Page 27 of 31 FirstFirst ... 172526272829 ... LastLast
Results 651 to 675 of 755

Thread: Freewebcams.com Thread

  1. #651
    God/dess justanothercamgirl's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,199
    Thanks
    17,224
    Thanked 19,867 Times in 4,132 Posts
    My Mood
    Lurking

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by loveshooks View Post
    as to the reference to "conflict with Loveshooks the mod on this board and Loveshooks the business owner", could you explain what that is in reference to? I've never sensed (not saying it's not there, only that this is the first I'm hearing of it) any discomfort from anyone and I try to relate to peeps the same way whether they're on sw, on my site, both or neither. If I am doing something that makes you (or anyone else) uncomfortable I hope you would feel comfortable speaking up.
    I completely understand how you would feel that people would be comfortable speaking up on this issue....but because this conflict does exist I can also understand how people wouldn't be comfortable speaking up about it.

    Not that I would ever, ever EVER compare you in anyway to Princess Jenny.....(EVER!) but do you remember how a conflict existed when he was a member of Camming Connection?

    I have no doubt that your heart is always in the right place loveshooks....but I must confess that even I am slightly afraid to agree with Boo right now that a conflict does exist.

    Edited to add: I just want to say that this conflict doesn't just apply to Loveshooks. As Bootsie pointed out it applies to pretty much every rep in Camming Connection when they could just as easily be put in 'Industry Insight'. It just becomes more glaring when a mod is also a business owner 'advertising' in the section.
    Last edited by justanothercamgirl; 04-09-2015 at 02:17 PM. Reason: ugh.....stupid tired brain

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to justanothercamgirl For This Useful Post:


  3. #652
    God/dess JaneBurgess's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,557
    Thanks
    2,337
    Thanked 9,040 Times in 2,641 Posts
    My Mood
    Amused

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    The site just confirmed they are paying Space out directly. Everyone has been paid out and I hope the site will do well. I know things havent been perfect and looking back I would change some of the things I did and how I handled them. I'm not perfect, I fucked up and I learned a lot from this experience. I do however feel like a lot of people on here have a mob mentality and attack people with little actual knowledge of certain situations. You should give both parties a change to explain the situation and then go on from there.

    As for the other drama that was in here, damn.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to JaneBurgess For This Useful Post:


  5. #653
    God/dess caramelcraze's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2013
    Location
    the burbs
    Posts
    2,888
    Thanks
    3,042
    Thanked 7,572 Times in 2,008 Posts
    My Mood
    Busy

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by justanothercamgirl View Post
    It just becomes more glaring when a mod is also a business owner 'advertising' in the section.
    I agree to a point. I really don't mind business owners or reps in CC, especially when they're a contributing part of the community, don't spam, and generally behave themselves. I personally think it's nice to be able to publicly ask them questions, receive answers, be aware of updates to their site, and generally see how they interact.

    What I will say is this:
    Name:  tumblr_static_8qp4c83f1go4cks8cs0scow8s.gif
Views: 820
Size:  907.7 KB
    I've personally never seen mods in CC react unacceptably as far as banning people who have overstepped their bounds in one way or another (which I truly thank all of the CC mods for), but there is a huge potential for abuse of power if a CC mod is also a cam related business owner. It also puts the users of the forum in an awkward position. On one hand, I don't want to be penalized if I share my honest experience about a site/studio owned by a mod on the site. On the other hand, I know that I should be allowed to have my experience heard; be it good or bad.
    Again, I have yet to see this become an issue, but there's always a possibility of it when there's a conflict of interest.
    Last edited by caramelcraze; 04-09-2015 at 11:44 PM.

  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to caramelcraze For This Useful Post:


  7. #654
    God/dess laurielegs's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2010
    Location
    USA, northeast
    Posts
    7,317
    Thanks
    30,604
    Thanked 17,693 Times in 5,185 Posts

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsie View Post
    Maybe if that is the case that the CC thread was what made you feel it was a bit on you somehow, CC should go back to not allowing ANYONE to post their business ventures in it? That would make it a lot more clear-cut imo. That would also call into question some of the site reps (ModelCentro, SkyPrivate) that post in CC as well. Just my 2 cents. It has already caused one train wreck, it might be wise to re-up on the rules to prevent further issues, even if bending and breaking them has been convenient to a large extent.
    I'd rather see the posts here really. I've never seen a more thorough trial by fire than when a new site posts in here.

    If there are problems with the site in any way, CC will find them and either motivate them to fix issues or make everyone aware that they are not worth working for.

    Also has worked the other way for me too, helping me find a nice assortment of reliable sites to put in my basket.


  8. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to laurielegs For This Useful Post:


  9. #655
    loveshooks
    Guest

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by caramelcraze View Post
    What I will say is this:
    Name:  tumblr_static_8qp4c83f1go4cks8cs0scow8s.gif
Views: 820
Size:  907.7 KB
    I feel you on that. Due to both LCMS and sw (in terms of performing verifications) I have been given a lot of information about a lot of members of this community. I don't take either responsibility lightly, all I can say is that thus far my record of complete discretion and honesty remains intact (I wanted to address that since PJ was mentioned above). Also, unlike PJ everyone here knows who I am on cam, and each person who has ever received a payment from me on LCMS knows my real name as well. I'm not hiding anything, ya'll have as much info on me as I have on any of you. I also want to point out that unless a sw chica is out here or chooses to disclose her identity, I have no idea which sw members are who on LCMS. Hell, I didn't even know who Space was on LCMS until the (unacceptable and dealt with) outing earlier in this thread occurred.

    Quote Originally Posted by caramelcraze View Post
    I've personally never seen mods in CC react unacceptably as far banning people who have overstepped their bounds in one way or another (which I truly thank all of the CC mods for), but there is a huge potential for abuse of power if a CC mod is also a cam related business owner. It also puts the users of the forum in an awkward position. On one hand, I don't want to be penalized if I share my honest experience about a site/studio owned by a mod on the site. On the other hand, I know that I should be allowed to have my experience heard; be it good or bad.
    Again, I have yet to see this become an issue, but there's always a possibility of it when there's a conflict of interest.
    It's funny how where someone stands affects perspective. I do see your point about the potential for abuse of power, what I find striking is that up until reading your post I saw my ownership of the site and mod duties as reinforcing the importance of behaving with character. I would anyways of course but in terms of business a reputation for being ethical is important, I think that goes doubly so when it comes to sw'ers (this whole thread being a perfect example of the response when things go south). I also want to point out that every mod here has a direct superior (the Supermod) so it's not like I could go on a rampage even if I wanted to do so. This forum has checks and balances in place, and any member of the community is free to approach a mod or the supermod if they feel that something unjust has occurred.

    One of the reasons I was so surprised by some of the commentary in this thread is that I honestly feel like opening LCMS has made me a better mod. Before I did I was burned the fuck out on both camming and camgirls (there was some sw drama going on at the time that I made the decision to make the site that was tedious to deal with), but getting to work with peeps I actually enjoy brought me back around 180 degrees.

    In terms of criticism of my site, I haven't received a ton thus far, mainly I think because I'm pretty open with LCMS listees about the 'work in progress' element of the site (a wonky online models feature, re-hauling the backend for an admin panel and c4s-like video upload system) that they find problematic. Still, anyone is welcome to make any comments they wish about the site, I don't consider it 'off-limits' by any means and I would hope my peers on the site would know that they have nothing to risk in doing so. Same goes for any sw'er who isn't on the site. I'm not afraid of criticism because I'm confident in my business structure, the existing site and my ongoing work on the site that will solve some of the issues both myself and site listees have identified. My response to criticism will always be 'you're right, let's change that' if it's a problem that can be solved, or "I'm sorry, I can't' with an explanation why if it's something that isn't practically feasible or permitted by my bank. I like problem-solving, and I see criticism as an integral element of that process.

    I always try to stress that I want the site to be different, to more collaborative in nature* and I can't do that without feedback. If someone chooses to believe that they'll be penalized for speaking up, I don't know what more I can do other than to say it won't happen. If it were to happen there are systems in place for dealing with that, but it's not going to happen.

    *speaking to collaboration, if nothing else running LCMS has taught me that sites are fucking crazy to not actively solicit feedback from cam chicas regarding business model and individual aspects/items of their sites. Some of the most successful elements of the site thus far as things I hadn't even thought of, that were brought to my attention by peeps who took the time to ask "I don't like this, can we do that instead?"

    In terms of running the site I perceive it as a dual role. half position of power (in that I control the money before it gets sent out) and half a position of serving my 'non cam' clients: the listees on the site. In terms of sw I do have mod powers, but y'all have some agency too, this isn't some dictatorship controlled by me.

    those are my thoughts on the issues raised. I hope I've been able to convey my assurance that as a mod or site owner I don't consider myself 'off limits'

    as to Space, I'm so relieved that this is finally over. While I'm pretty appalled at how long it took to reach a resolution to this issue that would get Space paid immediately, I do thank Tim for reaching out and stepping up.

  10. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to loveshooks For This Useful Post:


  11. #656
    God/dess justanothercamgirl's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,199
    Thanks
    17,224
    Thanked 19,867 Times in 4,132 Posts
    My Mood
    Lurking

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by loveshooks View Post
    Also, unlike PJ everyone here knows who I am on cam, and each person who has ever received a payment from me on LCMS knows my real name as well. I'm not hiding anything, ya'll have as much info on me as I have on any of you.
    I somehow miscommunication my point. The point I was trying to make it that it is hard for people to feel open to criticize the people who are in charge of giving them money. The way that people in most jobs find it awkward to criticize the boss. Thus the conflict of interest.

    Edited to add: Since you are both the mod of Camming Connection and Verified as well this make it a double-whammy
    Last edited by justanothercamgirl; 04-10-2015 at 07:23 AM. Reason: tired again

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to justanothercamgirl For This Useful Post:


  13. #657
    Featured Member space_cowgirl's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2008
    Location
    US
    Posts
    956
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked 1,729 Times in 519 Posts
    My Mood
    Happy

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    So far I have not heard from FWC directly regarding my payment. I will definitely post here when I receive my long overdue check!

  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to space_cowgirl For This Useful Post:


  15. #658
    God/dess audritwo's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2013
    Location
    10.0.0.1
    Posts
    4,582
    Thanks
    5,702
    Thanked 19,566 Times in 3,647 Posts
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Yes please do! <3





    Quote Originally Posted by Miss_Red View Post
    Audritwo's asshole sees all, knows all. Spurs on armies of orcs. Casts fear into the dwindling races of Middle-Earth. Fears hobbits.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to audritwo For This Useful Post:


  17. #659
    God/dess justanothercamgirl's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,199
    Thanks
    17,224
    Thanked 19,867 Times in 4,132 Posts
    My Mood
    Lurking

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by loveshooks View Post
    I also want to point out that every mod here has a direct superior (the Supermod) so it's not like I could go on a rampage even if I wanted to do so. This forum has checks and balances in place, and any member of the community is free to approach a mod or the supermod if they feel that something unjust has occurred.
    When it comes to the checks and balances of the site, I did want to mention to the other girls on the forum that when it comes to approaching the SuperMod the last time I had an issue that required her assistance it took me over three months to even get a hold of her so I could get it resolved.

    I mean, she was amazing and nice....but still.....three months.
    Last edited by justanothercamgirl; 04-12-2015 at 05:47 AM. Reason: I just can't spell in the morning

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to justanothercamgirl For This Useful Post:


  19. #660
    Featured Member Bootsie's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,012
    Thanks
    2,157
    Thanked 2,150 Times in 696 Posts

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by loveshooks View Post
    It's funny how where someone stands affects perspective. I do see your point about the potential for abuse of power, what I find striking is that up until reading your post I saw my ownership of the site and mod duties as reinforcing the importance of behaving with character. I would anyways of course but in terms of business a reputation for being ethical is important, I think that goes doubly so when it comes to sw'ers (this whole thread being a perfect example of the response when things go south). I also want to point out that every mod here has a direct superior (the Supermod) so it's not like I could go on a rampage even if I wanted to do so. This forum has checks and balances in place, and any member of the community is free to approach a mod or the supermod if they feel that something unjust has occurred.

    One of the reasons I was so surprised by some of the commentary in this thread is that I honestly feel like opening LCMS has made me a better mod. Before I did I was burned the fuck out on both camming and camgirls (there was some sw drama going on at the time that I made the decision to make the site that was tedious to deal with), but getting to work with peeps I actually enjoy brought me back around 180 degrees.
    I don't want to beat a dead horse, because I am aware that there isn't anything I can say that is going to tip this balance, but the perception of potential conflict of interest isn't about how YOU feel about it, but how OTHERS perceive it. I have been uncomfortable for a while with reps in Camming Connection who are permitted because they are female. The "Industry Discussions" section of the forum is pretty clear about it being only for current/former/future performers. I realize that the online nature of camming blurs some boundaries, but a female strip club manager would never be permitted to post in the General Stripping section of Industry Discussions, but by allowing site reps (and that does include LCMS, as well as Katy Boleyn, Jane's FWC studio, ModelCentro, and SkyPrivate) in, it changes the balance. In your first post about LCMS, Loveshooks, you mentioned "I'm availing myself of the 'cam chicas get to post promotional material' in cc thing" and I think that we have strayed from just allowing camgirls to do it into allowing companies (ModelCentro, SkyPrivate) to promote in here as well.

    I am not comfortable with this. I truly believe that you have no sinister motives or anything like that, and that you come from a place of awesomeness, but in the current situation (I too have attempted to contact super mod in the past, but got no response, and IsobelWren appears to have disappeared) you are the ONLY active mod in both Camming Connection AND the Verified group, as well as being a business owner. You are wicked and my experiences with you have been good, but that conflict makes me uncomfortable.

    *puts on flame-proof suit*

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bootsie For This Useful Post:


  21. #661
    God/dess KatyBoleyn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,367
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 7,163 Times in 1,840 Posts

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    I think my only counterpoint to that argument is that by being here, you are throwing yourself into the shark tank. Whereas most adult businesses easily get away with simply making up whatever line they want, you really have to stay on your toes to stay in good graces here and this only benefits the models using these services. Its also a major advantage for real existing models to get a credibility advantage on the outside competition, something I do think is right and fair...but also prone to what happened here when a cammodel/business owner gets cynical.

    Verified I can agree on, which is why I opted myself out of it. It was actually more of a case of other studio owners there not wanting me to talk, but final thought before I closed my access there was that I had crossed that line to being a business owner. I don't expect anyone else to agree or follow that line of thought though. The soldiers do need a place to privately blow off steam (or plot a coup) without the officers standing on their heads...you can tell I grew up a (Romanian-style) army brat That may or may not outweigh useful insider info that can be shared.

    For us (BoleynModels) being here, right now its about efficiency in communicating more than anything else. We can reach more of our current clients quicker by making a post in our thread than sending mass emails that don't get read, and many of our clients feel they get faster service posting openly than emails.

    What I don't want to see is a reaction to someone's poor handling of a $200 or so problem turn into a big disadvantage for any cammodel that wishes to start her own business in the future. We turned out very well and established, and being relegated elsewhere would hurt a little but wouldn't be devastating - starting about 2 months ago we've gotten more signups externally than community driven. What it would hurt badly is other cammodels that haven't had their chance to prove themselves yet.

    "Daily pay ALL the things!"
    [email protected] - Skype: BoleynModels - "If you haven't heard a rumor by 10am, start one."

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KatyBoleyn For This Useful Post:


  23. #662
    loveshooks
    Guest

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsie View Post
    the perception of potential conflict of interest isn't about how YOU feel about it, but how OTHERS perceive it.
    that was the point I attempted to make a few posts back, I can't read minds and if someone has an issue or concern it needs to be articulated in order to be addressed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsie View Post
    I have been uncomfortable for a while with reps in Camming Connection who are permitted because they are female. The "Industry Discussions" section of the forum is pretty clear about it being only for current/former/future performers. I realize that the online nature of camming blurs some boundaries, but a female strip club manager would never be permitted to post in the General Stripping section of Industry Discussions, but by allowing site reps (and that does include LCMS, as well as Katy Boleyn, Jane's FWC studio, ModelCentro, and SkyPrivate) in, it changes the balance. In your first post about LCMS, Loveshooks, you mentioned "I'm availing myself of the 'cam chicas get to post promotional material' in cc thing" and I think that we have strayed from just allowing camgirls to do it into allowing companies (ModelCentro, SkyPrivate) to promote in here as well.
    all of the sites you mentioned above had threads here in cc before I even began to plan LCMS, if you recall in that post I also asked the community if y'all would feel more comfortable if I moved it elsewhere and every single reply stated that it was fine where it was. Again, I can't respond to issues or concerns that aren't addressed, I guess I'm wondering why it had to come up in an outburst a few pages back rather than just talking to me about it or raising it as an issue in a thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsie View Post
    (I too have attempted to contact super mod in the past, but got no response, and IsobelWren appears to have disappeared) you are the ONLY active mod in both Camming Connection AND the Verified group, as well as being a business owner.
    contacting the supermod is not the most effective way to address issues. The supermod has her hands full dealing with the admin elements of the site, however sw has 8 mods, most of whom are active here every day. They are the best people to contact if someone has an issue with mod behavior in any section.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsie View Post
    *puts on flame-proof suit*
    the point I'm trying to make is that you don't need one.

    Quote Originally Posted by KatyBoleyn View Post
    prone to what happened here when a cammodel/business owner gets cynical.
    could you explain that comment? I don't understand how any of my actions or choices on or off sw could be construed as 'cynical'

    Quote Originally Posted by KatyBoleyn View Post
    For us (BoleynModels) being here, right now its about efficiency in communicating more than anything else. We can reach more of our current clients quicker by making a post in our thread than sending mass emails that don't get read, and many of our clients feel they get faster service posting openly than emails.
    I find the same, I receive far more feedback from chicas who read the LCMS thread than I do from the mass emails I send out relating to site updates.

    Quote Originally Posted by KatyBoleyn View Post
    What I don't want to see is a reaction to someone's poor handling of a $200 or so problem turn into a big disadvantage for any cammodel that wishes to start her own business in the future. We turned out very well and established, and being relegated elsewhere would hurt a little but wouldn't be devastating - starting about 2 months ago we've gotten more signups externally than community driven. What it would hurt badly is other cammodels that haven't had their chance to prove themselves yet.
    I share your concern. Right now there are 4 model-run enterprises here on sw. Only one of those four had some bumpy moments. I would hope that will be the focus when new model-run enterprises arise in the future.

    As far as verified, I was voted into that position by members of the group. I perceive all of my positions as attempts to serve this community, if that's no longer desired then I'd be perfectly fine with that.

    I guess what I don't understand is why things had to come to this. We are a community and we need to be able to talk to each other.

  24. #663
    God/dess KatyBoleyn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,367
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 7,163 Times in 1,840 Posts

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Cynical wasn't directed at you loveshooks Cynical is when you start thinking of your models as your underlings and forget where you came from.

    Quote Originally Posted by loveshooks View Post
    I guess what I don't understand is why things had to come to this. We are a community and we need to be able to talk to each other.
    I think we are...I hope so anyways.

    "Daily pay ALL the things!"
    [email protected] - Skype: BoleynModels - "If you haven't heard a rumor by 10am, start one."

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to KatyBoleyn For This Useful Post:


  26. #664
    God/dess Cam_Model_Jess's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,533
    Thanks
    6,705
    Thanked 5,856 Times in 1,676 Posts

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    I don't venture out into other areas of the site, so I'm sure my opinion on the matter is greatly influenced by that. If there's a camgirl-run service that I could benefit from, or that I need to avoid, I want to know about it. I think the best way for me personally to get that information is for the posts to be here in CC. I agree that when the owners of services post here they are subject to a great deal of scrutiny. We are smart ladies who look out for ourselves, and that's very obvious when a new service owner posts here. However, I do believe that the service owner's ability to post here should be dependent upon the receptiveness to questions & criticism.

    If a service owner simply wants to post an ad & has no interest in answering questions about the service, engaging in productive & professional conversation, and using the thread as a place to receive suggestions & offer support, then the thread has no business being here. However, I think most people would agree that it's a huge resource for us to be able to engage service owners here. Does that need to be done in another section of the board? Maybe? I certainly have no problem with it being done here. However, like I said, I don't venture into other areas of the site, so I'm sure that has a lot to do with why I'm ok with the info being here.

    Honestly, I'd never thought of these threads as not belonging in CC. Again, I'm sure, a product of my self-imposed isolation to CC. But I suppose I'm just wondering what the problem really is.

    One thing to consider is that if the people running the services don't start the threads here, cam models will. And then are the owners to not respond within the thread but start a new thread elsewhere & link to that? I suppose that's one way to handle it. But I think Katy brings up a good point that it's a nice perk for our fellow cam models to be able to advertise here, as long as they're professional about it.

    Specifically with regards to LCMS, I might not have signed up for the site if I wasn't able to read the thread here. I'd never been on an indy listing site before (other than to accept payments for clips), and I was really nervous about. I had no idea what it was all about. Being able to read several pages of info, and see the site progress through response to suggestions, made me much more comfortable. Just me, but I probably wouldn't have gone to another section to read up. An advantage for loveshooks? Absolutely. But also an advantage for me. I calculated that I've made an extra $550 from clip payments & cam shows, due solely to the increased percentage on loveshook's site vs. the last site I was using. A big advantage to me as well. And no freakin' way is Mark from CMD, or any owner of a big box site going to listen to me & help me out the way loveshooks has.
    Last edited by Cam_Model_Jess; 04-12-2015 at 04:29 PM.

  27. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Cam_Model_Jess For This Useful Post:


  28. #665
    God/dess Cam_Model_Jess's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,533
    Thanks
    6,705
    Thanked 5,856 Times in 1,676 Posts

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Ugh, sorry, my post was getting long. With regards to comfort in approaching site owners with issues, and the whole conflict of interest thing: I do agree that it's all about perception. At this point in time, my perception is that a tangible issue has yet to arise. Again, just personal opinion/ comfort level, but if I had a problem with loveshooks, I would approach her about it. I feel confident that whatever the issue, we'd work it out. I don't feel like I'd be afraid of any reprisal here. Or in Verified. I honestly can't think of a reason I'd need to vent to my other fellow cam models about the service. However, if that need arose, it would be as a result of having approached loveshooks & being unable to work out the issue. Then doesn't that issue belong here, in a place where other cam models can read about it?

    FWC is the perfect example. Sure, a fellow cam model gained the trust of other cam models (perhaps moreso because the thread was here in CC) and the situation got ugly (not assigning blame to anyone... not trying to start drama again... just using this as an example since it IS the FWC thread), but that really backfired when issues were posted about after not being resolved privately.

    If loveshooks, or any other cam model running a service, has issues with her site that are so severe that they can't be worked out privately, she will be called to account here, where we can all read about it.

  29. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cam_Model_Jess For This Useful Post:


  30. #666
    God/dess justanothercamgirl's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,199
    Thanks
    17,224
    Thanked 19,867 Times in 4,132 Posts
    My Mood
    Lurking

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by loveshooks View Post
    I guess what I don't understand is why things had to come to this. We are a community and we need to be able to talk to each other.
    I was hoping we were talking? Aren't we? I sure hope we are because I truly do believe that it is a conversation that needs to be had.

    In my opinion, how we came to 'this' has been through a bunch of things that happened at the same time. We had a very respected model who started a studio and did not fulfill her promise to pay some other camgirls which is a horrid breach of trust. This breach of trust brought on a secondary conversation about the fact that you being both the moderator of camming connection as well as the verified section is a conflict of interest because if anyone had any (hypothetical) issues with your business would have no 'safe' space to complain and also a generalized conversation on whether camgirls who own a business (or businesses directly marketing to camgirls) should be in Camming Connection and/or verified for this same reason.

    I do think after this whole FWC fiasco we really should have a conversation about how we should precede from this point forward. I do think it is a worthy conversation to have. (Maybe not for in this exact thread, but the clusterfuck of one camgirl not paying another is the reason we got here.) There are no 'right' or 'wrong' answers in this conversation. It is just something to think about.

    In summary: I hope you don't believe that this conversation has anything to do with you as a person. You are very caring mod and a very caring business women. No one is disputing that at all.
    Last edited by justanothercamgirl; 04-12-2015 at 05:45 PM. Reason: tired.brain.tired.so.many.edits

  31. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to justanothercamgirl For This Useful Post:


  32. #667
    God/dess SarahTime's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,681
    Thanks
    8,041
    Thanked 13,685 Times in 2,854 Posts
    My Mood
    Inspired

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Maybe there should be a new thread to talk about this?

    My ONLY issue with site reps being allowed to post is camming connection is that when they do, I always assume the likely hood that they are actually MEN using female names/profiles to gain access to this section is extremely high. That just brings about deception right from the beginning, which I think really sucks. The only reasonable explanation for Princess Jenny, for example, pretending to be female was so that he could be in this area of the forum as an active member. And look how that turned out. Ever since then I pretty much assume any site owner that posts here that is a "female" and not a cam girl, is like 80% chance of being male.

    That's my only issue. If it matters.
    xoxo ~ Sarah




  33. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to SarahTime For This Useful Post:


  34. #668
    Veteran Member RaineyLane's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    481
    Thanks
    3,052
    Thanked 978 Times in 315 Posts
    My Mood
    Happy

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Woah! What the heck happened with FreeWebCams??!! Not sure if I want to go back and read the old posts tho...

  35. #669
    Featured Member space_cowgirl's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2008
    Location
    US
    Posts
    956
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked 1,729 Times in 519 Posts
    My Mood
    Happy

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    I like seeing model-run businesses here in CC. Just like Jess said, it's the perfect place for us to learn about and share our experiences, whether good or bad.

  36. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to space_cowgirl For This Useful Post:


  37. #670
    Featured Member space_cowgirl's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2008
    Location
    US
    Posts
    956
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked 1,729 Times in 519 Posts
    My Mood
    Happy

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Tim says my check is being mailed today with $0 being sent to Jane. Will post when it arrives.

  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to space_cowgirl For This Useful Post:


  39. #671
    Featured Member space_cowgirl's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2008
    Location
    US
    Posts
    956
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked 1,729 Times in 519 Posts
    My Mood
    Happy

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    I received my FWC check today! I stand by everything I've said about the site and the studio I unfortunately worked with, but I am happy that FWC stepped up and finally paid me what they owed. I know that it was in large part due to Loveshooks' involvement and taking this public, but that's what had to be done. I'm grateful for this community and for the chance to let each other know which sites to take chances with and which to avoid.


  40. #672
    God/dess audritwo's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2013
    Location
    10.0.0.1
    Posts
    4,582
    Thanks
    5,702
    Thanked 19,566 Times in 3,647 Posts
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread






    Quote Originally Posted by Miss_Red View Post
    Audritwo's asshole sees all, knows all. Spurs on armies of orcs. Casts fear into the dwindling races of Middle-Earth. Fears hobbits.

  41. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to audritwo For This Useful Post:


  42. #673
    God/dess Issabelle's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Narnia Bitches!
    Posts
    2,214
    Thanks
    1,755
    Thanked 7,475 Times in 1,772 Posts
    My Mood
    Yeehaw

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    FUCK YEAH! I'm still not thrilled with the site or the studio, nor would I ever be able to recommend it to customers or models, but they've stepped up at least. Hopefully they can turn it into a successful business with a good working relationship with the community too.

    Or not, but hey, I'm an optimist.


  43. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Issabelle For This Useful Post:


  44. #674
    Veteran Member SamanthaSugar's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2010
    Location
    California
    Posts
    401
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 724 Times in 250 Posts

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    I'm digging this thread up because it just baffels me how I can do so well on SM at suck so miserably on FWC. I'm lucky that I even make $20 in tokens a day. I split so it's not the end of the world that I do so shitty but still hardly anybody ever takes me to private and when they do I'm shocked!
    Does anyone do well on here?

  45. #675
    Veteran Member bootiebabe's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    233
    Thanks
    311
    Thanked 288 Times in 113 Posts

    Default Re: Freewebcams.com Thread

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder the whole you need to be at least a 7 for that cam site baffles me, its not going anywhere fast with that attitude imo, you can be as pretty as anything and have zero personality, variety is key! How many guys are doing the whole "at least a 7 criteria" on that site? A 7 to one person is a 4 to another!

Page 27 of 31 FirstFirst ... 172526272829 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FreeWebCams.com
    By minniesoporno in forum Camming Connection
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-20-2019, 03:26 PM
  2. any one know freewebcams.com and freewebcamsgay.com???
    By jeg1skal in forum Industry Insight
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-28-2014, 04:11 PM
  3. Anyone heard of freewebcams.com aka camcity.com
    By minniesoporno in forum Camming Connection
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-23-2014, 05:22 PM
  4. the WANT thread!
    By silk55 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 07-12-2012, 08:44 AM
  5. Something Awfuk: A thread about my thread
    By VeraLynn in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-11-2008, 04:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •