If extra's were legal, would you do them?
Inspired by a couple recent threads here; Beckatron's Canadian Appeal to Prostitution Laws: APPEAL WATCH! and ScarletteJanuary's Masturbation during private dances, I'm wondering what it is exactly that stops you clean girls from doing extras, and what you consider an extra in general.
I've never really though about how I defined/or what constituted as an 'extra' - in my brain it has always been some combination of what's illegal and what's not a part of an actual 'Lap Dance' in the traditional term. Soon though, there could be laws passed in Canada that might make "Extras" (things like handjobs, blowjobs and even fullservice sex) more-or-less legal. I'm hearing arguments they this will lead to MORE extras in the club and less men buying straight-up dances, and arguments that say there will be less prostitution in the club, and selling dances will be easier. I'm hoping for the latter
I'm going to have to really re-think and re-establish my boundaries, and the reasoning behind them. I doubt I would start doing more than what I am now, for various reasons.
I guess what I'm wondering is (for all dancers):
-What do you consider an extra. And, why?
-Why do you choose (not) to preform them?
-Would your stance on extras change, or would you consider offering them if they became legal?
Lets leave name calling and mean language (filthy, nasty, whore, etc) out of this discussion. Thanks.
Edit: Added links to other threads and added a poll. Please vote.



Reply With Quote



How is it in Vegas? Prostitution is legal there,right? But im assuming guys who enjoy the tease go to get dances and guys who want strange go to a brothel... ? 
Bookmarks