sugar daddy.jpg
sugar daddy2.jpg
If replying to either ad, they just flat out ask for sex. I made an email account specifically to troll these dudes, and all they want is cheap sex.





sugar daddy.jpg
sugar daddy2.jpg
If replying to either ad, they just flat out ask for sex. I made an email account specifically to troll these dudes, and all they want is cheap sex.





i don't think its that sugar daddy's/babies are dead, its just not going to work finding them online





I came across these ads while looking for some modeling gigs, and I just can't help myself of how pathetic they sound. I couldn't resist into pretending being a potential "sugar babe". I wonder how many naive UT chicks had fallen for these ads.
I think it would be hard finding a creditable sugar daddy on craigslist. Hell finding an escort that's not a full blown tweaker or crack head on craigslist is a serious challenge.
Find the bars restaurants hang outs of rich men and there you will find sugar daddies.
I took up a bit of golf last summer, and I met a few men of means. ;-) Then I was cursed with having to talk golf while with them, ugh, I'll take sucking dick to hours of golf talk!





^^^^^^
Yup. I feel pity for all those UT chicks who probably think these dudes are classy gentlemen when in reality are probably creeps.
Yup it's dead there are more fakes and scammers on those sites than anything real. The once that girls consider "real" are just johns looking for a cheap hooker deal. If you ever read those sugar daddy site blogs you'll find out girls are fucking these men all for $400 -$1500 a month tops. We're talking several days in a month. I just read recently a girl that actually was denied her money for the night because she was on her period.
Craigslist is probably worse. No sugar daddy would be caught on craiglist spoiling anyone. It's a free place to advertise with no pictures yet he can spoil someone? lol Most of those guys see spoiling in the $25-65$ range for sex. Yes they are that bad.
That ad is bogus. He means 2-3 times a month for free. Or really once for free and he'll disappear. I would never trust any post that has sex and money in it on clist. If he really has $1500 to blow he can get an escort. Those types are trying to attract someone in financial dire need to force sex and then kick them out. Many women that attempt this will not report the guy because they feel they are wrong in the first place. So the guy just continues on. You see those ads in every clist area out there. It's just another cheap hobbyist sucker game.


There must be some kind of guide floating around out there that tells these guys to say that their last SB relationship ended because of "school", because I have seen/heard this at LEAST five or six times.
Maybe their logic is that if they say the last relationship ended for that reason, it makes them sound "experienced" or legit? I don't know. But they may want to come up with some new fake past relationship, because that reason has been used one time too many at this point.
^ Haha my favorite one is " She moved out of the country to take care of her sick mother, graduated etc. If you let these men talk you'll find out it wasn't 1 sugar baby but 200 or so women they conned into having sex for nothing.
Not sure if you've seen this:
http://fakesugardaddy.blogspot.com/
I actually got a marriage proposal on a sugar daddy site. I was like lol wtf is that?
Here are just some sugar daddy ads in NYC , CT
http://newyork.craigslist.org/que/m4w/3799495642.html
http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/m4w/3826475074.html
http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/m4w/3810284680.html
http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/m4w/3825896577.html
A sugar baby that can host? Why would a sugar daddy use the term "host". Fail!!
http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/m4w/3824010663.html -- ok if this is the guy in the picture he's actually pretty fucking hot!! I suspect you will get a different version of that in person. If he is that good looking then he's probably abusive or has a fetish desire like drinking vomit or smearing feces on teeth. lol
http://newyork.craigslist.org/lgi/m4w/3809068117.html
http://hartford.craigslist.org/m4w/3782145750.html
I can literally check every state and find a sugar baby/sugar daddy ad.
One thing I find funny is that they could join seeking arrangement or one of the other sugar sites. The problem is it costs some money. Monthly membership that they can't afford. Says volumes right there.



Actually my last arrangement did end because her school was getting to be too much. She told me a couple of months ago that life was getting too crazy. She didn't offer anything more. I respected her silence. I thought that maybe she met a guy or something. Maybe he was enjoying the VS outfits that I got her! LOL
A week or so ago we got back in touch and I took her out and we caught up. That was when she told me that it was school that got to be too much. I told her that I haven't yet entered into a new arrangement. She wants the new one to be really hot.
I didn't get that from any guide, but I can see where some guys might pull that. I have heard a few things from ladies that I have met, things like guys asking before meeting about anal sex or fetishes or whatever.
^ I didn't know they had a splenda daddy thread but here's a few more links to known offenders:
http://fakesugardaddiesexposed.wordpress.com/
http://fakesugardaddys.blogspot.com/
This last one for some reason stopped accepting new reports but you can also click on REport a Fake page 1 and/or page 2 and enjoy the read. It's quite interesting the level to which this men will go to be something they aren't.
A few have created fake websites talking about a business that doesn't even exist. Others will post press releases. There are a few others that when you google their number it will come up on a Ferrari forum but yet it has only 3 members that have ever signed in. It's hilarious actually.
One guy actually messaged me with photos from 1970. I was like really?? No man would be caught dead in those funky ass knee high tube socks. I told the guy like really dude? Who are you kidding with that?
Ohh and another thing I want to mention. 5 cam members that I've dealt with on MFC and naked are on a few of those sugar daddy sites. These men are cheap I mean usually spend $20 max in a span of 6 months yet show up daily. When I crossed their profile I nearly died laughing. They are obviously fakes especially what they wrote on their profiles.
Also don't sign up on any sugar daddy site that makes women pay. Seriously ass backwards.
SA would be your best bet.- Free Premium membership as long as you have an edu email. -They also have verified (background verified ) featured members list. Plus from what I heard they actually review reports of abuse or scams.
Sugar Daddy for me is like an online brothel. Avoid. They actually had a sting going on that site since it's so know for it's direct sex for money arrangements.
Sugar Daddie- another joke- They want women to pay $20 a month membership and many of the men signed up when it was free. So the men there are the worst. Plus they have no real local search function.
What I've enjoyed most is reading escort blogs when they go into sugar dating. You can tell many of the guys are looking for the rush of someone naive and bright eyed over a few hundred. They go in ,have sex and jump up ready to hit the door. It's funny when the guy says "you've done this before" as if he wanted her to feel a bit tortured about taking money having sex and leaving.
I say your best bet would be to have a club customer be a sugar daddy which is much easier or if you're camming having a virtual sugar daddy (nothing in person).
One thing I always find interesting is that the really generous sugar daddies tend to get the worst sugar babies. Women that take a full month's allowance in the 5k-10k range and disappear. Other women have been caught blackmailing them and really walk away with thousands.




I agree. I think of how many guys play right into my hand while I'm at work. I think I can similarly get a guy to do the same even if I meet him in the outside world. I honestly feel I'd have better luck snagging a sugar daddy at the bar of an extremely expensive restaurant.
"Rather have my feet hurting than my pockets."
I think this also, meeting a guy at an expensive restaurant would probably work. I havnt tried it yet tho. It seems like guys are more willing/easier to spend on me if they dont know I dance(idk why tho) and also when I was a waitress before I danced. Maybe its because they think I'm harder to get,lol.
OP, those dudes are just sad and pathetic.





I know this had been discussed before, but, why the FUCK would a sugar daddy be asking the sugar babe to host?!
splenda daddy4.jpg


He's probably married or has a significant other. If this is the case he obviously can't have the sugar baby come to his home. He also might not want to be seen in public with the sugar baby for fear of being caught by his wife or significant other.
He could spring for a hotel but that's not without risks. Someone could see him going into the hotel, could show up on a credit card etc.
What I meant is "host" is a term generally used in escorting. Many of those men that happen to be johns refuse to see/ sugar date escorts yet give themselves away by saying "host".
The other point is if he's married and can't afford to get a hotel then that's saying volumes of what he can't be " A sugar daddy".
Here's a link to reviews of SA
What I find funny is that many of the guys give it 5 stars the women 1 star lol
http://www.alldatingwebsites.com/rev...g-arrangement/


I would agree that if he can't afford a hotel he really can't afford a sugar baby either lol! I was thinking some married or guys in public life (politicians, entertainers, etc.) might not want to be seen going in and out of hotels.
It seems being a sugar baby means different things to different people. Here is one example:
http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/04/how-...ike-i-did.html
This SB actually moved in with the guy. This would seem to be blurring more into a relationship but I guess everyone has their own definition.
Here's another:
http://www.sheknows.com/love-and-sex...-sugar-daddy-1
In this one the author talks about marriage as an ultimate goal.
For both of these authors having sex with the SD is a given. Some posters on this board have argued that SBs shouldn't have sex with their SDs. Otherwise they might as well escort.
Clearly, if some women think sugar babies can move in and/or marry their sugar daddies they have a very different conception of what a SD is from what many of the posters on this board describe. I think some women, as indicated by the above referenced links, view sugar babying as a relationship where finances play a big role and perhaps there is an age difference beyond what the woman would normally seek. The woman likes the guy, but the money is the extra perk that makes her willing to be in a relationship with him.
So cherryblossomspring how would you classify these types of relationships? Clearly they are different from hourly escort services. But they're not quite boyfriend/girlfriend. Although I guess if they get married it's just a regular marriage at that point.
True I agree with politicians ,entertainers and married men would not necessarily want to be seen walking out of a hotel local to their home. Still most politicians and entertainers are not going to be found on a sugar daddy site unless they are ego maniacs. I mean look at Weiner showing off his weiner on clist. Who's really that dumb?
My point is that a man usually thinking with the head on his shoulders is going to figure that a madame, smaller more verified group of women, or an escort would be better for his own safety.
Also the married man against being caught coming out of a hotel tends to be full of it. Why? because what has he been doing up til this point? Coming out of hotels. Yup. He can also see an escort that "hosts".
I tend to feel that if he's really afraid of being seen at a hotel then it could be for more sinister reasons. Maybe what he's into in the bedroom could be consider dangerous to an unwilling partner.
Well I don't see anything wrong with a sugar baby moving in with her sugar daddy if that's part of the arrangement they both seek.
Now here's where that's could be a bad move for a sugar baby .
First unless she really known this man over a span of years she could be very well be setting herself up to be homeless or worse. I've seen ads on SA from some men up in age 60+ looking for a live in situation. What this says to me is someone that needs a ridiculous amount of control. Someone that is in a position of taking away a basic human need like food, shelter, clothing, cleanliness could be dangerous.
I even had a guy contact me on SA about something close. He went on his plan of how long we would sugar date and also expected after a certain amount of time that we would be married. He actually mapped out the time limits for each step. I had to look at the calendar just to make sure I didn't teleport back in time to the 1800s. After the confirmation of what year it was, I informed him that I wasn't actually seeking marriage but a sugar daddy/sugar baby relationship. I was met with some very choice words as he told me he wasn't interested in me. lol I always find it odd to be rejected by someone I don't want.
Another thing I noticed was that some sugar daddies will set a sugar baby up in her own home or condo. Now his name may be on the home but I see her as more of a kept mistress. This arrangement includes a clothing allowance, car, school tuition paid etc. <-----There types are quite rare.
You have to think that a sugar baby between 18-22 is being shown ads that state this guy above is in the majority. That she'll receive such spoiling from every man that contacts her. Even the fakes use this to their advantage contacting women from basic membership accounts promising 10K+ allowances.
Getting back to what you asked about how I view sugar arrangements. First I would hope they are relationships. My past sugar arrangement didn't include sex. Yes I'm one of those types. Yet just because sex wasn't on the table didn't mean I wasn't in a relationship with them.
When I joined the sites I started out with the same mindset but realized that perhaps I was being too unrealistic. I later decided a sexual relationship with someone in person would not be such an issue. Notice I said "sexual relationship" not "sexual arrangement". So for me if you're in a relationship with anyone hopefully they want you to succeed in life and help you along that journey. What I've seen from the vast majority of men on these sites is that it's not about anyone but themselves. Sex is what they are buying nothing more and in many cases they aren't buying it but pretending they will.
Then there's the issue with looks and age. My most generous sugar was attractive in shape and young yet was the most generous man I've ever met. You log in there and the guy is bordering on obesity, age is way over the hill through the woods to grandma's house., he's not nice, respectful, or sweet. He even has an edge of crudeness, rudeness, passive aggressive, argumentative etc. and he's also way below any decent range of what he offers financially.Let's not forget that he is also married. I haven't the slightest idea where any of that sounds great or wonderful for a relationship with or without sugar.
Being married to a wealthy man or any man for that matter is something that in general will cross a woman's mind at some point in her life. With unemployment rates still not being anywhere near where they were several years back, woman today wouldn't mind being married into wealth. If a sugar site is her way of getting a foot in, she'll try. The problem is even if he's wealthy that doesn't mean that he's kind or sweet.





I think that most sugar babies should not have sex until they get their money. Money is the reason to become a sugar baby...why would anyone want to have sex then get paid? Get the money upfront before anything sexy stuff happens. This way you can ensure that they live up to their end of the deal. Also I agree with getting married into money after your arrangement with your sugar daddy is over.
^ Absolutely correct. I think the issue is that most of the women don't want to feel greedy or as if they are heartless gold diggers. The sliver of doubt is all these men need to turn the tables and tell her just that. So she tries to see things their way at no benefit to why she's there in the first place and that's when she gets taken for a ride .. literally.
I think they call it "Test Drive".
^^yea thats why we need to not give a fuck about being "heartless gold diggers" if we know what were there for we should own that shit. The dude knows damn well he dont want nothing but sex from us while we know damn well we dont want nothing but $$ from him, so when both parties are just upfront about it with no games, its great but I am finding this harder to find in recent years. These guys want all the games so that they can play against us and then take us on that "test drive"lol. But there must be many girls out there who allow this or it wouldnt be such a popular game for these guys, ugh. I love the guys that you can be straight up with and tell them you just want there $$ and they dont mind, where these guys at?
Bookmarks