I keep seeing you do this thing with people's posts where you like, latch onto one piece of what someone says and then you try and try to twist it(or you just repeatedly misinterpret it, I can't tell if you do it on purpose or not) to make it suit your point of view, all while failing to grasp the overarching argument that was actually put forth. It's completely fine if you don't agree with anyone, but the counterpoints you present more often than not have nothing to do with whatever whoever you're debating with actually said. For instance with that guy; he clearly explained why he considers the stripper/customer dynamic to be completely different from the husband/wife dynamic and why he doesn't consider the latter to be transactional......then you seize 4 words from said post and say 'Wait but don't these words of yours prove that marriage is actually also transactional? And the answer is no.....and the reason why it's no was already explained in the post you took the quote from.







Bookmarks