So as some of you may know, I dance (and am one of the top earners) in a city where there are a LOT of extras girls - so many that I'd say at most clubs in my area it's at least 50/50, if not more extras girls. It's awful, and they do it at cheap prices. Anyway, there's a website I go to every now and then to check up on how things are in my state, and a lot of the guys at that website normally get extras. So I just went on there are and saw a thread askin what a "10" is to each personal member on there. Like when they rate a girl a "10" what does that mean to them?
So the first response to that thread is, "I would view an overall 10 as a 8+ in looks, a 10 at performing extras, and reasonably priced."
When I first read that response, I found it laughable. Now it's upsetting... I get more upset as I think about this. Not only have these "extras" girls overpowered the market so that the overall dancer quality has been lessened, but a deciding factor is whether or not they were cheap? No longer do these types of men consider a 10 a 10, now whether or not she's doing extras (in the club) is a deciding factor...? I feel like a lot of men in my area, where extras are so widespread, have a similar mindset - if a girl does extras (for a "reasonable" price) she'll go up a couple points in your ratings?
Any girls who work in such an "extras" environment, or who can at least empathize, any thoughts on this?



Reply With Quote

. Don't let a comment from someone who probably now has an STD from his 10
get to you.
Bookmarks