Is there any problems promoting other websites here? This is not for any commercial reason.

Is there any problems promoting other websites here? This is not for any commercial reason.





I think I'll promote my website here, and it's a website where we all talk about the wonderful Yoda.
Seriously though why promote another site? I have a website devoted to my work and I would never post it here. Sure it might get me more work, but also has all my private info and wouldn't want some people to get my info.

Well the website I wanted to promote is the following:
It's quite interesting.





Your website so far seems bizarre. Like this "dating value"
1. How old are you?
26 to 29 years old: +3 point
3. What is your IQ? (This relates tangentially to your ability to connect emotionally with a man.)
Under 85: -1 point
85 to 100: 0 points
101 to 120: +1 point
121 to 145: 0 points
Over 145: -1 point
So I guess older women who are smart have less value than a stupid young woman.

Wrong on all accounts....I love smart older women also!
It's not "my" website...just one I find interesting.....my post is more to the beta males who protect you.





Protect me? I can protect myself thank you.





Sorry I missed church. I was too busy practicing witchcraft and becoming a lesbian.
"If you're good at something, never do it for free." The Dark Knight
"you conjunctively engender an intoxicating combination of wicked, wholesome & insanely intelligent" - a friend describing me
Blessed Be


eww...here are some quotes from this site he's promoting, if you don't wanna waste your time reading through all his tl;dr asshattery and giving his page more hits:
It's be hilarious if he didn't actually spend so much time writing this. Now it's just sad.
Edited by Mod: I don't want passages from this idiots blog being posted here. There are possible copyright issues involved. Anyone who wants to follow the links and discuss here is welcome to do so. No copy and paste please...
Last edited by yoda57us; 02-22-2012 at 05:57 PM.


I think if this dude ever took a 101 gender studies or queer studies course his head would explode. Or read anything about intersectionality.





Edited by mod: Quote Removed.
Wow that leaves me speechless. Really, these men aren't marrying because the women are "disgusting"? No, the women are disgusting because these men are. I couldn't begin to explain all the low life disgusting men who refuse to go for a woman at his level and intends to try for a much hotter woman. Sorry, evolution generally doesn't work that way. Ugly go for ugly and attractive generally breeds with attractive. Most people do not marry people above or below them in most things but for some unexplained reason I see this with ugly men and no one else where they think they are entitled to attractive women.
Last edited by yoda57us; 02-22-2012 at 05:59 PM.
Actually, evolution works exactly that way.
Sorry. I recognize that it's incredibly annoying (it happens to men, too, after the female wallflowers drink enough.)
Anyway, you're right that ugly men overestimate how attractive hot women find them. It's just that there's an evolutionary reason for why that is so.
If ugly men don't try at all, their chance of reproductive success is exactly zero. Even if they fail 99% of time time they try, that's still a success rate of 1% vs. 0, and over the long run, that's a significant difference, as there's a progressive multiplier effect.
This has been demonstrated many times in research studies, but here's the most recent one:
Luna it looks like this thread was dead until you revived it...THANX....This is the same guy trying to pick up dancers.





My point was that generally speaking people tend to marry people like them in terms of looks, age, income, education and everything else. Ugly men have a chance of marrying but they need to be realistic and most aren't. An ugly man is only going to appeal to certain women (mostly ugly women). Ugly men with money will appeal to gold diggers but not usually long term (unless he keeps spending). An ugly guy without money will only appeal to women if he has a great personality and most don't. Even then most attractive women want a decent looking man. However attractive people of all ages have their pick, yes even older people. There have been studies where they examined the sex lives of the elderly in nursing homes and found that even then the best looking still had a better chance.
This offends people when I say it (though not so much here)but as an attractive woman who is older I am NOT open to an ugly man unless he's amazing and I have yet to meet an amazing ugly man. Instead I meet ugly men with ugly personalities and often awful jobs too. I have zero inclination for these guys and am repulsed when they hit on me or contact me online. They need to stick to the ugly women who are their level. I am not at their level. Yet men believe the bullshit that women judge on personality only. Nope I judge on both and certain things will get you an automatic no such as poor hygiene and being a slob.
Yes, I understand.
My post above was just meant to address this sentence in your post that I quoted:
"I couldn't begin to explain all the low life disgusting men who refuse to go for a woman at his level and intends to try for a much hotter woman. Sorry, evolution generally doesn't work that way."
As I noted in my post, evolution works exactly that way. I thought you might be interested in the evolutionary explanation of that particular ugly-guys-hit-on-hot-chicks behavior.
The fact that it's an evolutionary imperative may not mitigate your outrage, but there you are.
BTW, both women and men attempt to "marry up," men on the basis of beauty and youth (I know, I'm digging myself in deeper here, but this is exactly what the research shows) and women on status, money, interest, physical attraction and reliability -- all of those, and in roughly that order.
For women, creative, moody and introspective in a man work in the right combination; same on the other end of the spectrum with humor, sophistication, intelligence and the Armani suit.
Smiling men, oddly enough, don't attract women at all. The guys smiling at the bar should really smile at each other -- apparently smiling attracts men, not women.
Of those prone to cheat on the side, they do so in equal proportion, with the men exaggerating the numbers up, the women down. But from a mathematical perspective, they must be cheating in equal proportion. By that I mean that the sex industry would need to be about three to four orders of magnitude larger if pros were in fact filling in the acknowledged numbers gap. They aren't. Cheaters are also liars. Big surprise there.





Men can try to marry up but most I know who try that fail and then I laugh. Yet men still think they can do better than they can then complain there are no good women. There are great women out there, but knowing one's league means a better chance of finding someone in their league.
From "Sex and the City":
Miranda: You see, this is why I don't date. The men out there are freaks.
Charlotte: That's completely unfair.
Miranda: If a man is over 30 and single, there's something wrong with him. It's Darwinian. They're being weeded out from propagating the species.
Carrie: What about us?
Miranda: We're just choosy.
Last edited by All Good Things; 02-23-2012 at 02:03 PM.





Well I disagree with that. I am single because I am choosy but have found many people are single for being choosy as well. I know a lot of decent men and women who are single older than me.
^ I was just teasing you, sorry.
Both sides think they are choosy and both sides are right. But when either one goes off on a Darwinian tangent, it doesn't withstand a mirror very well. The fact that the writers on "Sex and the City" were willing to make their characters the butt of the joke is instructive.

This site is so unfair. Why is it that some members (men) can say whatever the fuck they want to and if some new guy (or resurected former member) says anything even slightly controvertial...ohhh let's ban him...ohhh he's bad.
Balderdash I say!!
Actually using the term "balderdash" should get you banned all by itself, leaving aside the snide, sexist, PUA, thin-skinned, butt-hurt crap you've posted so far.










Looks like Pierre was a former banned member. Figures.
Bookmarks