Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: "The Pill" preventing progess in the gym? Possible

  1. #1
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default "The Pill" preventing progess in the gym? Possible

    Inspired by the other thread here on the topic:

    Vid for you non science types, I sum it up:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njptjTEIRl8


    Effect of administration of oral contraceptives on the synthesis and breakdown of myofibrillar proteins in young women.

    Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Oct 22.

    Hansen M, Langberg H, Holm L, Miller BF, Petersen SG, Doessing S, Skovgaard D, Trappe T, Kjaer M.

    Institute of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Abstract

    Oral contraceptive (OC) treatment has an inhibiting effect on protein synthesis in tendon and muscle connective tissue. We aimed to investigate whether OC influence myofibrillar protein turnover in young women. OC-users (24+/-2 years; Lindynette((R))n=7, Cilest((R))n=4) and non-OC-users (controls, 24+/-4 years n=12) performed one-legged kicking exercise.

    The next day, the myofibrillar protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) was measured using stable isotopic tracers ((13)C-proline) while the subjects were fed standardized nutrient drinks. Simultaneously, a marker for myofibrillar protein breakdown, 3-methyl-histidine (3-MH), was measured in the interstitial fluid of the vastus lateralis. Measurements were performed in both legs.

    In general, myofibrillar protein FSR was lower in OC-users (two-way analysis of variance, P<0.05), although the difference seemed to depend on the OC type. Interstitial 3-MH in the skeletal muscle was not different between groups and did not vary by OC type. Exercise did not change myofibrillar protein FSR or 3-MH concentrations.

    Serum androstenedione and bioavailability of testosterone were lower in OC-users. In conclusion, the results indicate that the use of OC has an inhibiting effect on myofibrillar protein synthesis and the magnitude of the effect may depend on the type of OC. In contrast, there was no effect of OC on myofibrillar protein breakdown in the fed state.
    ________________________

    More damaging, but also a write up from a poster session at conference then fully published data from a journal:

    Birth control pills can limit muscle-training gains
    By Janet Raloff

    Some female athletes may pay a price for using oral contraception: lower strength gains from resistance exercise. These muscle-building exercises depend on lifting weights (like barbells and those in the big machines at your local gym) or working against tension bands and bars (like those in Bowflex devices).

    Personal trainers have long noted that all women don’t garner the same benefits from such exercise and there has been a suspicion that genetics might underlie differences. But exercise physiologist Chang Woock Lee and his colleagues at Texas A&M University wondered if other lifestyle factors might also play a role. And at the Experimental Biology meeting in New Orleans, this week, Lee identified birth control pills as a major suspect.

    In an earlier study, Lee’s group noted that many young female athletes reported using oral contraception. These pills have been specifically formulated to alter a woman’s steroid-hormone levels. Since certain steroids can affect how efficiently the body bulks up and gains muscle, Lee wondered whether these pills might also limit strength gains.

    So, three times a week for 10 weeks, the researchers had 73 young women (18 to 34 years old) complete 13 different exercises. The regimen was intense, working muscles throughout the body. None of the recruits had been regularly working out beforehand. But they sure were now. Each had to complete her resistance training against weights that were individually tailored to work her muscles at 75 percent of their maximum strength.

    Thirty-four of the recruits were taking some type of oral contraceptive. And as a group, they gained 2.1 percent muscle mass over the trial — or 40 percent less than the group not on the pill. So I asked Lee: What do you think is going on?

    One clue: Both before and after the trial, he found, women using oral contraception had dramatically lower blood levels of natural anabolic — as in muscle-building — hormones than did recruits not on the pill. The anabolic hormones included DHEA and its more abundant sulfated form, DHEAS. Compared to non-pill-users, women taking oral contraceptives also had substantially higher concentrations of cortisol, a hormone associated with the breakdown of muscle.

    So resistance training “did not rescue” this adverse hormone profile in the pill users, Lee points outs. And, he suspects “those hormone differences might be the underlying factor” accounting for why women on the pill gained less muscle.

    But that’s not the end of the story. Further analysis showed that not all pill users had an equally hard time gaining muscle through exercise. So Lee analyzed the formula for each woman’s contraceptive and found that many types contained progestins — a synthetic form of progesterone, a natural female sex hormone. In tests, he showed that these synthetic hormones bind to the androgen receptor in cells — the same receptor that binds male sex steroids, such as DHEA and DHEAS.

    Lee worries that if progestins dock with a receptor that DHEA would normally have turned on, they could essentially block the true androgen's ability to trigger muscle growth.

    Not all progestins were equally effective at this binding, however. So Lee grouped the contraceptives on the basis of whether their progestins exhibited low, medium or high androgenicity (i.e. androgen-receptor binding). And then a really striking difference emerged.

    Women who took pills containing low-androgenicity progestins acquired muscle through exercise as effectively as did women not on the pill. But women whose oral contraceptives contained medium- or highly androgenic progestins attained less than a 0.5 percent gain in muscle mass over 10 weeks — a far cry from what the others achieved. (By the way, Lee didn’t divulge which brands of contraceptives performed which way, so please don’t write me asking.)

    What all this means, he says, is that for women taking certain brands of the pill, the difference in strength-building from exercise could “make a difference in the color of her medal.” For the rest of us, he says, getting stronger would just require that we work “much harder.”

    http://www.sciencenews.org/view/gene...training_gains
    ___________

    Abstract from the above study:

    Oral Contraceptive Use Impairs Muscle Gains in Young Women
    Chang Woock Lee1, Mark A. Newman2 and Steven E. Riechman1,3

    1 Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
    2 Human Energy Research Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
    3 Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

    ABSTRACT

    Background: Many active young women use oral contraceptive (OC) yet its effect on their body composition and exercise performance has not been thoroughly studied. We examined the effects of oral contraceptive on muscle responses to resistance exercise training (RET).

    Methods: 2 groups of 18-31 year old subjects (OC: n=34, no OC: n= 39) underwent 10 week whole-body RET (3x/week, 3 sets, 6-10 reps, at 75% of max strength). Body composition was determined using hydrostatic weighing. Blood samples were taken before/after the training and assayed for DHEA, DHEAS, cortisol, and IGF1.

    Results: There were significant differences in lean mass gains (OC: 2.1±2.1%, no OC: 3.5±3.2% / OC: 1.0±1.0kg, no OC: 1.6±1.4kg, p<0.05). Plasma concentrations of DHEA, DHEAS, and IGF1 were significantly lower and cortisol was elevated in OC (DHEA: OC 9.5±4.4, no OC 13.6±4.6 / DHEAS: OC 1451±685, no OC 2196±1008 / IGF1: OC 163±42, no OC 239±126 / cortisol: OC 33.4±10.8, no OC 24.3±9.4, ng/ml, p<0.05). There also were significant differences in lean mass gains depending on androgenicity of the progestin in OC (low=2.5%, medium/high=0.3%, P<0.05).

    Conclusion: Oral contraceptive use impaired muscle gains in young women which was associated with lower DHEA, DHEAS and IGF1 and higher cortisol. The diminished lean mass gain may be related to the androgenicity of progestin which may bind to androgen receptor and inhibit its function.

    http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/me...stracts/955.25

    -OR-

    http://www.the-aps.org/press/releases/09/16.htm
    Last edited by Will; 11-05-2010 at 06:02 AM.
    A cunning linguist...

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Will For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    God/dess Will's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston-ish
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    278
    Thanked 505 Times in 289 Posts

    Default Re: "The Pill" preventing progess in the gym? Possible

    A general over view of the importance of understanding - and regularly testing - your hormones:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxsgyhKNSrI

    The obvious companion to the info/ vid above for women, regarding possible negative impact of BC on bodycomp.
    A cunning linguist...

  4. #3
    Featured Member
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    1,864
    Thanks
    83
    Thanked 457 Times in 287 Posts

    Default Re: "The Pill" preventing progess in the gym? Possible

    since going on the pill (brevicon) in june, i haven't noticed any differences in my muscles, but omg it's sooooooooo hard to lose fat. but it's highly likely that that's because i've been eating a ton. lol.
    -love everyone but keep them far from your soul-

  5. #4
    Moderator charlie61's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    13,467
    Thanks
    10,869
    Thanked 20,993 Times in 6,795 Posts

    Default Re: "The Pill" preventing progess in the gym? Possible

    I have gone off of my bc (after being on for years), so I will let everyone on SW know if I notice a change in my body (I work out often). It definitely seems that I used to have more control over losing fat and whatnot (despite the fact that I'm only 22). Maybe it takes awhile for the bc's negative effects to kick in. I will be very interested to see if any changes come about as a result of going off of it.

  6. #5
    Veteran Member Autumn Lily's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    589
    Thanks
    277
    Thanked 230 Times in 94 Posts

    Default Re: "The Pill" preventing progess in the gym? Possible

    I was on Mirena for 2.5 years and noticed that within 6 months, I had gained 15 lbs that, for the rest of the time I had it in me, I could not lose, for the life of me. Half of the weight literally DROPPED within a month of me removing it. People told me it wasn't Mirena doing it because of how little hormone was in it, but I am hormone sensitive, and the weight staying on while it was in VS coming off when it was out surely was no coincidence.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Autumn Lily For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    Senior Member Biancanz's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    127
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts

    Default Re: "The Pill" preventing progess in the gym? Possible

    I was on Yasmin for a year about 3 years ago. During that time I was trying like a maniac to tone up for a big holiday. I was working out like crazy with pretty heavy resistance/interval cardio but could only drop a kg and my body fat % was ridiculously high. When I came off it was a similar thing to Autumn Lily - I lost HEAPS of weight in just a month without doing anything extra and my body fat dropped significantly. I wont be going on the pill again in a hurry : )

Similar Threads

  1. maybe "the pill" is making me a grumpy bitch?
    By jaizaine in forum Body Business
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-09-2010, 01:47 PM
  2. Preventing nocturnal "noises"
    By Katrine in forum Body Business
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 09-17-2007, 08:31 PM
  3. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-24-2007, 04:15 PM
  4. "The Pill" is making my boobs appear like implants...
    By KamrynAnne in forum Body Business
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 04-09-2006, 06:48 PM
  5. Yasmin: new "pill"
    By whirlerz in forum Body Business
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-07-2005, 08:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •