Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Shhh! The FBI's listening to your keystrokes

  1. #1
    Veteran Member ATLDiscoLawyer420's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta (midtown), GA
    Posts
    257
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Shhh! The FBI's listening to your keystrokes

    or at least they really wanna make it easy to do so in the future..

    http://news.com.com/2010-1028-5193750.html


    The FBI is trying to convince the government to mandate that providers of broadband, Internet telephony, and instant-messaging services build in backdoors for easy wiretapping.
    That would constitute a sweeping expansion of police surveillance powers. Instead of asking Congress to approve the request, the FBI (along with the Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration) are pressing the Federal Communications Commission to move forward with minimal public input.

    The three agencies argue that the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) permits the FCC to rewire the Internet to suit the eavesdropping establishment. The bureau's not talking, but it seems to be all about ease of eavesdropping.
    "The importance and the urgency of this task cannot be overstated," their proposal says. "The ability of federal, state and local law enforcement to carry out critical electronic surveillance is being compromised today."

    Unfortunately for the three agencies, CALEA, as it's written, would not grant the request.

    When Congress was debating CALEA, then-FBI Director Louis Freeh reassured nervous senators that the law would be limited to telephone calls. (CALEA was intended to let police wiretap conversations flowing through then-novel services like cellular phones and three-way calling.)

    "So what we are looking for is strictly telephone--what is said over a telephone?" Sen. Larry Pressler, R-S.D., asked.

    Freeh replied: "That is the way I understand it. Yes, sir."

    A House of Representatives committee report prepared in October 1994 is emphatic, saying CALEA's requirements "do not apply to information services such as electronic-mail services; or online services such as CompuServe, Prodigy, America Online or Mead Data (Central); or to Internet service providers."

    Freeh, who has a sincere appreciation for wiretaps, had included Internet services in an earlier version of CALEA--but Congress didn't buy it. "Unlike the bills previously proposed by the FBI, this bill is limited to local and long-distance telephone companies, cellular and PCS providers, and other common carriers," Jerry Berman of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told Congress during a September 1994 hearing.

    But now that more conversations are taking place through audio-based instant-messaging and voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services, the FBI and its allies are hoping that official Washington won't remember inconvenient details. Louis Freeh reassured nervous senators that CALEA would be limited to telephone calls.
    "These (wiretapping) problems are real, not hypothetical, and their impact on the ability of federal, state and local law enforcement to protect the public is growing with each passing day," the police agencies say in their proposal to the FCC.

    It's true that the FBI has a difficult job to do, especially after Sept. 11, 2001, but is this proposal necessary, let alone wise?

    Police have long been able to intercept Internet traffic. In 1996, then-Attorney General Janet Reno announced that investigators were successfully tapping the Internet without any problems. Even earlier, the Secret Service's "datataps" of Masters of Deception members helped bust that hacking group in 1992. Efficient Internet wiretapping is exactly what the FBI's Carnivore system, also called DCS1000, is designed to accomplish.

    Then why is the FBI so emphatic? The bureau's not talking, but it seems to be all about ease of eavesdropping. Sorting through an intercepted stream of data is difficult and means that Carnivore must be updated to unpack the Session Initiation Protocol used to set up VoIP and instant-messaging conversations. Ordering those companies to include a backdoor for police is a lot easier.

    It's worth noting that the FBI is hardly alone. The National Sheriffs' Association, the Police Executive Research Forum, the Illinois State Police and the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation have petitioned the FCC to grant the FBI's request.

    They're even sharing talking points: Each of the groups included an identical paragraph in its letter to the FCC. "State and local law enforcement do not have the financial or personnel resources to develop costly ad hoc surveillance solutions for each new communications service," their letters said.

    Maybe they're right. New technologies do present police with new headaches, and perhaps that justifies additional wiretapping powers. But the question will be: Who gets to make that call--elected representatives in Congress or well-meaning but unelected bureaucrats at the FCC?



    biography
    Declan McCullagh is CNET News.com's Washington, D.C., correspondent. He chronicles the busy intersection between technology and politics. Before that, he worked for several years as Washington bureau chief for Wired News. He has also worked as a reporter for The Netly News, Time magazine and HotWired.



    They say there's a Heaven for those who await.
    Some say it's better but I say it ain't.
    I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints...
    the sinners have much more fun.

  2. #2
    God/dess Deogol's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,493
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts

    Default Re:Shhh! The FBI's listening to your keystrokes

    Some people have friends named Smith and Wesson,
    My friends are named gpg and pgp...

  3. #3
    Banned Melonie's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    way south of the border
    Posts
    25,932
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked 10,563 Times in 4,646 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    My Mood
    Cynical

    Default Re:Shhh! The FBI's listening to your keystrokes

    I suspect this has to do with the use of a supercomputer program they already have called Carnivor. Right now they are restricted in information gathering in the sense that they must obtain a court order in advance of collecting incriminating "internet info" about a specific person. The Carnivor program would allow them to automatically gather huge amounts of "internet info" from anybody, automatically search for anything incriminating in the content, and THEN seek the court order to prosecute. At the moment, congress has prevented them from using Carnivor (although I suspect that they ARE using it to gather terrorist info).

    The legal point here is a major one, since if they are granted this new authority it means that they'll basically have the legal right to "wiretap" everybody using the internet (although they couldn't DO anything with the info they gather without obtaining a court order to that effect). It still smacks of "big brother" big time !

Similar Threads

  1. Shhh, NYSE Aims to Bring Back Blocks
    By Adelina in forum Dollar Den
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-30-2007, 02:20 PM
  2. What the hell? Stupid FBI!
    By Lysondra in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-04-2006, 12:56 PM
  3. I think this website is monitored by FBI
    By Butchee in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 05-13-2004, 06:07 PM
  4. Cheetahs Vegas Raided today by FBI
    By Lynn in forum Club Chat
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-16-2004, 12:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •