Pretty interesting, no?
**********************************
How Big Business Evades Taxes
By Lucy Komisar, Pacific News Service
April 25, 2004
http://www.alternet.org
Were you stunned by the revelation, days before your taxes were due, that nearly two-thirds of companies
operating in America reported owing no taxes from 1996 through 2000? That over 90 percent of large
corporations – with at least $250 million in assets or $50 million in gross receipts – reported owing taxes
of only 5 percent or less?
The law requires firms to pay 35 percent tax on U.S. profits. Had big business complied, corporate income
taxes in 2002 would have been $308 billion instead of only an estimated $136 billion. Do you wish you knew
the corporate secret?
Is your town or state suffering from service cutbacks because tax revenues are down? Would you like to cut
your tax bite from the current 15 to 35 percent to 5 percent or zero? How do corporations do it?
The General Accounting Office report, commissioned by Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and Byron Dorgan (D-ND) and released April 5, gave a clue to how. It's called "transfer pricing," or improperly shifting income to
lower-tax countries.
Firms set up offshore "subsidiaries" which, on their books, perform functions that let them cut onshore
taxes. They may sell their own "logo" to the subsidiary and then pay a high price to "rent" it
back, deducting "rent" as expense. They may move money to the subsidiary and "borrow" it back, deducting
interest payments. If several of their subsidiaries are involved in a deal, the firms may grossly inflate
profits assigned to those in offshore tax havens, which levy no or minimal taxes on "profits" claimed
there.
The U.S. firm may "trade" with an offshore "shell" it owns – a phony company set up in a tax haven –
pretending it's buying goods or services at a high price or selling its product low, to create
deductions. Because the tax haven keeps owners' names secret, the IRS won't know the company is "trading"
with itself.
Professors Simon J. Pak (Penn State University) and John S. Zdanowicz (Florida International University)
examined the impact of over-invoiced imports and under-invoiced exports on 2001 U.S. tax revenues.
Would you buy multiple vitamins bought from China at $850 a pound, plastic buckets from the Czech Republic
for $973 each, tissues from China at $1,874 a pound, a cotton dishtowel from Pakistan for $154, and tweezers
from Japan at $4,896 each?
By contrast, U.S. companies, on paper, were getting very little for their exports. If you were in
business, would you sell multiple vitamins to Finland at 61 cents a pound, bus and truck tires to Britain
for $11.74 each, color video monitors to Pakistan for $21.90, missile and rocket launchers to Israel for
$52.03 and prefabricated buildings to Trinidad for $1.20 a unit?
Comparing claimed export and import prices to real world prices, the professors figured the 2001 U.S. tax
loss at $53.1 billion.
We all know that Enron cheated investors by using offshore firms to pretend that money it borrowed was
money it earned. We later found it also used shells to hide income from the IRS. Enron had 881 offshore
subsidiaries: 692 in the Cayman Islands; 119 in the Turks and Caicos; 43 in Mauritius and 8 in Bermuda.
Enron had no office in the Cayman's, but Box 1350 there received mail for 500 affiliates. Enron's 1996
through 2000 pretax U.S. profits were $1.8 billion, but it paid no tax in four of those five years. It
even got a rebate! Because of fancy paperwork that invented tax losses even while it was boasting of
profits to investors, Enron got back $381 million from the IRS.
Bob McIntyre, who heads the Washington-based Citizens for Tax Justice, says that in 1996-2000, Goodyear's
profits were $442 million, but it paid no taxes and got a $23-million rebate. Colgate-Palmolive made $1.6
billion and got back $21 million. Other companies that got rebates in 1998 included Texaco, Chevron, PepsiCo,
Pfizer, J.P. Morgan, MCI WorldCom, General Motors, Phillips Petroleum and Northrop Grumman. Microsoft,
run by the world's richest man, reported $12.3 billion U.S income in 1999 and paid zero federal taxes. In the
past two years, Microsoft paid only 1.8 percent on $21.9 billion pretax U.S. profits.
There are some 55 "offshore" zones, including legendary Switzerland; the Caribbean with
money-laundries Grand Cayman, Antigua, Aruba and the British Virgin Islands; European favorites Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Austria, Cyprus; and British Channel Islands Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man. Many banks in "offshore" centers are subsidiaries of major international banks, including Citibank, Bank of New York and Credit Suisse.
Why does Washington tolerate the offshore tax evasion system? Because powerful people benefit. With
President Bush on its board, Harken Energy set up an offshore network that cut its taxes. White House
spokesman Dan Bartlett defended Harken for seeking "tax competitiveness," the preferred euphemism. When
Vice President Cheney ran Halliburton, it increased its offshore subsidiaries from 9 to at least 44.
Lucy Komisar is a freelance journalist who is writing a book about the offshore bank and corporate secrecy
system.
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18474




Reply With Quote

Just wish I could find a few more for myself!! LOL

Bookmarks