Tough luck if the girl goes private!
I hate how they brag about free shows on MFC. I hate there's the word "free" in MyFreeCams.
I love that site, but stuff like this pisses me off!





Affilate site/white label looks like. The majority of shows on SM arent even free. Clients getting scammed nowadays too.
So what they want us to just fuck for free, PAID SITE MEANS PAID not like 4cam.Got so pissed when I saw this





The creator of the site makes the client believe its free, so they sign up, the creator either gets a commission for that or gets one when the client realises its not free and uses their credit card.
Its another scam / misinformation site taking advantage of people.
Damn, I need to make me one of these ''false promises" whitelabels soon!!! LOL! Cha-ching!!
Thank you guy for clearing that up for me





Ugh!!!! Just....ugh!!!
Not only does it mean that we get a crapload of freeloaders who have been told that they will get to see me for nothing (yay! More rude assholes who demand that I do things and get pissy when I don't!), but on top of that, it encourages guys to think that camsites either:
- Should be free, thus encouraging them to try and trick us out of our living
OR
- Are all just a big scam!! This one is almost worse, because when guys start thinking that camsites are scamming them, then they will be far less likely to use them or go private on them. Why would a guy come into a show with me when he believes that the site is all a scam? He may think that they are trying to steal cc info, or that I will just "say" that I will do things, and then not do them!
Grrrrrrrrr
I take cash, debit or credit. I just don't take shit.
OnlyFans.com/ScarlettMoore
Follow me on twitter! @MissScarlettM
Hear me ramble about random things:





I take cash, debit or credit. I just don't take shit.
OnlyFans.com/ScarlettMoore
Follow me on twitter! @MissScarlettM
Hear me ramble about random things:




hahahahaha - On webcams.com they actually had a little note in the model area saying something along the lines of - if you get a customer who thinks he's talked to you on yahoo , just go with it , it will be our affiliates and white labels , who sometimes message spenders pretending to be the model ..... FUCK RIGHT OFF .'Hi UKmissy , we chatted earlier, you said you were going to ride my big dick ' UKmissy- ''No we fucking didn't , that was webcams.com and it's white label promoters, I only want to kick your big dick ''
its almost free if its $5 for the show..
like gold shows for example....
group shows...for 0.99..
other deals sites have..
but it is what it is.....
and Im grateful Im still making money ....
God Bless.
even when someone spends $49.99 for the 10 minutes private...
thats only $50 to see a full show.
thats cheap.
where im at... $50 wont get u much.
aww the first girl is MARI my fave bitch EVER!!
I just sent her a message to see if she'd approved the use of her likeness in that video..
a few other ex OHC girls on there too..Evelyen, Carmen, ect
Ya. its not free, its a scam. fucking ballsack

Bump
I can't believe that ... Avg looking girls! Wouldn't u pay 50 bucks for dinner anyways with a girl on a date! Honestly makes me mad just go too tube for that - exposed cam geez



[QUOTE=Kayleebell;2420155]Bump
I can't believe that ... Avg looking girls!/QUOTE]
See, that part to me is a huge tell. Whoever is behind this doesn't get the appeal of cam girls. Trying to say only the porn looking girls are worth spending money on is ridic. There is plenty of porn out there and the fact is the cam girls are getting the attention. Porn studios are scrambling for what to do, hence all the advertising promotions that THEY PAY to run on cam sites.
They want a piece so they try to run down "average looking girls." Well, my custies pay $8/min for average, so good luck telling them I'm not worth it.



Ugh, what if they are using our cam archives as the free content to bait peeps in to buying their porn shows. If they are a white label of a cam site they can surely do this.
(Mental note: figure out that watermarking bidness.)



Wow. Not long after typing that, someone named Marty something came into my SM chat and said "6.99? You should be free." I said, "Marty, are you from a porn studio? Get out of here. Your face should be free." (My all-purpose nonsensical putdown.) He left immediately.
Let me say that I never call out beggars or even hecklers in my room (I will ban them or sometimes play with them if I feel saucy.) But from now on I am calling out "You should be free" shit like Norma Rae.

1. Cam girls were supposed to b about attention but ppl r all like boobs for free bitch
2. I'm new so they try to trick me but I read all these treads before
3. We don't get mfc to chat
What are you doing here - sorry - read my heading and profile
4. Ur pic looks nothing like u
Well of course it's professional and we r on a cam up n my face
The fact we r suppose to b avg girls that are chilling giving attention to ppl the way we say - the fact this site is out sucks n I feel so bad for everyone on there
Fuck that site and its owner.





Again, thank the SM's marketing policy. The site deliberately misinforms people so they believe they'll be given free stuff/real life sex, and makes it look like it's the bad greedy models who cheat on the poor dudes and want their money. Some day the guy who made it work this way will be found dead in a half a dozen garbage bags. Amen.
I heard that Abbie, former owner of OHC, is the main one that created this aggressive marketing scheme? I don't remember where I read it though. . floating around the GFY forums I believe..so don't quote me on that
Has anyone else noticed that the webpage in the video looks EXACTLY like Streammates main page except with the banner changed? Obvious white label is obvious.
Free camgirls would never make since in existence anyway. What would entice ANYONE to spend hours and hours masturbating and enticing men into chats for absolutely no money?
Bookmarks