Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The 'Relative Value' of $100 earned

  1. #1
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default The 'Relative Value' of $100 earned

    from



    (snip)The data in the map are based on Regional Price Parities (RPPs), which measure the differences in the price levels of consumer goods and services across all US states (and DC) according to BEA data released on July 1 for the year 2013. RPPs are expressed as a percentage of the overall national price level in 2013, which is equal to 100.

    In 2013, the District of Columbia’s RPP (117.7) was higher than that of any state, largely because DC housing costs are 57% above the national average and second only to Hawaii, where rents are 58.7% above the national average. Based on DC’s RPP of 117.7, that would mean that the real value (purchasing power) of $100 in DC is only $84.96 ($100 / 1.177), see map above. The four states with the highest RPPs and where the value of $100 is the lowest are Hawaii ($86.06), New York ($86.73), New Jersey ($87.34) and California ($89.05), and all of those states have housing costs that are more than one-third above the national average. The five states with the lowest RPPs and where the value of $100 is the highest are Mississippi ($115.21), Arkansas ($114.29), South Dakota ($114.16), Alabama ($114.03), and West Virginia ($113.12). Again, it’s mostly because of low housing costs that contribute to low RPPs and higher relative values for $100 – the five states with the lowest RPPs all have housing costs that are more than one-third below the national average.

    The Tax Foundation makes a couple of key points:

    1. Regional price differences are strikingly large; real purchasing power is 36 percent greater in Mississippi than it is in the District of Columbia. In other words: by this measure, if you have $50,000 in after tax income in Mississippi, you would have to have after-tax earnings of $68,000 in the District of Columbia just to afford the same overall standard of living. Some states, like North Dakota, have high incomes without high prices. Adjusting incomes for price level can substantially change our perceptions of which states are truly poor or rich.

    2. Many policies – like minimum wage, public benefits, and tax brackets – are denominated in dollars. But with different price levels in each state, the amounts aren’t equivalent in purchasing power [see related discussion below].(snip)

    (snip)As expected, the states that moved down the most in the rankings were high-tax, high cost-of-living states like California (fourth highest tax burden, fifth highest cost-of-living), which moved down 25 places from No. 12 to No. 37, New York (second highest tax burden, third highest cost-of-living), which moved down 24 places from No. 5 to No. 29, and New Jersey (fifth highest tax burden, fourth highest cost-of-living), which moved down 12 places from No. 4 to No. 16.

    Bottom Line: Personal taxes and cost-of-living differences vary widely among US states. To emphasize and expand on a point made by The Tax Foundation, adjusting state per-capita personal incomes for both differences in taxes and price levels can substantially change our perceptions of which states are poor or rich. And those perceptions change the most for high tax, high cost-of-living states like California, which goes from being in the top 25% of America’s states by pre-tax, per-capita personal income, to being in the bottom 25% of US states (and below Alabama and Arkansas) after adjusting for the state’s high tax burden and high cost-of-living. Likewise, New York drops from being America’s fifth highest-income state before adjusting for taxes and cost-of-living to being in the bottom half of states (and below Texas, Louisiana and Tennessee) on an after-tax, cost-of-living adjusted basis. On the other hand, a state like South Dakota that appears average based on pre-tax, per-capita personal income rises to become America’s fourth highest-income state after adjusting for taxes and cost-of-living.(snip)

  2. #2
    Member
    Joined
    May 2015
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 28 Times in 16 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: The 'Relative Value' of $100 earned

    Extremely surprised at North Dakota. From everything I've heard, the cost of living is becoming outrageous, especially if you are renting.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to RelaxationTechniques For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    God/dess SnuffleUffleGrass's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Location
    HearstCastle, Rosebud
    Posts
    8,848
    Thanks
    22,676
    Thanked 17,513 Times in 6,696 Posts
    My Mood
    Angelic

    Default Re: The 'Relative Value' of $100 earned

    Quote Originally Posted by RelaxationTechniques View Post
    Extremely surprised at North Dakota. From everything I've heard, the cost of living is becoming outrageous, especially if you are renting.
    Half of the state is expensive & the other half is a bit cheaper.

  5. #4
    Veteran Member Prussia's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2013
    Location
    hoth
    Posts
    563
    Thanks
    747
    Thanked 1,292 Times in 387 Posts
    My Mood
    Fine

    Default Re: The 'Relative Value' of $100 earned

    Thanks for posting this Melonie.. very interesting. I wish I could see the same chart but of Canadian regions.

  6. #5
    Moderator
    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    901
    Thanks
    635
    Thanked 1,519 Times in 585 Posts

    Default Re: The 'Relative Value' of $100 earned

    I'll take my 93 bucks and be happy

    Couldn't pay me to live in some 'affordable' places

    Also, looking at the Northeast, while there some logic to the rankings, they do not follow, as, for instance, many things are expensive in Maine, and not much different than NH, and while rent may be cheap, one must have a job, which are rare the further north you go.

    WE allknow it is more expensive to live in metro areas, but you usually make more money, so I think this is probably an oversimplification

  7. #6
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re: The 'Relative Value' of $100 earned

    ^^^ for sure 'oversimplification' is involved. The link author admitted as much by stating that the relative amounts shown on the graphic do not include the disparate effects of state / city income taxes ... which can range from zero to ~11% from one state to another ... effectively decreasing the dollar amounts listed on the graphic ( because $100 worth of spending in the highest tax state actually means having to earn $111 to have $100 left over net of additional state / city income tax ).

  8. #7
    God/dess SnuffleUffleGrass's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Location
    HearstCastle, Rosebud
    Posts
    8,848
    Thanks
    22,676
    Thanked 17,513 Times in 6,696 Posts
    My Mood
    Angelic

    Default Re: The 'Relative Value' of $100 earned

    I think it's all relative to where someone wants to live. I know people who are happy living in the South San Francisco Bay area b/c the pluses (for them) outweigh the minuses (high cost of living & gang activity.) It's called the risk/reward ratio.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-28-2012, 09:46 AM
  2. Suicidal relative coming to me for help
    By Michele.2 in forum Life Support
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-25-2011, 09:32 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-29-2008, 12:04 AM
  4. Size... is it relative?
    By xdamage in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-31-2007, 08:55 PM
  5. 'Last night I earned...'
    By brown_eyed_girl in forum Hustle Hut
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-21-2006, 04:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •