




Samantha Ray Mears, 19, was charged Friday with two felonies — aggravated burglary and assault with a weapon — as well as several misdemeanors for the incident at her ex-boyfriend’s Great Falls home, according to the Great Falls Tribune.
Mears reportedly broke into her ex of seven years’ house Friday while he was away.
Were they married when she was 12?
Wow, what a nutcase! :-/ Hopefully the charges stick.





A longer version
https://scallywagandvagabond.com/201...woman-machete/
Apparently the law requires the victim to be penetrated so she wasn't charged with rape.![]()





Montana Code Annotated 2017
TITLE 45. CRIMES
CHAPTER 5. OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON
Part 5. Sexual Crimes
Sexual Intercourse Without Consent
45-5-503. Sexual intercourse without consent. (1) A person who knowingly has sexual intercourse with another person without consent or with another person who is incapable of consent commits the offense of sexual intercourse without consent. A person may not be convicted under this section based on the age of the person's spouse, as provided in 45-5-501(1)(b)(iv).
(2) A person convicted of sexual intercourse without consent shall be punished by life imprisonment or by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not more than 20 years and may be fined not more than $50,000, except as provided in 46-18-219, 46-18-222, and subsections (3), (4), and (5) of this section.
(3) (a) If the victim is less than 16 years old and the offender is 4 or more years older than the victim or if the offender inflicts bodily injury on anyone in the course of committing sexual intercourse without consent, the offender shall be punished by life imprisonment or by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not less than 4 years or more than 100 years and may be fined not more than $50,000, except as provided in 46-18-219 and 46-18-222.
(b) If two or more persons are convicted of sexual intercourse without consent with the same victim in an incident in which each offender was present at the location where another offender's offense occurred during a time period in which each offender could have reasonably known of the other's offense, each offender shall be punished by life imprisonment or by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not less than 5 years or more than 100 years and may be fined not more than $50,000, except as provided in 46-18-219 and 46-18-222.
(c) If the offender was previously convicted of an offense under this section or of an offense under the laws of another state or of the United States that if committed in this state would be an offense under this section and if the offender inflicted serious bodily injury on a person in the course of committing each offense, the offender shall be:
(i) punished by death as provided in 46-18-301 through 46-18-310, unless the offender is less than 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense; or
(ii) punished as provided in 46-18-219.
(4) (a) If the victim was 12 years of age or younger and the offender in the course of committing a violation of this section was 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense, the offender:
(i) shall be punished by imprisonment in a state prison for a term of 100 years. The court may not suspend execution or defer imposition of the first 10 years of a sentence of imprisonment imposed under this subsection (4)(a)(i) except as provided in 46-18-222(1) through (5), and during the first 10 years of imprisonment, the offender is not eligible for parole. The exception provided in 46-18-222(6) does not apply.
(ii) may be fined an amount not to exceed $50,000; and
(iii) shall be ordered to enroll in and successfully complete the educational phase and the cognitive and behavioral phase of a sexual offender treatment program provided or approved by the department of corrections.
(b) If the offender is released after the mandatory minimum period of imprisonment, the offender is subject to supervision by the department of corrections for the remainder of the offender's life and shall participate in the program for continuous, satellite-based monitoring provided for in 46-23-1010.
(5) If the victim is at least 14 years of age and the offender is 18 years of age or younger, the offender may be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not more than 5 years and may be fined not more than $10,000 if:
(a) the offender has not previously been found to have committed or been adjudicated for a sexual offense as defined in 46-23-502;
(b) a psychosexual evaluation of the offender has been prepared and the court finds that registration is not necessary for protection of the public and that relief from registration is in the public's best interest; and
(c) the court finds that the alleged conduct was consensual as indicated by words or overt actions indicating a freely given agreement to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact.
(6) In addition to any sentence imposed under subsection (2) or (3), after determining the financial resources and future ability of the offender to pay restitution as required by 46-18-242, the court shall require the offender, if able, to pay the victim's reasonable medical and counseling costs that result from the offense. The amount, method, and time of payment must be determined in the same manner as provided for in 46-18-244.
(7) As used in subsections (3) and (4), an act "in the course of committing sexual intercourse without consent" includes an attempt to commit the offense or the act of flight after the attempt or commission.
(If as a result of sexual intercourse without consent a child is born, the offender who has been convicted of an offense under this section and who is the biological parent of the child resulting from the sexual intercourse without consent forfeits all parental and custodial rights to the child if the provisions of 46-1-401 have been followed.
History: En. 94-5-503 by Sec. 1, Ch. 513, L. 1973; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 2, L. 1975; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 129, L. 1975; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 94, L. 1977; amd. Sec. 16, Ch. 359, L. 1977; amd. Sec. 10, Ch. 584, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 94-5-503; amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 198, L. 1981; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 172, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 356, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 644, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 175, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 218, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 687, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 85, L. 1993; amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 482, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 550, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 312, L. 1997; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 84, L. 1999; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 523, L. 1999; amd. Sec. 85, Ch. 114, L. 2003; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 335, L. 2007; amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 483, L. 2007; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 149, L. 2013; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 277, L. 2017; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 279, L. 2017; amd. Sec. 6, Ch. 321, L. 2017.
https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0...0050-0030.html
https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0...ons_index.html
https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0...rts_index.html
https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0...ers_index.html
https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/index.html





Montana Code Annotated 2017
TITLE 45. CRIMES
CHAPTER 5. OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON
Part 5. Sexual Crimes
Aggravated Sexual Intercourse Without Consent
45-5-508. Aggravated sexual intercourse without consent. (1) A person who uses force while knowingly having sexual intercourse with another person without consent or with another person who is incapable of consent commits the offense of aggravated sexual intercourse without consent.
(2) A person convicted of aggravated sexual intercourse without consent shall be punished by life imprisonment or by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not less than 10 years or more than 100 years and may be fined not more than $50,000, except as provided in 46-18-219 and 46-18-222.
History: En. Sec. 1, Ch. 279, L. 2017.
I'm not from Montana so I don't know the laws there. Doesn't using a dangerous weapon to coerce someone to have sex count? I know where I live it does. It doesn't matter if someone is smaller than you. If someone's batshit crazy and have a potentially deadly weapon in their hand, they're a threat. You'd be surprised at some of the strength and how quick crazies can move. Rape is never okay, no matter what gender the victim or rapist is. No means no.
I'm sorry but she looks like a psycho. Dude was with that broad for 7 years?!?!?! When people show you their true colors - Leave immediately and don't go back. Don't wait till a mf show up with machetes n shit to leave their ass.
And how deranged and desperate can a person be to have to force sex when it's hella willing participants out there? Women can get dick with ease so if one man does not want to have sex then just call up someone else
Last edited by miss.a.p1600; 06-30-2018 at 09:27 PM.





^ This. She should have been able to get all she wanted
^ I don't think that difficulty finding sex was the issue. There's an overabundance of fuckboys out there who'd have sex with anyone with a vagina. I think in this case it was more along the lines of she wanted him and was fixated on him and him only.





^ Which is another way of saying she is crazy as a loon. But will an insanity defense hold up?
"There are different kinds of darkness. There is darkness that frightens, the darkness that soothes, the darkness that is restful. There is the darkness of lovers, and the darkness of assassins. It becomes what the bearer wishes it to be, needs it to be. It is not wholly bad or good."
- The Court of Mist and Fury





No, just cant understand what might motivate the actor, does not make it justifiable.
Last edited by slowpoke; 07-01-2018 at 04:57 PM.
The point I was getting at was she should have been able to find what she needed elsewhere (or masturbate or abstain) without having to force herself on this one dude who obviously didn't want her. That's what most sane people do. I've been in a similar situation where I wanted it bad but I knew better than to force myself on someone, especially when I could just open up my rolodex and get some action elsewhere.
Numbers wise it is easier for women to get sex than it is for men. I think it may have been a shock to her ego to be rejected sexually by this dude (which then enraged her) considering most men are dtf.
I don't think anyone is implying that non-consensual sex is understandable
Last edited by miss.a.p1600; 07-01-2018 at 08:09 PM.





There may be a semantics problem here with regard to the meaning of the word "understandable", which is being used here in terms "able to be understood". Apparently there is a definition that imiplies approval, but that is not the sense in which i am using understand.
Bookmarks