Hello lovely ladies- I realize this subject has come up before, but I was hoping those of you who have used both could weigh-in on the differences between the Logitech 9000 and the Logitech C910 specifically when it comes to flattering your skin. IE showing blemishes, hair growth, imperfections.
I have been using my laptop's built-in cam from the get go, and it is extremely flattering! My freckles don't even show up, and I can go 2-3 days without shaving my bikini area without it being visible on cam. I can go longer than I should between nail appointments, and my make-up can be smudged or sloppy and still look perfect.
Sometimes, I go to the bathroom on a break, and I am horrified to see a possessed demon-clown in the mirror, but as soon as I'm in front of my cam, I'm a playmate. It's fantastic, but the quality isn't where it should be, so I want to upgrade.
I've heard (read) a few girls saying that the C910 is unforgiving, and I'm having a reallllly hard time deciding between these two cams. I'm spoiled by my built-in cam, it makes me feel pretty lol. Will the 9000 break my heart too? Is the difference between the two negligible enough that I should just get the 910? I'm heavily considering buying both (found them on amazon for $120 for the pair.)
Does anyone use the C910 with additional lighting to achieve the perfect skin look? Do you think this route is better than using the 9000 to achieve the appearance of a better complexion?
Thank you for any input, hope you're having a great week! $$$



, but as soon as I'm in front of my cam, I'm a playmate. It's fantastic, but the quality isn't where it should be, so I want to upgrade. 

Reply With Quote


also my skin always looks soft with the 9000 no matter if smash some pimple recently and have a little mark here and there, but 9000 is not good when you zoom in (in case you like to zoom often) the image start to pixelate a lot with zoom in with the 9000 and you look like mario bro's from the 1980's ...in the other hand I read that c910 is so danm clear and zoom doesnt affect the clearness, but this is only good if the performer has a perfect body (no strecthmarks, no hair, no nothing) in my case I have all that, so 9000 goes better to 'cover' those little ugly things I have in my body, when I need to zoom I prefer to move very close to the cam instead of zooming with the cam software (of the 9000) since it starts to pixelate the image a lot.


Bookmarks