Hrm, I would hazard a guess that this is someone who uses a members site. That would put you in 'paid' all the time. Either that, or she is earning a massive amount of money.









When first signed up it said 5 k a weekI'm doing good IMO, when I saw the ad was bumped to 10k I was like "liars" lol
It doesn't have to be a "voyeur" acct to do a voyeur gold show. It's basically just a gold show where you put in the description that it's "voyeur and there will be no interaction" and then go about your business. Still doesn't mean you're raking in the dough. Just my opinion.
But yes the more you work the more you will earn.
That's a good point, Cara. I suppose when I get to thinking about it, if I did back to back voyeur gold shows and one person joined every show then my numbers would look a lot like this. Because technically I would be "in paid" for the entire length of the show as long as one person joined. However, let's say the rate for the show is maybe $10 for 60 min. If one person joined each show and I was only in free chat for a minute out between shows, then my earnings per hour would be $10/hr minus SM's cut and DP's cut.
But of course if I'm in a gold show for an hour then more than one person will join. So let's give the benefit of the doubt here and say that I have 10 guys join each and every show. That's $100/hr. But my cut of that would only be $30. Still pretty damn good for voyeur gold shows. But not exactly banking. And we still have to assume 10 guys are willing to pay each time.
I agree with the other scenario also. If you have pre-booked shows or you sign on and are almost immediately taken private, then your paid rates would be quite high. But it's very unlikely that a performer could maintain this level of paid chat consistently AND be banking at the same time. I just don't see how.
Many girls do very well on SM. I have no doubt that some do make that 10k/wk on occasion. But I doubt it's with those numbers.
May I ask what exactly IS it with this voyeur thing? I see it blowing up like crazy. Is Streamate really letting ALL these girls have 'voyeur' accounts, and giving them high ranking? I know there's the odd voyeur account here and there, and it IS an awesome feature to have something like that implemented on your membership site. But I just don't understand why ALLL these camgirls are just surfing the internet and ignoring the paying customer, and expecting to get paid good bucks while NOT trashing their cam persona. I really don't think there is enough 'demand' for that sort of thing to have all these girls doing voyeur shows.
I'd think it would piss a lot of guys off..we all know that when most men have a large amount of blood flow rushing through to their dicks. . .they don't read. I don't know, just my opinion.
/End threadjack
P.S.- I do believe that maybe somebody, sometime, made 10k a week like.. . ONCE. I also believe that percentages in paid chat don't mean much at all when it comes down to earnings. There are WAY too many factors involved.
To be honest, the only ones I've seen with "good" ranking are 1. the "real" voyeur pages that the guys love (by that I mean it's the girl's ONLY cam persona and has always been), and 2. the porn star voyeur pages... and they eventually end up with such bad ratings that they don't really last long (b/c the customer want the porn star to do something other than what is promised in the page description). Those are people who do voyeur page thru their member's account & thus get ratings.
There are girls who use the gold feature to do the voyeur show and they are required to be descriptive about the show. If not, SM will shut them down. And there are girls who were using their regular page to do voyeur shows who have been asked to open a separate voyeur page so as not to mislead customers. There were a lot of girls trying to trick customers into buying in with a "wow, I could be doing anything" kind of description, when in reality they're ALWAYS sleeping... but it looks like that's mostly been put to an end. So as far as I'm concerned, the guys need to read more closely. If there is the word "voyeur" in the performer's page name or show description, I think that's fair enough. If a guy buys into a voyeur show by accident then I'm betting he won't do it a second time. And really, the shows aren't all that expensive usually.
I also do think there's market for it when it's done correctly. It's a fetish & some guys just like to watch. And well, if there's not a market for it, then I guess that's a self-correcting problem, right? Eventually the girls won't make money and then they won't do it any longer. So I guess I don't see the issue. I don't do voyeur shows, but I don't see a problem with people doing them. And if it does have a negative effect on their cam reputation, that's on them.
Last edited by Cam_Model_Jess; 10-03-2012 at 11:12 AM. Reason: Inserting paragraph breaks
I do "voyeur" shows because I am in a specific niche and choose to plan privates in these shows. The shows are priced at about 1 minute's worth of my private shows and are set for long periods of time. I use these shows to not only show member that I AM in the specific niche (yes I'm pregnant but no you can't see my belly for free) but also to "force" them to read my profile before going private.
I have auto text for when someone states they want to plan a private and since I've started doing this I don't have any issues with people asking me for things I don't do or things like trying to get me to squirt without a block session and rating me 1 star because they can't be arsed to read.
Once I am not in this niche I will not have as many incentives to do voyeur shows and members would not have as many incentives to join them. As of now it prevents me from having huge hormonal blow ups in free chat and gets me much better quality privates.
Also, I always have 80-100% paid chat because I'm only sitting in free chat if I'm waiting for someone to join private after a voyeur show.
"Well then it's a good thing your faith in me has no impact on how much I make." - MissEgo
Bookmarks