Any thoughts on Millionare Match-Is it worth seeking out for SD's?
Any thoughts on Millionare Match-Is it worth seeking out for SD's?





Idk - never heard of it, is it new or been around awhile?
Pretty much the consensus is the online sites are crap, but you can give it a shot if you want.
MANY MEN WANTED TO LAY ME DOWN, BUT FEW WANTED TO LIFT ME UP
-Eartha Kitt
My mom suggested I sign up there. I'm like does she know that's a sugaring site lol?!?
But maybe try it out and see. I assume it's like the other sugar dating sites. I believe that one though supposedly verifies the men's net worth.
Last edited by miss.a.p1600; 12-16-2016 at 11:01 PM.
“Cook for him like a housewife, fuck him good like a nympho….pay the rent and the car note, he invests in me like crypto”





MANY MEN WANTED TO LAY ME DOWN, BUT FEW WANTED TO LIFT ME UP
-Eartha Kitt





It is like other sugar daddy sites but it slight better than Seeking Arrangements. However, Guys have to be verified there and it is less splenda daddies.
Yep - they do a nice verified millionaire thing and have been around for years - not sure of the quality now ... but I got my first sugar daddy in Italy there, and a ton of wealthy guys in London and on in San Fran. All generous.



LOL.... Nothing but wannabe sugardaddies. Go for it.



Wait..no..seriously. Why are we still looking for sugardaddies online? if you are serious about sugardaddies you will look OFFLINE first. The online well has been poisoned with entitled douchebags and hobbyists that THINK they're sugardaddies. Have any of you read the sugardaddy threads on eccie? They're literally coaching each other on ways to get the most out of you for as little as possible. So now you have all these young, hot college girls jumping for joy because they're getting $300 for an overnight. Please read the threads, do your research, the well has been poisoned.
True. A lot of rich men are cheap with women. I hate those kind. And even though they verified their income it could be possible that process isn't fool proof like the guy could have faked the documents or he could have went broke after being verified. I am guessing they only verify once and don't have to send ongoing yearly verifications.
Be wise and check them out on your own as well.
Cheap ass men trying to get the most for free or barely anything are literally everywhere not just online dating sites. But yeah definitely have to go in eyes wide open when meeting etc. to avoid getting used or played.
Last edited by miss.a.p1600; 12-17-2016 at 04:56 PM.
“Cook for him like a housewife, fuck him good like a nympho….pay the rent and the car note, he invests in me like crypto”




Most of the men in my area are saying they're looking for wives.
^^^And they're telling a boldface lie.
Well at least I don't think they're looking for wives in the sense that most women are thinking. If they are look for wife it's not for romantic love it's probably for their own self interest like having a live in maid, nanny, cook, on demand sex, making them look like settled family men to society, green cards, etc.
Plus men will use this line to sneak past women's defenses in order to have sex with them faster and easier.
I'm guessing the percentage of the men genuinely looking for a wife online for romantic love is minimal. Most men in the sugar daddy sites I would think are either married already or looking for short term action not long term responsibilities of a marriage.
“Cook for him like a housewife, fuck him good like a nympho….pay the rent and the car note, he invests in me like crypto”
There is an entire forum on TER called The Erotic Highway dedicated to men exchanging information on how to take advantage of "sugarbabies" on ALL online SB/SD sites.





Yes, I read those "tips"for how to take advantage of sugarbabies on many forums. However, I feel that happens if those sugarbabies allow men to get over them. Everyone should know that the first rule in the sugar bowl is never let men get over on you. In fact, that should be the first rule of sex work in general![]()
Wolves may lurk in every guise / Now as then, 'tis simple truth / Sweetest tongue has sharpest tooth.
Totally agree, guys can exchange all the tips in the world about "how to get over" but if you're a good hustler you'll see stuff a mile off ... whether certain patterns, certain asks etc. And even if you don't catch it immediately it'll become apparent pretty fast when you're not getting the money you wanted/asked for/agreed on etc.
I agree that experienced ladies can spot these guys from a mile away, but that wasn't really the point of my post. I guess I should have clarified.
The point is, with so many forums (including forums on huge sites like TER) created explicitly for (non-sugardaddy) men exchanging hour-by-hour advice about how to take advantage of wanna be "sugarbabies" it shows that the these "sugardaddy" sites are worthless. They are full of nothing but splendadaddies aiming to take advantage of naive women.
Any woman who is serious about making money should stay far away from those websites IMO.
Exactly what it is.
Even the blues here on this forum say they don't want the "pros", go after those young gullible naive women, and then come back either complaining about how unprofessional they are or bragging about how they got over.
Disgusting. Cold world.
Also I couldn't for the life of me figure out why people are saying stay off online dating sites. As an introvert I always thought it was a great way to meet people and I have heard success stories. However I am starting to think the success stories are a small percentage.
I realize now that lazy men can go on there and with the Tinder culture many men see online dating as a way to get cheap, easy, free sex. They swipe left if your pics dont look good enough and it's like the McDonald's of dating. The young gullible women giving them cheap free easy sex sets the tone and gives them unrealistic expectations.
Plus I believe lots of people / women signing up so there maybe more competition online than in real life. It takes more effort to freestyle and approach men first so maybe less competition. This is where I can see sexworkers having another advantage because they have no qualms about approaching the man first. Online dating sites the men expect to approach/message the woman first.
As far as all jerks and losers online I slightly agree. Jerks losers cheapskates are everywhere not just on online dating sites.
Last edited by miss.a.p1600; 01-02-2017 at 07:57 AM.
“Cook for him like a housewife, fuck him good like a nympho….pay the rent and the car note, he invests in me like crypto”



Approaching first is a huge skill to have in person, but online it sets up big red flags. Catfishing is a thing and no amount of free sex is worth waking up without a kidney. Granted I am joking, but if complete strangers don't approach first in real life, even when they send all the signals imaginable (like touching their own hair, neck etc), I find it hard to believe they would do so online.Plus I believe lots of people / women signing up so there maybe more competition online than in real life. It takes more effort to freestyle and approach men first so maybe less competition. This is where I can see sexworkers having another advantage because they have no qualms about approaching the man first. Online dating sites the men expect to approach/message the woman first.
I really like in person, at first sight there is very little she can lie to me about (that I care about), even less so if we hang out for a while.
All this is just my personal opinion only don't extrapolate if it works
Last edited by DeathAndTaxes; 01-02-2017 at 10:04 AM.



What is free styling? I am not familiar with this term.
Maybe online dating could work, I don't have that much experience to say
In real life she can approach first, since I have a ton of respect for that. That said it would just be a novelty since it is so rare in the real world.
I still prefer large circles of friends, let my reputation do all the introductions, then if I notice any hints of attraction any approach is likely to succeed.
My theory is that they target men almost exclusively, since most men have no built in defenses whatsoever (aside for the wallet of course), women are far better at gatekeeping under any scenario.kept asking me for more pictures which was annoying but even though its never happen to me, apparently it does happen.
For example rookies are forced to go to orientation in the NBA... an adult man needs to go to class about relationships.
http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/dish...led-ways-women
Also this story ties back nicely to the original topic. My advice is to mingle with the rich, its hard work but that is the only logical way.





Death and Taxes,
Freestyling is where you meet your sugar daddy in person like at a steakhouse or truck stop. Also, not only rich men can be sugar daddies but also highly paid blue collar workers can also be good sugar daddies. Plus, this thread was talking about meeting sugar daddies on millionaire match. Personally, I found it to be an okay site but I prefer meeting sugar daddies in person. However, freestyling takes some guts and practice on the lady's part.
Wolves may lurk in every guise / Now as then, 'tis simple truth / Sweetest tongue has sharpest tooth.



I tried to gently guide it back on topic
If third parties can verify the wealth of the man all you are missing is a third party willing to verify his spending. Until that happens it seems free styling is the only way forward, because at the very least you can avoid men playing the game.
Bookmarks