Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: weekend commentary - China Punches Back on "Rare Earth Elements'

  1. #1
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default weekend commentary - China Punches Back on "Rare Earth Elements'

    This economically important story got lost in the 'news noise' this week, but bears some attention ... since it could have significant effect on many US companies ...

    from


    (snip)"A serious simmering dispute involves China versus the rest of the world on rare earths. As most readers know, rare earths are essential to the manufacture of many high tech, defense, and “green energy” products, such as smartphones, lasers, and hybrid batteries. Even though rare earths are not rare, their extraction is an environmentally nasty business, and China, which has less than 30% of world reserves, now accounts for over 90% of global production. That is a stranglehold that China has decided to exploit. Per Wikipedia:


    On September 1, 2009, China announced plans to reduce its export quota to 35,000 tons per year in 2010–2015, ostensibly to conserve scarce resources and protect the environment.[21] On October 19, 2010 China Daily, citing an unnamed Ministry of Commerce official, reported that China will “further reduce quotas for rare earth exports by 30 percent at most next year to protect the precious metals from over-exploitation”.[22] At the end of 2010 China announced that the first round of export quotas in 2011 for rare earths would be 14,446 tons which was a 35% decrease from the previous first round of quotas in 2010.[23] China announced further export quotas on 14 July 2011 for the second half of the year with total allocation at 30,184 tons with total production capped at 93,800 tonnes.[24] In September 2011 China announced the halt in production of three of its eight major rare earth mines, responsible for almost 40% of China’s total rare earth production.

    We’ve followed this story because it is a colossal example of short-sightedness of military planners and corporate executives. I recall in my youth (the 1970s) concern about the vulnerability of the US military to the fact that certain strategic materials had limited supplies outside Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) which even then looked pretty unstable (note that outside meddlers seemed to have trouble figuring which horse to back. For instance, Lonhro started backing black nationalist parties in Rhodesia before international businesses abandoned the National Party in neighboring South Africa). One assumes that (at a minimum) military planners are aware of these vulnerabilities and do what they can to reduce their impact (e.g., stockpiling, developing alternative technologies to minimize or end their use, recycling).

    By contrast, letting China gain control of rare earths production was a self inflicted wound. And China was unusually aggressive in letting its customers know it held the whip hand. It implemented an unannounced export embargo in 2010 which targeted Japan above all others. Our reaction when China lifted the ban after consternation ensued:

    There are two different ways to read this little contretemps, and readers can no doubt come up with other interpretations:

    1. This was a successful shot across the bow of the US (the initial Japan freeze was in many ways directed as the US as welll because the US consumes far more of Chinese rare earths via Japanese intermediate and end products than via direct purchases from China, even if the immediate impact on Japan was more pronounced). The Treasury has backed off its pressure on China to have the renminbi appreciate more quickllyand is now supporting the idea of China coming up with longer term goals to rein in its trade surplus

    2. This was a shot across the bow that failed. China only banned raw materials exports; it wanted to force encourage its trade partners to buy products manufactured in China with rare earths content. But instead, Japan immediately started to focus on recycling rare earths and redesigning products to use less of them; the Eurozone similarly started to consider accelerated development of alternative sources, rather than buying higher value added goods from China. This seems consistent with the fact that Secretary Clinton was set to make remarks about the ban; it was dropped literally hours before her speech, but the State Department has not gotten confirmation.

    Note these readings may not be inconsistent. China may be preoccupied with gaining short-term advantage (particularly given continuing trade tensions; the hermit kingdom made it clear in 2010 it wanted a quid pro quo for restoring supplies) and may be willing to risk getting more competition down the road. Put it another way: what good is being a monopolist if you can’t abuse your power?

    The US, the EU, and Japan jointly filed a WTO case in 2012 against China over its export curbs, China looks more and more likely to gain from pressing its advantage. The US and other countries can’t ramp up production quickly, particularly given the environmental hazards involved. China is using its chokehold on supplies to reward companies that locate more higher-value-added manufacturing in China, allowing them to move up the skill chain.

    The latest salvo took place today, apparently in response to the March WTO lawsuit. The parties have met in late April as part of a formal dispute resolution process. If no agreement is reached within 60 days, the case will then go to a panel for a ruling. Given the timing, this move appears to signal that the negotiations are at an impasse (quelle surprise!) and China is taking its case public in case the talks fail. China is now claiming that its supplies are falling (peak rare earths, or at least in China). From the BBC:

    China has warned that the decline in its rare earth reserves in major mining areas is “accelerating”, as most of the original resources are depleted.

    In a policy paper, China’s cabinet blamed excessive exploitation and illegal mining for the decline…

    “After more than 50 years of excessive mining, China’s rare earth reserves have kept declining and the years of guaranteed rare earth supply have been reducing,” China’s cabinet said in the paper on the rare earth industry published by the official Xinhua news agency.


    China is also talking up the environmental damage associated with rare earths production. Since China has been remarkably unconcerned about this issue on numerous other fronts, this sort of talk seems a bit disingenuous. From the Associated Press:

    China on Wednesday defended its export curbs on rare earths used in high-tech products as an environmental measure and rejected a World Trade Organization challenge by the United States, Europe and Japan.

    A Cabinet official rejected complaints Beijing is using the environment as an excuse to support fledgling Chinese producers of lightweight magnets and other rare earths products by limiting supplies to foreign rivals in violation of its free-trade pledges.

    “The protection of the environment is never a pretext for gaining advantage or increasing economic returns,” said Su Bo, a deputy industry minister, at a news conference.


    This is not a great argument to push, since it works far more to the advantage of Western countries than China. It has been a sore point that China’s price advantages are based in part on environmental degradation. This sort of “we need to think of the planet” talk would also argue for importers to impose tariffs or import restrictions against countries with low environmental standards (note that idea does not fit well within the WTO framework; environmental and consumer protections are often characterized as restraints on trade, but rules change as prevailing concerns change).

    Bottom line: this row does not look like it will be resolved soon and it will take years for litigation to play out. And China will win even it it loses if it gets enough manufacturers to relocate in the meantime. Nicely played."(snip)


    At the root of this market segment issue is the fact that rare earth elements ( with the best known being Neodymium, Samarium etc. ) are a key 'ingredient' in the production of high efficiency rotating electrical devices, from hard disk drives to hybrid cars to wind generators. Thus China's imposition of export quotas ( i.e. strict limits on the volume of rare earth materials which the gov't will allow to be shipped to customers outside of China ) thus poses a 'threat' to any producer company which relies on the availability of rare earth elements to manufacture its product at all ... and who further relies on the price it must pay for rare earth elements to be somewhat equal to the price that competing companies must pay for the same rare earth elements. Referencing the author's 'bottom line', Chinese export quotas on rare earth elements are thus creating very strong pressure for US, Japanese, European etc. manufacturers whose products incorporate rare earth elements ( computer disk drives, hybrid cars, wind generators etc. ) to relocate their production facilities within Chinese borders asap to avoid having their businesses operations terminated due to lack of availability exported Chinese rare earths.

    In regard to non-Chinese rare earth mining, one US company - MolyCorp - is attempting to resume production at a closed US rare earth mine in California. See . The major issue with rare earth mining, of course, is that everywhere you find neodymium and other rare earth elements, you also find radium, thorium and uranium ... thus mining operations which 'disturb' deposits inevitably lead to the generation of radioactive waste. And the separation of rare earth elements from ore also involves huge quantities of sulfuric acid. There is a potentially huge amount of money at stake if this mine ( and/or other new rare earth mines outside of China ) can actually produce rare earth elements not subject to the Chinese export quota.




    It should be noted that this pure 'gambling', not investment !
    Last edited by Melonie; 06-23-2012 at 07:20 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned All Good Things's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,451
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 601 Times in 233 Posts
    My Mood
    Daring

    Default Re: weekend commentary - China Punches Back on "Rare Earth Elements'

    I have a proposal.

    Every time some scientifically illiterate brain-dead moronic goofball decides to post a story on his blog on a subject about which said moron knows exactly zero, said moron should be required to deposit $50,000 cash into an escrow account.

    If on the first page he actually cites Wikipedia, he forfeits $20,000.

    Every time he makes a stunningly stupid pronouncement preceded by "everybody knows," he forfeits $5,000.

    Every time he comes to a conclusion either not supported by the facts, or one that is exactly the opposite of a position supported by actual scientific fact, he forfeits $5,000.

    Every time he criticizes people who actually know what the hell they are talking about on a matter of public policy, particularly in a snarky, know-it-all way, he forfeits the balance.

    I know this proposal will never fly. These geniuses have never seen $50,000 in one place in their entire lives.

Similar Threads

  1. weekend commentary - China's bailout plan
    By Melonie in forum Member Boards
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-15-2008, 05:51 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-18-2007, 07:45 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-30-2007, 05:27 PM
  4. weekend commentary - China Changing Up ...
    By Melonie in forum Dollar Den
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-13-2007, 04:34 PM
  5. weekend commentary - China's Dollar Strategy ?
    By Melonie in forum Dollar Den
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-22-2006, 07:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •