Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Does porn objectify women?

  1. #1
    Veteran Member merely_lurking's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Houston, Texas and Worldwide
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Default Does porn objectify women?

    Um, this is related to another post that I made. Vote if you feel like it.
    A fat chick is like a big, warm, comfortable pillow that you can also have sex with....

  2. #2
    Guest

    Default Re: Does porn objectify women?

    I don't personally see women as sex objects, but I think porn does...not only for women but men too. But it's all part of the fantasy. I think that most of us can separate the fantasy from the reality.

  3. #3
    God/dess
    Joined
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Renaissance City
    Posts
    3,343
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Does porn objectify women?

    I've always been object-oriented in real life, fantasy and compuiter programming. Is that bad?

  4. #4
    Curious Guest
    Joined
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Does porn objectify women?

    The whole concept of "objectification" is spin created by the radical feminists. It's an exercise in self-projection. That is to say, that's how they feel, so It's supposedly how men see women. It's insulting to men, as well as sexist, to say that we see women as "objects." It's really more complicated than that. There has been scientific research on the subject of beauty. A universal standard that cuts across ALL races and ALL cultures is a clear, unblemished skin and clear eyes. I'm sure any good stripper is probably aware of the power of an erotic gaze. The biological reason for sex is reproduction. Obviously, the male wants to select a healthy mate to insure the success of his genes. Youthful beauty equates to healthy in the caveman's eyes, he didn't have medical exams. Guys need to think about this in the reverse, that is, what women wouldn't you have sex with? Probaby one covered in chicken pox.

    Men are suppossed to admire women for their beauty, thousands of years of selection have told them to. Yet, the radical feminists don't accept that sex is based in biology. They believe that's it's learned behavior that can be adjusted by social influences. In their view, the only reason that people are heterosexual is because that's the current societal norm which they can change. They are tying to do that very thing. Ironically, the most articulate critics of this are the equity feminists, such as Wendy McElroy, Camille Paglia, and Christina Hoff Sommers. They realize that fucking with mother nature (or little boys heads) is a very good idea and causes more problems than it solves. They routinely get blasted for it as well.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Joined
    May 2003
    Location
    CA.
    Posts
    929
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Does porn objectify women?

    Yes ,it objectifies women just the same as it objectifies men. Remember men a simply necessary props in a porno film. The only difference is that the men don't object (no pun intended) to it. The whole attitude is different between men and women. You don't see men crying discrimination because the female gets paid 5-10 times what he gets for a scene.

  6. #6
    God/dess doc-catfish's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    123 Tornado Alley Way, Hooterville USA
    Posts
    6,322
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts

    Default Re: Does porn objectify women?

    The whole concept of "objectification" is spin created by the radical feminists. It's an exercise in self-projection. That is to say, that's how they feel, so It's supposedly how men see women. It's insulting to men, as well as sexist, to say that we see women as "objects." It's really more complicated than that.

    Men are suppossed to admire women for their beauty, thousands of years of selection have told them to. Yet, the radical feminists don't accept that sex is based in biology. They believe that's it's learned behavior that can be adjusted by social influences.

    Ironically, the most articulate critics of this are the equity feminists, such as Wendy McElroy, Camille Paglia, and Christina Hoff Sommers. They realize that fucking with mother nature (or little boys heads) is a very good idea and causes more problems than it solves. They routinely get blasted for it as well.
    Apparently the radical feminists are way too busy selling t-shirts to lend their ear to an opposing viewpoint, as the following mindnumbing stupid website would suggest.

    http://www.oneangrygirl.net/

    Hey, at least I didn't see them selling a "So Many Men...So Little Ammunition" shirt.

    I'd love to see the owners of that website exchange links with Stripperweb. Oh would that not be entertaining!
    [rotflmao]
    Former SCJ now in rehab.

Similar Threads

  1. Women being abused on porn sets?
    By Dreamofluxie in forum Industry Insight
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 01-30-2012, 09:53 PM
  2. Replies: 49
    Last Post: 01-26-2012, 07:53 PM
  3. A heads up to women thinking about entering porn
    By MonicaF in forum Other Work
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-21-2011, 07:27 AM
  4. Porn for women (G-rated)
    By CinammonGirl in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-28-2008, 10:06 AM
  5. Fun New Game: objectify the stripper
    By mr_punk in forum Shop Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-02-2006, 09:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •