to the point she would have to quit, she couldn't go to the gym without every moron making comments, etc, she had stalkers, she would show at my my place in tears.

    This will sound really strange, but her looks pretty much killed our relationship and she didn't have the personality to match her looks, and literally was a prisoner in her own house.

    It's interesting, but ultra good looking women have to develop a thick skin, or some seem to be driven almost mad by it. Some obviously enjoy it, use it to their advantage, and generally wield that power well.

    The irony!
    Last edited by Will; 12-17-2009 at 12:47 PM.
    A cunning linguist...

  17. #15
    Veteran Member jadelady's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2009
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    373
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 57 Times in 41 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    This has been true in my experiences also, as a female.. out of the 9s and 10s I've been with, more of them were less interesting and dynamic in the bedroom. Not as creative.

  18. #16
    God/dess dlabtot's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2005
    Location
    in your dreams, in my nightmares
    Posts
    2,085
    Thanks
    59
    Thanked 139 Times in 85 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Well, I don't think it is as simple as "Mary is good in bed" and "Jane is not"

    Mary and Joe might be great in the sack and yet when she was with Frank he thought she was terrible....

    Sexual chemistry is real.

  19. #17
    Featured Member Laurisa's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Doesn't Matter
    Posts
    1,969
    Thanks
    649
    Thanked 1,823 Times in 587 Posts
    My Mood
    Confused

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by dlabtot View Post
    Well, I don't think it is as simple as "Mary is good in bed" and "Jane is not"

    Mary and Joe might be great in the sack and yet when she was with Frank he thought she was terrible....

    Sexual chemistry is real.
    I second that.



    I've talked to my some of sex partners openly at different points about past experiences and I don't think that any of my past partners would describe me exactly the same in the sack.

    One would say I'm a total tart monster that will try anything once.

    The other would say I'm totally average; not too freaky, not too reserved, but that he wished I gave more head.

    The other would say I'm more into slow, passionate sex, but that my blow jobs send him to cloud nine every time.

    The list goes on and on. I've had amazing chemistry with people that I would not have expected to have those sparks with, and no chemistry with people I would have expected to make fireworks with. Trial and error, but chemistry is real, I agree hands down.
    If you are willing to do for one year what other's won't, you can spend a lifetime doing what other's cant.


  20. #18
    Featured Member laurcon's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,291
    Thanks
    718
    Thanked 402 Times in 203 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    i'd say i'm a solid 8.5 and my personality is awesome
    anyway, that being said, i don't do much in bed at all, but apparently i don't have to. the OP mentions hot girls thinking they don't have to try hard, but sometimes we really don't. guys always think i'm such a great lay even though i don't really do anything but moan and talk dirty a little. is it possible its my vagina? are there magic boxes?

  21. #19
    Featured Member laurcon's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,291
    Thanks
    718
    Thanked 402 Times in 203 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Laurisa View Post
    I've talked to my some of sex partners openly at different points about past experiences and I don't think that any of my past partners would describe me exactly the same in the sack.

    One would say I'm a total tart monster that will try anything once.

    The other would say I'm totally average; not too freaky, not too reserved, but that he wished I gave more head.

    The other would say I'm more into slow, passionate sex, but that my blow jobs send him to cloud nine every time.

    The list goes on and on. I've had amazing chemistry with people that I would not have expected to have those sparks with, and no chemistry with people I would have expected to make fireworks with. Trial and error, but chemistry is real, I agree hands down.
    i'm sorry but laurisa you're 18 right? is this for real?
    i mean "the list goes on and on"
    i'm totally not judging, just feel out of touch with what's going on in HS these days!

  22. #20
    Banned ArmySGT.'s Avatar
    Joined
    May 2005
    Location
    SW Counter Troll HQ
    Posts
    5,582
    Thanks
    1,589
    Thanked 1,674 Times in 1,043 Posts
    Blog Entries
    13
    My Mood
    Amused

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    When I was in the Army the code word was "Salmon".


    As in Pink, smells like fish, cold, and just lays there. To be avoided.

  23. #21
    Veteran Member DancingDaisy's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2009
    Posts
    387
    Thanks
    199
    Thanked 93 Times in 67 Posts
    My Mood
    Tired

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Iv noticed that less attractive men are usually better in bed. They try harder

  24. #22
    Featured Member laurcon's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,291
    Thanks
    718
    Thanked 402 Times in 203 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    ^ i think the best guys in bed have been the hottest because they turn me on the most. that's prob why i was never really into sex with any of my boyfriends.

  25. #23
    Featured Member pixierocksonthepole's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    Location
    mmhmm
    Posts
    1,798
    Thanks
    1,862
    Thanked 377 Times in 218 Posts
    Blog Entries
    13
    My Mood
    Flirty

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Its an on and off thing I think. Chemistry has to be there for me to really get into it. I completly lucked ou twith my husband. mmmmmhmmmmm.





  26. #24
    Moderator Djoser's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Key West
    Posts
    16,343
    Thanks
    1,395
    Thanked 5,487 Times in 2,768 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    I remember quite well one extremely hot woman who pretty much expected me to do all the work, but there have been a few who were mind-blowingly good as well.

    I usually prefer the smarter 8-9's anyway. So often, through no fault of their own, the knockout '10' types have had trouble dealing with all the endless attention they have gotten all their lives, in one way or another.

    But I have had less trouble working with the really good-looking dancers, in general, than with the so-so's with an attitude. There have been a couple in ten years, maybe.
    You must have chaos within you to give birth to a dancing star.
    Friedrich Nietzsche

    Free your mind, and your ass will follow.
    George Clinton

    ______________________________________

  27. #25
    Featured Member laurcon's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,291
    Thanks
    718
    Thanked 402 Times in 203 Posts

    Default Re: Why are the 10s usually the worst in the sack?

    Quote Originally Posted by Djoser View Post

    I usually prefer the smarter 8-9's anyway. So often, through no fault of their own, the knockout '10' types have had trouble dealing with all the endless attention they have gotten all their lives, in one way or another.
    you don't think 8-9's get endless attn too? cause we do

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dumber than a sack of hammers
    By colleen in forum Hustle Hut
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-19-2008, 02:26 PM
  2. The terms "mojo" and "nation sack" in blues music
    By PhaedrusZ in forum Music Mix
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-29-2008, 08:00 AM
  3. I got the sack!! (just a rant)
    By xoxoGracexoxo in forum Stripping (was Stripping General)
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 10:06 PM
  4. What makes a guy/girl good in the sack?
    By Jenna in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 04-10-2004, 06:30 PM
  5. Dancing in Japan sucks ball sack
    By double oh winter in forum Club Chat
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-22-2004, 07:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •