
Originally Posted by
dpacrkk
Did _you_ read it? Particularly the part in red "e-CFR data is current as of August 1, 2017" or the amendment dates of the original publication: "52 FR 2859, Jan. 27, 1987, as amended at 68 FR 25111, May 9, 2003; 76 FR 6687, Feb. 8, 2011; 79 FR 28399, May 16, 2014." Even in the absence of that observation, just your brain: why would a recent website only have information from original publication without its amendments.
Anyway, the wording is as such because you changed your stance to "BUT there are also Suspicious Activity Reports ( SAR's ) which must be filed for transactions over $3000 ( my bad ) if there is an unusual pattern or any one day's total transactions total at least $10,000." I provided you the actual letter of the law concerning SARs. It doesn't have these requirements.
By the way, you didn't cite anything. Instead of hand waving, you could provide any source whatsoever. Until then, one should be inclined to believe the actual federal regulation instead of anecdotal evidence and hearsay, particularly since you've already backpedaled about it being within The Patriot Act, and already admitted you were incorrect at least once about the amount.
Bookmarks