I stumbled upon this! Anyone have one or know anything about it?
http://vsex.com/
Sent in an email requesting more info, but haven't heard back yet... That's not a very good sign, but still curious...
I stumbled upon this! Anyone have one or know anything about it?
http://vsex.com/
Sent in an email requesting more info, but haven't heard back yet... That's not a very good sign, but still curious...
Just... No.
Know all of those "harder bb DEEPER MORE FASTER HARDER NOOOOW!" guys? Why would one choose to give them control over what goes inside of you? Jeez the thought of that actually makes me shudder.
If you're looking for an interactive way to cam with your viewers I would suggest something like RealTouchInteractive, where YOU are the one in control at all times.
^^ Haha! Good point!





I so bad want one ... Im forever upgrading computers soooo..... SANTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Girl, you are brave. It just reminds me too much of crazy dangerous diddle machines that are put together with knives and saw blades. I want to be the only one who diddles me thank you very much![]()



I would ONLY want this in a case where I was using it with a trusted person.... like my boyfriend. But its a REALLY cool idea for people who have long-distance relationships!
xoxoxox




You're over-reacting.
I've had one of these. The software was integrated into the site I use, most often but the developer changed it several time and had to switch out machines so often, it was hard to maintain a following with it. It's also only available in PC format and I run on a Mac. Try as I might to get the inventor to make it Mac-compatible, he just hasn't, at this point. It's actually harder than it sounds to introduce this kind of technology to customers, in chat-based shows. More often than not, I would have it set to a one-sided control where I managed the functions, entirely. I found that when it all comes down to it, guys just want to see me using a fucking machine. Actually controlling its movements is a little over their heads (especially for the guys who aren't nearly as tech savvy or speak a foreign language). Overall, the guys who could manage to navigate the functions (there were fewer than five) were totally cool and never abused the interaction. They were always great communicators and willing to put in the money (typically over 15 mins, in prvt at around $4.99/min) for the kind of show that made this practical and enjoyable.
Personally, I really like fucking machines and I'm intrigued by the concept. I've spoken to both sides and I prefer this over the RealTouch concept because it's more exciting to look at and having tried both, I can sell the fucking machine angle with much more enthusiasm. I wish the development for this machine and idea, specifically (coordinating with FleshLight) had been a smoother process and taken off when it was first introduced over two years ago. It's still in the works but don't expect a speedy response (if you get one, at all) from the developer, who's basically running the entire show and manufacturing process, himself. I tried to get him to work more with indy-style cam girls but he's not making that a priority, at this point. Maybe someday. *sigh*
"SS=stripper shit, in the same spectrum as CS=customer shit, which is within the spectrum of SaS=sales shit, which is all contained in the universe of BS=bullshit." -- Jay Zeno (mod)
"Show me a hot chick and I'll show you someone who's tired of fucking her."
Oh, don't get me wrong, I see no problem whatsoever with fucking machinesIt's the idea of giving guys control over the movements that I find disconcerting. Now if *I* was in control of its functions then sure, but what would be the appeal of this specific product to the customer who actually wants to control the action?
The idea of marrying this with a FleshLight sounds great from a customer's perspective but it's a bit intimate for my liking. Probably why I never followed through with RealTouch.








Also, they use LiveJasmin to fill their live models page. I didn't see a single model with the machine online. If they were willing to be more reasonable with the prices of their machine I could see how this would be a great concept. But it would also be nice if it had a stand alone control option so it didn't need to be strictly used with their site/online controls.We do not charge anything to signup but you need to lease one of our sex machines. Our patented, remote controlled robotic dildo lets your customer fuck you over the Internet. You pay a down payment of $200 and we charge your credit card an ongoing lease fee of $100 per month as long as you use the machine. You can make this amount back in just ONE DAY! With the VSEX machine you will make more than all the other girls for every minute in private and so much more in tips by really setting yourself apart from the regular run-of-the-mill cam girl.





IMO, letting them control it is ok. After all, you aren't strapped to it and, if you feel that something's going wrong, you can always tell the guy. If he's the one in control, he's the one who has all the responsibility and he has noone but himself to blame if the result is disappointing. I would love to get one, but shipping it here would cost a fortune and there's no guarantee it arrives undamaged, if it arrives at all. I like the concept, the only drawback is that the guy has to control it with mouse while he needs his hands elsewhere lol - as Courtney said, a Fleshlight would be a better controller.
Bookmarks