The old Fantasy V reaity debate ... lies with the fact that in theory , a fantasy is harmless ... between two consenting like minded adults . The problem arises with the fact that a cam customer does not define ' a consenting like minded adult ' . Reason being , You don't know them from a non like minded psychopath . So when you role play something you personally find horrific , are you stopping that daddy from nailing his daughter , by giving him an outlet to release that fantasy, or are you actively encouraging it, by simulating that this is an erotic activity you agree with . While I agree with absolutely no limits in the bed room between myself and someone I know inside out ........ I can't say the same for a stranger . I'm not sure I could live with myself, if I saw one of my customers arrested for tying up and raping his wife - when weeks prior to that I had been role playing' such a conversation in my cam room about his wife . So yeah , A fantasy is harmless fantasy , but how do we define for whom it's a fantasy , and for whom it's fuel for the fire .... We can't . I will only cross my taboo limits if the client himself is the victim . I will not actively involve any other victim, be that child , animal , elderly , or bugs etc. However if the customer wants to be raped ( even by a donkey ) , trampled on , role play as my abused son ..... fine by me , but the second he wants to get his make believe daughter involved or fuck his dog ( or donkey) ,the victim is someone other than himself. My line is crossed. Just my 2 centsBut as always ... to each their own .



But as always ... to each their own .
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks