Cleaner? LOL, well, there are now two clubs instead of fifteen so it's exponentially cleaner for sure. That being said, I don't think you can lump in open prostitution (and that's pretty much what it was back then) with what the main crux of this thread is rick. Given that Boston is a very escort-friendly city it would be interesting to see what the clubs would be like if there were still more of them!
I used to get some pretty amazing offers back then...I was either single or newly married so I wasn't really doing the whole P4P thing. I can't really agree or disagree with the way it is today, I don't waste my time in either of the two remaining Boston clubs but it is pretty easy to get laid in Boston...





Reply With Quote


Now I answered "yes and no" because there were always some girls who bent or broke the rules in order to earn, but on the whole I would have to agree that many clubs used to be MUCH stricter about contact. Now there were always certain "dirty" clubs that were basically brothels fronting as strip clubs, but the lines were much brighter than they are today.
In the 15 years I've been going to clubs (okay, only 10 regularly) it hasn't changed all that much out west (4 states that I kave patronized clubs in). The availability of hardcore extras fluctuates with the economy more than anything, but that's a customer thing, not a dancer thing - if you're the guy that wants that, it's ALWAYS been available and always will be from certain girls. As for contact in the clubs - when I lived in Seattle, it was an airdance environment. Contact hapened. A lot. BJ's don't happen in most clubs here, period - when vice is around. Contact NEVER happened in Seattle, AT ALL - when vice was around...

Bookmarks