Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: 'Blighted Titles' cloud recent real estate purchases

  1. #1
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default 'Blighted Titles' cloud recent real estate purchases

    from

    (snip)"Oct. 1 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. courts are clogged with a record number of foreclosures. Next, they may be jammed with suits contesting property rights as procedural mistakes in those cases cloud titles establishing ownership.

    Defective documentation has created millions of blighted titles that will plague the nation for the next decade,” said Richard Kessler, an attorney in Sarasota, Florida, who conducted a study that found errors in about three-fourths of court filings related to home repossessions.

    Attorneys general in at least six states are investigating borrowers’ claims that some of the nation’s largest home lenders and loan servicers are making misstatements in foreclosures. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is asking judges to postpone foreclosure rulings, while Ally Financial Inc. said Sept. 21 its GMAC Mortgage unit would halt evictions. The companies said employees may have completed affidavits without confirming their accuracy.

    Such mistakes may allow former owners to challenge the repossession of homes long after the properties are resold, according to Kessler. Ownership questions may not arise until a home is under contract and the potential purchaser applies for title insurance or even decades later as one deed researcher catches errors overlooked by another. A so-called defective title means the person who paid for and moved into a house may not be the legal owner.

    ‘Nightmare Scenario’

    “It’s a nightmare scenario,” said John Vogel, a professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire. “There are lots of land mines related to title issues that may come to light long after we think we’ve solved the housing problem.”

    Almost one-fourth of U.S. home sales in the second quarter involved properties in some stage of mortgage distress, RealtyTrac Inc. said yesterday. In August, lenders took possession of record 95,364 homes and issued foreclosure filings to 338,836 homeowners, or one out of every 381 U.S. households, according to the Irvine, California-based data seller.

    The biggest deficiency in foreclosure suits is missing or improperly handled documents, Kessler found in his study of court filings in Florida’s Sarasota County. When home loans are granted, borrowers sign a promissory note outlining payment obligations and a separate mortgage that puts an encumbrance on the property in the lender’s name. If mortgages are resold, both documents must be properly conveyed to prevent competing claims."(snip)

    (snip)"“If I were in the title industry, or a mortgage holder, or someone who bought a foreclosed property, this is something I would be very worried about,” said Michael Carliner, a Potomac, Maryland-based economic consultant specializing in housing.

    Attorneys general in Florida, Texas, Iowa, Illinois, North Carolina and Connecticut have started their own investigations into GMAC. In addition, Florida investigators have issued subpoenas to three law firms after homeowners facing eviction said the firms pursued foreclosures without following proper procedure.

    “This is the most important issue of the whole mortgage mess because families are being thrown out of their homes by people who may not have the right to do that,” said Glenn Russell, a Fall River, Massachusetts, real estate attorney who won a case last year that reversed a foreclosure because of faulty paperwork.

    Mark and Tammy LaRace, his clients, were able to move back into their Cape Cod-style house in Springfield, Massachusetts, more than two years after they were evicted.

    Attempts to Clear Title

    In February, Judge Keith Long of the Massachusetts Land Court reaffirmed his 2009 decision to return the house to the LaRaces. San Francisco-based Wells Fargo & Co., which initiated the suit in an attempt to clear the property’s title after it foreclosed on it, has appealed the decision. The case now is under consideration by the state’s Supreme Judicial Court.

    The costs for title insurers to defend customers and reimburse for lost properties rose 14 percent to $480.5 million in 2010’s first half from a year earlier, according to American Land Title Association, a Washington-based industry group.

    Fidelity National Financial Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida, is the largest insurer, with 38 percent of the market in the second quarter, the association said. Santa Ana, California- based First American Title Insurance Co. is No. 2, with a 27 percent share.

    Title insurers use their records and public documents to verify a seller is the home’s true owner and that the property is free from liens. They collect a one-time premium and pay costs that may arise if someone challenges a new owner’s right to the property. To obtain a mortgage, buyers are required to purchase a policy to protect the lender. Many people also get a so-called owners policy to protect themselves.

    “Title is everything,” said Susan Wachter, a real estate professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School in Philadelphia. “There’s no collateral without possession, and that is title.”"(snip)


    For anybody who has already been 'bargain hunting' for distressed real estate, or who is considering doing so in the near future, this is a major new risk factor i.e. that despite making a down payment and despite making some mortgage payments a judge may now decide that the distressed property was improperly transferred thus you aren't actually the legal owner !

    This cloud over titles also creates a major new cost factor for both rising costs for lender title insurance as well as new costs for 'owner's title insurance. Without ponying up for 'owner's title insurance it's certainly possible that the house which you thought you purchased could be 'given back to' the previous owners by court action over 'flawed documents' ... with you then having no place to live and no way to immediately get your down payment / monthly mortgage payment money back from the mortgage lender until all legal appeals are exhausted !!!

    To say the least, this is going to cause major liquidity problems for real estate markets. It is also very likely to cause major additional losses for mortgage lenders. However, going forward, it also means that more delinquent subprime homeowners can avoid being foreclosed on and evicted without much higher levels of scrutiny ... which translates into those delinquent subprime homeowners being allowed to live in their houses 'rent free' for extra months or years.

    Also, in a larger sense, the US taxpayer is now the 'proud owner' of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of toxic mortgage bonds that were purchased as part of TARP / QE1 / MAIDEN LANE / Fannie & Freddie bailouts. It may turn out that some of the mortgages that were bundled into these mortgage bonds aren't actually valid as well, leaving US taxpayers on the hook for huge future loss risk.

    ~
    Last edited by Melonie; 10-01-2010 at 08:42 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: 'Blighted Titles' cloud recent real estate purchases

    of course, there are those that claim the 'clouded titles' situation reaches much farther ...

    (snip)"Here Comes The Spin! (Foreclosure Fraud)

    You can't expect The Manhattan Times to actually report on the facts that would sink all their patrons, can you?

    GMAC has acknowledged legal missteps in processing mortgages, and JPMorgan Chase has acknowledged the possibility of missteps, and both have suspended all foreclosures in the 23 states where they need a court’s approval. That’s 56,000 in the case of Chase alone; GMAC declined to provide a number.

    Notice the wording here - "legal missteps."

    Uh huh.

    Fabricating documents is a "misstep"? No, it's fraud and uttering (forgery.)

    Counterfeiting a summons is a "misstep"? No, it's both fraud and uttering (forgery.)

    GMAC and Chase are in trouble because, overwhelmed with foreclosures, they tried to process them as quickly and cheaply as possible, defense lawyers say. The companies say they are reviewing their procedures to take care of any violations.

    Oh c'mon.

    GMAC and Chase are in trouble because, during the go-go years in 2005 or thereabouts, they never properly conveyed the paper into the trusts in the first place, and, it has recently come out, much of the paper that was taken was not in compliance with the representations and warranties expressed in the offering circulars. While the particular cited example is from Countrywide, there is no reason to believe that any other lender was acting in a materially-different fashion.

    That is, it wasn't "a few bad loans." Indeed, it was a majority of bad loans, to the point that the banks issuing and funding them had to know they were no good in the first instance, and were in rank violation of the promises they made to investors. Yet once the bad loans were made, violating those promises (this is fraud too!) was necessary in order to refill the coffers from which more bad loans could be made.

    The banks didn't care. They (correctly, thus far) deduced that they would not be held responsible for their lies, just as they got away with it back in the 1990s with their "IPO madness" during the Internet Bubble, when they also peddled paper they knew was riddled through with lies.

    Caveat Emptor is all well and good, but in order to exercise it as a buyer you have to be able to actually discover the truth. In many cases this was literally rendered impossible - witness today that Fannie and Freddie have been unable to obtain the original loan documents from the banks as they examine whether the loans should be "put back" - that is, the banks are refusing to document what they originally sold.

    Why would you try to hide something that would exonerate you if you did nothing wrong? You wouldn't - you'd immediately present the proof, and that would be the end of it.

    The conclusion that comes from this is obvious.

    Defense lawyers say the disclosures are symptomatic of the carelessness, if not outright fraud, that lenders have been exhibiting for years in their rush to file cases. Many necessary documents have disappeared, with defense lawyers saying the lenders often do not even have standing to foreclose.

    The documents haven't "disappeared" they were destroyed. In point of fact, as I have documented, the lenders admit to, in many cases, having destroyed them. Then when they wish to foreclose they file an affidavit claiming the paperwork has been "lost." This too is a fraud - that which you intentionally destroyed was not lost, you trashed it. If you trashed it in a state that requires you to present originals, you have, by your own hand and with intent, destroyed your standing before the court.

    So there you have it. The media once again comes out and spins the news, trying to cover up the facts - the very institutions in their districts made a bunch of bad loans, they did it on purpose, they sold them knowing they were trash to other people, and now, having intentionally designed and implemented processes that did not meet state law requirements and having destroyed some of the evidence that might implicate them, they claim "the dog ate my homework."

    Just as with Watergate, the real crimes aren't usually in the original act. Watergate was a burglary - a decidedly pedestrian criminal event. But the attempt to cover it up was sufficient to bring down a President. Thus it will be this time too - if we can find an honest judge or prosecutor somewhere in the nation to decide that they've had enough of this crap.

    Fraud upon the court is an extremely serious matter. If it is allowed to continue without severe and certain punishment it destroys the citizen's confidence in the judicial system - the "last stand" for someone who has been wrongly accused of some act, whether it be civil or criminal.

    By allowing these frauds to stand with either a handslap (e.g. dismissal without prejudice, no sanctions, and no contempt citations) the Judges in this nation are trashing the last bit of confidence that the common man has in our government and legal system. This is an extremely dangerous act, and one that is likely to have consequences that, if it does not stop, will reverberate for a generation."(snip)

    from

Similar Threads

  1. real estate
    By cheetahchick in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-01-2018, 09:18 PM
  2. Real Country-Western Song Titles
    By Fabulous Disaster in forum Music Mix
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-13-2008, 05:54 AM
  3. Funny Porn film titles....either real or made up!
    By infra-red in forum Member Boards
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-02-2007, 02:07 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-28-2006, 08:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •