Legal and moral aren't necessarily the same thing. Law are not necessarily moral. It's just in your interests to follow them since it keeps you out of jail or from being fined.
It's offensive to offer a girl money for sex unsolicited in most situations. But I don't see why an exchange of money for sex is immoral. The girl doesn't have to be attracted to the guy to consent to it - obviously, as with a prostitute. The money takes the place of attraction on the girl's part.But I admit to thinking that I am way more moral than the person asking if he can fuck me in the ass while he's waving cash in my face. I just let that bastard admire the ass he'll never have as I walk away.
Why is it morally wrong of him to ask that? Well, because he doesn't think the girl he has sex with has to like it/be attracted to him as long as he hand her the money. Now that's a sick mindset. I hate anything that implies that there is no need for mutual attraction/genuine consent when it comes to sex, I just hate it.
Personally though I also think that money for sex in place of mutual attraction is disdainful. But sick or immoral? A guy isn't sick if he likes a girl who doesn't like him back and the girl isn't sick for wanting or needing his money. The morality of it depends on your general view of what is sexually moral.
That's a double standard. If you accept that a woman can sell sex then you should accetp that a man may buy it from her. Otherwise she can't sell it. If you recognise that the woman needs the money, then in one sense the manis giving her the opportunity to make money that she otherwise may not have.I don't mind whores (as long as they don't do business in the stripclub), they do what they can to survive in this world like everyone else, there's nothing morally wrong with that. But someone who thinks it's ok to buy sex (someone who isn't naive and thinks the girl loves him, but realises that money is power) and support a view of sex that I despise will not get my respect. And certainly not my ass.
Money isn't power. Having the money to pay the woman doesn't give the man control of her. She is free to refuse his money. And since she needs his money anyway, she will voluntarily take it. Nor did he man put the woman in the circumstances which forced her to become a prostitute.
However I agree that paying for sex is undesirable and unnatural, certainly in most real prostitution situations. A woman having sex with many men whom she is not attracted to each day is an ugly situation and mots men who seek prostitutes are not likely to be attractive or pleasant to be with.
I guess to sum it up you could say I draw my line out of concern for how sex ( and consent, power and so on) is viewed and out of disgust.




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks